Version classiqueVersion mobile
OpenEdition Books

Diversidad y heterogeneidad en redes de colaboración científica

 | 
Luis Antonio Orozco Castro

Bibliografía

Texte intégral

Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C. A. y Di Costa, F. (2008). Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155-171. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z.

Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C. A. y Solazzi, M. (2009). Assessing public– private research collaboration: is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics, 84 (1), 173-197. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0104-0.

Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. y Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957– 983. Wiley Online Library. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x/full.

Adams, J.; Black, G.; Clemmons, J. y Stephan, P. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259-285. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014.

Adler, N.; Shani, A. y Styhre, A. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations: foundations for learning, change and theoretical development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations Evolving. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Agndal, H. y Nilsson, U. (2006). Generation of Human and Structural Capital: Lessons from Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 91-98.

Albornoz, M. (2009). Desarrollo y políticas públicas en ciencia y tecnología en América Latina. Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas, 8(1), 65-75.

Albornoz, M.; Estébanez, M. y Alfaraz, C. (2005). Alcances y limitaciones de la noción de impacto social de la ciencia y la tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-cts, 2(4), 73-95. Recuperado de http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=92420405.

Almendral, J.; Oliveira, J.; Lopez, L.; Mendes, J. y Sanjuan, M. (2007). The network of scientific collaborations within the European framework programme. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 384(2), 675-683. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.05.049.

Alvarez, J.; Enrione, A. y Mazza, C. (1997). Legitimation and Integration Through Dependency: Graduate Business Education in Latin America. Organization, 4(4), 564-581.

Alvesson, M. y Karreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265– 1281. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/DN435K7629167811.pdf.

Amabile, T. M.; Patterson, C.; Mueller, J.; Wojcik, T.; Odomirok, P. W.; Marsh, M. y Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418-431. jstor. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069464.

Arocena, R. y Sutz, J. (2000). La Universidad Latinoamericana del Futuro. Tendencias-Escenarios-Alternativas. México DF: udual.

Arocena, R y Sutz, J. (2001). Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy, 30(8), 1221-1234. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00) 00143-8.

Arocena, Rodrigo y Sutz, J. (2005). Latin American Universities: From an original revolution to an uncertain transition. Higher Education, 50, 573-592. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6367-8.

Arranz, N. y Fdez de Arroyabe, J. (2007). Governance structures in R & D networks: An analysis in the European context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(5), 645-662. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.009.

Arbeláez, H. (2000). Carrera académica y escuelas de gerencia. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 23, 35-46.

Astley, W. G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 443-460.

Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173-184. doi:10.1007/BF02457446.

Baden Fuller, C. y Ang, S. (2001). Building Reputations: The Role of Alliances in the European Business School Scene. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 741-755. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(01) 00088-7.

Ball, D. y Rigby, J. (2006). Disseminating research in management of technology: journals and authors. R&D Management, 36(2), 205-215. doi:10.1109/emr. 2006.261389.

Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges. Research Policy, 37(5), 875-887. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004.

Barjak, F. (2006). Team diversity and research collaboration in life sciences teams: Does a combination of research cultures pay off? University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland Series A: Discussion Paper 2006-W02. Recuperado de http://netreact-eu.org/documents/DPW2006-02_TeamDiversity_Barjak_Franz.pdf.

Barjak, F. y Robinson, S. (2007). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography Discussions, 3 (1), 121-157. doi:10.5194/sgd-3-121-2007

Bartkus, K. R. y Holland, D. V. (2010). In Search of Engaged Scholarship: Evidence of Collaborative Research in the Business Literature. Decision Line, 41(3), 10-12. Recuperado de http://www.decisionsciences.org/decisionline/Vol41/41_3/dsi-dl41_3res.pdf.

Baum, J. A. C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy y W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 77-114). London: Sage.

Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365– 377. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+ Business Media BV, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers BV. Recuperado de http://www.akademiai.com/index/FA5LNKLHDKGD7X77.pdf.

Bedeian, A. G. (2004). Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 198-216.

Bedeian, A. G. y Feild, H. S. (1980). Academic Stratification In Graduate Management Programs: Departmental Prestige and Faculty Hiring Patterns. Journal of Management, 6(2), 99-115. doi:10.1177/014920638000600201.

Becher, T. y Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Recuperado de http://catalog.lib.purdue.edu/Find/Record/1252406.

Belkhodja, O. y Landry, R. (2007). “The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?” Scientometrics, 70(2), 301-332. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0205-6.

Benner, M. y Sandstrom, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29(2), 291-301. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00067-0.

Bennis, W. G. y O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104,154. Harvard Business School Publication Corp. Recuperado de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15929407.

Berle, A. A., y Means, G. G. C. (1991/1932). The modern corporation and private property. Transaction Publishers.

Berdugo, E. (2010). Antecedentes y orígenes de las escuelas y facultades de administración en Colombia. Gestión & Sociedad.

Bertero, C. O.; Caldas, M. P. y Wood Jr, T. (1999). Produção cientifica em administração de empresas: provocações, insinuações e contribuições para um debate local. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 3(1), 147– 178. SciELO Brasil. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1415-65551999000100009&script=sci_arttext.

Bianco, M. y Sutz, J. (2005). Las formas colectivas de la investigación universitaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 2(6), 25-44.

Blanc, G. (2008). Business education in Latin America. The future of business schools. Scenarios and strategies for 2020 (pp. 316-326). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

Bonaccorsi, A. (2008). Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva, 46(3), 285-315.

Bourdieu, P. (1976). Le champ scientifique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2 (2-3), 88-104. Recuperado de http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/arss_0335-5322_1976_num_2_2_3454.

Bourdieu, P. (1994). El Campo Científico. redes Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, 2 (1), 131-160.

Bourdieu, P. (1999). Intelectuales, política y poder. In A. Gutierrez (Ed.), (p. 270). Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). La Fuerza del Derecho. Elementos para una sociología del campo jurídico. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes-Siglo del Hombre Editores.

Bourdieu, P. (2003/2001). El oficio de científico. Ciencia de la ciencia y reflexividad. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Bourdieu, P. (2008/1997). Los usos sociales de la ciencia. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Bourdieu, P. (2008/1984). Homo Academicus. Buenos Aires: Siglo xxi Editores.

Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R & D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50-65. doi:10.2307/1556385.

Bozeman, B. y Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008.

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R. y Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817.

Bucheli, V.; Villaveces, J. L. y Daza, S. (2008). Recursos Destinados a los Procesos de Investigación en la Universidad de los Andes. Una Aproximación Desde el Capital Intelectual. En Orozco, L. A. (Editor). La investigación en Uniandes 2007: elementos para una política. Ediciones Uniandes. Bogotá.

Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review What is it? Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(3). Recuperado de http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-3.

Burke, P. (2000). A Social History of Knowledge. From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative science quarterly, 42, 339-365. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393923.

Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 345-423. Recuperado de http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WAEur1SSQdcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA345&dq=THE+NETWORK+STRUCTURE+OF+SOCIAL+CAPITAL&ots=M8-Gz3ZHiC&sig=ZfPccPYAgGaVcbwai_QEu2av1Fo.

Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715. Recuperado de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5660731.

Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

Byrne, J. A. (1995). BusinessWeek guide to the best business schools. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Calderón, G. y Amaya, M. (2005). La investigación en administración en Colombia: Una descripción a partir de los grupos reconocidos por Colciencias. In G. Calderón & G. Castaño (Eds.), La investigación en administración en América Latina: Evolución y Resultados. Manizales: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Calderón, G. y Castaño, G. (2005). La investigación en administración en América Latina: Evolución y Resultados. (G. Calderón & G. Castaño, Eds.). Manizales: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Calderón, G.; Arrubla, J.; Gutiérrez, L.; Castaño, G.; Posada, R.; Ruiz, A.; Serna, H.; Vivares, J. A. (2010). La investigación en administración en Colombia. Condiciones para la generación de conocimiento, investigadores, institucionalización y producción científica (1st ed., p. 250). Bogotá: Ascolfa.

Cameron, A. y Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, D. (2005). University/Business research networks: new challenges for knowledge production and advanced innovation systems. Bridges, 5. Recuperado de http://www.ostina.org/content/view/391/149/.

Campbell, D. F. J. y Güttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the scientification of business R & D. Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152-175.

Campbell, E. G.; Koski, G. y Blumenthal, D. (2004). The triple helix: university, government and industry relationships in the life sciences. Policy. Boston: Working Policy Paper of the aei– Brookings Joint Center on Regulatory Studies. Recuperado de http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262367.

Carayol, N. y Matt, M. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33(8), 1081-1102. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.004.

Carayol, Nicolás y Nguyen Thi, T. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? Research Evaluation, 14(1), 70– 79. Strasbourg: Beech Tree Publishing. Recuperado de http://cournot2.u-strasbg.fr/users/beta/publications/2004/2004-17.pdf.

Cardoza, G. y Fornés, G. (2011). International co-operation of Ibero-American countries in business administration and economics research. Presence in high-impact journals. European Business Review, 23(1), 7-22.

Casas, R. y Luna, M. (1998). Gobierno, Academia y Empresas en México: hacia una nueva configuración de relaciones. México DF: Plaza y Valdés.

Casile, M. y Davis-Blake, A. (2002). When Accreditation Standards Change: Factors Affecting Differential Responsiveness of Public and Private Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 180. doi:10.2307/3069291.

Cassiman, B.; Veugelers, R. y Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in) direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646. doi:10.1093/icc/dtn023.

Chavarro, D. A. y Orozco, L. A. (2011). Policy change in the Colombian research evaluation system of research groups: The need for a different route. Criterio jurídico garantista, 3 (4), 118-134.

Chavarro, D. A.; Orozco, L. A.; Ruiz, C.; Bonilla, R.; Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. y Villaveces, J. L. (2011). Diversity and Research Collaboration in Management and Business in Latin America: An efficiency analysis of scientific performance. Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011. Recuperado de http://conferences.library.gatech.edu/acsip/index.php/acsip/ATLC11/paper/view/583.

Cherchye, L. y Abeele, P. (2005). On research efficiency: A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management. Research Policy, 34, 495-516. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.005.

Chetty, S. y Agndal, H. (2008). Role of Inter-organizational Networks and Interpersonal Networks in an Industrial District. Regional Studies, 42(2), 175-187. doi:10.1080/00343400601142696.

Chompalov, I.; Genuth, J. y Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31(5), 749-767. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01) 00145-7.

Chung, K.; Cox, R. y Kim, K. (2009). On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: Evidence from the finance academy. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 893–916. Recuperado de http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1062976908000616.

Clark, B. Y. (2008). Government Funding and Academic Scientific Collaboration. papers. ssrn. com, 1-39. Recuperado de http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310736.

Clark, T. y Wright, M. (2007). Reviewing Journal Rankings and Revisiting Peer Reviews: Editorial Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 612– 621. Wiley Online Library. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00701.x/full.

Colodro, I. (2006). Escuelas en movimiento. AméricaEconomía, 18 al 31 d, 30-43.

Contreras, C.; Edwards, G. y Mizala, A. (2006). La productividad científica de economía y administración en Chile. Un análisis comparativo. Cuadernos de Economía, 43, 331-354. SciELO Chile. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/cecon/v43n128/art05.pdf.

Cozzens, Susan E.; Gatchair, S.; Kim, K.-sup; Ordóñez, G. y Supnithadnaporn, A. (2008). Knowledge and Development. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch y J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed., pp. 787-812). Boston: MIT Press.

Croissant, J. y Smith-Doerr, L. (2008). Organizational contexts of science: Boundaries and relationships between University and Industry. In E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch y J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed.). Boston: mit Press.

Cronin, B. y Atkins, H. (2000). The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. (B. Cronin & H. Atkins, Eds.) (p. 544). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. & American Society for Information Science.

Cummings, J. N. y Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722. doi:10.1177/0306312705055535.

Cummings, J. N. y Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.

Cummings, L. L. y Frost, P. J. (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences. Publishing in the Organizational Sciences (p. xiii, 330 p.). Sage Publications. Recuperado de http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qAJPBRstPPEC&pgis=1.

Dagnino, R. y Velho, L. (1998). University-industry-government relations on the periphery: the University of Campinas, Brazil. Minerva, 36(3), 229– 251. Springer. Recuperado de http://www.springerlink.com/index/W7L2882V13066597.pdf.

Dasgupta, P. y David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487-521. Recuperado de http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V77-46384W1.

Dávila, C. (2012). Empresariado Colombiano. Perspectiva histórica y regional. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

De Solla Price, D. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

DiMaggio, P. J. (1979). On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460– 1474. jstor. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777906

DiMaggio, P. J. (1983). State expansion and organizational fields. In R. Hall & R. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 147–161). Beverly Hills: Sage.

DiMaggio, P. J. y Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147– 160. JSTOR. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101

Duque, R. B.; Ynalvez, M.; Sooryammorthy, P.; Dan-, D. y Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration Paradox: Scientific Productivity, the Internet, and Problems of Research in Developing Areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755-785. doi:10.1177/0306312705053048.

Durand, T. y Dameron, S. (2008). The Future of business schools: scenarios and strategies for 2020. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Recuperado de http://www.palgrave.com/PDFs/0230515487.Pdf.

Dávila, C. (1980). La Crisis de la Educación en Administración en Colombia. Revista Eafit Temas Administrativos, 39, 20-35.

Dávila, C. (1986). La investigación en administración: Anotaciones sobre la experiencia colombiana y políticas para su promoción a nivel nacional y latinoamericano. Revista Cátedra, 1, 13-27.

Dávila, C. (1989). Grounding management education in local research: A Latin American experience. In J. Davies, M. Easterby-Smith, S. Mann y M. Tanton (Eds.), The challenge to western management development. London: Routledge.

Dávila, C. (1990). A proposito del informe Porter McKibbin: Anotaciones comparativas sobre los estudios de administración en Estados Unidos y América Latina. In R. Echeverry, A.

Chanlat y C. Dávila (Eds.), En búsqueda de una administración para America Latina. Experiencias y desafios. Bogotá: Oveja Negra/Universidad del Valle/hec.

Dávila, C. (1991a). The evolution of management education and development in Latin America. Journal of Management Development, 10(6), 22-31. MCB UP Ltd. Recuperado de http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=879988.Dávila, C. (1991b). Ensayos sobre la educación en administración en Colombia. Monografías de Administración. N.º 24. Serie Educación y Administración. Facultad de Administración. Universidad de Los Andes. Bogotá.

Dávila, C. (1996). A proposito del informe Porter McKibbin: Anotaciones comparativas sobre los estudios de administración en Estados Unidos y América Latina. In R. Echeverry, A. Chanlat y C. Dávila (Eds.), En búsqueda de una administración para America Latina. Experiencias y desafios. (4 Ed. pp. 129-135). Santiago de Cali: Editorial Universidad del Valle.

