• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 15974 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 15974 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • Presses des Mines
  • ›
  • Économie et gestion
  • ›
  • Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Eng...
  • ›
  • Resilience As Resource-based Design Of A...
  • Presses des Mines
  • Presses des Mines
    Presses des Mines
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral 1 Safety And Resilience In Anesthesia 2 A Study of Anticipation Processes In Anesthesia 3 Results 4 Conclusion Acknowledgement Bibliographie Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Resilience As Resource-based Design Of Anticipated Situations

    Lucie Cuvelier et Pierre Falzon

    p. 72-78

    Texte intégral Bibliographie References Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Texte intégral

    1 Safety And Resilience In Anesthesia

    1.1 From safety to resilience

    1Traditional safety approaches are focused on risks prevention: they rely on models that explain the origin of adverse events and the mechanisms of their occurrence from causal explanations Even if the shape of these models has changed (sequential, epidemiological or migrational models) and the risk factors have evolved (technical, human, organizational or economic factors), the origin of adverse events is always attributed to the presence of causes, more or less close to the “ultimate event”, that lead to the drift of the system toward an incidental chained scenario (Hollnagel, 2004, 2010; Sheridan, 2008). Thus, in all these traditional approaches, improving safety requires actions against these risk factors, aiming as far as possible to remove them. In practice, this means the establishment of different types of barriers (physical, functional, symbolic, etc.), the purpose of which is to avoid or control anticipated failures (Hollnagel, 2004). In these approaches, it is more or less explicitly accepted that these barriers enhance safety. In other words, if the system remains within the expected margins, there will be no accidents, as if the existence and application of formalisms developed to deal with anticipated failures could ensure the absence of risk.

    2These traditional approaches have limitations that have been the subject of much criticism in recent decades. On the one hand, socio-technical systems have evolved a lot, making “obsolete” the tools previously used: in the complex and "ultra safe" systems of today, traditional measures no longer lead to progress in terms of safety and may even be counterproductive (Amalberti, 2001; Dien, 1998). On the other hand, traditional approaches have inherent limitations:

    • They seek to reduce and constrain the variabilities of situations without taking into account the existence of a mandatory gap between prescribed work and real work. In doing, so, they ignore that safety is also based on the strategies, initiatives, tinkering and ingenuity brought by individual and collective skills in real time (Cook, Render, & Woods, 2000; Daniellou, Simard, & Boissières, 2009; Leplat, 1998).
    • They are based on causal explanations focused on failures that do not understand how risks (and even less how safety) emerge from “normal conditions”. In this sense, they do not improve our knowledge of real situations but aim rather to establish reassuring certainties that ensure stakeholders that the threat revealed by the failures is now under control (Hollnagel, Pariès, Woods, & Wreathall, 2010; Woods & Cook, 2002).

    3A radical revision of how we think about risks and safety is then needed. This is the goal of the “resilience engineering” approach. As a matter off fact, the concept of “resilience” is not yet stabilized (Sheridan, 2008). According to the latest definition proposed by Hollnagel, it means: " the intrinsic ability of a system to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following changes and disturbances, so that it can sustain required operations under both expected and unexpected conditions” (2010, p. xxxvi). The many debates around this definition question the way we describe and understand the systems and the variable conditions under which they operate. In particular, they invite us to move our safety analysis from an approach focused on failures to a more general understanding of “safely acting”: the resilience’s studies aim not only to understand why a system is safe but also to identify what enables it to be effective and efficient in all conditions. Their goal is not so much to understand the causes of negative events, but to understand how operators at various levels in organizations adapt and act, so that the system can function and achieve its goals under variable conditions foreseen or not (Hollnagel, 2010).

