The rough and the smooth
Care and carelessness in the forgetting of buildings
p. 61-73
Résumé
In this paper I explore tensions between the perceived instantaneity of human intentionality, and the slowness of material agency. When archaeologists describe ‘intentional destruction’ or ‘ritual killing’, they imply human actions directed at materials that are instantaneous: the smashing of a figurine, the burning of a building. These are instances in which even in prehistory one might have some notion of the intentionality underlying human agency. But what of more gradual processes of change, when the agency of materials is more prominent, as houses collapse ‘by themselves’, or artefacts ‘simply’ disintegrate? Do such situations really imply an absence of intentionality? If abandonment or disintegration results from a lack of investment in materialities – a kind of carelessness, or even negligence – then is this not also a form of (passive) intentionality? Allowing materialities to take their course can amount to an absence of care – and such absence can be just as willful as active destruction. I will develop these ideas by drawing on recent work in architectural theory, and archaeological and ethnoarchaeological observations from the Aegean on the temporality of buildings. Some buildings are forgotten or grow old with care, others without. The aim, then, is to raise questions concerning the loci of agency and intentionality that are of relevance more broadly for studies of material culture and society.
Extrait
Introduction
1Intentional destruction (e.g. ‘ritual killing’) is an intervention in the ‘normal’ life history of an object. It is often dramatic, staged, and intended to align with the biological death of an individual. The question then is, what is the point of such an intervention? In some cases, perhaps especially when the destruction is visited upon the object by outside aggressors, the aim is for such an episode to be terminal. However, it also seems quite possible that in other instances, intentional destruction is actually intended to facilitate renewal. Although this may seem counterintuitive, I shall argue here that destruction is in many cases an act of care.
2For an act of intentional destruction to have this power, the implication is that the slow ‘normal’ death of an object entails a lack of care. But what is a ‘normal’ life history? We cannot be normative in anticipating life histories to be predictable, but at the very least an object can be expected to gradually
Les formats HTML, PDF et ePub de cet ouvrage sont accessibles aux usagers des bibliothèques qui l’ont acquis dans le cadre de l’offre OpenEdition Freemium for Books. L’ouvrage pourra également être acheté sur les sites des libraires partenaires, aux formats PDF et ePub, si l’éditeur a fait le choix de cette diffusion commerciale. Si l’édition papier est disponible, des liens vers les librairies sont proposés sur cette page.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
Du Phénotype au génotype
Analyse de la syntaxe spatiale en architecture minoenne (MMIIIB – MRIB)
Quentin Letesson
2009
PERIFEREIA Étude régionale de la Crète aux Minoen Récent II-IIIB (1450-1200 av. J.-C.)
La Crète centrale et occidentale
Charlotte Langohr
2009
Minoan Realities
Approaches to Images, Architecture, and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age
Diamantis Panagiotopoulos et Ute Günkel-Maschek (dir.)
2012
Excavations at Sissi III
Preliminary Report on the 2011 Campaign
Jan Driessen, Charlotte Langohr, Quentin Letesson et al.
2012
Minoan Archaeology
Perspectives for the 21st Century
Sarah Cappel, Ute Günkel-Maschek et Diamantis Panagiotopoulos (dir.)
2015
THRAVSMA
Contextualising the Intentional Destruction of Objects in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus
Kate Harrell et Jan Driessen (dir.)
2015
How Long is a Century?
Late Minoan IIIB Pottery. Relative Chronology and Regional Differences
Charlotte Langohr (dir.)
2017