Amsterdamska, Olga (1990), ‘Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500407

Aristotle (1941e), On the Generation of Animals, trans. by Arthur Platt, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 665–80.

Aristotle (1941f), Metaphysics, trans. by W. D. Ross, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 689–926.

Averill, James R. (1980b), ‘A Constructivist View of Emotion,’ in Theories of Emotion, ed. by Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman (New York: Academic Press), pp. 305–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1

Babich, Babette E. (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science: Calculation, Thought, and Gelassenheit,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 589–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1624-6_36

Bagni, Giorgio T. (2010), ‘Mathematics and Positive Sciences: A Reflection Following Heidegger,’ Education Studies in Mathematics 73(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9214-0

Barnes, Barry (1974), Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203706541

Barnes, Barry (1977), Interests and the Growth of Knowledge (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315763576

Barnes, Barry (1981), ‘On the “Hows” and “Whys” of Cultural Change (Response to Woolgar),’ Social Studies of Science 11(4), 481–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278101100404

Barnes, Barry (1982), T. S. Kuhn and Social Science (London: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16721-0

Barnes, Barry (1983), ‘Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction,’ Sociology 17(4), 524–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004004

Barnes, Barry (1992a), ‘Relativism, Realism and Finitism,’ in Cognitive Realism and Social Science, ed. by Diederick Raven, Lietke van Vucht and Jan de Wolf (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction), pp. 131–47.

Barnes, Barry (1992b), ‘Status Groups and Collective Action,’ Sociology 26(2), 259–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026002008

Barnes, Barry (1995), The Elements of Social Theory (London: UCL Press). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400864355

Barnes, Barry (2004), ‘On Social Constructivist Accounts of the Natural Sciences,’ in Knowledge and the World: Challenges beyond the Science Wars, ed. by Martin Carrier, Johannes Roggenhofer, Günter Küppers and Philippe Blanchard (Berlin: Springer), pp. 105–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08129-7_5

Barnes, Barry (2011), ‘Relativism as a Completion of the Scientific Project,’ in The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge, ed. by Richard Schantz and Markus Seidel (Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag), pp. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110325904.23

Bartels, Christoph (2010), ‘The Production of Silver, Copper, and Lead in the Harz Mountains from Late Medieval Times to the Onset of Industrialization,’ in Materials and Expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between Market and Laboratory, ed. by Ursula Klein and Emma C. Spary (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 71–100. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439709.003.0004

Baudelaire, Charles (1964 [1863]), ‘The Painter of Modern Life,’ in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, by Charles Baudelaire, trans. by Jonathan Mayne (London: Phaidon Press), pp. 1–40.

Blattner, William D. (1994), ‘Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist?,’ Inquiry 37(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749408602348

Blattner, William D. (1995), ‘Decontextualization, Standardization, and Deweyan Science,’ Man and World 28, 321–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273736

Blattner, William D. (2004), ‘Heidegger’s Kantian Idealism Revisited,’ Inquiry 47(4), 321–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740410004160

Bloor, David (1973), ‘Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the Sociology of Mathematics,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4(2), 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(73)90003-4

Bloor, David (1983), Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge (London: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17273-3

Bloor, David (1984), ‘The Sociology of Reasons: Or Why “Epistemic Factors” Are Really “Social Factors,”’ in Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, ed. by James Robert Brown (Dordecht: Reidel), pp. 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7688-8_12

Bloor, David (1996), ‘Idealism and the Sociology of Knowledge,’ Social Studies of Science 26(4), 839–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026004005

Bloor, David (1997a), ‘Remember the Strong Program?,’ Science, Technology, & Human Values 22(3), 373–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200307

Bloor, David (1997b), Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions (London: Routledge).

Bloor, David (1998), ‘A Civil Scepticism,’ Social Studies of Science 28(4), 655–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028004009

Bloor, David (1999a), ‘Anti-Latour,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(98)00038-7

Bloor, David (1999b), ‘Reply to Bruno Latour,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 131–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00040-5

Bloor, David (2000), ‘Whatever Happened to “Social Constructiveness”?,’ in Bartlett, Culture & Cognition, ed. by Akiko Saito (London: Psychology Press), pp. 194–215. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203457504

Bloor, David (2001), ‘What Is a Social Construct?,’ Facta Philosophica 3, 141–56.