    4To investigate this question, an empirical study was conducted in the pediatric anesthesia services of two French hospitals. This medical specialty has the double advantage of being both an ultra-safe discipline, viewed as a pioneer in the field of patient safety, and a practice that has to cope with a high level of uncertainty and variability related to the complexity and the impredictability of the human body (Gaba, 2000; Xiao, 1994). The question is then: what are the characteristics of anesthetists’ activities which allow them to face variable situations, more or less unexpected, while achieving high levels of safety, i.e. to be resilient ?

    1.2 Disturbances in anesthesia: “potential situations” and “unthought situations”

    5A first study was conducted in order to characterize the disturbances that the “anesthesia system” is facing (Cuvelier & Falzon, 2010). Its goal was twofold: it was both to describe the variability of situations and their potential risks to patients and to begin to grasp the "coping strategies" implemented by anesthetists to avoid the negative consequences of this variability. The results characterize two types of critical disturbed situations endangering patients’ lives: the “potential situations” and the “unthought situations”. They show that the way anesthetists manage disruptions is not simply dependent on the nature of the disturbances themselves (often described by their frequencies or their level of complexity), but mainly depends on the anticipation of these disruptions by operators who take care of the patient in context. In other words, having or not planned and prepared the resources a priori changes the management of disturbances. Thus, two perspectives have emerged to further investigate resilience in anesthesia. One possible avenue concerns the occurrence, during the surgical operation, of an “unthought situation”, i.e an event that was not envisaged before it occurrence. In that case, the objective is to investigate the mechanisms of decisions made by anesthetists and their team to immediately manage situations that have not been foreseen as “possible” ones. A second avenue concerns the preoperative definition of an envelope of “potential situations” that could occur during the surgical intervention. This second perspective aims to describe the way in which anesthetists anticipate “potential situations” and prepare themselves to manage them. This “anticipating factor”, concerns the anesthetists’ ability to “know what to expect, that is how to anticipate developments, threats, and opportunities further into the future” (Hollnagel, 2010, p. xxxvii). This resilience factor will be developed in this paper.

    2 A Study of Anticipation Processes In Anesthesia

    6To investigate how anesthetists anticipate “potential situations”, we conducted a study based on field observations and on simulation-based interviews. The general principle of these interviews was to submit the same two cases on paper to several anesthetists in the presence of a researcher: a classic case, frequently encountered by pediatric anesthetists (bilateral inguinal hernia in a 6 months-old former premature) and a more complex one (syndactyly in a 2 year old child with a rare disease). These 2 clinical cases have been constructed by an expert anesthestist from real cases. The interviews were conducted using a think-aloud verbalization technique (Walker, 2005): anesthetists were presented data from the 2 cases and were asked to think aloud how they planned anesthesia. The researcher could, at any time, ask participants to explain certain points in order to obtain decision rules used by operators. Twenty anesthetists varying in experience and working in two hospitals voluntarily participated (cf. Figure 1).

    Image img01.jpg

    Figure 1: Distribution of interviewed anesthetists according to their hospital and to their seniority in the profession

    7The interviews were recorded and fully transcribed for a thematic analysis of content. Following the resilience approach, the analysis did not focus on risk analysis, targeting for example only the failures anticipated by anesthetists. Rather, it aimed to understand how anesthetists prepare themselves to act, by imagining possible future situations, which include disturbances but also opportunities. Thus, data processing focused on the main decision made by anesthetists during the pre-anesthetic consultation in the 2 cases (i.e. the decision made by each of the 20 physicians, which also proved to be the most detailed decision). In the complex case, it concerns the arrangements envisaged for intubation (intubation by laryngoscopy, fiberoptic intubation or “no intubation”). In the classic case, it relates to anesthesia techniques proposed by each of the 20 physicians (general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, etc.).

