Publication Details
p. VI-VII
Texte intégral
1Each numbered chapter in this book has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Details are provided below.
2Between the point of publication of the articles and publication of this monograph, many further changes have been made, such that even those chapters not designated as published in shorter form are different from the published versions. In all cases, however, the integrity of the published version has been preserved.
1. Reflections on Moore’s ‘Proof’
3Published as “The Dogmatists and Wright on Moore’s ‘Proof’”, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 2 (2012), 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1163/221057011X554133
2. First Reflections on the Problem of Easy Knowledge
4Shorter version published as “Zalabardo on Easy Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 38 (2013), 177–88, https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr2013389
3. The Problem of Easy Knowledge: Towards a Solution
5Published as “Davies on Easy Knowledge”, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 4 (2013), 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-03011093
4. Evidence and Transmission Failure
6Published in Logos & Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2 (2011), 557–74, https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme2011245, available at: https://logos-and-episteme.proiectsbc.ro/?q=taxonomy/term/222
5. A Puzzle for Dogmatism
7Published in Logos & Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2 (2011), 295–302, https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20112238, available at: https://logos-and-episteme.proiectsbc.ro/?q=node/91
6. Conclusive Reasons
8Published as “Is Knowledge Closed Under Known Entailment? The Strange Case of Hawthorne’s ‘Heavyweight Conjunct’ (and Other Strange Cases)”, Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 2 (2009), 117–28, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2009.01036.x
7. Sensitivity
9Published as “Sensitivity and Closure”, Episteme: A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology, 11 (2014), 181–97, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2014.5
8. Safety
10Published as “Saving Sosa’s Safety”, Logos & Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology, 3 (2012), 637–52, https://doi.org/10.5840/logosepisteme20123413, available at: http://logos-and-episteme.proiectsbc.ro/sites/default/files/SAVINGSOSA'SSAFETY.pdf
9. Safety: An Application
11Published as “Reply to Pardo: Unsafe Legal Knowledge?”, Legal Theory, 17 (2011), 67–73, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325211000048
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.