Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2018

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

2. Bat conservation

2.9 Threat: Invasive species

Texte intégral

2.9.1 Invasive species

Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

● Remove invasive plant species

1One site comparison study in North America found higher bat activity in forest preserves where invasive plant species had been removed alongside other restoration practices. Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 20%; certainty 10%; harms 0%).

2http://www.conservationevidence.com/​actions/​1008

Likely to be ineffective or harmful

● Translocate to predator or disease free areas

3Two small unreplicated studies in New Zealand and Switzerland found low numbers of bats remaining at release sites after translocation, and observed homing tendencies, disease and death. Assessment: Likely to be ineffective or harmful (effectiveness 5%; certainty 40%; harms 80%).

4http://www.conservationevidence.com/​actions/​1009

No evidence found (no assessment)

5We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

6• Control invasive predators

2.9.2 White-nose syndrome

No evidence found (no assessment)

7We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

  • Control anthropogenic spread
  • Cull infected bats
  • Increase population resistance
  • Modify cave environments to increase bat survival

Table des illustrations

URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/6368/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 153k
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/6368/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 92k

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search