• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 16304 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 16304 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • Presses des Mines
  • ›
  • Économie et gestion
  • ›
  • Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Eng...
  • ›
  • New Balanced Scorecard leading indicator...
  • Presses des Mines
  • Presses des Mines
    Presses des Mines
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral 1 Background 2 The OHS Balanced Scorecard Model 3 Method and Results 4 Conclusion Bibliographie Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    New Balanced Scorecard leading indicators to monitor performance variability in OHS management systems

    Frédéric Juglaret, Jean-Marc Rallo, R. Textoris, Franck Guarnieri et Emmanuel Garbolino

    p. 121-127

    Résumé

    While it has been established for many years that the management of Occupational Safety and Health (OHS) is carried out by means of management systems, the question of how to measure the performance and control of these systems is still current. Uncertainties related to their operation and the difficulty of gathering information about their level of performance makes control of performance variability a challenge. This article addresses this problem. It is in three parts. The first part outlines the general context. It describes traditional health and safety indicators, the links between processes in management systems and establishes the requirements of resilience engineering. An advanced indicators model is proposed. The second part describes the Balanced Scorecard tool. An Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Balanced Scorecard model is built using the control of regulatory compliance sub-process. The final part presents some specific examples of compliance control indicators, which are the results of an experiment carried out in a French aerospace company.

    Note de l’auteur

    Note portant sur l’auteur1

    Note portant sur l’auteur2

    Note portant sur l’auteur3

    Note portant sur l’auteur4

    Note portant sur l’auteur5

    Texte intégral 1 Background 1.1 Safety indicators 1.2 The limitations of traditional safety indicators 1.3 OHS safety management systems: sub-processes 1.4 A model of advanced indicators 2 The OHS Balanced Scorecard Model 2.1 Scorecard overview 2.2 Advanced indicators for regulatory compliance 3 Method and Results 3.1 Experimental context 3.2 Regulatory compliance indicators 4 Conclusion Bibliographie References Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Texte intégral

    1 Background

    1This first section discusses the concept of the safety indicator. First the general concept is defined. Then it is demonstrated that traditional safety indicators are in many ways lacking when it comes to proactive safety management. We then show the sub-processes of Safety Management Systems (SMS) may, to a certain extent be able to fill some of the gaps identified. Finally, we propose a model of advanced indicators which aims to reduce the performance variability of SMS and promote the implementation of resilience engineering.

    1.1 Safety indicators

    2All management systems in all domains use indicators. An indicator aims to facilitate the assessment of a situation or the state of a system by an actor (or group of actors) within a management system. The information provided by indicators facilitates decision-making and implementation of appropriate actions in situations that deviate from the norm. Indicators therefore interact with three components: strategic targets, actors, and actions (Lorino, 2003). The appropriateness and the quality of indicators are measured according to their strategic relevance, their cognitive efficiency and their operational relevance.

    3The literature deals extensively with the differences between leading and lagging indicators. Typically, it demonstrates the lack of consensus on a naming convention. We propose in this article to adopt a simple definition that incorporates the principal features of the most widely used designations. An indicator is described as leading or lagging according to its place in the management system and its operational goal. Lagging indicators indicate results, and leading indicators either act as control (implementation) or intermediate indicators. It should be noted that depending on the angle of analysis, and its place in the management system, an intermediate indicator may be used to evaluate the results of activities that underlie the overall management system.

    1.2 The limitations of traditional safety indicators

    4Traditional measures of performance and monitoring of OHS management are based on result indicators that measure past failures. They reflect a dysfunction in the system that is the cause of work-related accidents or illness. The analysis of accidents and incidents facilitates the establishment of feedback mechanisms. This knowledge helps to avoid similar adverse events recurring in the future. However, this learning from experience can be limited by the small number of case studies. Depending on the maturity of the management system and its performance levels, the number of work-related accidents or illnesses may be insufficient to provide enough material for an effective assessment. When the absence or lack of safety is measured in this way, it does not help at all to anticipate future events that have never happened before (Cambon, 2007). Moreover, the description of events can be different, sometimes even within the same industrial group. Usually expressed as an index or ratio, these indicators have a very low predictive capacity. Therefore they do not facilitate action and decision-making. When used alone, these OHS management results do not meet the requirements of resilience engineering (namely reaction, learning, monitoring and anticipation). It is therefore necessary to obtain and identify ‘advanced’ sources of information from the OHS management system to fill these gaps and move towards a more proactive OHS management.