Bloor, David (2004a), ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ in Handbook of Epistemology, ed. by I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Woleński (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 919–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_25

Bloor, David (2004b), ‘Institutions and Rule-Scepticism: A Reply to Martin Kusch,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704044910

Bloor, David (2007), ‘Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise,’ CommonKnowledge 13(2–3), 250–80. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-2007-007

Bloor, David (2011), The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics, 1909–1930 (Chicago: Chicago University Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226060934.001.0001

Bloor, David and David Edge (2000), ‘Knowing Reality through Society,’ Social Studies of Science 30(1), 158–60. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/030631200030001009

Boghossian, Paul A. (2006), Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Bourgeois, Patrick L. and Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988), ‘Heidegger and Peirce: Beyond “Realism or Idealism,”’ Southwest Philosophy Review 4(1), 103–10. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview19884111

Boyle, Robert (1685 [1966]), An Essay of the Great Effects of Even Languid and Unheeded Motion, in The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 5, by Robert Boyle, ed. by Thomas Birch (Hildesheim: Georg Olms), pp. 1–37.

Brandom, Robert (1983), ‘Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time,’ Monist 6(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198366327

Brown, James Robert (2001), Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Science Wars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Brun, Georg and Dominique Kuenzle (2008), ‘A New Role for Emotions in Epistemology?,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Burnyeat, Miles F. (1982), ‘Gods and Heaps,’ in Language and Logos, ed. by Malcolm Schofeld and Martha Craven Nussbaum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 315–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511550874.017

Burtt, Edwin Arthur (1925), The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822754

Caputo, John D. (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science: The Two Essences of Science,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4362-9_3

Carson, Cathryn (2010), ‘Science as Instrumental Reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg,’ Continental Philosophy Review 42(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-009-9124-y

Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139167093

Celluci, Carlo (2013), Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method (Dordecht: Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2

Cerbone, David R. (1995), ‘World, World-Entry, and Realism in Early Heidegger,’ Inquiry 38(4), 401–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749508602397

Cerbone, David R. (2005), ‘Realism and Truth,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 248–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch15

Code, Lorraine (2015), ‘Care, Concern, and Advocacy: Is There a Place for Epistemic Responsibility?,’ Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 1(1), 1–20. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol1/iss1/1/

Collins, Harry M. (1982), ‘Special Relativism — The Natural Attitude,’ Social Studies of Science 12(1), 139–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012001009

Collins, Harry M. (1999), ‘The Science Police,’ Social Studies of Science 29(2), 287–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029002012

Collins, Harry M. (2002), ‘The Experimenter’s Regress as Philosophical Sociology,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1), 153–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00033-4

Collins, Harry M. and Trevor Pinch (2007), ‘Who Is to Blame for the Challenger Explosion?,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38(1), 254–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.006

Collins, Harry M. and Steven Yearley (1992), ‘Journey into Space,’ in Science as Practice and Culture, ed. by Andrew Pickering (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 369–89. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668208.001.0001

Crease, Robert P. (1992), ‘The Problem of Experimentation,’ in Phenomenology of Natural Science, ed. by Lee Hardy and Lester Embree (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 215–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2622-9_11

Crease, Robert P. (2009), “Covariant Realism,’ Human Affairs 19(2), 223–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-009-0035-7

Crouthamel, Jason (2002), ‘War Neurosis versus Saving Psychosis: Working-Class Politics and Psychological Trauma in Weimar Germany,’ Journal of Contemporary History 37(2), 163–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094020370020101

Crowell, Steven Galt (1992), ‘Lask, Heidegger, and the Homelessness of Logic,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23(3), 222–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1992.11006996

Crowell, Steven Galt (1994), ‘Making Logic Philosophical Again (1912–1916),’ in Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in his Early Thought, ed. by Theodore Kisiel and John van Buren (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 55–72.

