• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 16308 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 16308 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • Open Book Publishers
  • ›
  • OBP collection
  • ›
  • What Works in Conservation 2018
  • ›
  • 8. Shrubland and heathland conservation
  • ›
  • 8.8. Threat: Invasive and other problema...
  • Open Book Publishers
  • Open Book Publishers
    Open Book Publishers
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral 8.8.1 Problematic tree species 8.8.2 Problematic grass species 8.8.3 Bracken 8.8.4 Problematic animals

    What Works in Conservation 2018

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    8.8. Threat: Invasive and other problematic species

    p. 462-476

    Texte intégral 8.8.1 Problematic tree species Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) ● Apply herbicide to trees ● Cut trees ● Cut trees and remove leaf litter ● Cut trees and remove seedlings ● Use prescribed burning to control trees ● Use grazing to control trees ● Cut trees and apply herbicide ● Cut trees and use prescribed burning ● Increase number of livestock and use prescribed burning to control trees No evidence found (no assessment) 8.8.2 Problematic grass species Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) ● Cut/mow to control grass ● Cut/mow to control grass and sow seed of shrubland plants ● Rake to control grass ● Cut/mow and rotovate to control grass ● Apply herbicide and sow seeds of shrubland plants to control grass Apply herbicide and remove plants to control grass ● Use grazing to control grass ● Use precribed burning to control grass ● Cut and use prescribed burning to control grass ● Use herbicide and prescribed burning to control grass ● Strip turf to control grass ● Rotovate to control grass ● Add mulch to control grass ● Add mulch to control grass and sow seed ● Cut/mow, rotovate and sow seeds to control grass Unlikely to be beneficial ● Use herbicide to control grass 8.8.3 Bracken Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) ● Use herbicide to control bracken ● Cut to control bracken ● Cut and apply herbicide to control bracken ● Cut bracken and rotovate ● Use ‘bracken bruiser’ to control bracken ● Use herbicide and remove leaf litter to control bracken No evidence found (no assessment) 8.8.4 Problematic animals Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) ● Use fences to exclude large herbivores ● Reduce numbers of large herbivores No evidence found (no assessment)

    Texte intégral

    8.8.1 Problematic tree species

    Image

    Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

    ● Apply herbicide to trees

    1One replicated, controlled, before-and-after study in South Africa found that using herbicide to control trees increased plant diversity but did not increase shrub cover. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that herbicide treatment of trees increased the abundance of common heather seedlings. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 40%; certainty 35%; harms 10%).

    2https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1629

    ● Cut trees

    3One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting birch trees increased density of heather seedlings but not that of mature common heather plants. One replicated, controlled study in South Africa found that cutting non-native trees increased herbaceous plant cover but did not increase cover of native woody plants. One site comparison study in South Africa found that cutting non-native Acacia trees reduced shrub and tree cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 37%; certainty 30%; harms 3%).

    4https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1630

    ● Cut trees and remove leaf litter

    5One before-and-after trial in the Netherlands found that cutting trees and removing the litter layer increased the cover of two heather species and of three grass species. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 45%; certainty 10%; harms 3%).

    6https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1631

    ● Cut trees and remove seedlings

    7A controlled, before-and-after study in South Africa found that cutting orange wattle trees and removing seedlings of the same species increased plant diversity and shrub cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 62%; certainty 20%; harms 0%).

    8https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1632

    ● Use prescribed burning to control trees

    9One randomized, replicated, controlled, before-and-after trial in the USA found that burning to control trees did not change cover of two of three grass species. One randomized, controlled study in Italy found that prescribed burning to control trees reduced cover of common heather, increased cover of purple moor grass, and had mixed effects on the basal area of trees. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 10%; certainty 20%; harms 22%).

    10https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1721

    ● Use grazing to control trees

    11One randomized, controlled, before-and-after study in Italy found that grazing to reduce tree cover reduced cover of common heather and the basal area of trees, but did not alter cover of purple moor grass. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 20%; certainty 10%; harms 5%).

    12https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1634

    ● Cut trees and apply herbicide

    13One controlled study in the UK found that cutting trees and applying herbicide increased the abundance of heather seedlings. However, one replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting silver birch trees and applying herbicide did not alter cover of common heather when compared to cutting alone. Two controlled studies (one of which was a before-and-after study) in South Africa found that cutting of trees and applying herbicide did not increase shrub cover. Two controlled studies in South Africa found that cutting trees and applying herbicide increased the total number of plant species and plant diversity. One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting and applying herbicide reduced cover of silver birch trees. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 45%; certainty 35%; harms 3%).