    1.3 OHS safety management systems: sub-processes

    5OHS Safety Management Systems are composed of several interacting processes. Depending on the system used, the number and names of these sub-processes can vary, but generally they all assume the same logic of continuous improvement. We will show that most of these SMS sub-processes support the implementation of resilience engineering (Table 1).

    6The Management review sub-process facilitates organizational learning and the anticipation of unexpected situations. It adapts OHS goals and policy to evolution and changes in the environment of the management system (social pressure, competition, etc.) and to the corresponding safety results. Training, preparation for emergency situations, skills development and the definition of employees’ roles and responsibilities can improve their responsiveness when faced with a threat. Medical monitoring and audit and control supervisory sub-processes help to monitor these threats. Regulatory compliance management can be used as a knowledge base, enabling companies to implement various protection and prevention measures. Risk analysis is used to round out the list of measures to be implemented and provides a more exact and responsive analysis of actual work situations. Both of these activities reduce risk through prevention measures used to isolate the threat, and protective barriers which limit the adverse consequences of an event. Risk analysis and regulatory compliance management can therefore help to better prepare an organization when faced with adverse events (responding) and to better monitor these threats (monitoring). Risk analysis, complemented by accident analysis can promote learning from experience in order that events that have already occurred do not recur in the future. The risks models established must be updated to improve anticipation of future threats (knowing what to expect).

    Table 1. Main safety management sub-processes (Cambon, 2007) and their contribution to the requirements of resilience engineering.

    Image 1.jpg

    1.4 A model of advanced indicators

    7For resilience engineering, it is relevant to evaluate the findings and the extent to which each of these sub-processes can contribute. Improved monitoring of activities related to the sub-processes of a management system can also improve control of variability in overall system performance. Advanced indicators, when implemented, can help to better monitor and assess the level of operation.

    8The aim of the model is to improve implementation and monitoring of results from sub-processes (Figure 1). The advanced indicators system also improves control of the variability in overall system performance and better anticipation of health and safety performance.

    2 The OHS Balanced Scorecard Model

    9First, the Balanced Scorecard tool is described. Then we propose a model of the system of second-level leading indicators on the sub-process of the management of regulatory compliance, integrated in the form of an OHS Balanced Scorecard. Another Balanced Scorecard model based on the management of professional risk sub-process has also been constructed (Juglaret et al., 2011).

    Image 2.jpg

    Figure 1. Leading indicators on OHS sub-processes integrated into an OHS management model (adapted from Hollnagel, 2006).

    2.1 Scorecard overview

    10The scorecard tool is designed to facilitate decision support. The quality of a scorecard comes primarily from its ability to inform the various actors in the management system of the presence of deviant situations, and to facilitate decision-making in order to implement the necessary corrective actions. The information provided should be updated at intervals appropriate to the particular management system in question. Depending on the nature of the information required, indicators can be represented digitally, graphically, etc. Finally, the quality of a scorecard rests upon both its ability to alert managers to the occurrence of a deviant or unwanted event (in order to reduce, or ideally, remove it), and on its ability to anticipate the consequences of adverse situations.

    11The Balanced Scorecard concept (Kaplan & Norton, 1996) was originally intended to be used by companies in their strategic management and implementation activities. It is interesting to now see how the application of this tool can be transferred from the domain of management systems to that of health and safety. The value of the approach lies in the ability to take into account factors other than just the end result. The Balanced Scorecard tool has the ability to integrate advanced performance indicators at different levels. In this context, construction of an OHS Balanced Scorecard is relevant to the proactive management of health and safety.