Dávila, C. (1997). Best practices in Latin American organizations: A challenge for organization theory. Organization, 4 (4), 582-589.

Dávila, C. (2001). Teorías organizacionales y administración. Un enfoque crítico (2nd ed.). Bogotá: McGraw-Hill.

Dávila, C. y Gómez, H. (1994). Innovative Management and Organizational Development in Latin America. The International Executive, 36(6), 671-688.

Dávila, C. y Malaver, F. (2004). A propósito del reconocimiento de Colciencias a grupos de investigación en administración. Cuadernos de Administración, 17(27), 5-9.

Deephouse, D. L.; Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. En: The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Durango, C. M. (2008). Mitos sobre la naturaleza de la investigación en administración en Colombia y otros países latinoamericanos. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas. 16(19): 23-32.

Edmondson, A. C. y McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/T2727N54151X7212.pdf.

Engwall, L. y Zamagni, V. (eds.). (1998). Management education in historical perspective. Manchester University Press. Manchester.

Eto, H. (2002). Authorship and citation patterns in Management Science in comparison with operational research. Scientometrics, 53(3), 337-349. Recuperado de http://www.akademiai.com/index/Y3U91W6B4EU1W555.pdf.

Ettorre, E. (2000). Recognizing diversity and group processes in international, collaborative research work: A case study. Social Policy & Administration, 34(4), 392– 407. Wiley Online Library. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9515.00199/abstract.

Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Normative change in science: from entrepreneurial science to social entrepreneurship. In G. Libecap (Ed.), Measuring the Social Value of Innovation: A Link in the University Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship Equation Volume 19 of the book series: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Economic Growth. London: Esmerald.

Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix-university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledgebased economic development. easst Review, 1(14-19).

Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and Mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research policy, 29(22), 109-123.

Recuperado de http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00487333/2000/00000029/00000002/art00055.

Fabregas, J. (1972). El Hombre. Editorial Bruguera. Barcelona.

Fatt, C. K., Ujum, E. A. y Ratnavelu, K. (2010). The structure of collaboration in the Journal of Finance. Scientometrics, 85(3), 849-860. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0254-0.

Fernández, C. y Gantman, E. (2011). Spain and Argentina as Importers of Management Knowledge (1955-2008): A Comparative Analysis. Canadian Journal Of Administrative Sciences Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’Administration, 173(January), 160-173. doi:10.1002/CJAS.188.

Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against the Method: Outline of Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. Verso. Londres.

Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological theory, 19(2), 105-125. Recuperado de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.8.9421&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Floyd, S. W.; Schroeder, D. M. y Finn, D. M. (1994). “Only If I’m First Author”: Conflict over Credit in Management Scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 734. doi:10.2307/256709.

Forero-Pineda, Clemente y Jaramillo-Salazar, H. (2002). The access of researchers from developing countries to international science and technology. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 129-140. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00364.

Frazier, P. A.; Tix, A. P. y Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.

Gantman, E. R. (2002). La creación de conocimiento administrativo en la República Argentina. Reflexiones sobre el desarrollo de la investigación en management en universidades argentinas (1995-2000)*. Documento de Trabajo n.º 81, Universidad de Belgrano. Recuperado de http://www.ub.edu.ar/investigaciones/dt_nuevos/81_gantman.pdf.

Gantman, E. R. (2005). Capitalism, social privilege and managerial ideologies. Aldershot: Ahgate.

Gantman, E. R. (2008). Determinantes de la produccion de conocimiento administrativo en escuelas de negocios de America Latina. Vision de Futuro, 9(1). Recuperado de http://revistacientifica.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=138&Itemid=42.

Gantman, E. R. (2009). International differences of productivity in scholarly management knowledge. Scientometrics, 80(1), 153-165. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2054-8.

Gantman, E. R. (2010). Scholarly Management Knowledge in the Periphery: Argentina and Brazil in Comparative Perspective (1970-2005). Brazilian Administration Review, 7 (2), 115-135.

Gantman, E. R. (2012). Escuelas de negocios latinoamericanas y graduados exitosos: un análisis empírico. Revista Contaduría y Administración. En prensa. Recuperado de http://www.contaduriayadministracionunam.com.mx/userFiles/app/pp_17012012.pdf.

Garfield, E. (2004). The unintended and unanticipated consequences of Robert K. Merton. Social Studies of Science, 34(6), 845-853. JSTOR. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4144346.

Garfield, E. (2009). Five decades of Citation Indexing. International Workshop for Scientometrics ( istic). Beijing. Recuperado de http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/beijingchina2009.html.

Garfield, E. y Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). New York: Wiley.

Gazda, E. y Quandt, C. (2010). Inter-institutional collaboration in research in Brazil: trends in articles in the innovation management area. rae eletrônica, 55(11).

George, C. y Álvarez, L. (2005). Historia del pensamiento administrativo. 2.ª ed., Pearson Prentice Hall. México.

Gersick, C. J. G., Dutton, J. E. y Bartunek, J. M. (2000). Learning From Academia: the Importance of Relationships in Professional Life. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1026-1044. doi:10.2307/1556333.

Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P. y Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Information Processing & Management (Vol. 31, p. 179). London: Sage. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(95)90023-3.

Glänzel, W. (1996). A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990– 1992. Scientometrics, 35(3), 291-307. doi:10.1007/BF02016902.

Godin, B. y Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273-278. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99) 00065-7.

Goldfinch, S.; Dale, T. y DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and “Periphery Effects” in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321-337.

Gómez-Mejía, L. R. y Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: an agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921-955.

Gómez, Henry, C. Leal, L. Vivas, y P. Márquez (eds.). (1998), Gerencia exitosa con sello latinoamericano, Caracas, Editorial Galac.

Gómez, H. y Dávila, C. (2007). Indigenous management practices. Insihts from Latin America. Management Galleys 18. Facultad de Administración. Universidad de los Andes. Bogotá.

Gómez, H. (2000). Gestión social: nuevo reto para las escuelas de gerencia. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 23, 6-14.

Gómez, H. y Pérez, C. (1986). Estudios de administración en América Latina (p. 107). Caracas: iesa, Ediciones.

González-Brambila, C. N. y Veloso, F. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035-1051. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.005.

González-Brambila, C. N., Veloso, F. y Krackhardt, D. (2008). Social capital and the creation of knowledge. Science And Technology (p. 26). México DF. Recuperado de http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1120977.

Goodall, A. (2009). Socrates in the boardroom. Why research universities should be led by top scholars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Gordon, R. A. y Howell, J. E. (1959). Higher education for business. Harvard Business Review. New York: Columbia University Press. Recuperado de http://www.questia.com/library/book/higher-education-for-business-by-robert-aaron-gordonjames-edwin-howell.jsp.

Gozubuyuk, R. (2008). Co-evolution of multiple networks. Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 1-6). California: Anaheim.

Greenwood, R.; Oliver, C.; Sahlin, K. y Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction: The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Recuperado de http://scholar.google.com.co/scholar?q=Sage+Handbook+of+Organizational+Institutionalism&hl=es&btnG=Buscar&lr=#0.

Greenwood, R.; Suddaby, R. y Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58– 80. JSTOR. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3069285.

Grimm, H. (1970). Random counts in scientific work. (G. Patil, Ed.) (Vol. 1.). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Groot, T. y García-Valderrama, T. (2006). Research quality and efficiencyAn analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs. Research Policy, 35(9), 1362-1376. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.07.002.

Gu, Y. (2004). Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 61(2), 171-190. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+ Business Media BV, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers BV. doi:10.1023/B: SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4.

Guarido, E. R.; Machado-da-Silva, C. L. y Gonçalves, S. A. (2009). Organizational institutionalism in the academic field in Brazil: social dynamics and networks. Brazilian Administration Review, 6 (4), 299-315. doi:10.1590/S1807-76922009000400003.

Guerrero, O. (1997). La trascendencia de los Elementos de la ciencia administrativa: estudio introductorio. Tecnología administrativa, 11(24), 33-70. http://www.omarguerrero.org/articulos/TrascendenciaElementosCA.pdf.

Guimarães, T. D. A.; Gomes, A. D. O.; Odelius, C. C.; Zancan, C. y Corradi, A. A. (2009). A rede de programas de pós-graduação em administração no Brasil: análise de relações acadêmicas e atributos de programas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(4), 564-582. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552009000400004.

Gulbrandsen, M.; Mowery, D. y Feldman, M. (2011). Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and university– industry relations. Research Policy, 40(1), 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.007.

Hagstrom, W. O. (1964). Traditional and Modern Forms of Scientific Teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(3), 241-263. doi:10.2307/2391440.

Hair, J. F.; Black, B.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R. E. y Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Learning (pp. 116-117). Pearson Prentice Hall. Recuperado de http://www.amazon.com/dp/0130329290.

Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346-1352.

Hannan, M. y Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American journal of sociology, 82(5), 929-964. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2777807.

Hannan, M. y Freeman, J. (1986). Where do organizational forms come from? Sociological forum, 1(1), 50-72. Recuperado de http://www.springerlink.com/index/T9861MX04736M751.pdf.

Hannan, M. y Carroll, G. (1995). Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure and Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hara, N.; Solomon, P.; Kim, S.-L. y Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965. doi:10.1002/asi.10291.

Harmon, M. M. (2006). Business Research and Chinese Patriotic Poetry: How Competition for Status Distorts the Priority Between Research and Teaching in U. S. Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (2), 234-243.

Harrison, D. A. y Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199– 1228. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/4741884WMV7611J0.pdf.

Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems: bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 15(4), 325-354. Recuperado de http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ476378&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ476378.

Hatchuel, A. (2001). The two pillars of new management research. British Journal of Management, 12, 33-39. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.4/abstract.

Hawawini, G. (2005). The future of business schools. Journal of Management Development, 24(9), 770-782. doi:10.1108/02621710510621286

He, Z.-L.; Geng, X.-S. y Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306-317. Elsevier B. V. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011.

Hedmo, T.; Sahlin-Andersson, K. y Wedlin, L. (2006). Is a Global Organizational Field of Higher Education Emerging?: Management Education as an Early Example. In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky y M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a Multiversity?: Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions. Bielefeld: Wissenschaftssoziologie.

Heimeriks, G.; Hoerlesberger, M. y Van den Besselaar, P. (2003). Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics, 58(2), 391-413. Springer. Recuperado de http://www.springerlink.com/index/GJR38607293874L3.pdf.

Heinze, T. y Bauer, G. (2007). Characterizing creative scientists in nano S&T: productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective. Scientometrics, 70, 811– 830.

Heinze, T. y Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Across institutional boundaries?:: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience. Research Policy, 37, 888-899. Recuperado de http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733308000255.

Hessels, L. y Vanlente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008.

Hirao, Y. (2012). Efficiency of the top 50 business schools in the United States. Applied Economics Letters, 19(1), 73-78. doi:10.1 080/13504851.2011.568380.

Hollingsworth, R. J. (2006). A path-Dependent Perspective on Institutional and Organizational Factors Shaping Major Scientifc Discoveries. In J. Hage & M. Meeus (Eds.), Innovation, Science and Institutional Change (Vol. 449, pp. 201-202). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1177/000271628044900154.

Hoopes, J. (2003). False prophets: The Gurus who Created Modern Management and why Their Ideas are Bad for Business Today. Cambridge, MA. Perseus.

Huang, W.; Akcakir, O. y Haller, M. (2009). The Effects of Organizational Resources on Scientists’ Research Production across Ranks: Does Collaboration Matter? uic. edu. Chicago: University of Illinois-Department of Public Administration. Recuperado de http://www.uic.edu/orgs/stresearch/Documents/Symposium09/Huang_Akcakir_Haller.pdf.

Huczynski, A. A. (1993). Management gurus. London: Routledge.

Huff, A. (2000). Changes in Organisational Knowledge Production: 1999 Presidential Address. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 288– 293.

Huff, A. y Huff, O. (2001). Re-focusing the Business School Agenda. British Journal of Management, 12, 49-54.

Hunt, J. G. y Blair, J. D. (1987). Content, process, and the Matthew effect among management academics. Journal of Management, 13(2), 191-210. Sage Publications. Recuperado de http://jom.sagepub.com/content/13/2/191.short.

Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Mexico’s Management and Organization Studies Challenges in the Twenty-First Century: Practices, Knowledge, and Reencounters. Management Research, 4(3), 181-192. doi:10.2753/JMR1536-5433040304.

Ibarra-Colado, E. (2007). Organization Studies and Epistemic Coloniality in Latin America: Thinking Otherness from the Margins. Organization, 13(4), 463-488. doi:10.1177/1350508406065851.

Ilgen, D. R. (2007). Citations to management articles: Cautions for the science about advice for the scientist. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 507– 509. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/F180751015317558.pdf.

Ireland, R. D. (2008). From the Editors your Manuscript’s Journey Through the AMJ Review Process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 409-412. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aom.metapress.com/index/MHV0JUG7TG07701U.pdf.

Ismail, N. y Jemain, A. (2007). Handling overdispersion with Negative Binomial and Generalized Poisson regression models.

Casualty Actuarial Society Forum. Recuperado de https://www.casact.com/pubs/forum/07wforum/07w109.pdf.

Jackson, B. (2003). Gurús anglosajones: verdades y mentiras. Barcelona: Ariel.

Jansen, D.; Görtz, R. y Heidler, R. (2010). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics, 83(1), 219-241. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0022-1.

Johnson, J. L. y Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Journal Influence in the Field of Management: an Analysis Using Salancik’s Index in a Dependency Network. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1392-1407. doi:10.2307/256679.

Judge, T. A.; Cable, D. M.; Colbert, A. E. y Rynes, S. L. (2007). What Causes a Management Article to Be Cited-Article, Author, or Journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/X53274078119M111.pdf.

Kao, C. y Pao, H.-L. (2008). An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics, 78(2), 261-277. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1906-6.

Katz, J. (1999). The self-similar science system. Research Policy, 28(5), 501-517. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99) 00010-4.

Katz, J. S. y Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96) 00917-1.

Kipping, M. y Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2002). Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry. Oxford University Press.

Klitkou, A. y Kaloudis, A. (2007). Scientific versus economic specialisation of business R & D– the case of Norway. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 283-298. doi:10.3152/095820207X259308.

Knights, D. y Willmott, H. (1997). The Hype and Hope of Interdisciplinary Management Studies. British Journal of Management, 8(1), 9-22. Blackwell Publishing Limited. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00035.

Koljatic, M. M. y Silva, M. R. (2001). The international publication productivity of Latin American countries in the economics and business administration fields. Scientometrics, 51(2), 381– 394. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+ Business Media BV, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers BV. Recuperado de http://www.akademiai.com/index/VL12397231M03143.pdf.

Krichel, T. y Bakkalbasi, N. (2006). A social network analysis of research collaboration in the economics community. Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, 3, 1-12. Citeseer. Recuperado de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.107.9147&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kurek, K.; Geurts, P. A. T. M. y Roosendaal, H. E. (2007). The research entrepreneur: strategic positioning of the researcher in his societal environment. Science and Public Policy, 34(7), 501-513. doi:10.3152/030234207X244810.

Land, K. C.; McCall, P. L. y Nagin, D. S. (1996). A Comparison of Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Models: With Empirical Applications to Criminal Careers Data. Sociological Methods & Research, 24(4), 387-442. doi:10.1177/0049124196024004001.

Landry, R. y Amara, N. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27(9), 901-913. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98) 00098-5.

Langford, C. H.; Hall, J.; Josty, P.; Matos, S. y Jacobson, A. (2006). Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? Research Policy, 35(10), 1586-1598. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.021.

Larivière, V. y Gingras, Y. (2010). On the Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Scientific Impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1998), 126-131. doi:10.1002/asi.

Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y. y Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8.

Larivière, V.; Macaluso, B.; Archambault, É. y Gingras, Y. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 45-53. doi:10.3152/095820210X492495.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actornetwork-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lawless, J. (1987). Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 15(3), 209–225. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/3314912/abstract.

Lawrence, B. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8 (1), 1-22. Recuperado de http://www. jstor. org/stable/10.2307/2635225.

Lazega, E.; Jourda, M.; Mounier, L. y Stofer, R. (2008). Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks, 30(2), 159-176. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.02.001.

Lazega, E.; Mounier, L.; Jourda, M. T. y Stofer, R. (2006). Organizational vs. personal social capital in scientists’ performance: A multi-level network study of elite French cancer researchers (1996-1998). Scientometrics, 67(1), 27-44. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+ Business Media BV, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers BV. doi:10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.3.

Leavitt, H. J. (1989). Educating our MBAs-on teaching what we havent taught. California Management Review, 31(3), 38-50.

Lee, S. y Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359.

Leitner, K. H. (2004). Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities. Research evaluation, 13(2), 129-140. Leong, F. y Leung, K. (2004). Academic careers in Asia: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2), 346-357. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2002.09.002.

Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 510– 513. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aomarticles.metapress.com/index/Y3881725720343RK.pdf.

Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467. Recuperado de http://www.akademiai.com/index/v4gx12k32411xu27.pdf.

Leydesdorff, Loet. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327-1336. doi:10.1002/asi.21024.

Li, J. y Tsui, A. S. (2002). A Citation Analysis of Management and Organization Research in the Chinese Context: 1984-1999.

Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 87-107. Springer Science & Business Media B. V. doi:10.1023/A:1014891624018.

Liebeskind, J. P.; Oliver, A. L. y Zucker, L. G. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4), 428-443. Recuperado de http://www.nber.org/papers/w5320.

Lorange, P. (2002). New vision for management education. Leadership Challenges. Oxford: Elsevier-Pergamon.

López, A. (1928). El trabajo. Principios fundamentales. Dangerfield Printing CO. ltd. Londres.

MacLean, D. y MacIntosh, R. (2002). Mode 2 management research. Journal of Management, 13, 189-207. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.00237/abstract.

Macdonald, S. y Kam, J. (2007). Ring a ring o’ roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 640– 655.

Macdonald, S. y Kam, J. (2010). Counting footnotes: Citability in management studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(2), 189– 203.

Malaver, F. (2000). La investigación en gestión empresarial. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 23, 62-77.

Malaver, F. (2006). El despegue de la investigación colombiana en administración: análisis de sus avances en el periodo 2000 2006. Cuadernos de Administración, 19(32), 71-109. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.unal.edu.co/scielo.php?pid=S0120-35922006000200004&script=sci_arttext.

Mamun, M. A. y Mohamad, A. B. (2009). Management Education for Contemporary Challenges: The Role of Business School. European Journal of Scientific Research, 30(4), 649-661.

Mangematin, V. y Badenfuller, C. (2008). Global Contests in the Production of Business KnowledgeRegional Centres and Individual Business Schools. Long Range Planning, 41(1), 117-139. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.11.005.

Manjarrés, L. M. (2009). Las relaciones Universidad-empresa y su efecto sobre la segunda misión universitaria. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Tesis doctoral. Recuperado de http://www.riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/6342.

Martínez, C. (2012). Administración de organizaciones. Grandes transformaciones estratégicas y organizacionales. 5.ª ed. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá.

Mayor, A. (1989). Etica, trabajo y productividad en Antioquia. (3a ed). Tercer mundo editores. Bogotá.

Mayor, A. (1990). Institucionalizado!! y perspectivas del taylorismo en Colombia: conflictos y subculturas de trabajo entre ingenieros, supervisores y obreros en torno a la productividad, 1959-1990. Ponencia presentada en el iv coloquio colombiano de sociología. Universidad del Valle. Cali.

Mayor, A. (1996). La profesionalización de la administración de empresas en Colombia. In RD Echeverry, A. Chanlat y C. Dávila (Eds.), (4th ed., pp. 83-92). Santiago de Cali: Editorial Universidad del Valle.

Mayor, A. (2001). Técnica y utopía. Biografía intellectual y política de Alejandro López, 1876-1940. Fondo editorial Universidad Eafit. Medellín.

McCullagh, P. y Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.

McFadyen, M. A. y Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746. doi:10.2307/20159615.

McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L. y Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27, 415-444. jstor. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678628.

Medoff, M. (2003). Collaboration and the quality of economics research. Labour Economics, 10, 597-608. doi:10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00072-1.

Merrill, H. (2005). Clásicos en Administración. México: Limusa.

Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social. Forces. 18(4), 560-568.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. Recuperado de http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthew1.pdf.

Merton, R. K. (1977). La Sociología de la ciencia: investigaciones teóricas y empíricas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Meyer, J. W. y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340. doi:10.1086/226550

Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. Development (Vol. 49, p. 464). Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Recuperado de http://www.amazon.com/dp/1576753514.

Mintzberg, H. y Gosling, J. (2002). Educating Managers Beyond Borders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 64-76.

Mitev, N. y Venters, W. (2009). Reflexive Evaluation of an Academic-Industry Research Collaboration: Can Mode 2 Management Research be Achieved? Journal of management studies, 46(5), 733-754. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00846.x/full.

Mitra, D. y Golder, P. N. (2008). Does Academic Research Help or Hurt MBA Programs? Journal of Marketing, 72 (September), 31-49.

Montaño, L. (2001). Dilemas y desafíos de la investigación en administración en México. Revista contaduría y administración, (202), 21-28. Recuperado de http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rca/article/view/4523.

Moody, J. (2004). The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213-238. doi:10.1177/000312240406900204.

Morris, N. (2004). Scientist responding to science policy. A multilevel analysis of the situation of life scientist in the UK. University of Twente.

Motta, P. R. (1993). La ciencia y el arte de ser dirigente. Tercer Mundo Editores y Ediciones Uniandes. Bogotá.

Méndez, A.; Gómez, I. y Bordons, M. (1993). Some indicators for assessing research performance without citations. Scientometrics, 26(1), 157-167. Springer. Recuperado de http://www.springerlink.com/index/X384155T813X1813.pdf.

Nicholls-Nixon, C. L.; Dávila Castilla, J. A.; Sánchez García, J. y Rivera Pesquera, M. (2011). Latin America Management Research: Review, Synthesis, and Extension. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1178-1227. doi:10.1177/0149206311403151.

Nord, W. R. (1969). Beyond the teaching machine: The neglected area of operant conditioning in the theory and practice of management. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4 (4), 375-401.

Ogliastri, E.; Dávila, C. y Gómez, H. (2000). La educación gerencial en América Latina. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 23, 3-5.

Olmeda-Gómez, C.; Perianes-Rodríiguez, A.; Ovalle-Perandones, M. A. y Moya-Anegón, F. (2008). Comparative analysis of university-government enterprise co-authorship networks in three scientific domains in the region of Madrid. Information Research, 13(3), 352. TD Wilson. Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/13-3/paper352.html.

Ordóñez-Matamoros, G.; Cozzens, S. E. y García, M. (2010). International Co-Authorship and Research Team Performance in Colombia. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 415-431. Georgia Institute of Technology. Recuperado de http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/ropr/2010/00000027/00000004/art00003.

Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo. (2008). International Research Collaboration, Research Team Performance, and Scientific and Technological Capabilities in Colombia: A Bottom-Up Perspective. Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia State University.

Orozco, L. A. y Carrizosa, M. S. (2004). Indicadores en biotecnología. Colombia. En: Orozco L. A. y Chaves F. (eds). Construcción de indicadores en biotecnología. Región comprendida por cuatro países de América Latina y el Caribe. oea y OcyT. Bogotá.

Orozco, L. A. y Chavarro, D. A. (2005). De la investigación al mercado: Un acercamiento a la medición del impacto de las heliconias colombianas. Estudios Gerenciales, 96, 107-126. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.unal.edu.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123-59232005000300004&script=sci_arttext.

Orozco, L. A. y Chavarro, D. A. (2006). De historia y sociología de la ciencia a indicadores y redes sociales. (O. C. de C. y T. -OCyT, Ed.) (p. 196). Bogotá: Javegraf. Recuperado de http://www.lulu.com/product/file-download/de-historia-y-sociologíade-la-ciencia-a-indicadores-y-redes-sociales/1309377.

Orozco, L. A. y Chavarro, D. A. (2010). R & D departments and innovation in the manufacturing industry of Colombia: a comparative analysis from the perspective of organizational behavior. Innovar Journal, 20(37), 101-115. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.unal.edu.co/scielo.php?pid=S0121-50512010000200009&script=sci_arttext.

Orozco, L. A. y Chavarro, D. A. (2010). Science as Institution. res Revista de Estudios Sociales, 37, 143-162. Recuperado de http://res.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/667/index.php?id=667.

Orozco, L. A. y Chavarro, D. A. (2011). El programa del centro de investigaciones en microbiología y parasitología tropical- cimpat. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. Recuperado de http://ediciones.uniandes.edu.co/index.php?Itemid=83&option=com_zoo&view=item&category_id=0&item_id=2622.

Orozco, L. A. y Villaveces, J. L. (2015). Heterogeneous research networks in Latin American schools of business management. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 28(1), 115-134.

Orozco, L. A.; Buitrago, J. y Chavarro-Bohórquez, D. (2012). Biotecnologia y valor social: el emprendimiento científico del cimpat para enfrentar la enfermedad de Chagas en Colombia. In E. Hodson & T. Zamudio (Eds.), Biotecnologías e innovación: el compromiso social de la ciencia (pp. 267–282). Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana y RedBio Internacional.

Orozco, L. A.; Chavarro, D. A. y Ruiz, C. F. (2011). Redes e híbridos como formas organizacionales de gobernanza en la biotecnología en Colombia. In A. Beltrán, A. Rodríguez y C. Restrepo (Eds.), Memorias Encuentro Internacional de Investigadores en Administración 2011 (pp. 2433-2460). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia-Universidad del Valle.

Orozco, L. A.; Ruiz, C. F.; Bonilla, R. y Chavarro, D. A. (2013). Los grupos de investigación en Colombia. Sus prácticas, su reconocimiento y su legitimidad. In: Salazar, M (Ed). Colciencias cuarenta años: entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica. Bogotá: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología-OCyT.

Ortega, J. L. y Aguillo, I. F. (2010). Shaping the European research collaboration in the 6th Framework Programme health thematic area through network analysis. Scientometrics, 85(1), 377-386. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0218-4.

Owen-Smith, J. y Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21. doi:10.1287/orsc. 1030.0054.

Owen-Smith, J. y Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and Institutions. Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 594-621). Los Ángeles: Sage Publications.

O’Brien, J. P.; Drnevich, P. L.; Crook, T. R. y Armstrong, C. E. (2010). Does business school research add economic value for students? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(4), 638-651. Academy of Management. Recuperado de http://aom.metapress.com/index/Q4343557466J41L7.pdf.

Özmen Uysal, Ö. (2009). Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 137-160. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0187-9.

Pabón, RS. (SF). Los estudios de administración en Colombia: origen, expansión y diversificación. Clío América. Universidad del Magdalena.

Parsons, T. (1956/57). A sociological approach to the theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63-85.

Pautt, G. y Orozco, L. A. (2014). Emprendimiento economia y sociedad. El caso colombiano. En: Beltrán, A.; Cobo, E.; Chacón, E. y Restrepo, C. (Comp.) La administración frente a los desafíos de la economía global. Memorias del Encuentro Internacional de Investigadores en Administración-2013. Universidad Externado de Colombia-Universidad del Valle-Universidad del Magdalena. Santa Marta, pp. 2155-2169.

Pérez, C. & Vinck, D. (2008). Redes sociotécnicas de cogestión de conocimiento en Nanotecnología en Colombia: Entre la visibilidad internacional y la apropiación local? redes Revista de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia, 15(29): 113-137.

Pettigrew, A. (2001). Management Research After Modernism. British Journal of Management, 12, 61-70.

Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299-357.

Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299-357.

Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599. doi:10.2307/258592.

Pfeffer, J. y Fong, C. T. (2002). The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78-95. doi:10.5465/AMLE. 2002.7373679.

Pfeffer, J. y Fong, C. T. (2004). The Business School “Business”: Some Lessons from the US Experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501-1520.

Pfeffer, J. y Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 62.

Phillips, N.; Lawrence, T. B. y Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 23-43.

Podsakoff, P. M.; MacKenzie, S. B.; Bachrach, D. G. y Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488. doi:10.1002/smj.454.

Podsakoff, P. M.; MacKenzie, S. B.; Podsakoff, N. P. y Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century. Journal of Management 34: 641-720.

Ponds, R.; van Oort, F. y Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423-443. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x.

Ponomariov, B. L. y Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613-624. Elsevier B. V. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013.

Porac, J. F.; Wade, J. B.; Fischer, H. M.; Brown, J.; Kanfer, A. y Bowker, G. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy, 33(4), 661-678. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.007.

Porter, L. W. y McKibbin, L. E. (1988). Management Education and Development-Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? New York: McGraw-Hill.

Powell, W. W.; Koput, K. W. y Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. jstor. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393988.

Powell, Walter W. (2007). The New Institutionalism. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Studies. Sage.

Powell, Walter W.; White, D. R.; Koput, K. W. y Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. doi:10.1086/421508.

Rafols, I.; Leydesdorff, L.; O’Hare, A.; Nightingale, P. y Stirling, A. (2011). How rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies and business and management. Arxiv preprint arXiv: 1105.1227. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1227.

Rafols, I.; Porter, A. L. y Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science Overlay Maps: A New Tool for Research Policy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(9), 1871-1887. doi:10.1002/asi.

Ramos, R.; Royuela, V. y Suriñach, J. (2007). An analysis of the determinants in Economics and Business publications by Spanish universities between 1994 and 2004. Scientometrics, 71(1), 117-144. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1652-9.

Rarick, C. A. (2008). Mencius on Management: Managerial Implications of the Writings of China’s Second Sage. Journal of Comparative International Management, 11(2): 55-61.

Reagans, R. y Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R & D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502– 517. jstor. doi:1047-7039/01/1204/0502.

Rigby, J. y Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34(6), 784-794. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004.

Rigby, John. (2005). Handcrafted by 16 men: The impact of single and multiple authorship in collaborative research networks. Research Evaluation, 14(3), 199-206. Beech Tree Publishing. Recuperado de http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/beech/rev/2005/00000014/00000003/art00002.

Rigby, John; Julian, K. y Ball, D. F. (2008). Characterisation and measurement methods for author productivity and research vitality: a study of the R & D management field. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 59-69. doi:10.3152/095820208X283797.

Ríos, W. (2009). La propiedad intelectual en la era de las tecnologías. Ediciones Uniandes-Temis. Bogotá.

Rip, A. (1994). The republic of science in the 1990s. Higher Education, 28(1), 3-23. doi:10.1007/BF01383569.

Rip, A. (2003). Societal Challenges for R&D Evaluation. In Stefan Kuhlmann & P. Shapira (Eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Rivera-Camino, J. y Mejía, L. G. (2006). Management education in Ibero-America: An exploratory analysis and perspective. Journal of World Business, 41(3), 205-220. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.004.

Rodríguez, F. (1997). Las maestrías en administración en Europa, las Américas y Colombia. Innovar, 9, 7-20.

Rodríguez, M.; Dávila, C. y Romero, L. (1992). Gerencia privada, gerencia pública, educación en crisis (p. 168). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. Recuperado de http://www.manuelrodriguezbecerra.com/gerencia.html.

Rodríguez-Mena, L. (1977). La Transferencia de Ciencia y Tecnologia: Con referencia al caso de la Ciencia Administrativa. International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 43(1), 31-38. doi:10.1177/002085237704300104.

Ronda-Pupo, G. A. y Guerras-Martín, L. Á. (2010). Dynamics of the scientific community network within the strategic management field through the Strategic Management Journal 1980-2009: the role of cooperation. Scientometrics, 85(3), 821–848. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0287-4.

Rossoni, L. y Guarido, E. R. (2009). Scientific cooperation among graduate programs in the field of business in Brazil: structural evidence in four thematic areas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3), 366– 390. SciELO Brasil. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1415-65552009000300003&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es.

Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256-269.

Ruiz, C. F.; Bonilla, R.; Chavarro, D. A.; Orozco, L. A.; Zarama, R. y Polanco, X. (2010). Efficiency measurement of research groups using Data Envelopment Analysis and Bayesian networks. Scientometrics, 20(37), 101-116. Recuperado de http://www.springerlink.com/index/CR7N15250QN23408.pdf.

Ruiz-Torres, A.; Penkova, S. y Villafañe-Rodríguez, C. (2012). Evaluación y clasificación de revistas arbitradas en el área de administración de empresas publicadas en español. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 51, 48-64.

Ryan, S.; Neumann, R. y Guthrie, J. (2008). Interdisciplinarity in Management Education: Australian Graduate Schools of Business. 11th Annual Conference of the Irish Academy of Management Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, 2008 (pp. 1-31). Recuperado de http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1358710.

Rynes, S. (2006). “Getting on board” with amj: balancing quality and innovation in the review process. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1097– 1102. Recuperado de http://amj.aom.org/content/49/6/1097.short.

Rynes, S. y Bartunek, J. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340-355. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3069460.

Sábato, J. (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-tecnología-desarrollo-dependencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Sábato, J. y Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la Integración, 1(3), 15-36. Recuperado de http://tecale.org/documCurso/poci_Sábato-Botana_Unidad_3.pdf.

Safford, F. (1989). El ideal de lo práctico. El desafío de formar una élite técnica y empresarial en Colombia. Empresa Editorial. Universidad Nacional y El Áncora Editores. Bogotá.

Salleh, A.; Ahmad, A. & Kumar, N. (2008). Call for a paradigm shift in the quest for advanced business schools. The Journal of International Social Research, 1(5), 715-731. Recuperado de http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:CALL+FOR+A+PARADIGM+SHIFT+IN+THE+QUEST+FOR+ADVANCED+BUSINESS+SCHOOLS#4.

Sanabria, R. (2007). De los conceptos de administración, gobierno, gerencia, gestión y management: algunos elementos de corte epistemológico y aportes para una mayor comprensión. Revista Universidad & Empresa, 6(13), 155-194. Recuperado de http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/empresa/article/viewArticle/1040.

Sánchez, M. P.; Elena, S. y Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 307-324.

Sanz-Menéndez, L.; Bordons, M. & Zulueta, M. A. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas. Research Evaluation, 10(1), 47–58. Beech Tree Publishing. Recuperado de http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/beech/rev/2001/00000010/00000001/art00006.

Schmoch, U. y Schubert, T. (2009). When and how to use bibliometrics as a screening tool for research performance. Science and Public Policy, 36(10), 753-762. doi:10.3152/030234209X481978.

Schmoch, U.; Schubert, T. y Jansen, D. (2010). How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: a balanced approach. Research, 19(1), 2-18. doi:10.3152/095820210X492477.

Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2008). The Future Challenges of Business: Rethinking Management Education. California Management Review, 50(3), 119-139. Recuperado de http://www.jucs.org/jukm_0_2/riss/jukm_0_2_77_100_riss.html.

Schubert, A. y Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6), 281-291. doi:10.1007/BF02017249.

Schuler, I. y Orozco, L. A. (2007). Managing agricultural biotechnology in Colombia. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 3(10), 1-20. Recuperado de http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol10/issue3/full/15/.

Schuler, I.; Hodson, E. y Orozco, L. A. (2011). The Potential of Biodiversity in the Andean Region: Use, Conservation and Regulations. In O. Grillo & G. Venora (Eds.), Biological Diversity and Sustainable Resources Use (pp. 77-100). Rijeka: InTech. Recuperado de http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/the-potential-of-biodiversity-in-the-andean-region-useconservation-and-regulations.

London: Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Second Edition.

Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Scott, R. W. y Davis, G. (2007). Organizations and organizing rational, natural and open system perspectives. New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Segalla, M. (2008). Publishing in the right place or publishing the right thing: journal targeting and citations’ strategies for promotion and tenure committees. European J. of International Management, 2(2), 122-127. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2008.017765.

Segalla, M. (2009). Will you cite me? The emerging strategy of academic publishing. European J. of International Management, 3(4), 411. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2009.028847

Selznick, P. (1948) Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1): 25-35.

Serenko, A. y Bontis, N. (2004). Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and process management, 11(3), 185-198.

Shafritz, J. M.; Ott, J. E. y Jang, Y. S. (2005). Classics of Organization Theory. 6 Ed. Thomson. Belmont.

Shin, J. C. y Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581-594. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0236-2.

Shrum, W.; Chompalov, I. y Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681. Sage Publications. Recuperado de http://sss.sagepub.com/content/31/5/681.short.

Shrum, W.; Genuth, J. y Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Simon, H. A. (1946), The Proverbs of Administration. Public Administration Review, 6 (1): 53-67.

Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688-688. Nature Publishing Group. Recuperado de http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v163/n4148/abs/163688a0.html.

Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific Collaboration: A Synthesis of Challenges and Strategies. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 4 (Vol. 4). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Sörlin, S. (2007). Funding Diversity: Performance-based Funding Regimes as Drivers of Differentiation in Higher Education Systems. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 413-440.

Starkey, Ken y Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12, S3-S26. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.2/abstract.

