Desktop versionMobile version
OpenEdition Books

Text and Genre in Reconstruction

 | 
Willard McCarty

References

Full text

Aarseth, Espen J. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Andrén, Anders. 1998. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Trans. Alan Crozier. New York: Plenum Press.

Anon. 1911. ’The New York Public Library: How the Readers and the Books Are Distributed in the New Building’. Scientific American 104.21 (27 May): 527.

Anon. 1971. ’Keepers of Rules Versus Players of Roles’. Rev. of The Impact ofComputers on Organizations by Thomas I. Whistler, and The ComputerizedSociety by James Martin and Adrian R. D. Norman. Times LiterarySupplement 21.5: 585.

Appiah, K. Anthony. 2005. ’Humane, All Too Humane’. Profession 2005. New York: Modern Language Association.

Baddeley, Alan. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

— 2000. ’The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?’ Trends in Cognitive Science 4.11: 417-23.

— 2003. ’Working Memory and Language: An Overview’. Journal of Communication Disorders 36.3: 189-203.

— 2004. Your Memory: A User’s Guide. Buffalo: Firefly Books.

Barber, Karin. 2007. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons, and Publics: Oral andWritten Culture in Africa and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Barthes, Roland. 1986. ’The ”Death” of the Author’. In The Rustle of Language, trans. Richard Howard. 49-55. New York: Hill and Wang.

Bateson, Gregory. 2002. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.

Bayley, J. 1999. Iris: A Memoir of Iris Murdoch. London: Harper Collins.

Bellow, Saul. 2006. ’The Art of Fiction’, interviewed by Gordon Lloyd Harper, The Paris Review Interviews, I, intro. by Philip Gourevitch. New York: Picador.

Bender, Todd. 1973. ’Computer Assisted Editorial Work on Conrad’. Conradiana, 5/3: 37-45.

— 1976a. ’Computational Bibliography’. In The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Studies. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, ed. Alan Jones and R.F. Churchhouse. 329-37. Cardiff: The University of Wales Press.

— 1976b. ’Literary Texts in Electronic Storage: The Editorial Potential’. Computers and the Humanities 10.4: 193-99.

Bernard, Claude. 1865. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Trans. Henry Copley Greene. New York: Dover, 1957.

Berrie, P., G. Barwell, C. Tiffin and P. Eggert. 2003. ’Authenticated Electronic Editions Project’. In Cole and Craig 2003: 114-22.

— P. Eggert, G. Barwell and T. Tiffin. 2006. ’Authenticating Electronic Editions’. In Burnard, O’Brien O’Keeffe and Unsworth 2006: 436-38.

Bird, Helen, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Karalyn Patterson, John R. Hodges. 2000. ’The Rise and Fall of Frequency and Imageability: Noun and Verb Production in Semantic Dementia’. Brain and Language 73.1 17-49.

Bjelland, Karen. 2000. ’The Editor as Theologian, Historian, and Archaeologist: Shifting Paradigms within Editorial Theory and their Sociocultural Ramifications’. Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 11.1: 1-43.

Blake, Norman and Peter Robinson. 2000. ’The General Prologue on CD-ROM (2000): General Editors’ Preface’. In The General Prologue of The Canterbury Tales on CD-ROM, ed. Elisabeth Solopova. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.canterburytalesproject.org/pubs/GPGenEdintro.html [accessed 8 February 2010].

Blayney, Peter, ed. 1996. The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. 2nd edn. New York: W.W. Norton.

Bliss, T.V. and T. Lomo. 2006. ’Long-lasting Potentiation of Synaptic Transmission in the Dentate Area of the Anaesthetized Rabbit Following Stimulation of the Perforant Path’. Journal of Physiology 232: 331-56.

Bowers, Fredson. 1969. ’Practical Texts and Definitive Editions’. In Two Lectures in Editing: Shakespeare and Hawthorne, ed. Charlton Hinman and Fredson Bowers. 21-70. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.

Bringhurst, Robert. 2006. ’The Voice in the Mirror’. In The Tree of Meaning: Thirteen Talks (Kentville, NS: Gaspereau Press). 107-38.

Brothman, Brien. 1999. ’Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction’. Archivaria 48: 64-88.

Brown, John. 1958. ’Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10: 12-21.

Brown, Matthew P. 2004. ’Book History, Sexy Knowledge, and the Challenge of the New Boredom’. American Literary History 16.4: 688-706.

Brown, Susan et al. 2006. ’Between Markup and Delivery; or, Tomorrow’s Electronic Texts Today’. In Mind Technologies: Humanities Computing and the Canadian Academic Community, ed. Raymond Siemens and David Moorman. 15-31. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.

Burnard, Lou. 1992. ’Tools and Techniques for Computer-assisted Text Processing’. In Computers and Written Texts, ed. Christopher S. Butler. 1-28. Oxford: Blackwell.

Burnard, Lou, Katherine O’Brien O’Keeffe and John Unsworth, eds. 2006. Electronic Textual Editing. New York: Modern Language Association.

Burrows John. 2002. ’”Delta:” A Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship,’ Literary and Linguistic Computing 17: 267-86.

— 2003. ’Questions of Authorship: Attribution and Beyond.’ Computers and the Humanities 37: 1-26.

— 2007. ’All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22: 27-47.

— and Anthony J. Hassall. 2006. ’Sarah and Henry Fielding and the Authorship of The History of Ophelia’. Script and Print 30: 69-102.

Burrows, Toby. 1997. ’Toward a Typology of the Electronic Text.’ Paper presented at the Conference of the Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand, Perth, October 1997 docker.library.uwa.edu. au/~tburrows/bibsocpaper.html [accessed 19 January 2009].

Busa, R., S. J. 1976. ’Guest Editorial: Why Can a Computer Do So Little?’ Bulletin of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing 4.1: 1-3.

Buzzetti, Dino. 1996. ’Digital Editions: Variant Readings and Interpretations’. In ALLC-ACH ’96 Abstracts. University of Bergen June 25-29 1996. 254-56.

Bergen: University of Bergen.

Caldwell, T. Price. 1989. ’Molecular Sememics: A Progress Report’. Meisei Review 4: 65-86.

— 2000. Meisei Review 15: 155-62.

— 2002. ’Topic-Comment Effects in English’ Meisei Review 17: 49-69.

— 2004. ’Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese’. Meisei Review 19: 91-106.

— 2006. ’The Epistemologies of Linguistic Science: Reassessing Structuralism, Redefining the Sememe’. Meisei Review 21: 27-39.

Canterbury Tales Project. http://www.canterburytalesproject.org [accessed 8 February 2010].

Capurro, R. and B. Hjørland. 2002. ’The Concept of Information’. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37.1: 343-411.

Catach, Nina, ed. 1988. Les éditions critiques. Problèmes techniques et éditoriaux. Paris: Université de Besançon.

Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology. Trans. Betsy Wing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chesnutt, David R. 1991. ’Historical Editions in the States’. Computers and the Humanities 25.6: 377-80.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1400-1405. Ellesmere Chaucer. Huntingdon Library.

http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=6074&terms=chaucer [accessed 8 February 2010].

Chklovskii, D. B., B. W. Mel and K. Svoboda. 2004. ’Cortical Rewiring and Information Storage’. Nature 14.431 (October): 782-88.

Cole, C. and H. Craig, eds. 2003. Computing Arts. Sydney: University of Sydney and the Australian Academy of the Humanities.

Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse, quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cme/[accessed 8 February 2010].

Cowan, Nelson. 2000. ’The Magical Number 4 in Short-term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 24: 87-185.

Craig, Hugh. 2004. ’Stylistic Analysis and Authorship Studies.’ In Schreibman, Siemens and Unsworth 2004: 273-88. Oxford: Blackwell.

Crane, Gregory. 2006. ’What Do You Do with a Million Books?’. D-Lib Magazine, 12.3. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march06/crane/03crane.html [accessed 9 February 2010].

—, David Bamman and Alison Jones. 2007. ’ePhilology: When the Books Talk to Their Readers’. In Siemens and Schreibman 2007: 29-64.

Croft, P. J., ed. 1973. Autograph Poetry in the English Language: Facsimiles or Original Manuscripts from the Fourteenth to the Twentieth Centuries. London: Cassell.

Crowder, Robert G. and Richard K. Wagner. 1992. The Psychology of Reading: An Introduction. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cummings, James. 2006. ’REED [the Records of Early English Drama Project] and the Possibilities of Web Technologies’. In REED in Review: Essays in Celebration of the First Twenty-Five Years, ed. Audrey Douglas and Sally-Beth MacLean. 178-99. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

— 2007. ’The Text Encoding Initiative and the Study of Literature’. In Siemens and Schreibman 2007: 451-76.

Curio, Gabriel, Georg Neuloh, Jussi Numminen, Veikko Jousmäki and Riitta Hari. 2000. ’Speaking Modifies Voice-Evoked Activity in the Human Auditory Cortex’. Human Brain Mapping 9.4 (April): 183-91.

Dahlström, Mats. 2000. ’Drowning by Versions’. Human IT 4: 7-38.

2001. ’Trycket från trycket. Fixerade, mindre editioner eller mindre fixerade arkiv?’. In Bok og Skjerm. Forholdet mellom bokbasert og digitalt basert tekstutgivelse, ed. Jon Gunnar Jorgensen, Tone Modalsli, Espen S. Ore and Vigdis Ystad. 61-80. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

— 2004. ’How Reproductive is a Scholarly Edition?’ Literary and Linguistic Computing 19.1: 17-33.

Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.

Davis, Tom. 1998. ’The Monsters and the Textual Critics’. Textual Formations and Reformations, ed. Laurie E. Maguire and Thomas L. Berger. 95-111. Newark NJ: University of Delaware Press.

Day, Ronald E. 2001. The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, Power. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Deegan, Marilyn and Peter Robinson. 1994. ’The Electronic Edition’. In The Editing of Old English. Papers from the 1990 Manchester Conference, ed. D.G. Scragg and Paul E. Szarmach. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.

Deegan, Marilyn. 2006. ’Collection and Preservation of an Electronic Edition’. In Burnard, O’Keeffe and Unsworth 2006: 358-70. New York: Modern Language Association of America. http://www.tei-c.org/About/Archive_new/ETE/Preview/mcgovern.xml [accessed 8 February 2010].

Dening, Greg. 1998. Readings/Writings. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

DeRose, Steven J., David G. Durand, Elli Mylonas and Allen H. Renear. 1990. ’What is Text, Really?’ Journal of Computing in Higher Education 1.2: 3-26.

Derrida, J. 1973. Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. Trans. David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

di Franco, Ani. 2002. ’My IQ’. In So Much Shouting / So Much Laughter, disc 2. Buffalo NY: Righteous Babe Records.

Dillon, Andrew. 2004. Designing Usable Electronic Text. 2nd edn. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

Donaghy, M. 2001. Brain’s Diseases of the Nervous System. 11th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Donald, Merlin. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Inside Technology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Eggert, Paul. 1990. Introduction to The Boy in the Bush, by D. H. Lawrence; ed. by M. L. Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

1994. ’Document and Text: The ”Life” of the Literary Work and the Capacities of Editing’. TEXT 7: 1-24.

— 1998. ’The Work Unravelled’. TEXT, 11, 41-60.

— 2004. ’The Way of All Text: The Materialist Shakespeare’. In Modiano, Searle and Shillingsburg 2004: 155-68.

— 2005. ’Text-encoding, Theories of the Text, and the ”Work-site”’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 20: 425-35.

— 2009. Securing the Past: Conservation in Art, Architecture and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engelbart, Douglas. 1962. Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Summary Report AFOSR-3233, Office of Scientific Research, U.S. Air Force. Menlo Park CA: Stanford Research Institute. http://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html [accessed 17 April 2009].

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1976/1514-6. The Correspondence of Erasmus: Letters 298 to 445, 1514 to 1516, ed. R.A.B. Mynors and D.F.S. Thomson. Collected Works of Erasmus, vol. 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Ericsson, K. Anders and Walter Kintsch. 1995. ’Long-term Working Memory’. Psychological Review 102.2: 211-45.

ESE. 1994. ESE Discussion on Critical Editing and the Nature of an Electronic Archive.

Espinel, C. H. 1996. ’De Kooning’s Late Colours and Forms: Dementia, Creativity and the Healing Power of Art’. Lancet 347: 1096-98.

Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. 1974. ’Sir Thomas More: The Additions Ascribed to Shakespeare’. The Riverside Shakespeare. 1683-1700. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Faulhaber, Charles B. 1991. ’Textual Criticism in the 21st Century’. Romance Philology 45.1 (August): 123-48.

Federmeier, Kara D. and Marta Kutas. 1999. ’A Rose by any Other Name: Long-term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing’. Journal of Memory and Language 41.4 (November): 469-95.

Ferrer, Daniel. 1995. ’Hypertextual Representation of Literary Working Papers’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 10.2: 143-45.

Finkelstein, David and Alistair McCleery. 2006. The Book History Reader. 2nd edn. Abigdon UK: Routledge.

Finneran, Richard, ed. 1996. The Literary Text in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

and George Bornstein. 1994. ’Towards a Hypermedia Edition of the Poems of W. B. Yeats’. In Résumés/Abstracts. Colloque international / International Conference Consensus ex Machina? Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing/Association for Computers and the Humanities. Paris, 19-23 April 1994. 73-4. Paris: INaLF, CNRS/ENS.

Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

— 1980/1973. ’What is Stylistics and Why Are They Saying Such Terrible Things About It?’. In Fish 1980: 68-96.

Flanders, Julia. 1998. ’Trusting the Electronic Edition’. Computers and the Humanities 31: 301-10.

— 2009. ’Data and Wisdom. Electronic Editing and the Quantification of Knowledge’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24.1: 53-62.

Forsyth, Richard, David Holmes and Emily Tse. 1999. ’Cicero, Sigonio, and Burrows: Investigating the Authenticity of the Consolatio’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 14: 393.

Foucault, Michel. 1989/1969. ’What is an Author’. Trans. Josué Harari. In The Critical Tradition, ed. David H. Richter. 978-88. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Fraistat, N. and S. E. Jones. 2003. ’Immersive Textuality: The Editing of Virtual Spaces’. TEXT 15: 69-82.

Freud, Sigmund. 2002. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Trans. Anthea Bell. London: Penguin.

Gabler, Hans Walter, ed. 1984. Ulysses: A Critical and Synoptic Edition. New York: Garland Publishing.

— 1989. ’Naissance de lédition: de l’ordinateur comme sage-femme’. In La Naissance du Texte, ed. Louis Hay. 53-62. Paris: José Corti.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1998. Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays. Trans. Chris Dawson. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

Galison, Peter. 1994. ’The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision’. Critical Inquiry 21.1 (Autumn): 228-66.

Gants, David L. 1994. ’Toward a Rationale of Electronic Textual Criticism’. Paper. ALLC/ACH Conference, Paris, 19 April 1994.

Garrard, Peter. 2005. ’The Effects of Very Early Alzheimer’s Disease on the Characteristics of Writing by a Renowned Author’. Brain 128: 250-60.

— R. J. Perry and J. R. Hodges. 1997. ’Disorders of Semantic Memory’. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 62: 431-35.

— Ralph M. A. Lambon, K. Patterson and J. R. Hodges. 2005. ’Semantic Feature Knowledge and Picture Naming in Dementia of Alzheimer’s Type: a New Approach’. Brain and Language 93: 79-94.

— L. M. Maloney, J. R. Hodges and K. Patterson. 2005. ’The Effects of Very Early Alzheimer’s Disease on the Characteristics of Writing by a Renowned Author’. Brain 128.2: 250-60.

Genette, Gérard. 1982. Palimpsestes: la littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil.

Geschwind, Norman. 1979. ’Specializations of the Human Brain’. The Brain. 108-17. A Scientific American Book. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Given-Wilson, Chris, ed. 2005a. The Parliament Rolls of Medieval England 1275-1504: PROME. 16 Vols. Woodbridge, London: Boydell Press, National Archives.

— 2005b. The Parliament Rolls of Medieval England 1275-1504: PROME. Published on CD-ROM and Internet. Leicester: Scholarly Digital Editions.

Gleason, Jean Burko and Nan Bernstein Ratner, eds. 1998. Psycholinguistics. 2nd edn. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

Gobet, Fernard and Gary Clarkson. 2004. ’Chunks in Expert Memory: Evidence for the Magical Number Four … or is it Two?’ Memory 12.6: 732-47.

Goodglass, H. 2001. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination: Stimulus Cards-Short Form.

Graber, Stefan. 1998. Der Autortext in der historisch-kritischen Ausgabe. Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Textkritik. Bern: Peter Lang.

Grafton, Anthony. 2002. ’How Revolutionary Was the Print Revolution?’. American Historical Review 107.1: 84-87.

Greetham, David. 1991. ’[Textual] Criticism and Deconstruction’. Studies in Bibliography 44: 1-30.

— 1999. Theories of the Text. London: Oxford University Press.

— 2007. ’Electronic Textual Editing’ (Review of Barnard Lou, Katherine O’Brien O’Keefe, and John Unsworth, eds., Electronic Textual Editing, New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2006), Textual Cultures 2.2: 133-36. Greg, W. W. 1950–51. ’The Rationale of Copy-Text’. Studies in Bibliography 3: 19-36.

— 1998/1932. ’Bibliography – An Apologia’. In Sir Walter Wilson Greg: A Collection of His Writings. Ed. Joseph Rosenblum. 135-57. Lanham MD: Scarecrow Press.

Groden, Michael. 1977-79 Gen. ed., and Hans Walter Gabler, David Hayman, A. Walton Litz, and Danis Rose eds. The James Joyce Archive. [Facsimile ed. of James Joyce’s manuscripts] 63 vols. New York: Garland, 1978.

— 1998. ’Perplex in the Pen—and the Pixels: Reflections on the James Joyce Archive, Hans Walter Gabler’s Ulysses, and ’James Joyce in Hypermedia’. Journal of Modern Literature 22.2 (Winter): 225-31.

Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haddon M. 2003. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time. London: Jonathan Cape.

Hamming, R. W. 1980. ’The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics’. American Mathematical Monthly 87.2 (February): 81-90.

Hartsuiker, Robert J., Roelien Bastiaanse, Albert Postma and Frank Wijnen, eds. 2005. Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

— 2001. ’What Cybertext Theory Can’t Do’. Electronic Book Review, posted 15 February 2001, modified 8 March 2003 at http://www.electronicbookreview.com [accessed 21 April 2004].

— 2002. Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— 2003. ’Translating Media: Why We Should Rethink Textuality’. Yale Journal of Criticism 16: 263-90.

— 2004. ’Print is Flat, Code is Deep: The Importance of Media-Specific Analysis’. Poetics Today 25.1: 67-90.

— 2005. ’Translating Media’. In My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. 89-116. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayward, N. 2006. ’Humanities Computing’. Ecdotica 3: 271-73.

Hearle, Noah. 2007. ’Sentence and Word Length’. http://hearle.nahoo.net/Academic/Maths/Sentence.html [accessed 9 February 2010].

Hebb, D.O. 2002/1949. The Organisation of Behaviour: A Neuropsychological Theory. Philadelphia PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hedstrom, Margaret. 2002. ’Archives, Memory, and Interfaces with the Past’. Archival Science 2: 21-43.

Hockey, Susan. 1996. ’Creating and Using Electronic Editions’. In Finneran 1996: 1-22.

— 2000. Electronic Texts in the Humanities: Principles and Practice. London: Oxford University Press.

Holmes, David. 1994. ’Authorship Attribution’. Computers and the Humanities 28: 87-106.

Hoover, David. 2004. ’Testing Burrows’s ”Delta’’’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 19: 453-75.

— 2005. ’Hot-Air Textuality: Literature after Jerome McGann’. Text and Technology 14: 71-103.

— 2007. ’The End of the Irrelevant Text: Electronic Texts, Linguistics and Literary Theory’. Digital Humanities Quarterly 1.2. digitalhumanities. org/dhq/[accessed 9 February 2010].

Huidobro, Vincente. 1925. ’El Creacionismo’. http://www.vicentehuidobro.uchile.cl/manifiesto1.htm [accessed 9 February 2010].

— 1925. Manifestes: manifeste, manifest, manifes, manife, mani, man, ma, m. Paris: Editions de la revue mondiale.

Huxley, Aldous. 1928. ’Introduction’. In Printing of To-day: An Illustrated Survey of Post-war Typography in Europe and the United States, by Oliver Simon and Julius Rodenberg. 1-15. London: Peter Davies.

James, Henry. 1976. The American. The version of 1877 revised in autograph and typescript for the New York Edition of 1907. Reproduced in facsimile from the original in the Houghton Library, Harvard University, with an introduction by Rodney G. Dennis. London, Scolar Press.

Johannessen, K. and T. Nordenstam. 1995. Culture and Value: Philosophy and the Cultural Sciences. Kirchberg am Wechsel: The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.

Karlsson, Lina and Lina Malm. 2004. ’Revolution or Remediation? A Study of Electronic Scholarly Editions on the Web’. Human IT 7.1: 1-46. http://www.hb.se/bhs/ith/1-7/lklm.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

Kay, Martin. 1967. ’Standards for Encoding Data in a Natural Language’. Computers and the Humanities 1.5: 170-77.

Kellogg, Ronald T. 2004. ’Working Memory Components in Written Sentence Generation’. The American Journal of Psychology 117.3: 341-61.

Kincaid, J. Peter, Robert P. Fishburne, Jr., Richard L. Rogers and Brad S. Chissom. 1975. Derivation of New Readability Formulas for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Millington, TN: Chief of Naval Training.

Kintsch, Walter. 1998. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2001. ’Materiality and Matter and Stuff: What Electronic Texts Are Made Of’. Electronic Book Review, posted 1 October 2001, modified 30 November 2003 at http://www.electronicbookreview.com [accessed 21 April 2004].

— 2002. ’Editing the Interface: Textual Studies and First Generation Electronic Objects’. TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies 14: 15-51.

— 2004a. ’”So the Colors Cover the Wires”: Interface, Aesthetics and Usability’. In Schreibmann, Siemens and Unsworth 2004: 523-42.

— 2004b. ’Extreme Inscription: Towards a Grammatology of the Hard Drive’. TEXT Technology 13.2: 91-125.

— 2008. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Boston: MIT Press.

Lancashire, Ian. 1989. ’Working with Texts’. Paper. IBM Academic Computing Conference, Anaheim, 23 June [unpublished paper].

— 1996. ’Editing English Renaissance Electronic Texts’. In Finneran 1996: 117-43.

— 1999. ’Probing Shakespeare’s Idiolect in Troilus and Cressida I.3.1-29’. University of Toronto Quarterly 68.3: 728-67.

— 2004a. ’Cognitive Stylistics and the Literary Imagination’. In Schreibman, Siemens and Unsworth 2004: 397-414. Oxford: Blackwell.

— 2004b. ’Cybertextuality’. TEXT Technology 2: 1-18

Lance, G.N., and W. T. Williams (1967), ’A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies, I. Hierarchical Systems,’ Computer Journal, 9: 373-80

Lashley, Karl S. 1958. ’Cerebral Organization and Behavior in the Brain and Human Behavior’. Proceedings of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Diseases 36: 1-18.

Laslett, Peter. 1971/1965. The World We Have Lost. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.

Laufer, Roger. 1989. ’Edition critique synoptique sur écran: l’example des Maximes de La Rochefoucauld’. In Les éditions critiques. Problèmes techniques et éditoriaux, ed. Nina Catach. 115-25. Paris: Université de Besançon.

Lavagnino, John. 1996. ’Reading, Scholarship and Hypertext Editions’. Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 8: 109-24. Repub. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 3/1 (1997) quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=j ep;view=text;rgn=main;idno=3336451.0003.112 [accessed 8 February 2010].

Lebrave, Jean-Louis. 1987. ’Rough Drafts: A Challenge to Uniformity in Editing’. Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship, 3: 135-42.

— 1988. ’L’écriture interrompue: quelques problèmes theoriques’. In Les éditions critiques. Problèmes techniques et éditoriaux, ed. Nina Catach. 126-42. Paris: Université de Besançon.

— 1991. ’L’hypertexte et l’avant-texte’. In LINX. Texte et ordinateur: les mutations du lire-écrire, ed. Jacques Anis and J.-L. Lebrave. 101-17. La Garenne-Colombes: Éditions de l’Espace Européen.

— 1994. ’L’hypertexte et l’avant-texte’. In Les sentiers de la création, ed. Maria Teresa Giaveri and Almuth Grésillon. 171-89. Reggio Emilia: Edizioni Diabasis.

Lerer, Seth. 2002. ’My Casaubon: The Novel of Scholarship and Victorian Philology’. In Error and the Academic Self: The Scholarly Imagination, Medieval to Modern. 103-74. New York: Columbia University Press.

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— Ardi Roelofs and Antje S. Meyer. 1999. ’A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1-75.

Lieberman, Philip. 2000. Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax, and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Liu, Alan. 2004. ’Transcendental Data: Towards a Cultural History and Aesthetics of the New Encoded Discourse’. Critical Inquiry 31: 49-84.

Logan, George, David T. Barnard and Robert G. Crawford. 1986. ’Computer-Based Publication of Critical Editions Some General Considerations and a Prototype’. In Computers and the Humanities. Today’s Research Tomorrow’s Teaching. Conference Pre-Prints, ed. Ian Lancashire. 318-26. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Lord, John B. 1979. ’Some Solved and Some Unsolved Problems in Prosody’. Style, 13.4: 311-33.

Love, Harold. 2002. Attributing Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maguire, Laurie E. 1996. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The ’Bad’ Quartos and Their Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Manicas, Peter T. 1998. ’Social Science, History of Philosophy’. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online, ed. E. Craig. London: Routledge. http://www.rep.routledge.com/[accessed 8 February 2010].

Manning, Christopher D. and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marantz, Enid J. 1988. ’Hypotextes et hypertextes. Étude génétique et genettienne des avant-textes et du texte Proustiens’. Texte. Revue de critique et de théorie littéraire 7: 129-51.

Marr, D. 1982. Vision. New York: Freeman.

Martens, Gunter. 1995a. ’(De)Constructing the Text by Editing: Reflections on the Receptional Significance of Textual Apparatuses’. In Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. Hans Walter Gabler, George Bornstein and Gillian Borland Pierce. 125-52. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

— 1995b. ’What is a Text? Attempts at Defining a Central Concept in Editorial Theory’. In Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. Hans Walter Gabler, George Bornstein and Gillian Borland Pierce. 209-31. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Masani, Pesi R. 1990. Norbert Wiener 1894-1964. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Masterman, Margaret. 1962. ’The Intellect’s New Eye’. In Freeing the Mind. Articles and Letters from ”The Times Literary Supplement” During March-June 1962. 38-44. London: The Times Publishing Company.

McCarty, Willard. 2002. ’A Network with a Thousand Entrances: Commentary in an Electronic Age?’ In Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, ed. Roy K. Gibson and Christina Shuttleworth Kraus. 359-402. Leiden: Brill.

2003. ’Data modelling for a history of the book?’ Humanist Discussion Group, 16/509 (26 February 2003) http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/Archives/Virginia/v16/0501.html [Accessed 17 May 2010].

— 2004. ’Modeling: A Study in Words and Meanings’. In Schreibman, Siemens and Unsworth 2004: 254-70.

— 2005. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

— 2006. ’Presence and Genre in Digital Scholarship’. Paper delivered at Master Classes in Textual Studies, De Montfort University, 1 June.

McCulloch, Warren S. 1988/1960. ’What is a Number, That a Man May Know it, and a Man, That He May Know a Number?’ The Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture 1960. In Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. http://www.generalsemantics.org/[accessed 17 April 2009], Programs & Publications, Programs, Korzybski Memorial Lectures.

McDayter, Mark. 2005. ’In Praise of Procedural Markup: Some Thoughts on the Encoding and Rendering of Texts’. Consortium for Computers in the Humanities / Consortium pour ordinateurs en sciences humaines (COCH-COSH) Annual Conference, CFHSS Congress, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

McDermott, Anne. 1996. Samuel Johnson: Dictionary of the English Language on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McGann, Jerome J. 1983. A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Charlottesville and London: The University Press of Virginia.

— 1991. The Textual Condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

— 1994. ’The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti: A Hypermedia Research Archive’. Text: Transactions of the Society of Textual Scholarship 7: 95-105.

— 1995. ’The Rationale of Hypertext’. www2.iath.virginia.edu/public/jjm2f/rationale.html, dated 6 May 1995 [accessed 8 February 2010]. Republished as chapter two of McGann 2001.

— 1996a. ’The Rationale of HyperText’. TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies 9: 11-32.

— 1996b. ’Imagining What You Don’t Know: The Theoretical Goals of the Rossetti Archive’. http://www.iath.virginia.edu/~jjm2f/old/chum.html;

web.mit.edu/comm-forum/papers/mcgann.html [accessed 19 January 2009].

— 1997. ’The Rationale of Hypertext’. In Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory, ed. Kathryn Sutherland. 19-46. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

— 2001. Radiant Textuality. Literature after the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

— 2004a. ’A Note on the Current State of Humanities Scholarship’. Critical Inquiry 30: 409-13.

— 2004b. ’Marking Texts of Many Dimensions’. In Schreibman, Siemens and Unsworth 2004: 198-217.

— 2005a. ’Information Technology and the Troubled Humanities’. TEXT Technology 14.2: 105-21.

— 2005b. The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti A Hypermedia Research Archive. http://www.rossettiarchive.org/[accessed 19 January 2009].

— 2007. ’Database, Interface, and Archival Fever’. PMLA 122.5: 1588-92.

McGurk, H. and J. MacDonald. 1976. ’Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices’. Nature 263: 746-48. See ’The McGurk Effect’. http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~rosenblu/VSMcGurk.html [accessed 8 February 2010].

McKenzie, 1999/1985. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— 2002/1992. ’”What’s Past is Prologue”: The Bibliographical Society and the History of the Book’. In Making Meaning: ’Printers of the Mind’ and Other Essays, ed. Peter D. McDonald and Michael F. Suarez. 259-75. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.

McLeod, Randall [as Random Cloud]. 1982. ’The Marriage of Good and Bad Quartos’. Shakespeare Quarterly 33.4: 421-31.

Medawar, Peter. 1982. ’Hypothesis and Imagination’. In Pluto’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Milic, Louis T. 1966. ’The Next Step’. Computers and the Humanities 1.1: 3-6.

Miller, B. L. and C. E. Hou. 2004. ’Portraits of Artists: Emergence of Visual Creativity in Dementia’. Archives of Neurology 61: 842-44.

Miller, George A. 1956. ’The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information’. Psychological Review 63: 89-97.

Modiano, R., L. F. Searle and P. Shillingsburg, eds. 2004. Voice, Text, Hypertext: Emerging Practices in Textual Studies. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Montfort, Nick. 2004. ’Continuous Paper: The Early Materiality and Workings of Electronic Literature’. The Modern Language Association Annual Convention, Philadelphia, 28 December 2004, nickm.com/writing/essays/continuous_paper_mla.html [accessed 8 February 2010].

Moore, Christopher, Alan Galey, and Stan Ruecker (2008). ’Registers of Usage: Results from Usability Testing of the Electronic New Variorum Shakespeare.’ Paper presented at the Society for Digital Humanities/Société pour l’étude des médias interactifs annual conference at the 2008 Congress of the Social Sciences and Humanities, University of British Columbia. June 2-3, 2008.

Moretti, Franco. 2000. ’Conjectures on World Literature’. New Left Review 1: 54-68.

— 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso. Murdoch, Jean Iris. 1954. Under the Net. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1978. The Sea, The Sea. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1980. Nuns and Soldiers. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1983. The Philosopher’s Pupil. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1988. The Book and the Brotherhood. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1990. The Message to the Planet. London: Chatto and Windus.

— 1994. The Green Knight. London. Chatto and Windus.

— 1995. Jackson’s Dilemma. London: Chatto and Windus.

Mysak, Edward D. 1966. Speech Pathology and Feedback Theory. Springfield IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Nagel, Alexander and Christopher S. Wood. 2005. ’Interventions: Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism’. Art Bulletin 87.3: 403-15.

Nelson, Theodor H. 1987. Literary Machines. South Bend IN.

— 2003. ’A File Structure for the Complex, the Changing, and the Indeterminate’. In The New Media Reader, ed. Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort. 134-45. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Original publication in Association for Computing Machinery: Proceedings of the 20th National Conference, 1965, ed. Lewis Winner, 84-100.

Nestle, Eberhard, Kurt Aland et al. 1993. Novum Testamentum Graece. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.

Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1996. ’Farewell to the Information Age’. In The Future of the Book, ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. 103-38. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

Ohm, T. G., H. Muller, J. Braak and J. Bohl. 1995. ’Close-meshed Prevalence Rates of Different Stages as a Tool to Uncover the Rate of Alzheimer’s Disease-related Neurofibrillary Changes’. Neuroscience 64: 209-17.

Ore, Espen S. 1999. ’Elektronisk publisering: forskjellige utgaveformer og forholdet til grunntekst(er) of endelig(e) tekst(er)’ in Vid Texternas Vägskäl. Textkritiska uppsatser, ed. Lars Burman and Barbro Ståhle Sjönell. 138-44. Stockholm: Svenska Vitterhetssamfundet.

— 2004. ’Monkey Business – or What is an Edition?’ Literary and Linguistic Computing 19.1: 35-43.

Ott, Wilhelm. 1988. ’Software Requirements for Computer-Aided Critical Editing’. In Editing, Publishing and Computer Technology: Papers given at the Twentieth Annual Conference on Editorial Problems, ed. S. Butler and W.P. Stoneman. 81-103. New York: AMS Press.

Oxford University Press. 2007. ’Better writing’. AskOxford.com, http://www.askoxford.com/betterwriting/plainenglish/sentencelength/[accessed 8 February 2010].

P[egues], F[ranklin] J. 1965. ’Editorial: Computer Research in the Humanities’. The Journal of Higher Education 36.2 (February): 105-08.

Peterson, L. R. and M. J. Peterson. 1959. ’Short-term Retention of Individual Verbal Items’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 193–98.

Pichler, A. 1995. ’Transcriptions, Texts and Interpretation’. In Johannessen and Nordenstam 1995: 690-95.

― and G. Lanestedt. 2007. ’Humanistisk forskning og publisering i en digital kontekst: Europeiske filosofimiljøer trekker veksler på semantisk metadata-tagging’. Human IT 9.2: 29-51, etjanst.hb.se/bhs/ith//2-9/apgl. pdf (abstract in English) [accessed 8 February 2010].

Pierce, John R. 1980/1961. An Introduction to Information Theory: Symbols, Signals & Noise. Rev. edn. New York: Dover.

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: HarperCollins.

Plachta, Bodo. 1999. ’In Between the ”Royal Way” of Philology and ”Occult Science”: Some Remarks About German Discussion on Text Constitution in the Last Ten Years’. TEXT 12: 31-47.

Polanyi, Michael. 1969. Knowing and Being. Ed. Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Poore, Quintin E., Lisa J. Rapport, Darren R. Fuerst and Pamela Keenan. 2006. ’Word List Generation Performance in Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia’. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 13.1 (March): 86-94.

Popper, R. K. and J. C. Eccles. 1977. The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Porlock, H. 1995. ’Why Can’t Critics Reveal Whether a Book is Worth Reading?’ The Sunday Times, 22 October.

Posner, Michael I. and Marcus E. Raichle. 1994. Images of Mind. New York: Scientific American.

Potter, Rosanne G. 1985. ’Reasonable Computer-assisted Research on Literary Texts: The Problem of ”Messy Data Sets” ’. In La critique littéraire et l’ordinateur - Literary Criticism and the Computer, ed. Bernard Derval and Michel Lenoble. 95-110. Montréal: Derval and Lenoble.

Rabinovitz, Lauren and Abraham Geil. 2004. ’Introduction’. In Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and Digital Culture, ed. Lauren Rabinovitz and Abraham Geil. 1-19. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

Reed, Charlotte M. and Nathaniel I. Durlach. 1998. ’Note on Information Transfer Rates in Human Communication’. Presence 7.5 (October): 509-18.

Renear, A. 1997. ’Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality’. In Sutherland 1997: 107-26.

— Jerome McGann and Susan Hockey. 1999. What is Text?: A Debate on the Philosophical and Epistemological Nature of Text in the Light of Humanities Computing Research, Position papers originally presented at the 1999 ACH/ALLC Conference. http://www.humanities.ualberta.ca/Susan_Hockey/achallc99.htm [accessed 8 February 2010].

Richards, I. A. 1924. Principles of Literary Criticism. International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Ltd.

Richards, Thomas. 1993. The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire. London: Verso.

Roberts, Helen I. 1959. ’St. Augustine in ”St. Jerome’s Study”: Carpaccio’s Painting and Its Legendary Source’. Art Bulletin 41: 283-97.

Robinson, Peter, ed.

— 1994. ’Collation, Textual Criticism, Publication, and the Computer’. Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 7: 77-94.

— 1996a. ’Is There a Text in These Variants?’ In Finneran 1996: 99-115.

— 1996b. ’...But What Kind of Electronic Editions Should We Be Making?’ In ALLC-ACH ’96 Abstracts. University of Bergen June 25-29 1996. 81-2. Bergen: University of Bergen.

— 1996c. The Wife of Bath’s Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— 2000. ’The One Text and the Many Texts’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 15/1: 5-14.

— 2002. ’What is a Critical Digital Edition?’ Variants. The Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship 1: 43-62.

— 2003a. ’Where We Are with Electronic Scholarly Editions, and Where We Want to Be’. In Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 5: 125-46. computerphilologie.uni-muenchen.de/jg03/robinson.html [accessed 19 January 2009].

— 2003b. ’The History, Discoveries and Aims of the Canterbury Tales Project’. The Chaucer Review 38.2: 126-39. Preprint at http://www.canterburytalesproject.org/pubs/PR-ChauRev.pdf [accessed 19 January 2009].

— 2004. ” Where We Are with Electronic Scholarly Editions, and Where We Want to Be”. In Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 5. 123-143, computerphilologie.uni-muenchen.de/ejournal.html [accessed 8 February 2010].

— 2007a. ’Electronic Editions Which We Have Made and Which We Want to Make’. In Digital Philology and Medieval Texts, ed. Arianna Ciula and Francesco Stella. 1-12. Pisa: Pacini Editore.

— 2007b. ’Current Directions in the Making of Digital Editions: Towards Interactive Editions’. Ecdotica 4: 176-91.

— 2007c. ’A Specification towards Distributed Editions 2.1’. Draft at http://www.itsee.bham.ac.uk/DistributedEditions/UTv21.pdf [accessed 19 January 2009].

— 2008. ’Documenting Texts and Text Sources for Exposure and Retrieval’. Working paper at vmr.bham.ac.uk/media/vmrdocuments/architectformal091008.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

— 2009. ’What Text Really is Not, and Why Editors Have to Learn to Swim’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24.1: 41-52.

— and Marilyn Deegan. 1994. ’The Electronic Edition’. In D. G. Scragg and P. E. Szarmach (eds.) Editing Old English Texts. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer.

Robinson-Riegler, Gregory and Bridget. 2004. Cognitive Psychology: Applying the Science of the Mind. Boston: Pearson.

Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2003. ’Graduate Education in Humanities Computing’. Computers and the Humanities 37: 243-44.

Rose, Danis Rose, ed. 1997. Ulysses: A Reader’s Edition. London: Picador Press.

Rosenbach Foundation, Philip H. and A. S. W. 1975. Ulysses: A Facsimile of the Manuscript. 3 Vols. New York: Octagon Books, 1975.

Ross, Donald Jr. 1981. ’Aids for Editing ”Walden” ’. Computers and the Humanities 15.3: 155-62.

Rudman, Joseph. 1998. ’The State of Authorship Attribution Studies: Some Problems and Solutions’. Computers and the Humanities 31: 351-65.

Rudman, Joseph. 2000. ’Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies: Ignis Fatuus or Rosetta Stone?’ BSANZ Bulletin [Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin] 24: 163-76.

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1999. ’Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Text’. In Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory, ed. Marie-Laure Ryan. 78-107. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Sabor, Peter. 2004. Introduction to The History of Ophelia, by Sarah Fielding. Peterborough (Ontario): Broadview.

Santos, Paulo J. and Albert N. Badre. 1994. ’Automatic Chunk Detection in Human-Computer Interaction’. 69-77. Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Bari, Italy, 1-4 June 1994. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. http://www.acm.org [accessed 7 February 2010].

Schreibman, Susan. 2002. ’Computer-Mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice’. Computers and the Humanities 36: 283-93.

— 2003. ’Next Generation Student Resources: A Speculative Primer’. Electronic Book Review, posted 8 November 2003, modified 13 November 2003. http://www.electronicbookreview.com [accessed 8 February 2010].

— Ray Siemens and John Unsworth, eds. 2004. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.

Searle, John. 1980. ’Minds, Brains and Programs’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3.3: 417-57.

Shakespeare, William and others. 1910. The Book of Sir Thomas More, Harleian MSS. 7368, c. 1590-96. Tudor Facsimile Texts, Folio series [London].

Shannon, C. E. 1948. ’A Mathematical Theory of Communication’. The Bell System Technical Journal, July-October, 27: 379-423, 623-56. cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

Shillingsburg, Miriam J. 1983. ’Relying on the Weird: Dangers in Editing by Computer’. In Sixth International Conference on Computers and the Humanities, ed. Sarah K. Burton and Douglas D. Short. 654-58. Rockville, Maryland: Computer Science Press.

Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1980. ’The Computer as Research Assistant in Scholarly Editing’. Literary Research Newsletter 5/1: 31-45.

— 1993. ’General Principles for Electronic Scholarly Editions’. sunsite. berkeley.edu/MLA/principles.html [accessed 19 January 2009].

— 1996a. Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age. Theory and Practice. Third Edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

— 1996b. ’Principles for Electronic Archives, Scholarly Editions, and Tutorials’. In Finneran 1996: 23-35.

— 2005. ’Practical Editions of Literary Texts’. Variants. The Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship 4: 29-55.

— 2006a. ’The Dank Cellar of Electronic Texts’. In From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. 138-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— 2006b. From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— 2009. ’How Literary Works Exist: Convenient Scholarly Editions’. In Special Cluster: Digital Textual Studies: Past, Present and Future, ed. Amy Earhart and Maura Ives. Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.3. digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000054/000054.html [accessed 7 February 2010].

Siemens, Ray G. 1996. ’The New Scholarly Edition in the Academic Marketplace’. Text Technology 6.1: 35-50.

— 2001. ’Unediting and Non-Editions’. Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 119.3: 423-55. Reprint, with additional introduction, of ’Shakespearean Apparatus? Explicit Textual Structures and the Implicit Navigation of Accumulated Knowledge’. TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies, 14 (2002): 209-40. Electronic pre-print published in Surfaces, 8/106: 1-34. http://www.pum.umontreal.ca/revues/surfaces/vol8/siemens.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

— 2005. ’Text Analysis and the Dynamic Edition? A Working Paper, Briefly Articulating Some Concerns with an Algorithmic Approach to the Electronic Scholarly Edition’. Text Technology 14.1: 91-8 texttechnology. mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol14_1_09.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

— and Susan Schreibman, eds. 2007. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sigurd, Bengt, Mats Eeg-Olofsson and Joost van Weijer. 2004. ’Word Length, Sentence Length and Frequency – Zipf Revisited’. Studia Linguistica 58.1 (April): 37-52.

Solopova, Elizabeth, ed. 2000. The General Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spurgeon, Caroline. 1930. ’The Imagery in the Sir Thomas More Fragment’. Review of English Studies 6: 257-70.

Squire, Larry R. 1987. Memory and Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stubbs, Estelle, ed. 2001. The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile, Leicester: Scholarly Digital Editions.

Sutherland, Kathryn, ed. 1997. Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sweller, John. 1988. ’Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning’. Cognitive Science 12: 257-85.

Sweller, John. 2006. ’Commentary: The Worked Example Effect and Human Cognition’. Learning and Instruction 16: 165-69.

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1989. ’Reproductions and Scholarship’. Studies in Bibliography 42: 25-54.

— 1989. The Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

— 1990. ’Textual Criticism and Deconstruction’. Studies in Bibliography 43: 1-33.

— 1991. ’Textual Criticism and Literary Sociology’. Studies in Bibliography 44: 84-144.

— 1995a. ’The Varieties of Scholarly Editing’. In Scholarly Editing. A Guide to Research, ed. D.C. Greetham. 9-32. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.

— 1995b. ’Critical Editions, Hypertexts, and Genetic Criticism’. The Romanic Review 86.3: 581-93.

— 2006. ’Foreword.’ In Burnard, O’Keeffe and Unsworth 2006: 1-6. http://www.tei-c.org/About/Archive_new/ETE/Preview/tanselle.xml [accessed 8 February 2010].

Taylor, Gary. 1988. ’The Rhetoric of Textual Criticism’. TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies 4: 39-57.

Thaller, Manfred. 1996. ’Text as Data Type’. In ALLC-ACH ’96 Abstracts. University of Bergen June 25-29 1996. 252-54. Bergen: University of Bergen.

Todd, R. 2001. ’Realism Disavowed: Discourses of Memory and High Incarnations in ”Jackson’s Dilemma”’. Modern Fiction Studies 47: 674-95.

Tufte, Edward. 1997. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire CT: Graphics Press.

Turing, A. M. 1950. ’Computing Machinery and Intelligence’. Mind 59.236: 433-60.

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). 2003. Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage. portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/13367/10700115911Charter_en.pdf/Charter_en.pdf [accessed 8 February 2010].

van der Weel, Adriaan. 2005. ’Bibliography for the New Media’. Quærendo 35.1-2: 96-168.

Vanhoutte, Edward. 2006. ’Prose Fiction and Modern Manuscripts. Limitations and Possibilities of Text-encoding for Electronic Editions’. In Burnard, O’Keeffe and Unsworth 2006: 161-80. http://www.tei-c.org/About/Archive_new/ETE/Preview/vanhoutte.xml [accessed 8 February 2010].

Vigliocco, G. 1997. ’Grammatical Gender is on the Tip of Italian Tongues’. Psychological Science 8:14.

Vincenti, Walter G. 1990. What Engineers Know and How they Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wentersdorf, Karl P. 2006. ’On ”Momtanish Inhumanity” in ”Sir Thomas More” ’. Studies in Philology 103: 178-85.

Werstine, Paul. 2008. ’Past is Prologue: Electronic New Variorum Shakespeare’. Shakespeare 4.3: 224-36.

Whittlesea, B. W. 2002. ’False Memory and the Discrepancy-attribution Hypothesis: The Prototype-familiarity Illusion’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131: 96-115.

Wiener, Norbert. 1950/1967. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. New York: Hearst.

— 1956. I Am a Mathematician: The Later Life of a Prodigy. Garden City NY: Doubleday.

— 1961/1948. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. 2nd. edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wigner, Eugene P. 1960. ’The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences’. Richard Courant Lecture in Mathematical Sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13.001-14: 1-14.

Wilson, A. N. 2003. Iris Murdoch as I Knew Her. London: Hutchinson.

Windelband, Wilhelm. 1998/1894. ’History and Natural Science’. Trans. James T. Lamiell. Theory and Psychology 8.1: 5-22.

Wood, Albert B. 1955. A Textbook of Sound. 3rd edn. New York Macmillan.

Wittig, Susan. 1978. ’The Computer and the Concept of Text’. Computers and the Humanities 11: 211-15.

Woolf, Virginia. 1976. The Waves: The Two Holograph Drafts. Ed. J. W. Graham. London: The Hogarth Press.

Woolf, Virginia. 2006. The Waves. Intr. by Ann. Molly Hite; ed. Mark Hussey. Orlando: Harvest / Harcourt.

Yates, Frances A. 1966. The Art of Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Zeki, Semir. 2006. ’The Neurology of Ambiguity’. The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity, ed. Mark Turner. 245-70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.