Visiting Goddesses? Female Deities in the Sanctuary of Apollo at Claros
Déesses visiteuses ? Divinités féminines dans le sanctuaire d’Apollon à Claros
p. 515-522
Résumés
Terracotta figurines representing different goddesses were found in the sanctuary of Apollo Clarios, mainly in the sector of Artemis: they indicate various cults related to the main worship of Apollo. The most popular of the female divinities is Aphrodite, represented in different iconographic types. An additional major group consists of kourotrophoi, who recalls the role of Artemis as protector of childhood. A Kybele is probably linked with the cave where the goddess was worshipped near the sanctuary of Apollo.
Un certain nombre de figurines de terre cuite représentant des déesses a été recueilli dans le sanctuaire d’Apollon Clarios, principalement dans le secteur d’Artémis : elles suggèrent l’existence de cultes liés au culte principal en l’honneur d’Apollon. Aphrodite est représentée dans le plus grand nombre d’exemplaires, de types iconographiques différents. Les kourotrophes sont également nombreuses : elles rappellent le rôle d’Artémis protectrice de la petite enfance. Une Cybèle est sans doute à mettre en relation avec la grotte où était vénérée la déesse, non loin du sanctuaire d’Apollon Clarios.
Entrées d’index
Mots-clés : sanctuaire d’Apollon, Aphrodite, Artémis, Kourotrophe, Cybèle, figurine de terre cuite
Keywords : Apollo sanctuary, Aphrodite, Artemis, Kourotrophos, Cybele, terracotta figurine
Index géographique : Claros
Texte intégral
1During the 2001-2006 excavation seasons at the Apollo sanctuary at Claros approximately 300 fragments of votive terracotta figurines have been found. Some of them represent female deities: among them, Aphrodite (1-4), Cybele (7) and kourotrophoi (5-6) that possibly represent Artemis and the Nymphe Nysa (?) could be identified.1 All of the terracottas were found in the Artemis sector of the sanctuary (fig. 1), excepting the kourotrophos figurine 5, which was found in a bothros located in the western sector of the sanctuary probably dedicated to Dionysos.2
Fig. 1. – Claros, sanctuary of Apollo: Sector of Artemis.

Drawing Claros Excavation Archive, 2004.
2The Aphrodite terracotta figurines are the most numerously represented in the collection and may suggest the presence of her cult in Claros. They were found together in a structure called “fountain structure”(?) at the sector of Artemis (fig. 1). Therefore it is possible to suggest that the structure where these figurines were found might be dedicated to Aphrodite.3 In this group 4 Aphrodite figurines representing different iconographic types are examined.
1. Standing Aphrodite (fig. 2). Sector of Artemis, Missing right arm, left forearm. H. 8.1 cm. W. 3.6 cm. Fabric: reddish yellow; traces of madder pink, yellow and brown paint on drapery. Hollow. Back moulded (?), flattened. The back part of the figure shows traces of the fingers of the coroplast. No vent. She leans to her left against a pillar, weight on right leg, right hip outthrust, elbow rests on pillar. Left leg crossed over right. Lower part of the figure is draped in a himation that covers the left arm; thick, diagonal folds on the level of the hip, the rest part is transparent. Head tilted up and slightly turned to left. Face is small. Hair arranged in high, rounded mass in front. No base. Middle 4th century BC.
Fig. 2. – Standing Aphrodite 1 (Museum of Ephesus; inv. no. 3/3/01).

Author’s photo.
3This type of Aphrodite, which indicates the influence of monumental sculpture,4 began in the earlier periods and continued until the 2nd century BC with several variations.5 Similar semi-nude figures are sometimes represented leaning on a pillar and holding a mantle.6 Parallels to the figurine are common in Asia Minor and South-Italy.7 This type was also produced in Amathus where a quite similar example of an Aphrodite figurine was found at the sanctuary of Aphrodite.8
2. Standing Aphrodite (fig. 3). Sector of Artemis. Missing head and right arm. H. 11.2 cm. W. 4.2 cm. Fabric: reddish yellow, fine clay. Traces of white slip and madder yellow paint. Hollow. Back moulded. No vent. Weight on the right leg, left leg advanced. Torso and left leg are nude. She lifts the drapery behind left shoulder and carries around back; upper edge of the drapery is folded down and brought to front at hip to cover entire right leg with horizontal folds, ends at groin with looped folds. Torso is slender. No base.
Fig. 3. – Standing Aphrodite 2 (Museum of Ephesus; inv. no. 11/3/01).

Author’s photo.
4It seems that the figurine is quite close to the “Pudica Type”, which is associated with the goddess’s bath or with her birth from the sea.9 The drapery held in the goddess’ right hand is wrapped over her weight-bearing, right leg, covering her genitalia. Similar nude or semi-nude representations of Aphrodite from the Hellenistic and Roman periods are well known.10
3. Sitting Aphrodite (fig. 4). Sector of Artemis. Missing head and feet. H. 7 cm, W. 3.9 cm. Fabric: pink, micaceous and sandy. Traces of madder yellow paint at back and shoulder. Solid. Vent at the bottom as a little circular hole. Nude. Left arm at side; right hand holds an unidentified object probably a pomegranate or a flower on the level of the breast. Although torso is slender, stomach is baggy.
Fig. 4. – Sitting Aphrodite 3 (Excavation House of Claros; inv. no. KL 04, 11).

Author’s photo.
5There are parallel figurines from several sites in Greece and Asia Minor.11 Similar seated, naked figures are classified as “hierodouloi” by D. Burr Thompson,12 while, on the other hand, S. Reinach and E. Pottier identify the type as “Oriental Aphrodite”.13
4. Aphrodite and Eros (fig. 5). Sector of Artemis. Preserved: Aphrodite’s head and part of neck, Eros’ head and arm. H. 5.6 cm, W. 3.7 cm. Fabric: red clay including mica. Traces of white slip and pink paint. Figure holds a child probably on her left shoulder. Eros leans to Aphrodite’s head with his right arm and head, his facial details indistinct. Aphrodite’s face oval with triangular forehead; eyes prominent, lids slightly lifted, nose smooth, mouth narrow, lips full. As coiffure parallel waves radiate downward covering the ear. Eros has the same hair style. 4th century BC.
Fig. 5. – Aphrodite and Eros 4 (Museum of Ephesus; inv. no. 1/3/01).

Author’s photo.
6The iconographic type of a female with a child seated on her left shoulder is of Ionian origin and is usually used for Aphrodite and Eros in Ionia.14 The parallels for this figurine could suggest to restore a figure of Himeros at the right of Aphrodite.15 Other Eros figurines, represented alone or riding on a dolphin, were also found in the same area of excavation.
5. Kourotrophos (fig. 6). Sector of B.O.A (Batı Onur Anıtları / West Honorific Monuments). Complete. H. 6.5 cm, W. 2.8 cm. Fabric: reddish yellow, micaceous. Back unmodelled, hollow. No vent. She sits carrying a baby on her left breast with left arm. Tiny figure of a baby shown horizontal. Head of the woman covered by a long veil (mantle?) which falls loosely over the shoulder ends on the lap leaving the arms. Face is small, facial details are indistinct. The himation forms a wavy drapery on the knees. The lower part of the chiton is slightly detailed by vertical folds. No base. Middle 4th century BC.
Fig. 6. – Kourotrophos Nymph Nysa 5 (?) (Museum of Ephesus; inv. no. 24/22/02).

Author’s photo.
7The kourotrophos figurine16 was found in an area of approximately 3 square-meters with a hundred chous, black-glazed pottery fragments of the 4th century BC, Megarian bowl fragments of the early Hellenistic period, and coins of Colophon that are dated 350-300 BC.17 That archaeological context suggest a datation within the 4th century BC for the figurine 5. Also, its stylistic parallels from Ephesos and Halicarnassos belong to a similar date.18 The excavations carried out in this sector have shown that the area mentioned above is a bothros associated with the cult of Dionysos. It can be suggested that the kourotrophos figurine found in the bothros might represent the Nymph Nysa who carries a baby Dionysos on her lap.19
6. Artemis Kourotrophos (fig. 7). Sector of Artemis. Missing head and lower part of the body. H. 4.5 cm., W. 4.2 cm. Fabric: very pale brown. Hollow. No vent. She carries a baby with her left hand. The head of the baby, shown frontally, leans against her mother’s left breast. A veil falls over the shoulder. The arms of the baggy figure of baby are shown parallel. It has a rounded face with deep eyes, full lips. Right arm of the woman is parallel to the body, hands and fingers are prominent. 4th century BC.
Fig. 7. – Artemis Kourotrophos 6 (Excavation House of Claros; inv. no. KL 02, 6).