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (2013), The Heidegger Dictionary (London: Bloomsbury).

Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison (2010), Objectivity (New York: Zone Books).

Dea, Shannon (2009), ‘Heidegger and Galileo’s Slippery Slope,’ Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 48(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217309090040

Dear, Peter (1990), ‘Miracles, Experiments, and the Ordinary Course of Nature,’ Isis 81(4), 663–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/355544

Dear, Peter (1995), Discipline & Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001

Dear, Peter (1998), ‘Method and the Study of Nature,’ in The Cambridge Companion of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 147–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.009

Dear, Peter (2001), Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and Its Ambitions, 1500–1700 (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

Dear, Peter (2006a), ‘The Meanings of Experience,’ in The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3: Early Modern Science, ed. by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 106–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521572446.005

Dear, Peter (2006b), The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226139500.001.0001

de Bruyckere, Anna and Maarten Van Dyck (2013), ‘Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism,’ Perspectives of Science 21(4), 453–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00112

Descartes, René (1969a [1644]), The Principles of Philosophy, trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1, by René Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 201–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805042.007

Descartes, René (1969b [1644]), Rules for the Direction of the Mind, trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1, by René Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805042.007

de Sousa, Ronald (1987), The Rationality of Emotion (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

de Sousa, Ronald (2008), ‘Epistemic Feelings,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Desroches, Dennis (2003), ‘Phenomenology, Science Studies, and the Question of Being,’ Configurations 11(3), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0025

Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan (1961 [1950]), The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. by C. Dikshoorn (London: Oxford University Press).

Döring, Sabine A. (2010), ‘Why Be Emotional?,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.001.0001

Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1991a), ‘Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Realism,’ in The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, ed. by David R. Hiley, James F. Bohman and Richard Shusterman (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0005

Dreyfus, Hubert L. (2001), ‘How Heidegger Defends the Possibility of a Correspondence Theory of Truth with Respect to the Entities of Natural Science,’ in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr D. Cetina and Eike von Savigny (London: Routledge), pp. 151–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006

Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Charles Spinosa (1999), ‘Coping with Things-in-Themselves: A Practice-Based Phenomenological Argument for Realism,’ Inquiry 42(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017499321624

Dror, Otniel E., Bettina Hitzer, Anjy Laukötter and Pilar León-Sanz, eds. (2016), History of Science and the Emotions (Osiris 31) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.1086/687590

Elgin, Catherine Z. (2008), ‘Emotion and Understanding,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. (1937), Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford: Clarendon). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912128297

Fay, Thomas A. (1977), Heidegger: The Critique of Logic (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1057-3

Feenberg, Andrew (1992), ‘Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy,’ Inquiry 35(3/4), 301–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602296

Feenberg, Andrew (2005), Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203489000

Feenberg, Andrew (2006), ‘Symmetry, Asymmetry, and the Real Possibility of Radical Change: A Reply to Kochan,’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 37(4), 721–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.003

Fell, Joseph P. (1989), ‘The Familiar and the Strange: On the Limits of Praxis in the Early Heidegger,’ in Heidegger and Praxis, ed. by Thomas J. Nenon (The Southern Journal of Philosophy 28, Spindel Conference Supplement), pp. 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1990.tb00563.x

Fleck, Ludwik (1979 [1935]), Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, trans. by Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn, ed. by Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Forman, Paul (1971), ‘Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment,’ Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3, 1–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757315

Foucault, Michel (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Pantheon Books).

Freud, Sigmund (1985 [1919]), ‘The “Uncanny,”’ in Art and Literature, vol. 14 of The Penguin Freud Library, ed. by Albert Dickson (London: Penguin Books), pp. 339–76.