Stewart, D. W. (2002). Getting published: Reflections of an old editor. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 1-6.

Stiles, D. R. (2004). Narcissus Revisited: The Values of Management Academics and their Role in Business School Strategies in the UK and Canada. British Journal of Management, 15(2), 157-175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00412.x.

Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/the Royal Society, 4(15), 707-19. doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.0213

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. jstor. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/258788.

Sun, Y.; Negishi, M. y Nishizawa, M. (2007). Coauthorship linkages between universities and industry in Japan. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 299-309. Beech Tree Publishing. doi:10.3152/095820207X263619.

Sutter, M. y Kocher, M. (2004). Patterns of co-authorship among economics departments in the usa. Applied Economics, 36(4), 327-333. doi:10.1080/00036840410001674259.

Sutz, Judith. (2000). The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 279-290. Recuperado de http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733399000669.

Tan, C. W.; Pan, S. L.; Lim, E. T. K. y Chan, C. M. L. (2005). Managing knowledge conflicts in an interorganizational project: A case study of the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1187-1199. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1002/asi.20222.

Thijs, B. y Glänzel, W. (2010). A structural analysis of collaboration between European research institutes. Research Evaluation, 19(March), 55-65. doi:10.3152/095820210X492486.

Thomas, H. y Wilson, A. D. (2011). ‘Physics envy’, cognitive legitimacy or practical relevance: dilemmas in the evolution of management research in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 443-456.

Torres, S. y Mejía, A. (2006). Una visión contemporánea del concepto de administración: revisión del contexto colombiano, 19(32), 111-133. Recuperado de http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Una+visión+contemporánea+del+concepto+de+administración:+revisión+del+contexto+colombiano#0.

Tranfield, D. y Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9(4), 341-353. Wiley Online Library. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.00103/full.

Trank, C. y Washington, M. (2009). Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: The work of aacsb and its constituents. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby y B. Leca (Eds.), Institutions and Institutional Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trieschmann, J. S.; Dennis, A. R.; Northcraft, G. B. y Nieme, A. W. (2000). Serving Constituencies in Business Schools: m. b. a. Program Versus Research Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130-1141. doi:10.2307/1556341.

Universidad de los Andes (1971). “Proyecto de Creación de la Facultad de Administración de la Universidad de los Andes”. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.

Valderrama-Zurián, J. C.; González-Alcaide, G.; Valderrama-Zurián, F. J.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R. y Miguel-Dasit, A. (2007). Coauthorship Networks and Institutional Collaboration in Revista Española de Cardiología Publications. Revista Española de Cardiología, 60(2), 117-130.

Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19-36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x.

Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Statistical Properties of Bibliometric Indicators: Research Group Indicator Distributions and Correlations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 57(3), 408-430. doi:10.1002/asi.

Van de Ven, A.; Poiley, D.; Garud, R. y Venkataraman, V. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.

Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

Van de Ven, Andrew y Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.

Vessuri, H. (1994). La ciencia académica en América Latina en el siglo xx. redes Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, 2(1978), 41-76. Recuperado de http://www.iec.unq.edu.ar/pdf/revista/RedesNro02/02.04.LacienciaacademicaenAmericaLatinaenelsiglo xx. pdf.

Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007). Reputation Beyond the Rankings: A Conceptual Framework for Business School Research. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278-304. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550055

Vieira, P. C. y Teixeira, A. a. C. (2010). Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations. Scientometrics, 85(3), 627-646. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0292-7.

Villaveces, J. L. (2006). Nuevas políticas de ciencia y tecnología. In H. Vessuri (Ed.), Universidad e investigación científica. Buenos Aires: clacso, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. Recuperado de http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/secret/vessuri/JoseLVCardoso.pdf.

Villaveces, J. L. (2005). Redes tecnoeconómicas entre productores y usuarios de conocimiento. In M Albornoz & D. Rato (Eds.), Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología en Iberoamérica, Agenda 2005. Buenos Aires: Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología- ricyt.

Villaveces, J. L. y Forero-Pineda, C. (2007). Cincuenta años de ciencia en Colombia, 1955-2005. In C Forero-Pineda (Ed.), Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar 50 años. Bogotá: Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar. Arfo.

Villaveces, J. L, Orozco, L. A., Olaya, D., Chavarro, D. A. y Suárez, E. (2005). Cómo medir el “impacto” de las políticas de ciencia y tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad - cts, 2(4), 125-146. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850-00132005000100007&script=sci_arttext.

Villaveces, J. L. (2001). Los grupos de investigación en la universidad colombiano año 2000. In L. E. Orozco (Ed.), Educación superior: desafío global y respuesta nacional. Tomo ii. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Vinck, D. (2014). Ciencias y sociedad. Sociología del trabajo científico. Gedisa Editoria. Barcelona.

Vinkler, P. (1986). Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 10(3), 157-177. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+ Business Media BV, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers BV. Recuperado de http://www.akademiai.com/index/W8046253XK485K57.pdf.

Wahrlich, B. (1978). Evolucion de las Ciencias Administrativas en America Latina. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 44(1), 70-92. doi:10.1177/002085237804400107.

Walsh, J. y Maloney, N. (2007). Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(2), 712-732. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x/abstract.

Waltman, L.; van Eck, N. J.; van Leeuwen, T. N.; Visser, M. S. y van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 87(3), 467-481. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5.

Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking Business Schools: forming fields, identities, and boundaries in international management education. International Management. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Wedlin, L. (2007). The role of rankings in codifying a business school template: classifications, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields. European Management Review, 4(1), 24-39. doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500073.

Whitley, R. (1984a). The Fragmented State of Management Studies: Reasons and Consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 331-348. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00415.x.

Whitley, R. (1984b). The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science. Journal of Management Studies, 21(4), 369-390. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00234.x/abstract.

Whitley, R. (1989). On the nature of managerial tasks and skills: their distinguishing characteristics and organization. Journal of Management Studies, 26(3), 209-224. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00725.x/abstract.

Whitley, R. (1995). Academic knowledge and work jurisdiction in management. Organization Studies, 16(1), 81-105.

Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organisation of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whitley, R. (2007). Changing governance of the public sciences. In R. Whitley & J. Gläser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences: the advent of research evaluation systems (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht: Springer.

Whitley, R. (2008). Varieties of Knowledge and Their Use in Business and Management Studies: Conditions and Institutions. Organization Studies, 29(4), 581-609. doi:10.1177/0170840607088152.

Williams, K. y O’Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research In Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.

Wilson, D. y Thomas, H. (2012). The legitimacy of the business of business schools: what’s the future? Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31 (n.º 4), pp. 368-376.

Wooldridge, J. (2002). Introductory Econometrics (2nd ed.). South-Western.

Wooten, M. y Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Ángeles: Sage Publications.

Wren, D. A. y Van Fleet, D. D. (1983). History in schools of business. Business and Economic History, 12, 29-35. Recuperado de http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:History+in+Schools+of+Business#0.

Wuchty, S.; Jones, B. F. y Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316 (5827), 1036-9. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.

Zaleznik, A. (1989). The Managerial Mystique: Restoring Leadership in Business, New York: Harper & Row.

Zucker, L. G.; Darby, M. R. y Armstrong, J. S. (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.

Zucker, L. G.; Darby, M. R. y Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., usa. Recuperado de http://www.nber.org/papers/w8499.

Zuckerman, H. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 391-403. Recuperado de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6046812.

© Universidad externado de Colombia, 2015

Conditions d’utilisation : http://www.openedition.org/6540

Lire

Freemium

open access

Offert par L’éditeur de ce site

Acheter