    14https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1636

    ● Cut trees and use prescribed burning

    15One replicated, before-and-after trial in the USA found that cutting western juniper trees and using prescribed burning increased the cover of herbaceous plants. One replicated, randomized, controlled, before-and-after trial in the USA found that cutting western juniper trees and using prescribed burning increased cover of herbaceous plants but had no effect on the cover of most shrubs. One controlled study in South Africa found that cutting followed by prescribed burning reduced the cover of woody plants but did not alter herbaceous cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 40%; certainty 35%; harms 5%).

    16https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1637

    ● Increase number of livestock and use prescribed burning to control trees

    17One randomized, controlled, before-and-after study in Italy found that using prescribed burning and grazing to reduce tree cover reduced the cover of common heather and the basal area of trees. However, it did not alter the cover of purple moor grass. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 2%; certainty 12%; harms 12%).

    18https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1722

    No evidence found (no assessment)

    19We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

    • Cut/mow shrubland to control trees
    • Cut trees and increase livestock numbers.

    8.8.2 Problematic grass species

    Image

    Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

    ● Cut/mow to control grass

    20One controlled study in the UK found that mowing increased the number of heathland plants in one of two sites. The same study found that the presence of a small minority of heathland plants increased, but the presence of non-heathland plants did not change. Three replicated, controlled studies in the UK and the USA found that cutting to control grass did not alter cover of common heather or shrub seedling abundance. One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting to control purple moor grass reduced vegetation height, had mixed effects on purple moor grass cover and the number of plant species, and did not alter cover of common heather. Two randomized, controlled studies in the USA found that mowing did not increase the cover of native forb species. Both studies found that mowing reduced grass cover but in one of these studies grass cover recovered over time. One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that mowing did not alter the abundance of wavy hair grass relative to rotovating or cutting turf. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 22%; certainty 35%; harms 5%).

    21https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1638

    ● Cut/mow to control grass and sow seed of shrubland plants

    22One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the USA found that the biomass of sagebrush plants in areas where grass was cut and seeds sown did not differ from areas where grass was not cut, but seeds were sown. One randomized controlled study in the USA found that cutting grass and sowing seeds increased shrub seedling abundance and reduced grass cover One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the USA found that sowing seeds and mowing did not change the cover of non-native plants or the number of native plant species. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 31%; certainty 20%; harms 0%).

    23https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1639

    ● Rake to control grass

    24A randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study in the USA found that cover of both invasive and native grasses, as well as forbs was lower in areas that were raked than in areas that were not raked, but that the number of annual plants species did not differ. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 30%; certainty 20%; harms 12%).

    25https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1640

    ● Cut/mow and rotovate to control grass

    26One controlled study in the UK found that mowing followed by rotovating increased the number of heathland plant species in one of two sites. The same study found that the presence of a minority of heathland and non-heathland species increased. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 22%; certainty 15%; harms 7%).

    27https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1641

    ● Apply herbicide and sow seeds of shrubland plants to control grass

    28One randomized, controlled study in the USA found that areas where herbicide was sprayed and seeds of shrubland species were sown had more shrub seedlings than areas that were not sprayed or sown with seeds. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the USA found that spraying with herbicide and sowing seeds of shrubland species did not increase the cover of native plant species, but did increase the number of native plant species. One of two studies in the USA found that spraying with herbicide and sowing seeds of shrubland species reduced non-native grass cover. One study in the USA found that applying herbicide and sowing seeds of shrubland species did not reduce the cover of non-native grasses. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 35%; certainty 30%; harms 0%).

    29https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1644

    Apply herbicide and remove plants to control grass

    30One randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study in the USA found that areas sprayed with herbicide and weeded to control non-native grass cover had higher cover of native grasses and forbs than areas that were not sprayed or weeded, but not a higher number of native plant species. The same study found that spraying with herbicide and weeding reduced non-native grass cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 42%; certainty 20%; harms 2%).

    31https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1645

    ● Use grazing to control grass

    32One replicated, controlled, before-and-after study in the Netherlands found that grazing to reduce grass cover had mixed effects on cover of common heather and cross-leaved heath. One replicated, controlled, before-and-after study in the Netherlands found that cover of wavy-hair grass increased and one before-and-after study in Spain found a reduction in grass height. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 32%; certainty 17%; harms 10%).