Freydberg, Bernard (2002), ‘What Becomes of Science in “The Future of Phenomenology?”’ Research in Phenomenology 32(1), 219–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640260490656

Frijda, Nico H., Antony S. R. Manstead and Sacha Bem, eds. (2000), Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511659904

Frijda, Nico H. and Louise Sundararajan (2007), ‘Emotion refinement: A theory inspired by Chinese poetics,’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(3), 227–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00042.x

Ginev, Dimitri (2005), ‘Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590500249522

Ginev, Dimitri (2012), ‘Two Accounts of the Hermeneutic Fore-structure of Scientific Research,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26(4), 423–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.748498

Ginev, Dimitri (2015), ‘The Battle for Mathematical Existentialism and the War of the Heideggerian Succession: Rejoinder to Kochan,’ in Debating Cognitive Existentialism, ed. by Dimitri Ginev (Leiden: Brill Rodopi), pp. 168–93. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004299191_008

Glazebrook, Trish (1998), ‘Heidegger on the Experiment,’ Philosophy Today 42(3), 250–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199842326

Glazebrook, Trish (2000b), ‘From φύσις to Nature, τέχνη to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton,’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 38, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2000.tb00892.x

Glazebrook, Trish (2001a), ‘Heidegger and Scientific Realism,’ Continental Philosophy Review 34, 361–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013148922905

Glazebrook, Trish (2001b), ‘The Role of the Beiträge in Heidegger’s Critique of Science,’ Philosophy Today 45(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200145139

Glazebrook, Trish, ed. (2012a), Heidegger and Science (Albany: SUNY Press).

Godin, Benoît and Yves Gingras (2002), ‘The Experimenter’s Regress: From Skepticism to Argumentation,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1), 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00032-2

Goffman, Erving (1967), Interaction Ritual (New York: Anchor).

Goldie, Peter (2004), ‘Emotion, Reason, and Virtue,’ in Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality, ed. by Dylan Evans & Pierre Cruse (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 249–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528975.003.0013

Greenspan, Patricia (1988), Emotions and Reasons: An Inquiry into Emotional Justification (London: Routledge).

Greenspan, Patricia (2000), ‘Emotional Strategies and Rationality,’ Ethics 110(3), 469–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831848

Gross, Alan G. (2006), ‘The Verbal and the Visual in Science: A Heideggerian Perspective,’ Science in Context 19(4), 443–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889706001037

Gründer, Karlfried (1963), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Science in Its Historical Background,’ Philosophy Today 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday1963719

Hacking, Ian (1992), ‘“Style” for Historians and Philosophers,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(92)90024-z

Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).

Hacking, Ian (2012), ‘“Language, Truth and Reason” 30 Years Later,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002

Haugland, John (2013), Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. by Joseph Rouse (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674074590

Heelan, Patrick (1987), ‘Husserl’s Later Philosophy of Natural Science,’ Philosophy of Science 54(3), 368–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/289389

Heelan, Patrick (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Longest Day: Twenty-Five Years Later,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 579–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1624-6_35

Heidegger, Martin (1976 [1967]), ‘On the Being and Conception of φύσις in Aristotle’s Physics B, 1,’ Man and World 9(3), 219–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01249371

Heidegger, Martin (1977a [1952]), ‘The Age of the World Picture,’ in The Question Concerning Technology, by Martin Heidegger, trans. by William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 115–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_3

Heidegger, Martin (1987/88), ‘Brief an Jean Beaufret/Letter to Jean Beaufret,’ trans. by Steven Davis, Heidegger Studies 3/4, 3–6. https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=heideggerstud&id=heideggerstud_1987_0003_0000_0005_0006

Heidegger, Martin (1993a [1978]), ‘What Is Metaphysics?,’ trans. by David Farrell Krell, in Basic Writings, revised and expanded edn, by Martin Heidegger, ed. by David Farrell Krell (New York: HarperCollins), pp. 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812637.006

Heidegger, Martin (1995a [1983]), The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1998), ‘Traditional Language and Technological Language,’ trans. by Wanda Torres Gregory, Journal of Philosophical Research 23, 129–45. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_16

Heidegger, Martin (2000 [1953]), Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt (New Haven: Yale University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (2010b), Being and Time, trans. by Joan Stambaugh, revised edn (Albany: SUNY Press).

Hoffman, Piotr (2000), ‘Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism,’ Inquiry 43(4), 403–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017400750051215

Hookway, Christopher (1998), ‘Doubt: Affective States and the Regulation of Inquiry,’ in Pragmatism, ed. by C. J. Misak (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24), pp. 203–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1998.10717500

Hookway, Christopher (2002), ‘Emotions in Epistemic Evaluations,’ in The Cognitive Basis of Science, ed. by Peter Carruthers, Steven Stich and Michael Siegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 251–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613517.014

Hookway, Christopher (2008), ‘Epistemic Immediacy, Doubt and Anxiety: On a Role for Affective States in Epistemic Evaluation,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), p. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Howson, Colin (2009), ‘Sorites Is No Threat to Modus Ponens: A Reply to Kochan,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2), 209–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903007188

Hyder, David and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, eds. (2010), Science and the Life-World: Essays on Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences (Stanford: University of Stanford Press). https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804756044.001.0001

Jagger, Alison M. (1989), ‘Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology,’ in Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Epistemology, ed. by Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (Boston: Unwin Hyman), pp. 129–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185

Jardine, Nicholas (1976), ‘Galileo’s Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7(4), 277–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(76)90009-1

Kant, Immanuel (1956), Critique of Practical Reason, trans. by Lewis White Beck (New York: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809576

Kant, Immanuel (1998 [1781/1787]), Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649

Käufer, Stephan (2001), ‘On Heidegger on Logic,’ Continental Philosophy Review 34(4), 455–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013110920041

Käufer, Stephan (2005), ‘Logic,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L Dreyfus and Mark A. Wrathall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch9

Kaufman, Doris (1999), ‘Science as Cultural Practice: Psychiatry in the First World War and Weimar Germany,’ Journal of Contemporary History 34(1), 125–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200949903400107

Keller, Evelyn Fox (1982), ‘Feminism and Science,’ Signs 7(3), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1086/493901

Kessler, Eckhard (1988), ‘The Intellective Soul,’ in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. by Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner, Eckhard Kessler and Jill Kraye (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 485–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.017

Kisiel, Theodore J. (1992), ‘Heidegger and the New Images of Science,’ in Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. 4: Reverberations, ed. by Christopher Macaan (London: Routledge), pp. 325–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916477x00112

Kitcher, Philip (1998), ‘A Plea for Science Studies,’ in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodern Myths about Science, ed. by Noretta Koertge (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195117255.003.0004

Kiverstein, Julian, ed. (2012), Heidegger and Cognitive Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

Klein, Ursula and Emma C. Spary (2010), ‘Introduction: Why Materials?,’ in Materials and Expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between Market and Laboratory, ed. by Ursula Klein and Emma C. Spary (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439709.003.0001

Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-025777-8.50014-1

Kochan, Jeff (2006), ‘Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37(4): 702–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.06.001

Kochan, Jeff (2008), ‘Realism, Reliabilism, and the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590802280878

Kochan, Jeff (2009a), ‘The Exception Makes the Rule: Reply to Howson,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2), 213–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903007196

Kochan, Jeff (2009b), ‘Popper’s Communitarianism,’ in Rethinking Popper, ed. by Zuzana Parusniková and Robert S. Cohen (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272) (Berlin: Springer), pp. 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_22

Kochan, Jeff (2010a), ‘Contrastive Explanation and the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ Social Studies of Science 40(1), 127–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709104780

Kochan, Jeff (2010b), ‘Latour’s Heidegger,’ Social Studies of Science 40(4), 579–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709360263

Kochan, Jeff (2011a), ‘Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger,’ Perspectives on Science 19(1), 81–115. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00026

Kochan, Jeff (2011b), ‘Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(3), 467–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.02.003

Kochan, Jeff (2013), ‘Subjectivity and Emotion in Scientific Research,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(3), 354–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.05.003

Kochan, Jeff (2015a), ‘Scientific Practice and Modes of Epistemic Existence,’ in Debating Cognitive Existentialism, ed. by Dimitri Ginev (Leiden: Brill Rodopi), pp. 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004299191_007

Kochan, Jeff (2015b), ‘Putting a Spin on Circulating Reference, or How to Rediscover the Scientific Subject,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49, 103–07. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.10.004

Kochan, Jeff (2015d), ‘Objective Styles in Northern Field Science,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 52, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.04.001

Kochan, Jeff (2015e), ‘Reason, Emotion, and the Context Distinction,’ Philosophia Scientiae 19(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1036

Kochan, Jeff and Hans Bernhard Schmid (2011), ‘Philosophy of Science,’ in The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology, ed. by Sebastian Luft and Søren Overgaard (London: Routledge), pp. 461–72. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816936.ch42

Kohler, Robert E. (2002), Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226450117.001.0001

Kolb, David A. (1983), ‘Heidegger on the Limits of Science,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 14(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1983.11007608

Kovacs, George (1990), ‘Philosophy as Primordial Science (Urwissenschaft) in the Early Heidegger,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 21(2), 121–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1990.11006890

Koyré, Alexandre (1943a), ‘Galileo and Plato,’ Journal of the History of Ideas 4(4), 400–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707166

Koyré, Alexandre (1943b), ‘Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century,’ Philosophical Review 52(4), 333–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2180668

Kuhn, Thomas (1977), ‘Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science,’ in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, by Thomas Kuhn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 31–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/202372

Kusch, Martin (2004a), ‘Reply to My Critics,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 615–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704046600

Kusch, Martin (2004b), ‘Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 571–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704044168

Kusch, Martin (2018), ‘Scientific Realism and Social Epistemology,’ in Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, ed. by Juha Saatsi (London: Routledge), pp 261–75.

Langton, Rae (1998), Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves (Oxford: Clarendon Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243174.001.0001

Latour, Bruno (1999a), ‘For David Bloor… and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s “Anti-Latour,”’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 113–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00039-9

Latour, Bruno (2002), ‘The Science Wars: A Dialogue,’ Common Knowledge 8 (1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-8-1-71

Lewens, Tim (2005), ‘Realism and the Strong Program,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56(3), 559–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi125

Ma, Lin and Jaap van Brakel (2014), ‘Heidegger’s Thinking on the “Same” of Science and Technology,’ Continental Philosophy Review 47(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9287-z

May, Reinhard (1996), Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influence on His Work, trans. by Graham Parkes (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979792

McAllister, James W. (2002), ‘Recent Work on Aesthetics of Science,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118783

McAllister, James W. (2014). ‘Methodological Dilemmas and Emotion in Science,’ Synthese 191, 3143–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0477-3

McManus, Denis (2007), ‘Heidegger, Measurement and the “Intelligibility” of Science,’ European Journal of Philosophy 15(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00243.x

McManus, Denis (2012), Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from his Early Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694877.001.0001

Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (San Francisco: Harper & Row).

Mohanty, Jitendranath (1988), ‘Heidegger on Logic,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(1), 107–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0014

Morton, Adam (2010), ‘Epistemic Emotions,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 385–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0018

Mosse, George L. (2000), ‘Shell-Shock as a Social Disease,’ Journal of Contemporary History 35(1), 101–08. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200940003500109

Mumford, Lewis (1964), ‘Authoritarian and Democratic Technics,’ Technology and Culture 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101118

Norton, John D. (2000), ‘How We Know about Electrons,’ in After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend, ed. by Robert Nola and Howard Sankey (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9_2

Osbeck, Lisa M. and Nancy J. Nersessian (2011), ‘Affective Problem-Solving: Emotion in Research Practice,’ Mind & Society 10(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-010-0074-1

Osbeck, Lisa M. and Nancy J. Nersessian (2013), ‘Beyond Motivation and Metaphor: “Scientific Passions” and Anthropomorphism,’ in EPSA 11: Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, ed. by V. Karakostas & D. Dieks (Dordecht: Springer), pp. 455–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_37

Osbeck, Lisa M., Nancy J. Nersessian, Wendy C. Newstetter and Kareen R. Malone (2011), Science as Psychology: Sense-Making and Identity in Scientific Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511933936

Pickering, Andrew (2009), ‘The Politics of Theory: Producing Another World, With Some Thoughts on Latour,’ Journal of Cultural Economy 2(1–2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064204

Pickering, Andrew (2010), The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001

Polanyi, Michael (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226232768.001.0001

Popkin, Richard H. (1979), The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (Berkley: University of California Press).

Psillos, Stathis (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks the Truth (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979648

Randall, John Herman, Jr (1940), ‘The Development of the Scientific Method in the School of Padua,’ Journal of the History of Ideas 1 (2), 177–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707332

Ratcliffe, Matthew (2002), ‘Heidegger’s Attunement and the Neuropsychology of Emotion,’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021312100964

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2010a), An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life (Durham: Duke University Press). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391333

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2010b), On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

Richardson, William J. (1968), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Science,’ New Scholasticism 42(4), 511–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas196842444

Roeser, Sabine (2012), ‘Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design,’ Science and Engineering Ethics 18(1), 103–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0

Rorty, Richard (1991), ‘Is Natural Science a Natural Kind?,’ in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Philosophical Papers, vol. 1), by Richard Rorty (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press), pp. 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643.004

Roubach, Michael (1997), ‘Heidegger, Science, and the Mathematical Age,’ Science in Context 10(1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700000326

Rouse, Joseph (1987a), Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

Rouse, Joseph (1987b), ‘Husserlian Phenomenology and Scientific Realism,’ Philosophy of Science 54(2), 222–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/289371

Rouse, Joseph (1993), ‘What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?,’ Configurations 1(1), 57–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0006

Rouse, Joseph (1996a), Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

Rouse, Joseph (1996b), ‘Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge,’ in Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, ed. by L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_10

Rouse, Joseph (1998), ‘Heideggerian Philosophy of Science,’ in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4, ed. by Edward Craig (London: Routledge), pp. 323–27.

Rouse, Joseph (2002a), ‘Vampires: Social Constructivism, Realism, and Other Philosophical Undead,’ History and Theory 41, 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00191

Rouse, Joseph (2005a), ‘Heidegger and Scientific Naturalism,’ in Continental Philosophy of Science, ed. by Gary Gutting (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 123–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501.ch10

Rouse, Joseph (2005b), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Harrison Hall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 173–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch11

Rouse, Joseph (2015), Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226293707.001.0001

Scheff, Thomas J. (1988), ‘Shame and Conformity: The Deference-Emotion System,’ American Sociological Review 53(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095647

Schmitt, Charles B. (1969), ‘Experience and Experiment: A Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De Motu,’ Studies in the Renaissance 16, 80–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2857174

Schyfter, Pablo (2012), ‘Standing Reserves of Function: A Heideggerian Reading of Synthetic Biology,’ Philosophy & Technology 25(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0053-4

Seigfried, Hans (1990), ‘Autonomy and Quantum Physics: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Heisenberg,’ Philosophy of Science 57(4), 619–30.

Shapin, Steven (1988), ‘Robert Boyle and Mathematics: Reality, Representation, and Experimental Practice,’ Science in Context 2 (1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026988970000048x

Shapin, Steven (1992), ‘Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate,’ History of Science 30(4), 333–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539203000401

Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Shapin, Steven (1995), ‘Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ Annual Review of Sociology 21, 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.21.1.289

Shapin, Steven (1996), The Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226750224.001.0001

Shapin, Steven (2012), ‘The Sciences of Subjectivity,’ Social Studies of Science 42(2), 170–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435375

Shaw, Robert (2013), ‘The Implications for Science Education of Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science,’ Education Philosophy and Theory 45(5), 546–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00836.x

Sherover, Charles (1967), ‘Heidegger’s Ontology and the Copernican Revolution,’ Monist 51(4), 559–73. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196751432

Shirley, Greg (2010), Heidegger and Logic: The Place of Lógos in Being and Time (London: Continuum). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472546661

Skinner, Quentin (2002), ‘Hobbes and the Politics of the Early Royal Society,’ in Visions of Politics, vol. 3: Hobbes and Civil Science, by Quentin Skinner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 324–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613784.015

Skulsky, Harold (1968), ‘Paduan Epistemology and the Doctrine of the One Mind,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 6(4), 341–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.1596

Smith, Pamela H. (2004), The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226764269.001.0001

Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont (1998), Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science (New York: Picador).

Sokolowski, Robert (1979), ‘Exact Science and the World in which We Live,’ in Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls, ed. by Elisabeth Ströker (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann), pp. 92–106.

Solomon, Robert C. (1977), ‘The Logic of Emotion,’ Noûs 11, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214329

Solomon, Robert C. (1992), ‘Existentialism, Emotions, and the Cultural Limits of Rationality,’ Philosophy East & West 42(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/1399671

Solomon, Robert C. (2003), ‘Emotions, Thoughts and Feelings: What is a “Cognitive Theory” of the Emotions and Does It Neglect Affectivity?,’ in Philosophy and the Emotions, ed. by Anthony Hatzimoysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550270.002

Spiller, Michael R. G. (1980), ‘Concerning Natural Experimental Philosophie’: Méric Casaubon and the Royal Society (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8913-9

Steiner, Carol J. (1999), ‘Constructive Science and Technology Studies: On the Path to Being?,’ Social Studies of Science 29(4), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029004005

Steiner, Carol J. (2008), ‘Ontological Dance: A Dialogue between Heidegger and Pickering,’ in The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society, and Becoming, ed. by Andrew Pickering and Keith Guzik (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 243–65. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390107

Stepanich, Lambert V. (1991), ‘Heidegger: Between Idealism and Realism,’ The Harvard Review of Philosophy 1(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5840/harvardreview1991113

Sterelny, Kim (2012), ‘Language, Gesture, Skill: the Co-Evolutionary Foundations of Language,’ in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367, 2141–51. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0116

Stocker, Michael (2010), ‘Intellectual and Other Nonstandard Emotions,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 401–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0019

Ströker, Elisabeth (1997), The Husserlian Foundations of Science (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9

Tanzer, Mark Basil (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Realism,’ Southwest Philosophy Review 11(2), 145–59. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview199511228

Tanzer, Mark Basil (1998), ‘Heidegger on Realism and Idealism,’ Journal of Philosophical Research 23, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_14

Thagard, Paul (2001), ‘How to Make Decisions: Coherence, Emotion, and Practical Inference,’ in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, ed. by Elijah Millgram (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 355–71.

Thagard, Paul (2002), ‘The Passionate Scientist: Emotion in Scientific Cognition,’ in The Cognitive Basis of Science, ed. by Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich and Michael Siegal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 235–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613517.013

Thagard, Paul (2006a), ‘How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science,’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44, 177–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x

Thagard, Paul (2008), ‘How Cognition Meets Emotion: Beliefs, Desires and Feelings as Neural Activity,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 167–84. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Tiez, John (1993), ‘Heidegger on Realism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth,’ Dialogue 32(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300014980

Tiez, John (2005), ‘Heidegger on Science, Realism, and the Transcendence of the World: Being and Time, Section 69,’ Idealistic Studies 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20053518

Tomasello, Michael (2014), A Natural History of Human Thinking (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369

Tosh, Nick (2007), ‘Science, Truth and History, Part II. Metaphysical Bolt-holes for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge?,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.002

Traweek, Sharon (1992), Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Tugendhat, Ernst (1967), Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger (Berlin: de Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110826890

van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), ‘A Re-Examination of Aristotle’ s Philosophy of Science,’ Dialogue 19(1): 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300024719

Weber, Max (1968), Economy and Society, trans. by Günther Roth and Claus Wittich (Berkeley: University of California Press).

White, Paul, ed. (2009), The Emotional Economy of Science, focus section in Isis 100(4), 792–851. https://doi.org/10.1086/652019

Winner, Langdon (1980), ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?,’ Daedalus 109(1), 121–36.

Young, Julian (2006), ‘The Fourfold,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, second edn, ed. by Charles B. Guignon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521821363.015

Zilsel, Edgar (1942), ‘The Sociological Roots of Science,’ American Journal of Sociology 47(4), 544–62. https://doi.org/10.1086/218962

Zoller, David J. (2012), ‘Realism and Belief Attribution in Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Religion,’ Continental Philosophy Review 45(1), 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9208-3