1Charles Taylor, « Die blosse Vernunft (“reason alone”) », dans : Dilemmas and Connections. Selected Essays, Cambridge et Londres, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011, p. 328.
3Charles Taylor, Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2002, p. 43‑44.
4Charles Taylor « Reason and its adventures since the enlightenment », conférence présentée dans le cadre du colloque ‘Faith + Reason: A Dialogue at the Heart of Jesuit Education’, Fordham Center on Religion and Culture, Fordham University, 2009, p. 15.
5Charles Taylor, « Die blosse Vernunft (“reason alone”) », op. cit., p. 326‑327.
6« […] the Enlightenment would be an unqualified move into error, a massive forgetting of salutary and necessary truths about the human condition. » : Ibid.
7Charles Taylor, « Reason and its adventures since the enlightenment », op. cit., p. 7.
8Charles Taylor, « Explanation and Practical Reason », dans : Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1995, p. 60.
9Charles Taylor, « Reason and its adventures since the enlightenment », op. cit., p. 13.
10Cf. Charles Taylor, « Lichtung or Lebensform : Parallels between Heidegger and Wittgenstein », dans : Philosophical Arguments, op. cit., p. 69‑70.
11« The grand theories in social science are separated by their philosophical anthropologies, their conception of how humans relate in societies, of the fundamental goals which humans pursue, of the distinction between sacred and profane, and so on. » Charles Taylor, « Die blosse Vernunft (“reason alone”) », op. cit., p. 345
12« The problem lies with the whole unreflecting assumption that “criteria” in this sense are what the argument needs. » : Charles Taylor, « Explanation and Practical Reason », op. cit., p. 41‑42.
13Charles Taylor, « Reason, Faith and Meaning », Faith and Philosophy, vol. 28, n° 1, 2011, p. 9.
14« The notion is that we are capable of grasping our own action in a way that we cannot come to know external objects or events. » Taylor, Charles, « Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind », dans : Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge, Cambridge Université Press, 1985, p. 80.
15Charles Taylor, « A Philosopher’s Postscript: Engaging the Citadel of Secular Reason », dans : Griffiths, Paul J. & Hütter, Reinhard (dir.), Reason and the Reasons of Faith, Londres, T & T Clark International, 2005, p. 349.
16Cf. Charles Taylor, « Heidegger, Language, and Ecology », dans : Philosophical Arguments, op. cit., p. 111.
17Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1989, p. 163‑164.
18Taylor discute ces arguments sous trois modalités : « Either they make better sense of inner difficulties than the interlocutor can (case 1); or they present a development which cannot be explained on the interlocutor’s own terms (case 2); or they show the transition to Y to come about through a move that is intrinsically described as error-reducing (case 3). » « Explanation and Practical Reason », dans : Philosophical Arguments, op. cit., p. 54.
19Charles Taylor (2009), « Reason and its adventures since the enlightenment », op. cit., p. 11.
21Charles Taylor, « Reason, Faith and Meaning », op. cit., p. 9.
22« […] an option between two risks of loss of truth. » Charles Taylor, Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, op. cit., p. 48‑49.
23Idem, p. 53‑60. Voir également le chapitre intitulé « The Immanent Frame » dans son magnum opus A Secular Age, Cambridge et Londres, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.
24« This seems to render hopeless the idea of drawing a line between matters of faith and those that are accessible to reason, irrespective of starting point. » Charles Taylor, « A Philosopher’s Postscript: Engaging the Citadel of Secular Reason », op. cit., p. 342.
25Cf. Charles Taylor, A Secular Age, op. cit., p. 833
26Charles Taylor, « Reason, Faith and Meaning », op. cit., p. 9.
27Charles Taylor, « Reason and its adventures since the enlightenment », op. cit., p. 16.
28Charles Taylor, « A Catholic Modernity? », dans : Dilemmas and Connections. Selected Essays, op. cit., p. 167.
29Charles Taylor, « Overcoming Epistemology », dans : Philosophical Arguments, op. cit., p. 14.
30Charles Taylor & David Mcpherson, « Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor », Philosophy & Theology, vol. 24, n° 2, 2012, p. 294.
31Charles Taylor (2005) « A Philosopher’s Postscript: Engaging the Citadel of Secular Reason », op. cit., p. 339.