Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2018

William J. Sutherland
Lynn V. Dicks
Nancy Ockendon
et al.

11. Some aspects of enhancing natural pest control

11. Some aspects of enhancing natural pest control

Hugh L. Wright, Joscelyne E. Ashpole, Lynn V. Dicks, James Hutchison, Caitlin G. McCormack et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

Barbara Smith, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK

Tony Harding, Rothamsted Research, UK

Anthony Goggin, Linking Environment and Farming (LEAF), UK

Felix Wackers, BioBest/University of Lancaster, Belgium/UK

Melvyn Fidgett, Syngenta, UK

Michael Garratt, University of Reading, UK

Michelle Fountain, East Malling Research, UK

Phillip Effingham, Greentech Consultants, UK

Stephanie Williamson, Pesticides Action Network, UK

Toby Bruce, Rothamsted Research, UK

Andrew Wilby, University of Lancaster, UK

Eve Veromann, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia

Mattias Jonsson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Vicky Kindemba, Buglife, UK

Steve Sait, University of Leeds, UK

Scope of assessment: 22 of 92 possible actions to enhance natural regulation of pests (including animals, plants, fungi, bacteria and viruses) in agricultural systems across the world.

Assessed: 2014

Effectiveness measure is the median % score.

Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects for the farmer such as reduced yield and profits or increased costs.


Open access


Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search