    2.2 Advanced indicators for regulatory compliance

    12The objective of the Regulatory Compliance Management process is to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements. It can be seen as a system composed of sub-processes which operate according to a rationale of cyclic functioning and continuous improvement. This Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) procedure involves the following: planning of compliance actions (Plan), achieving compliance with un-met regulatory obligations (Do), identification of discrepancies with the regulations (Check), and regulatory monitoring and adjustment of the applicable scope (Act/Adjust). Using these different processes, a model of second level advanced indicators can be established (Figure 2).

    Image 3.jpg

    Figure 2. Regulatory compliance management model.

    13The Rate of compliance indicator is based on completed assessments. The Progress of audits management indicator improves the implementation of these assessment activities and clarification of the results. A second management indicator Actions scheduled makes it possible to better anticipate and prepare compliance activities.

    3 Method and Results

    14This section describes the actual implementation of an OHS BSC and presents the results. After outlining the experimental context, some examples of indicators for compliance control are presented and discussed.

    3.1 Experimental context

    15The company concerned is a global player in the field of aeronautics. The activities of this company are very varied and they have multiple production sites. The risks associated with these production activities are many and varied: chemical hazards, handling, mechanical, fire and explosion, electrical, work environment, etc.

    3.2 Regulatory compliance indicators

    16The experiment shows that the number of applicable regulatory obligations increased significantly from 2009-2011 (Figure 3). The increase is from 6,373 requirements assessed as applicable in the first quarter of 2009 to over 9,000 in 2011. Despite this increase in the applicable scope, the organization has improved its level of control of regulatory compliance, from 89 % to 97 %. The classification of regulations into categories provides a new perspective on the distribution of regulatory requirements (Figure 4) and shows that legal requirements related to chemicals have a significant impact in this study.

    Image 4.jpg

    Figure 3. Regulatory compliance evolution

    Image 5.jpg

    Figure 4. Regulatory compliance distribution according to category of hazard

    17The evaluated regulatory requirements were all associated with prevention measures (Figure 5) which correspond to management principles (individual protection, staff training, operational control, etc.). In this case study, regulatory requirements for personal protective equipment are not all met (89 %) which leads to the conclusion that the provision of personal protective equipment would significantly reduce risks.

    Image 6.jpg

    Figure 5. Level of regulatory compliance according to prevention measure

    4 Conclusion

    18This experiment in the aviation industry shows that a system of advanced indicators based on a sub-process of an OHS management system offers interesting perspectives for the implementation of resilience safety engineering. Traditional OHS indicators, although essential to validate the overall OHS strategy and the implementation of organizational learning, are by themselves insufficient to meet the requirements of proactive safety management. The construction and use of leading indicators integrated into an OHS Balanced Scorecard improve the control of performance variability in safety and encourage proactive safety management. To further improve this level of control and proactive management, it would be interesting to identify and construct leading indicators based on other OHS management processes (e.g. operational control, documentation, communication).

    Bibliographie

    References

    Cambon J. (2007). Vers une nouvelle méthodologie de mesure de la performance des systèmes de management de la sante-sécurité au travail. Doctoral Thesis. Mines ParisTech.

    Hollnagel E., Leveson N., and Woods D. (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts.

    Juglaret F., Guarnieri F., Garbolino E., Rallo J-M, Textoris R., (2011). The Contribution of Balanced Scorecards to the Management of Occupational Health and Safety, ESREL 2011.

    Kaplan R., and Norton D. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard -Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business School.

    Lorino P. (2003). Méthodes et pratiques de la performance, 3ème édition, Editions d'organisation.

    Notes de bas de page

    1 Mines ParisTech / Preventeo, Sophia Antipolis, France. frederic.juglaret@preventeo.com

    2 Preventeo, Le Cannet, France. Jean-Marc.Rallo@preventeo.com

    3 L’Oreal, Aulnay sous bois, France . rTextoris@fr.loreal.com

    4 Mines ParisTech, Sophia Antipolis, France. Franck.Guarnieri@mines-paristech.fr

    5 Mines ParisTech, Sophia Antipolis, France. Emmanuel.garbolino@mines-paristech.fr

    Auteurs

    • Frédéric Juglaret
    • Jean-Marc Rallo
    • R. Textoris
    • Franck Guarnieri
    • Emmanuel Garbolino
    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    Journées d’étude MTO’2011

    Pierre-Michel Riccio et Daniel Bonnet (dir.)

    2012

    Construire la biodiversité

    Construire la biodiversité

    Processus de conception de « biens communs »

    Julie Labatut

    2010

    Évaluation des coûts

    Évaluation des coûts

    Éléments d’une théorie de la gestion

    Claude Riveline

    2005

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Serge Agostinelli, Dominique Augey et Frédéric Laurie (dir.)

    2010

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    June 8-10, 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud et Denis Besnard (dir.)

    2011

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    Colloque de Cerisy

    Armand Hatchuel, Olivier Favereau et Franck Aggeri (dir.)

    2010

    Fragiles compétences

    Fragiles compétences

    Sophie Bretesché et Cathy Krohmer (dir.)

    2012

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Les instruments de la gestion environnementale

    Jeanne Riot

    2014

    Aider les proches aidants

    Aider les proches aidants

    Comprendre les besoins et organiser les services sur les territoires

    Sébastien Gand, Léonie Hénaut et Jean-Claude Sardas

    2014

    Urbanisme durable

    Urbanisme durable

    Pilotage des collectifs d'innovation

    Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel

    2014

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    Comprendre et agir

    Brami Laurent, Sébastien Damart, Mathieu Detchessahar et al.

    2014

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    Un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise

    Blanche Segrestin, Kevin Levillain, Stéphane Vernac et al.

    2015

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 12
    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    TIC et innovation organisationnelle

    Journées d’étude MTO’2011

    Pierre-Michel Riccio et Daniel Bonnet (dir.)

    2012

    Construire la biodiversité

    Construire la biodiversité

    Processus de conception de « biens communs »

    Julie Labatut

    2010

    Évaluation des coûts

    Évaluation des coûts

    Éléments d’une théorie de la gestion

    Claude Riveline

    2005

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Entre communautés et mobilité : une approche interdisciplinaire des médias

    Serge Agostinelli, Dominique Augey et Frédéric Laurie (dir.)

    2010

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    June 8-10, 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud et Denis Besnard (dir.)

    2011

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    L’activité marchande sans le marché ?

    Colloque de Cerisy

    Armand Hatchuel, Olivier Favereau et Franck Aggeri (dir.)

    2010

    Fragiles compétences

    Fragiles compétences

    Sophie Bretesché et Cathy Krohmer (dir.)

    2012

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Construire l'innovation durable

    Les instruments de la gestion environnementale

    Jeanne Riot

    2014

    Aider les proches aidants

    Aider les proches aidants

    Comprendre les besoins et organiser les services sur les territoires

    Sébastien Gand, Léonie Hénaut et Jean-Claude Sardas

    2014

    Urbanisme durable

    Urbanisme durable

    Pilotage des collectifs d'innovation

    Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel

    2014

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    L'absentéisme des personnels soignants à l'hôpital

    Comprendre et agir

    Brami Laurent, Sébastien Damart, Mathieu Detchessahar et al.

    2014

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    La « Société à Objet Social Étendu »

    Un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise

    Blanche Segrestin, Kevin Levillain, Stéphane Vernac et al.

    2015

    Voir plus de chapitres

    Avertissement aux lecteurs

    Franck Guarnieri et Aurélien Portelli

    Un héros japonais

    Franck Guarnieri et Aurélien Portelli

    Voir plus de chapitres
    1 / 2

    Avertissement aux lecteurs

    Franck Guarnieri et Aurélien Portelli

    Un héros japonais

    Franck Guarnieri et Aurélien Portelli

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert freemium

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Acheter

    Édition imprimée

    Presses des Mines
    • amazon.fr
    • mollat.com
    • leslibraires.fr
    • placedeslibraires.fr
    ePub / PDF