Author’s photo.
8The figurine is stylistically different from 5 because of its frontal position and the physical appearance of the baby figure.20 It was probably dedicated to Artemis Claria as a votive offering in relation to her epithet “Kourotrophos”, one of the most significant epithets of the goddess worshiped in the aspect of nursing mother and protector of the babies. This epithet of the Goddess comes from one of the myths, which declares that she suckles her brother Apollo as the first wet nurse. Therefore, it is believed that Artemis is the protector goddess of the newborn babies.21 In addition, in Laconia, the festivals called “Tithenidia” (nursing mother) used to be celebrated in honour of Artemis.22
7. Cybele (fig. 8). Sector of Artemis. Missing head and upper part of the body. H. 10 cm., W. 7.1 cm. Fabric: reddish yellow including full mica, traces of white slip and madder brown paint on the knees of the figure and throne. Back is missing. Hollow. She sits with a small lion which have preserved only as a back part on her lap and a phiale on her right hand.23 She wears a chiton depicted with thick, horizontal folds on the knees. The lower part of drapery is composed diagonally between the legs.
Fig. 8. – Cybele 7 (Excavation House of Claros; inv. no. KL 04, 13).

Author’s photo.
9The cult of the mother goddess Cybele preceded the cult of Apollo in this territory. The cave located on the northeast of the sanctuary might have been a cult center of the goddess.24 Moreover, a relief of Cybele was found at the exterior of the cave which is located in a place where the valley can be seen completly.25 This location of the cave is in accord with her epithet of a goddess of wild animals and of nature.
Notes de bas de page
1 Generally, for the question of “visiting gods”, i. e. representations of gods placed in the sanctuary of another god, see Alroth 1987.
2 N. Şahİn, “Klaros 2002 Yılı Kazı, Restorasyon ve Epigrafi Çalışmaları”, KST 25 (2003), 2, p. 78.
3 For the structure where the figurines were found, see N. Şahİn, “Klaros 2001 Yılı Kazı, Restorasyon ve Epigrafi Çalışmaları”, KST 24 (2002), 2, p. 83.
4 Higgins 1967, p. 67.
5 Burr Thompson 1987, p. 396.
6 See Charbonneaux 1936, pl. 71; Kriseleit, Zimmer 1994, p. 39; Paul 1962, p. 10.
7 See Charbonneaux 1936, pl. 80, p. 20; Baudat 1953, pl. IX, 17; Besques 1963, pl. 25, B°147, MYR 629, pl. 29, MYRINA 962, M14, pl. 31, MYR 26; Higgins 1967, p. 67, 27D; Besques 1972, pl. 7, D 23, D 24; Higgins 1973, pl. 54a; Töpperwein 1976, pls. 212, 214; Besques 1986, pl. 3, D 3341, D 3342, D 3343, D 3344, D 3345; Palumbo 1986, pl. 17; Kassab 1988, pl. 14, no. 73, pl. 36, no. 178, pl. 38, no. 184, pl. 40, no. 196, pl. 50, no. 254; d’Ambrosio, Borriello 1990, pl. 8,30; Merker 2000, pl. 45, H249.
8 Aupert 1981, p. 386, fig. 11.
9 The word “pudica” originates from the latin: see the related latin words “pudenda” (external genitalia) and “pudicitia” (modesty). The term “pudica” is used for Aphrodite covering her bosom and genitalia with the hands, an iconographic theme represented in various statuary types during the Hellenistic period, like Cnidian Aphrodite, Capitoline Aphrodite, Aphrodite Medicis (Delivorrias 1984, p. 49).
10 Charbonneaux 1936, p. 71, pl. 78; Besques 1963, pl. 12, MYR 28, MA 525, pl. 13, MYR 26, MYR 27; Besques 1986, pl. 4, D 3346; Merİç 2002, pl. 106, TK 6.
11 See E. Boehringer, F. Krauss, Das Temenos für den Herrscherkult, AvP 9 (1937), pl. 52, c8; Davidson 1952, pl. 19, no. 224; Besques 1972, pl. 215, D 1058; Schmidt 1994, pl. 30; Palumbo 1986, pl. 23; Töpperwein 1976, pl. 37, nos. 228, 229, 230.
12 Burr Thompson 1963, p. 87.
13 Pottier, Reinach 1887, pp. 262-265.
14 Hadzisteliou Price 1978, p. 47, figs. 34-37.
15 In the cult of Aphrodite, love and desire are the emotions which are connected between very strongly. Those two emotions are symbolised as two brothers in the myths; Eros (love) and Himeros (desire). Aphrodite carries Eros on her left shoulder because of the reason that the heart occurs on the left, and she carries Himeros on her right side or right shoulder (Simon 1985, pp. 230-231, figs. 218, 220). For a sculpture group of Aphrodite, Eros, Himeros see G.W. Elderkin, “The Venus Genetrix of Arcesilaus”, AJA 42 (1938), pp. 371-374.
16 Several kourotrophos figurines which have the same stylistic characteristics have been found in the same excavation area (BOA sector) during the 2001-2006 excavation seasons at Claros. Only one example of them is examined in this article.
17 N. Şahİn, “Klaros 2002 Yılı Kazı, Restorasyon ve Epigrafi Çalışmaları”, KST 25 (2003), 2, p. 78. For the Colophonian coins found at Claros with the name “Magistratus Ikesios” see M. Amandry, “Le trésor monétaire du Sondage 2a”, in La Genière 1992, nos. 22-23, 28-29, 32, 34; P. Kinns, Studies in the Coinage of Ionia (1980), pp. 574-576, 602-618.
18 For Ephesos see Hadzisteliou Price 1978, p. 157; Higgins 1969, pls. 551-557, Soykal Alanyali 2002, pp. 169-176, figs. 3-6; for Halicarnassos see Higgins 1967, p. 66, pl. 27C.
19 N. Şahİn, KST 25 (2003), 2, p. 78. For Nymph Nysa as the nursing mother of Dionysos, see Simon 1985, p. 271, fig. 259; Hadzisteliou Price 1978, pp. 36, 37, 126, 136.
20 For stylistic parallels to the figurine, see Blinkenberg 1931, nos. 2226, 2227, 2229, 2242; Charbonneaux 1936, p. 22; Higgins 1969, pl. 11; Richter 1953, pl. 78f; Schneider-Lengyel 1937, Taf. 28; Töpperwein 1976, pls. 29, 184.
21 Hadzisteliou Price 1978, p. 25.
22 Çelgİn 1986, p. 17; Nilsson 1955, pp. 123 and 490.
23 D. Burr Thompson states that by the end of the 5th century, the lion on Cybele figurines’ lap is not emphasized strongly and it seems like a small attribute: see Burr Thompson 1963, p. 78.
24 Şahİn 1998, p. 22.
25 La Genière 1992, p. 16, fig. 2.
Auteur
-
Elçin Doğan Gürbüzer
Ege University, Department of Tourism Guidance, Izmir, Turkey.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
Le mythe Néron
La fabrique d'un monstre dans la littérature antique (ier-ve s.)
Laurie Lefebvre
2017
Figurines de terre cuite en Méditerranée grecque et romaine
2 - Iconographie et contextes
Arthur Muller et Ergün Laflı (dir.)
2015
Corps, travail et statut social
L’apport de la paléoanthropologie funéraire aux sciences historiques
Anne-Catherine Gillis (dir.)
2014
Figurines grecques en contexte
Présence muette dans le sanctuaire, la tombe et la maison
Stéphanie Huysecom-Haxhi et Arthur Muller (dir.)
2015
Boulogne et Thérouanne au temps de César
Approche toponymique de la cité des Morins
Hubert Le Bourdellès
2009
Figures d’empire, fragments de mémoire
Pouvoirs et identités dans le monde romain impérial (IIe s. av. n. è.–VIe s. de. n. è.)
Stéphane Benoist, Anne Daguet-Gagey et Christine Hoët-van Cauwenberghe (dir.)
2011
Boulogne-sur-Mer antique, entre terre et mer
Gesoriacum-Bononia, le port et son arrière-pays
Olivier Blamangin, Angélique Demon et Christine Hoët-van Cauwenberghe (dir.)
2020
Choses vues et entendues par Pausanias
Guide des croyances de la Grèce antique
Jacques Boulogne, Marion Muller-Dufeu et Maude Picouet-de Crémoux (dir.)
2015
« Quartiers » artisanaux en Grèce ancienne
Une perspective méditerranéenne
Arianna Esposito et Giorgos M. Sanidas (dir.)
2013