    33https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1646

    ● Use precribed burning to control grass

    34One replicated controlled, paired, before-and-after study in the UK found that prescribed burning to reduce the cover of purple moor grass, did not reduce its cover but did reduce the cover of common heather. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that prescribed burning initially reduced vegetation height, but this recovered over time. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 20%; harms 15%).

    35https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1723

    ● Cut and use prescribed burning to control grass

    36One randomized, replicated, controlled, paired, before-and-after study in the UK found that burning and cutting to reduce the cover of purple moor grass reduced cover of common heather but did not reduce cover of purple moor grass. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 10%; harms 10%).

    37https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1724

    ● Use herbicide and prescribed burning to control grass

    38One randomized, replicated, controlled, paired, before-and-after study in the UK found that burning and applying herbicide to reduce the cover of purple moor grass reduced cover of common heather but did not reduce cover of purple moor grass. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 10%; harms 20%).

    39https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1725

    ● Strip turf to control grass

    40One controlled study in the UK found that cutting and removing turf increased the number of heathland plants. The same study found that the presence of a small number of heathland plants increased, and that the presence of a small number of non-heathland plants decreased. One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that presence of heather was similar in areas where turf was cut and areas that were mown or rotovated. One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that the presence of wavy hair grass was similar in areas where turf was cut and those that were mown or rotovated. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 32%; certainty 25%; harms 2%).

    41https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1647

    ● Rotovate to control grass

    42One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that rotovating did not alter the presence of heather compared to mowing or cutting. The same study found that wavy hair grass presence was not altered by rotovating, relative to areas that were mown or cut. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 5%; harms 0%).

    43https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1648

    ● Add mulch to control grass

    44One randomized, controlled study in the USA found that areas where mulch was used to control grass cover had a similar number of shrub seedlings to areas where mulch was not applied. The same study found that mulch application did not reduce grass cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 10%; harms 0%).

    45https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1649

    ● Add mulch to control grass and sow seed

    46One randomized, controlled study in the USA found that adding mulch, followed by seeding with shrub seeds, increased the seedling abundance of one of seven shrub species but did not reduce grass cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 5%; certainty 7%; harms 0%).

    47https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1650

    ● Cut/mow, rotovate and sow seeds to control grass

    48One replicated, controlled study in the UK found that rotovating did not alter the presence of heather compared to mowing or cutting. The same study found that wavy hair grass presence was not altered by rotovating, relative to areas that were mown or cut. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 50%; certainty 12%; harms 1%).

    49https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1651

    Unlikely to be beneficial

    ● Use herbicide to control grass

    50Two randomized, controlled studies in the UK and the USA found that spraying with herbicide did not affect the number of shrub or heathland plant seedlings. One of these studies found that applying herbicide increased the abundance of one of four heathland plants, but reduced the abundance of one heathland species. However, one randomized, controlled study in the UK found that applying herbicide increased cover of heathland species. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK reported no effect on the cover of common heather. One randomized, replicated study in the UK reported mixed effects of herbicide application on shrub cover. Two randomized, controlled studies in the USA and the UK found that herbicide application did not change the cover of forb species. However, one randomized, controlled, study in the USA found that herbicide application increased native forb cover. Four of five controlled studies (two of which were replicated) in the USA found that grass cover or non-native grass cover were lower in areas where herbicides were used to control grass than areas were herbicide was not used. Two randomized, replicated, controlled studies in the UK found that herbicide reduced cover of purple moor grass, but not cover of three grass/reed species. Two randomized, controlled studies in the UK found that herbicide application did not reduce grass cover. Assessment: unlikely to be beneficial (effectiveness 32%; certainty 40%; harms 7%).

    51https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1643

    8.8.3 Bracken

    Image

    Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

    ● Use herbicide to control bracken

    52One controlled, before-and-after trial in the UK found that applying herbicide to control bracken increased the number of heather seedlings. However, two randomized, controlled studies in the UK found that spraying with herbicide did not increase heather cover. One randomized, controlled study in the UK found that applying herbicide to control bracken increased heather biomass. One replicated, randomized, controlled study in the UK found that the application of herbicide increased the number of plant species in a heathland site. However, one replicated, randomized, controlled study in the UK found that spraying bracken with herbicide had no effect on species richness or diversity. One randomized, controlled study in the UK found that applying herbicide to control bracken increased the cover of wavy hair-grass and sheep’s fescue. One controlled study in the UK found that applying herbicide to control bracken increased the cover of gorse and the abundance of common cow-wheat. One controlled, before-and-after trial in the UK found that the application of herbicide reduced the abundance of bracken but increased the number of silver birch seedlings. Three randomized, controlled studies in the UK found that the application of herbicide reduced the biomass or cover of bracken. However, one controlled study in the UK found that applying herbicide did not change the abundance of bracken. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 50%; certainty 35%; harms 10%).

    53https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1652

    ● Cut to control bracken

    54One randomized, controlled, before-and-after trial in Norway and one randomized, controlled study in the UK found that cutting bracken increased the cover or biomass of heather. However, two randomized, replicated, controlled studies in the UK found that cutting bracken did not increase heather cover or abundance of heather seedlings. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting to control bracken increased the species richness of heathland plant species. However, another randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting to control bracken did not alter species richness but did increase species diversity. One randomized, replicated, controlled study in the UK found that cutting bracken increased cover of wavy hair-grass and sheep’s fescue. One controlled study in the UK found that cutting bracken did not increase the abundance of gorse or common cow-wheat. One randomized, controlled, before-and-after trial in Norway and two randomized, controlled studies in the UK found that cutting bracken reduced bracken cover or biomass. One randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study the UK found that cutting had mixed effects on bracken cover. However, one controlled study in the UK found that cutting bracken did not decrease the abundance of bracken. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 50%; certainty 35%; harms 2%).

    55https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1653

    ● Cut and apply herbicide to control bracken

    56One randomized, controlled study in the UK found that cutting and applying herbicide to control bracken did not alter heather biomass. One randomized, controlled, before-and-after trial in Norway found that cutting and applying herbicide increased heather cover. One randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study in the UK found that cutting and using herbicide had no significant effect on the cover of seven plant species. One replicated, randomized, controlled study in the UK found that cutting bracken followed by applying herbicide increased plant species richness when compared with applying herbicide followed by cutting. Three randomized, controlled studies (one also a before-and-after trial, and one of which was a paired study) in the UK and Norway found that cutting and applying herbicide reduced bracken biomass or cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 30%; certainty 30%; harms 4%).

    57https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1654

    ● Cut bracken and rotovate

    58One controlled study in the UK found that cutting followed by rotovating to control bracken did not increase total plant biomass or biomass of heather. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 10%; harms 0%).

    59https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1656

    ● Use ‘bracken bruiser’ to control bracken

    60One randomized, replicated, controlled, before-and-after, paired study in the UK found that bracken bruising increased bracken cover, though bracken cover also increased in areas where bracken bruising was not done. There was no effect on the number of plant species or plant diversity. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 0%; certainty 10%; harms 7%).

    61https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1726

    ● Use herbicide and remove leaf litter to control bracken

    62One randomized, controlled study in the UK found that using herbicide and removing leaf litter did not increase total plant biomass after eight years. The same study found that for three of six years, heather biomass was higher in areas where herbicide was sprayed and leaf litter was removed than in areas that were sprayed with herbicide. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 27%; certainty 12%; harms 2%).

    63https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1660

    No evidence found (no assessment)

    64We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

    • Cut and burn bracken
    • Use herbicide and sow seed of shrubland plants to control bracken
    • Increase grazing intensity to control bracken
    • Use herbicide and increase livestock numbers to control bracken.

    8.8.4 Problematic animals

    Image

    Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

    ● Use fences to exclude large herbivores

    65One controlled study in the USA found that using fences to exclude deer increased the height of shrubs, but not shrub cover. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 7%; certainty 10%; harms 0%).

    66https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1662

    ● Reduce numbers of large herbivores

    67One before-and-after trial in the USA found that removing feral sheep, cattle and horses increased shrub cover and reduced grass cover. One replicated study in the UK found that reducing grazing pressure by red deer increased the cover and height of common heather. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 70%; certainty 30%; harms 0%).

    68https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1663

    No evidence found (no assessment)

    69We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

    70• Use biological control to reduce the number of problematic invertebrates.

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    Altering Eye

    Altering Eye

    Contemporary International Cinema

    Robert Phillip Kolker

    2009

    Les Bienveillantes de Jonathan Littell

    Les Bienveillantes de Jonathan Littell

    Murielle Lucie Clément (dir.)

    2010

    The End of the World

    The End of the World

    Apocalypse and its Aftermath in Western Culture

    Maria Manuel Lisboa

    2011

    Economic Fables

    Economic Fables

    Ariel Rubinstein

    2012

    Coleridge’s Laws

    Coleridge’s Laws

    A Study of Coleridge in Malta

    Barry Hough et Howard Davis

    2010

    Brownshirt Princess

    Brownshirt Princess

    A Study of the “Nazy Conscience”

    Lionel Gossman

    2009

    The End and the Beginning

    The End and the Beginning

    The Book of My Life

    Hermynia Zur Mühlen

    2010

    Bourdieu and Literature

    Bourdieu and Literature

    John R. W. Speller

    2011

    Telling Tales

    Telling Tales

    The Impact of Germany on English Children’s Books 1780-1918

    David Blamires

    2009

    That Greece Might Still Be Free

    That Greece Might Still Be Free

    The Philhellenes in the War of Independence

    William St Clair

    2008

    The Theatre of Shelley

    The Theatre of Shelley

    Jacqueline Mulhallen

    2010

    Henry James's Europe

    Henry James's Europe

    Heritage and Transfer

    Dennis Tredy, Annick Duperray et Adrian Harding

    2011

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 12
    Altering Eye

    Altering Eye

    Contemporary International Cinema

    Robert Phillip Kolker

    2009

    Les Bienveillantes de Jonathan Littell

    Les Bienveillantes de Jonathan Littell

    Murielle Lucie Clément (dir.)

    2010

    The End of the World

    The End of the World

    Apocalypse and its Aftermath in Western Culture

    Maria Manuel Lisboa

    2011

    Economic Fables

    Economic Fables

    Ariel Rubinstein

    2012

    Coleridge’s Laws

    Coleridge’s Laws

    A Study of Coleridge in Malta

    Barry Hough et Howard Davis

    2010

    Brownshirt Princess

    Brownshirt Princess

    A Study of the “Nazy Conscience”

    Lionel Gossman

    2009

    The End and the Beginning

    The End and the Beginning

    The Book of My Life

    Hermynia Zur Mühlen

    2010

    Bourdieu and Literature

    Bourdieu and Literature

    John R. W. Speller

    2011

    Telling Tales

    Telling Tales

    The Impact of Germany on English Children’s Books 1780-1918

    David Blamires

    2009

    That Greece Might Still Be Free

    That Greece Might Still Be Free

    The Philhellenes in the War of Independence

    William St Clair

    2008

    The Theatre of Shelley

    The Theatre of Shelley

    Jacqueline Mulhallen

    2010

    Henry James's Europe

    Henry James's Europe

    Heritage and Transfer

    Dennis Tredy, Annick Duperray et Adrian Harding

    2011

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    Acheter

    Édition imprimée

    Open Book Publishers
    • amazon.fr

    What Works in Conservation 2018

    X Facebook Email

    What Works in Conservation 2018

    Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    What Works in Conservation 2018

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Ockendon, N., Petrovan, S. O., & Smith, R. K. (éds.). (2018). 8.8. Threat: Invasive and other problematic species. In What Works in Conservation 2018. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Consulté à l’adresse https://books.openedition.org/obp/6692
    Sutherland, William J., Lynn V. Dicks, Nancy Ockendon, Silviu O. Petrovan, et Rebecca K. Smith, éd. « 8.8. Threat: Invasive and Other Problematic Species ». In What Works in Conservation 2018. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://books.openedition.org/obp/6692.
    Sutherland, William J., et al., éditeurs. « 8.8. Threat: Invasive and Other Problematic Species ». What Works in Conservation 2018, Open Book Publishers, 2018, https://books.openedition.org/obp/6692.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Ockendon, N., Petrovan, S. O., & Smith, R. K. (éds.). (2018). What Works in Conservation 2018. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Consulté à l’adresse https://books.openedition.org/obp/6257
    Sutherland, William J., Lynn V. Dicks, Nancy Ockendon, Silviu O. Petrovan, et Rebecca K. Smith, éd. What Works in Conservation 2018. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://books.openedition.org/obp/6257.
    Sutherland, William J., et al., éditeurs. What Works in Conservation 2018. Open Book Publishers, 2018, https://books.openedition.org/obp/6257.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    Open Book Publishers

    Open Book Publishers

    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Facebook
    • X
    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://www.openbookpublishers.com

    Email : a.tosi@openbookpublishers.com

    Adresse :

    40 Devonshire Road

    CB1 2BL

    Cambridge

    United Kingdom

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement