Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2018

William J. Sutherland
Lynn V. Dicks
Nancy Ockendon
et al.

7. Primate conservation

7. Primate conservation

Jessica Junker, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Lisa Orth, Rebecca K. Smith, Silviu O. Petrovan et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

Graham L. Banes, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

Sergio Marrocoli, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany

Sarah Papworth, Royal Holloway University of London, UK

Silviu O. Petrovan, University of Cambridge, UK

Andrew J. Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society, Uganda

Ricardo Rocha, University of Cambridge, UK

Joanna M. Setchell, Durham University, UK

Kathy Slater, Operation Wallacea, UK

Erin Wessling, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany

Liz Williamson, University of Stirling, UK

Scope of assessment: for wild primate species across the world.

Assessed: 2017

Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.


Open access


Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search