    3 Results

    3.1 Several possible solutions and a diversity of anaesthetists’ practices

    8Results show that to ensure patient safety, all anesthetists do not choose the same solution. First, in both cases, most physicians retained several possible solutions. Secondly, the various alternatives proposed in the sample are variably retained or rejected (cf.Table 1): while some solutions are consensual (eg, intubation by endoscopy in the complex case), others reveal diversified practices among anesthetists (eg, the solution “Spinal Regional Anesthesia (RA) alone” in the simple case)

    Table 1: Diversity of anesthetists’pratices in the 2 clinical cases. The table shows the positioning of of the 20 anesthetists vis-à-vis the possible solutions in the 2 cases (the total of each line is equal to 20). GA = General Anesthesia; RA = Regional Anesthesia

    Image img02.jpg

    9Thus, several solutions seem possible to manage an intervention, even for a classic case. The activity of anesthetists may, in this sense, be compared to a “design activity”: despite the existence of rules (protocols treatment established under the principles of the Evidence Base Medicine), there is not one “good solution” but several more or less satisfactory solutions, according to the trade-off made between the various criteria for solving the problem. In order to understand how anesthetists “know what to expect” and describing their ability “to address the potential” (Hollnagel et al., 2010), we need therefore to identify the criteria they take into account to develop the most suitable solution according to the singularity of situation.

    3.2 Analysis of decision criteria

    10The rejection or the selection of solutions by each physician is the result of a trade-off that aims to ensure the patient's anesthesia in the best conditions of comfort and safety. Thus the trade-off criteria have been identified and categorized (see example below).

    Table 2: Example of the analysis of data collected

    Image img03.jpg

    11The analysis of these decision criteria revealed that the choice of a technique rests on two types of criteria: the management of risks for the patient and the management of resources available to to handle the situation. The assessment of risks for the patient (60 risk-related criteria were mentioned in the classic case, 38 in the more complex case) refers exclusively to the management of "clinical risks" in medicine (Figure 2). It aims to ensure "maximum distance" vis-à-vis the adverse effects of the intervention for the patients’ health (respiratory risks, risk of bleeding, etc.). The evaluation of this "distance to adverse effects" by physicians is strongly referenced to their general knowledge regarding undesirable consequences of the techniques. Indeed, in all the verbalizations based on clinical risk management, the use of safety rules and of treatment protocols is very present.

    12The criteria for "resources management" refers to management of "extrinsic" resources (i.e. ressources extrinsic to the operators: material, technical, organizational,) but also to the management of their "intrinsic" resources (skills, abilities, attention, cognitive resources, local rules of the trade, etc.). In our results, the resources impacting physicians' decisions concerns mainly the intrinsic resources developed by anesthetists during practice (28 resource-related criteria were mentioned in the classic case and 32 in the other one) (cf. Figure 2.). This management of resources may be individual. In that case, anesthetists take into account their own skills and knowledge in order to choose a strategy that they master (choosing a technique that is better mastered, choosing a “personally preferred” technique). The management of resources is also collective. This means that anesthetists take into account in their decision the skills of their colleagues who are likely to provide anesthesia as well as the “standard practices” adopted locally in a team1 (choosing a technique mastered by their colleagues, choosing “a “standard technique” preferred in the institution).

    Image img04.jpg

    Figure 2: Decision criteria mentioned by the 20 anesthetists in the 2 cases

    4 Conclusion

    13Anethetists’ main objective during the planning phase is to design an envelope of "possible situations" adjusted to the resources (especially “intrinsic” resources) of the operators who are involved and who could be involved in these situations. The strategies chosen are not solely intended to be compliant ones, for which “action resources” are prepared. They must first be “controllable situations” for the team, and therefore they reflect the skills, the know-how and the individual and collective preferences of operators. To design these envelopes of "possible situations", anesthetists articulated procedural knowledge about risks and local knowledge regarding their own resources and those of their colleagues. This indicates that ultra safe performance in highly variable systems cannot be achieved only through standardization but also through the possibility and ability of the subjects to adapt their practices to their practical experience and to that of their colleagues. In other words, the development of resilience includes, in addition to the assessment of “external” risks to the patient based on protocols and rules (established by evidence-based medicine), the assessment and the management of individual and collective resources developed in each service, at the local level.

    14In anesthesia, the implementation of these mechanisms of management of their own

    15resources by the operators is possible thanks to two major organizational conditions. The first is that the rules are designed with the aim to empower operators and not to control them. This means firstly that “safety rules” are not "separate", "independent", or divorced from “action rules”. And secondly, it means that these rules do not replace decisions, that are necessarily localized and singular (Dien, 1998).

    16Second, in order for these individual and collective resources management mechanisms to be developed:

    • organizations must be designed so that they integrate and value the collective activity. This means in particular that local rules and shared work practices can be developed within each institution, at the interface between the formal protocols and the actual practice in context. In this perspective, a way to improve resilience is to enable the development of the collective activity that allows “local standard practices” to be shared (Mollo & Falzon, 2008)
    • work situations must be favorable to continuous skill development. This means in particular that the working and training conditions aim at developing one’s knowledge about their own expertise (Falzon, 2008).

    Acknowledgement

    17This study was supported by a grant from the “Haute Autorité de Santé”.

    Bibliographie

    Des DOI sont automatiquement ajoutés aux références bibliographiques par Bilbo, l’outil d’annotation bibliographique d’OpenEdition. Ces références bibliographiques peuvent être téléchargées dans les formats APA, Chicago et MLA.

    Format

    • APA
    • Chicago
    • MLA
    Amalberti, R. (2001). The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science, 37(2-3), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00045-x
    Cook, R. I. (2000). Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ, 320(7237), 791-794. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791
    Pariès, J., & Wreathall, J. (2017). Resilience Engineering in Practice (E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. Woods, & J. Wreathall, Eds.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781317065265
    Dien, Y. (1998). Safety and application of procedures, or `how do `they’ have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?’. Safety Science, 29(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00021-6
    Gaba, D. M. (2000). Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. BMJ, 320(7237), 785-788. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785
    Hollnagel, E. (2016). Barriers and Accident Prevention. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261737
    Hollnagel, E. (2017). The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315616247
    Leplat, J. (1998). About implementation of safety rules. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00022-8
    Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2008). The development of collective reliability: a study of therapeutic decision-making. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(3), 223-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220701195186
    Sheridan, T. B. (2008). Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas. Human Factors, 50(3), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x250773
    Stanton, N. A., Hedge, A., Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., & Hendrick, H. W. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203489925
    Woods, D. D., & Cook, R. I. (2002). Nine Steps to Move Forward from Error. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110200012
    Amalberti, R. “The Paradoxes of Almost Totally Safe Transportation Systems”. Safety Science 37, no. 2-3 (March 2001): 109-26. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00045-x.
    Cook, R. I. “Gaps in the Continuity of Care and Progress on Patient Safety”. BMJ 320, nos. 7237 (March 18, 2000): 791-94. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791.
    Pariès, Jean, and John Wreathall. Resilience Engineering in Practice. Edited by Erik Hollnagel, Jean Pariès, David Woods, and John Wreathall. []. CRC Press, 2017. doi:10.1201/9781317065265.
    Dien, Y. “Safety and Application of Procedures, or `how Do `they’ Have to Use Operating Procedures in Nuclear Power plants?’”. Safety Science 29, nos. 3 (August 1998): 179-87. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00021-6.
    Gaba, D. M. “Anaesthesiology As a Model for Patient Safety in Health Care”. BMJ 320, nos. 7237 (March 18, 2000): 785-88. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785.
    Hollnagel, Erik. Barriers and Accident Prevention. []. Routledge, 2016. doi:10.4324/9781315261737.
    Hollnagel, Erik. The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off. []. CRC Press, 2017. doi:10.1201/9781315616247.
    Leplat, J. “About Implementation of Safety Rules”. Safety Science. Elsevier BV, August 1998. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00022-8.
    Mollo, Vanina, and Pierre Falzon. “The Development of Collective Reliability: A Study of Therapeutic Decision-Making”. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 9, nos. 3 (May 2008): 223-54. doi:10.1080/14639220701195186.
    Sheridan, Thomas B. “Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas”. Human Factors 50, nos. 3 (June 2008): 418-26. doi:10.1518/001872008x250773.
    Stanton, Neville Anthony, Alan Hedge, Karel Brookhuis, Eduardo Salas, and Hal W. Hendrick, eds. “Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods”. []. CRC Press, August 30, 2004. doi:10.1201/9780203489925.
    Woods, D. D., and R. I. Cook. “Nine Steps to Move Forward from Error”. Cognition, Technology &Amp; Work. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, June 1, 2002. doi:10.1007/s101110200012.
    Amalberti, R. “The Paradoxes of Almost Totally Safe Transportation Systems”. Safety Science, vols. 37, no. 2-3, Mar. 2001, pp. 109-26. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00045-x.
    Cook, R. I. “Gaps in the Continuity of Care and Progress on Patient Safety”. BMJ, vols. 320, nos. 7237, Mar. 2000, pp. 791-4. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791.
    Pariès, Jean, and John Wreathall. Resilience Engineering in Practice. [], Edited by Erik Hollnagel et al., CRC Press, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781317065265.
    Dien, Y. “Safety and Application of Procedures, or `how Do `they’ Have to Use Operating Procedures in Nuclear Power plants?’”. Safety Science, vols. 29, nos. 3, Aug. 1998, pp. 179-87. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00021-6.
    Gaba, D. M. “Anaesthesiology As a Model for Patient Safety in Health Care”. BMJ, vols. 320, nos. 7237, Mar. 2000, pp. 785-8. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785.
    Hollnagel, Erik. Barriers and Accident Prevention. [], Routledge, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261737.
    Hollnagel, Erik. The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off. [], CRC Press, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315616247.
    Leplat, J. “About Implementation of Safety Rules”. Safety Science, vols. 29, nos. 3, Elsevier BV, Aug. 1998, pp. 189-04. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00022-8.
    Mollo, Vanina, and Pierre Falzon. “The Development of Collective Reliability: A Study of Therapeutic Decision-Making”. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vols. 9, nos. 3, May 2008, pp. 223-54. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220701195186.
    Sheridan, Thomas B. “Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas”. Human Factors, vols. 50, nos. 3, June 2008, pp. 418-26. CrossRef, https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x250773.
    Stanton, Neville Anthony, et al., editors. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. [], CRC Press, 30 Aug. 2004. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203489925.
    Woods, D. D., and R. I. Cook. “Nine Steps to Move Forward from Error”. Cognition, Technology &Amp; Work, vols. 4, nos. 2, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 1 June 2002, pp. 137-44. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110200012.

    Cette bibliographie a été enrichie de toutes les références bibliographiques automatiquement générées par Bilbo en utilisant Crossref.

    References

    10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00045-X :

    Amalberti, R. (2001). The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science, 37(2-3), 109-126.

    10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791 :

    Cook, R., Render, M., & Woods, D. D. (2000). Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. British Medical Journal, 320, 791-794.

    10.1201/9781317065265 :

    Cuvelier, L., & Falzon, P. (2010). Coping with Uncertainty. Resilient Decisions in Anaesthesia. In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. Woods & J. Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook (pp. 29-43). Ashgate: Studies in Resilience Engineering.

    Daniellou, F., Simard, M., & Boissières, I. (2009). Facteurs humains et organisationnels de la sécurité industrielle : un état de l'art. Toulouse: FonCSI.

    10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00021-6 :

    Dien, Y. (1998). Safety and application of procedures, or how do "they" have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants? Safety Science, 29(3), 179-187.

    Falzon, P. (2008). Enabling safety: issues in design and continuous design. Cognition, Technology and Work, 10, 7-14.

    10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785 :

    Gaba, D. M. (2000). Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 320(7237), 785-788.

    10.4324/9781315261737 :

    Hollnagel, E. (2004). Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    10.1201/9781315616247 :

    Hollnagel, E. (2010). Prologue : The scope of resilience engineering. In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. Woods & J. Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook. Ashgate: Studies in Resilience Engineering.

    Hollnagel, E., Pariès, J., Woods, D., & Wreathall, J. (2010). Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook: Ashgate Studies in Resilience Engineering.

    10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00022-8 :

    Leplat, J. (1998). About implementation of safety rules. Safety Science, 29(3), 189-204.

    10.1080/14639220701195186 :

    Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2008). The development of collective reliability: a study of therapeutic decision-making. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(3), 223-254.

    10.1518/001872008X250773 :

    Sheridan, T. (2008). Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas. Human Factors, 50(3), 418-426.

    10.1201/9780203489925 :

    Walker, G. (2005). Verbal protocol analysis. In N. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas & H. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors an Ergonomics Methods (pp. 30.31 - 30.39). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

    10.1007/s101110200012 :

    Woods, D., & Cook, R. (2002). Nine Steps to Move Forward from Error. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4(2), 137-144.

    Xiao, Y. (1994). Interacting with complex work environments: a field study and a planning model. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.

    Notes de bas de page

    1 In France the physician carrying out the consultation and the preparation of anesthesia is not necessarily the one who will perform anesthesia during the surgery.

    Auteurs

    • Lucie Cuvelier

      CNAM, CRTD, Equipe Ergonomie, Paris. Lucie.cuvelier@cnam.fr

    • Pierre Falzon

      CNAM, CRTD, Equipe Ergonomie, Paris. pierre.falzon@cnam.fr

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    Journées d’étude MTO’2011

    Pierre-Michel Riccio et Daniel Bonnet (dir.)

    2012

    Construire la biodiversité

    Construire la biodiversité

    Processus de conception de « biens communs »

    Julie Labatut

    2010

    Évaluation des coûts

    Évaluation des coûts

    Éléments d’une théorie de la gestion

    Claude Riveline

    2005

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Serge Agostinelli, Dominique Augey et Frédéric Laurie (dir.)

    2010

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    June 8-10, 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud et Denis Besnard (dir.)

    2011

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    Colloque de Cerisy

    Armand Hatchuel, Olivier Favereau et Franck Aggeri (dir.)

    2010

    Fragiles compétences

    Fragiles compétences

    Sophie Bretesché et Cathy Krohmer (dir.)

    2012

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Les instruments de la gestion environnementale

    Jeanne Riot

    2014

    Aider les proches aidants

    Aider les proches aidants

    Comprendre les besoins et organiser les services sur les territoires

    Sébastien Gand, Léonie Hénaut et Jean-Claude Sardas

    2014

    Urbanisme durable

    Urbanisme durable

    Pilotage des collectifs d'innovation

    Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel

    2014

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    Comprendre et agir

    Brami Laurent, Sébastien Damart, Mathieu Detchessahar et al.

    2014

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    Un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise

    Blanche Segrestin, Kevin Levillain, Stéphane Vernac et al.

    2015

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 12
    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    Journées d’étude MTO’2011

    Pierre-Michel Riccio et Daniel Bonnet (dir.)

    2012

    Construire la biodiversité

    Construire la biodiversité

    Processus de conception de « biens communs »

    Julie Labatut

    2010

    Évaluation des coûts

    Évaluation des coûts

    Éléments d’une théorie de la gestion

    Claude Riveline

    2005

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Serge Agostinelli, Dominique Augey et Frédéric Laurie (dir.)

    2010

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    June 8-10, 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud et Denis Besnard (dir.)

    2011

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    Colloque de Cerisy

    Armand Hatchuel, Olivier Favereau et Franck Aggeri (dir.)

    2010

    Fragiles compétences

    Fragiles compétences

    Sophie Bretesché et Cathy Krohmer (dir.)

    2012

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Les instruments de la gestion environnementale

    Jeanne Riot

    2014

    Aider les proches aidants

    Aider les proches aidants

    Comprendre les besoins et organiser les services sur les territoires

    Sébastien Gand, Léonie Hénaut et Jean-Claude Sardas

    2014

    Urbanisme durable

    Urbanisme durable

    Pilotage des collectifs d'innovation

    Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel

    2014

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    Comprendre et agir

    Brami Laurent, Sébastien Damart, Mathieu Detchessahar et al.

    2014

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    Un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise

    Blanche Segrestin, Kevin Levillain, Stéphane Vernac et al.

    2015

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert freemium

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Acheter

    Édition imprimée

    Presses des Mines
    • amazon.fr
    • mollat.com
    • leslibraires.fr
    • placedeslibraires.fr
    ePub / PDF

    1 In France the physician carrying out the consultation and the preparation of anesthesia is not necessarily the one who will perform anesthesia during the surgery.

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    X Facebook Email

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est cité par

    • Sena, Aderita. Ebi, Kristie L.. Freitas, Carlos. Corvalan, Carlos. Barcellos, Christovam. (2017) Indicators to measure risk of disaster associated with drought: Implications for the health sector. PLOS ONE, 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181394
    • Cedergren, Alexander. (2013) Designing resilient infrastructure systems: a case study of decision-making challenges in railway tunnel projects. Journal of Risk Research, 16. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.726241
    • Liwång, Hans. (2023) Future National Energy Systems, Energy Security and Comprehensive National Defence. Energies, 16. DOI: 10.3390/en16186627
    • Yang, Zhuyu. Barroca, Bruno. Mebarki, Ahmed. Laffréchine, Katia. Dolidon, Hélène. Lilas, Lionel. (2024) Critical infrastructure resilience: a guide for building indicator systems based on a multi-criteria framework with a focus on implementable actions. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024

    Ce chapitre est cité par

    • Towards resilient adaptive socio-technical systems(2013) . DOI: 10.1145/2501907.2501959
    • Burkhardt, J-M.. Corneloup, V.. Garbay, C.. Bourrier, Y.. Jambon, F.. Luengo, V.. Job, A.. Cabon, Ph.. Benabbou, A.. Lourdeaux, D.. (2016) Simulation and virtual reality-based learning of non-technical skills in driving: critical situations, diagnostic and adaptation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.191

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est diffusé en accès ouvert freemium. L’accès à la lecture en ligne est disponible. L’accès aux versions PDF et ePub est réservé aux bibliothèques l’ayant acquis. Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque Acheter ce livre aux formats PDF et ePub

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Cuvelier, L., & Falzon, P. (2011). Resilience As Resource-based Design Of Anticipated Situations. In E. Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud, & D. Besnard (éds.), Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.982
    Cuvelier, Lucie, et Pierre Falzon. « Resilience As Resource-Based Design Of Anticipated Situations ». In Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, édité par Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud, et Denis Besnard. Paris: Presses des Mines, 2011. doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.982.
    Cuvelier, Lucie, et Pierre Falzon. « Resilience As Resource-Based Design Of Anticipated Situations ». Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, édité par Erik Hollnagel et al., Presses des Mines, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.982.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Hollnagel, E., Rigaud, Éric, & Besnard, D. (éds.). (2011). Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.931
    Hollnagel, Erik, Éric Rigaud, et Denis Besnard, éd. Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines, 2011. doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.931.
    Hollnagel, Erik, et al., éditeurs. Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Presses des Mines, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.931.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    Presses des Mines

    Presses des Mines

    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://www.pressesdesmines.com

    Email : presses@mines-paristech.fr

    Adresse :

    60, Boulevard Saint-Michel

    75272

    Paris

    France

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement