1 E.g. Cooey 1994.
2 E.g. Sofaer 2006.
3 E.g. Meskell 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001.
4 E.g. Csordas 1993.
5 E.g. Gombrich 1982, 1991; Turner 1983, 2008.
6 E.g. Turnbull 2002.
7 E.g. Bourdieu 2005; Fraser 2005.
8 E.g. Merleau-Ponty 2006.
9 Hamilakis 2002; Shilling 2008.
10 E.g. Chapman 2000; Chapman and Gaydarska 2007; Fowler 2008.
11 Cooey 1994.
12 E.g. Borić and Robb 2008; Tarlow 2002, 24; Fraser and Greco 2005, 43–6.
13 Wedde 1999.
14 Morris 2001, 2009.
15 Morris and Peatfield 2002.
16 Goodison 2001, 2004.
17 Malafouris 2009.
18 Voutsaki 2010.
19 Rehak 1999.
20 E.g. Alberti 2001, 2002.
21 Mina 2008.
22 Hitchcock 1997.
23 Adams 2004.
24 Preston 2004a, 2004b.
25 German 2005; also see German 2000; and, to a lesser extent, McGowan 2006.
26 Vansteenhuyse 2006.
27 Fox 2008; also see Tsamis 2006.
28 Nafplioti, this volume.
29 Hamilakis 1998, 2002, 2008. This cursory list is by no means exhaustive, of course.
30 See also e.g. Mina, Nafplioti, Peters, Soar, Zeman-Wiśniewska, this volume.
31 Kopytoff 1986.
32 E.g. Kopytoff 1989; Gosden and Marshall 1999; Joy 2009.
33 Malafouris 2008, esp.118; Whitley 2002; Voutsaki 2010, esp. 82.
34 Appadurai 1986.
35 Kopytoff 1986.
36 Hoskins 2006.
37 Sofaer 2006.
38 Hamilakis 2002.
39 Gosden and Marshall 1999.
40 Joy 2009.
41 Cf. Hamilakis 2002, 122; also see Hamilakis et al. 2002, 11.
42 Cf. Malafouris 2008, esp.120; Fowler 2008, 47.
43 Sofaer 2006, 70–9, esp. 84, 86.
44 See also Fowler 2008, 48.
45 Cf. Sofaer 2006, 64; Betancourt et al. 2008; Maggidis 1998; Hamilakis et al. 2002, 11.
46 Cf. Shilling 2008, 150, who makes a similar point.
47 Sofaer 2006, 30. Also see Hamilakis 1998, 116.
48 Voutsaki 2010, 90. See also Meskell 1998, 153; Tarlow 2002, 26; Malafouris 2008, 116; Borić and Robb 2008, 3; and Joy 2009, 545 for an application of the relational approach to object biographies/identities.
49 My definition overlaps, but does not coincide, with Grosz 1995, 4 (as cited in Joyce 2005, 141).
50 Meskell 1998, 159.
51 E.g. Meskell 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001.
52 E.g. Joyce 2005.
53 Rautman 2000.
54 Sofaer 2006.
55 Gosden and Marshall1999.
56 Joy 2009.
57 Voutsaki 2010.
58 See also Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010c.
59 Rethemiotakis 1998, 2001; Pilali-Papasteriou 1992; Rutkowski 1991; Sakellaraki 1995.
60 Krzyszkowska 2005; Weingarten 1983; Tsagaraki 2006.
61 Maggidis 1998.
62 E.g. van de Moortel 1997.
63 Branigan 2001.
64 This is in direct response to the caveat expressed by Boyd 2002, 138 (quoted in Joyce 2005, 151) for combining examinations of “food consumption, treatment of the dead body, treatment of the living body, and body representation”.
65 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010c, 127, on the Minoan Body database; cf. Jasink et al. 2006.
66 This is the overall, and long-term, aim of the project, which I have been conducting since 2007.
67 Simandiraki 2008.
68 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010a; Simandiraki-Grimshaw and Stevens 2012.
69 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2011.
70 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010b.
71 Cf. Joy 2009. As Voutsaki (2010, 91), again, rightly puts it: “each person consisted of a unique combination of intersecting vectors of difference, had different allegiances, had a unique biography engaging with different groups and communities in different stages of his/her life, and hence positioned him-/herself differently regarding cultural traditions and social obligations. Each person contained the potential for change”.
72 E.g. Morris 2009, 185, states: “the diversity of the figurines is only imperfectly glimpsed through the currently published material”. I would add that this is true for most somatic occurrences, from figurines to skeletal remains. Cf. Meskell 1998, 147 on experience conflation.
73 Cf. Malafouris 2008, 121; Hamilakis et al. 2002, 2. My approach is an explicit, positive response to Hamilakis 1998, 116: “we should try and comprehend humans in the past as embodied social relationships, with sensory and emotive properties”.
74 Younger n.d.
75 E.g. Kyriakides 2004; Polinger Foster 1997.
76 Joyce 2005, 144; Malafouris 2008, 118.
77 Joyce 2005, 145.
78 Cf. Voutsaki 2010, 91.
79 Liston in Tsipopoulou and Vagnetti 1995; Arnott in Betancourt and Davaras 2003, 157–58; McGeorge 1987, 412; 1988, 49.
80 McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 578.
81 McGeorge 1987, 408; 1988, 48; 2008, 118–19.
82 But exceptions did exist, e.g. some septuagenarian occurrences, McGeorge 1988, 48.
83 McGeorge 1988, 53.
84 McGeorge 1987, 412; 1988, 51; Arnott 1999, 500.
85 E.g. McGeorge 1988, 52.
86 Arnott in Betancourt and Davaras 2003, 157, 159.
87 McGeorge 2008, 123–24.
88 McGeorge 1988, 50; Arnott 1999, 503.
89 Arnott in Betancourt and Davaras 2003, 158; Gowland in Preston 2005, 122 for examples from Chania and Armenoi.
90 McGeorge 1988, 53.
91 McGeorge 2008, 125.
92 E.g. McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 581–89; these occur in both men and women.
93 E.g. Gowland in Preston 2005, 119; see also McGeorge 1987, 411, for an individual with a long-term habit of chewing food on the less painful side of his/her mouth.
94 Arnott in Betancourt and Davaras 2003, 157; McGeorge 1987, 409; 1988, 53; Gowland in Preston 2005, 118, also citing parallels. This is commonly attributed to the consumption of more carbohydrates.
95 McGeorge 1987, 408; 1988, 48.
96 McGeorge 1988, 53.
97 McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 590.
98 McGeorge 1987, 408–9, 412; 1988, 48; 2008; McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 578.
99 McGeorge 1987, 414.
100 McGeorge 1987, 413; 1988, 49; McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 594; Arnott 1999, 502.
101 McGeorge 1988, 52.
102 McGeorge 1987, 414–15; McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 578, 581, 586–94.
103 Cf. Arnott 1999, 501.
104 Younger n.d.
105 Arnott 2008.
106 Cf. Joyce 2005, 147–49.
107 Younger n.d.
108 E.g. Militello 1998, pl. O3–4.
109 Cf. Younger n.d.
110 Evans 1967, pl. B, fig. 2.
111 MacGillivray et al. 2000, pl.15.
112 Evans 1967, pl. V, fig. 4.
113 Rethemiotakis 2001, col.pl. 2.
114 Cf. Wells 2008, 83.
115 E.g. CMS VI, no. 101a.
116 I thank O. Krzyszkowska for this reference.
117 Becker 1975.
118 Carr 1960, 120–21; Wall et al. 1986; Gowland in Peston 2005, esp.118–21; Nafplioti, this volume.
119 Preston 1999.
120 Hamilakis 1998; Isaakidou 2007.
121 Hamilakis 1998; Simandiraki 2008.
122 Cf. Howes 2006; also see Hamilakis’s (1998, 128; Hamilakis et al. 2002, 10) fundamental social and corporeal notion of “gastropolitics”, following Appadurai.
123 Cf. Hamilakis 1998, 117; Mitchell 2006.
124 Cf. Morris and Peatfield 2002, 111–15; Morris and Peatfield 2004; Morris 2004, 35–42.
125 Cf. Stevens 2007, esp. on issues of proximity.
126 Peatfield 1992.
127 Evans 1901–1902, 97.
128 Hägg 1985; Cameron 1987; Immerwahr 1990; Hood 2005, 63–4.
129 Hood 2005, 64.
130 Cameron 1987, 327, fig. 11.
131 Cf. Hamilakis 2002, esp. 128; 2008; Howes 2006. New sensorial readings of e.g. Cameron’s (1987), Palyvou’s (1987) and Immerwahr’s (2000) work, combining e.g. approaches employed by Goodison 2001, 2004, may yield surprising new insights into spatial bodily manipulation and the management of impression and emotion.
132 Cf. Berg 2004; Turnbull 2002; Hamilakis 2002, 129 on the “sensory landscape”; also see Liston’s (in Tsipopoulou and Vagnetti 1995) point about the pronounced musculature of the people in Achladia, which she attributes to a “lifetime of walking”.
133 Hallager 1985, fig. 13.
134 Cf. Sakellarakis and Sapouna-Sakellaraki 1997, I, fig. 253; Müller 2005.
135 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010a.
136 Simandiraki-Grimshaw and Stevens 2012.
137 Also see Morris’ discussion on hybridity, i.e. “collapsing of boundaries of the self” as an experiential outcome of altered states of consciousness, Morris 2004, 40.
138 Cf. Voutsaki 2010.
139 Cf. Busby 1997.
140 Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010b; Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2013.
141 Hamilakis et al. 2002, 11.
142 Cf. Fowler 2008, 51–2.
143 Cf. Fowler 2008, who makes a crucial case for “fractal persons”. This notion, in turn, may enhance our understanding of fragmentation and dismemberment of biological and represented Minoan human bodies.
144 Peatfield 1992, fig. 21.
145 Peatfield 1992, fig. 22.
146 E.g. Rutkowski 1991, pl. XLV, no. 14.
147 E.g. Ferrence in Betancout et al. 2008, 570.
148 Sakellarakis and Sapouna-Sakellaraki 1997, II, figs. 841, 845.
149 E.g. Evans 1967, pl. VI, fig. 12.
150 Wall et al. 1986.
151 Arnott in Betancourt and Davaras 2003, 162; he argues that the Knossian bodies might indicate “surgeons”, rather than “butchers”.
152 Soles 2010, 332–33.
153 Maggidis 1998.
154 Betancourt et al. 2008.
155 McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 578.
156 McGeorge in Betancourt et al. 2008, 580.
157 Hamilakis 1998, 123; 2002, 128; cf. Fowler 2008, 50.
158 E.g. the Archanes footstool (Sakellarakis and Sapouna-Sakellaraki 1997, II, fig. 841) would have created the effect of a biological foot stepping on a zone of represented warrior heads.
159 Cf. the human bone grid excavated in the Hagios Charalambos cave, Betancourt et al. 2008, 541, 543, fig. 5.
160 Sakellarakis and Sapouna-Sakellaraki 1997, II, fig. 532.
161 Hägg 1983; Sapouna-Sakellarakis 1995, pl. 53.
162 MacGillivray et al. 2000; Sackett 2006, fig. 11 c, d.
163 Cf. Gombrich 1991, 12.
164 Cf. Morris 2009, 183, figs. 15.2, 15.3; also Joyce 2005, 146.
165 Compare e.g. Rethemiotakis 2001, front cover with idem, fig. 101.
166 The suggestion of Gates (2004, 42) becomes relevant here, according to which the introduction of pictorial wall paintings in the Neopalatial era might have occurred “because of the need or desirability of such imagery in an evolved sociopolitical framework of newly centralized authority for which the veneration of nature and the importance of religious ritual have become its metaphysical foundation”.
167 Cf. Malafouris 2008, 116; Voutsaki 2010, 87.
168 Morris 2009, 179.
169 Cf. Logue 2004.
170 Isaakidou 2007.
171 Preston 1999.
172 Wall et al. 1986.
173 Cf. Branigan et al. 2002.
174 V. Petrakis, pers.comm.19/7/2011.
175 Cf. Landenius Enegren 2008.
176 E.g. Baumbach 1987; Steele 2009.
177 E.g. Killen 1964.
178 Driessen 2000.
179 Malafouris (2008, 116), examining Mycenaean sensoriality, talks about the “construction and social appropriation of a new sensory environment emphasising certain properties, media, and themes of representation …”.
180 Cf. Hamilakis et al. 2002, 2; Preston 2004.
181 Cf. Bennet and Davis 1999.
* I would like to thank first of all the organisers of the conference, for their acceptance of my paper. I would additionally like to thank the Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, whose Margo Tytus Research Fellowship enabled me to access several relevant materials in 2009. A previous version of this paper was delivered at the Mycenaean Seminar in 2009 (see Simandiraki-Grimshaw 2010c): I thank all colleagues who provided valuable feedback. Finally, I thank Fay Stevens, who, during one of our fruitful discussions, suggested I use the term “zonation”.