    1 Mines ParisTech / Preventeo, Sophia Antipolis, France. frederic.juglaret@preventeo.com

    2 Preventeo, Le Cannet, France. Jean-Marc.Rallo@preventeo.com

    3 L’Oreal, Aulnay sous bois, France . rTextoris@fr.loreal.com

    4 Mines ParisTech, Sophia Antipolis, France. Franck.Guarnieri@mines-paristech.fr

    5 Mines ParisTech, Sophia Antipolis, France. Emmanuel.garbolino@mines-paristech.fr

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    X Facebook Email

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est cité par

    • Sena, Aderita. Ebi, Kristie L.. Freitas, Carlos. Corvalan, Carlos. Barcellos, Christovam. (2017) Indicators to measure risk of disaster associated with drought: Implications for the health sector. PLOS ONE, 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181394
    • Cedergren, Alexander. (2013) Designing resilient infrastructure systems: a case study of decision-making challenges in railway tunnel projects. Journal of Risk Research, 16. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.726241
    • Liwång, Hans. (2023) Future National Energy Systems, Energy Security and Comprehensive National Defence. Energies, 16. DOI: 10.3390/en16186627
    • Yang, Zhuyu. Barroca, Bruno. Mebarki, Ahmed. Laffréchine, Katia. Dolidon, Hélène. Lilas, Lionel. (2024) Critical infrastructure resilience: a guide for building indicator systems based on a multi-criteria framework with a focus on implementable actions. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024

    Ce chapitre est cité par

    • Haas, Emily J.. Demich, Brendan. McGuire, Joseph. (2020) Learning from Workers’ Near-miss Reports to Improve Organizational Management. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 37. DOI: 10.1007/s42461-020-00206-9
    • Podgórski, Daniel. (2015) Measuring operational performance of OSH management system – A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety Science, 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018
    • Krstić, Bojan. Rađenović, Tamara. Živković, Snežana. (2022) Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development Handbook of Research on Key Dimensions of Occupational Safety and Health Protection Management. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch001
    • Haas, Emily Joy. Yorio, Patrick. (2016) Exploring the state of health and safety management system performance measurement in mining organizations. Safety Science, 83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.009
    • Amir-Heidari, Payam. Maknoon, Reza. Taheri, Bahram. Bazyari, Mahdieh. (2017) A new framework for HSE performance measurement and monitoring. Safety Science, 100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.001

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Ce livre est diffusé en accès ouvert freemium. L’accès à la lecture en ligne est disponible. L’accès aux versions PDF et ePub est réservé aux bibliothèques l’ayant acquis. Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque Acheter ce livre aux formats PDF et ePub

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Juglaret, F., Rallo, J.-M., Textoris, R., Guarnieri, F., & Garbolino, E. (2011). New Balanced Scorecard leading indicators to monitor performance variability in OHS management systems. In E. Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud, & D. Besnard (éds.), Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.1015
    Juglaret, Frédéric, Jean-Marc Rallo, R. Textoris, Franck Guarnieri, et Emmanuel Garbolino. « New Balanced Scorecard Leading Indicators to Monitor Performance Variability in OHS Management Systems ». In Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, édité par Erik Hollnagel, Éric Rigaud, et Denis Besnard. Paris: Presses des Mines, 2011. doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.1015.
    Juglaret, Frédéric, et al. « New Balanced Scorecard Leading Indicators to Monitor Performance Variability in OHS Management Systems ». Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, édité par Erik Hollnagel et al., Presses des Mines, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.1015.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Hollnagel, E., Rigaud, Éric, & Besnard, D. (éds.). (2011). Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.931
    Hollnagel, Erik, Éric Rigaud, et Denis Besnard, éd. Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Paris: Presses des Mines, 2011. doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.931.
    Hollnagel, Erik, et al., éditeurs. Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Presses des Mines, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.931.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    Presses des Mines

    Presses des Mines

    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://www.pressesdesmines.com

    Email : presses@mines-paristech.fr

    Adresse :

    60, Boulevard Saint-Michel

    75272

    Paris

    France

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement