Desktop versionMobile Version

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

7. SOME ASPECTS OF ENHANCING NATURAL PEST CONTROL

7. Some aspects of enhancing natural pest control

Volltext

1Hugh, L. Wright, Joscelyne E. Ashpole, Lynn V. Dicks, James Hutchison, Caitlin G. McCormack & William J. Sutherland

Expert assessors

Barbara Smith, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK

Tony Harding, Rothamsted Research, UK

Anthony Goggin, Linking Environment and Farming (LEAF), UK

Felix Wackers, BioBest/University of Lancaster, Belgium/UK

Melvyn Fidgett, Syngenta, UK

Michael Garratt, University of Reading, UK

Michelle Fountain, East Malling Research, UK

Phillip Effingham, Greentech Consultants, UK

Stephanie Williamson, Pesticides Action Network, UK

Toby Bruce, Rothamsted Research, UK

Andrew Wilby, University of Lancaster, UK

Eve Veromann, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia

Mattias Jonsson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Vicky Kindemba, Buglife, UK

Steve Sait, University of Leeds, UK

Scope of assessment: 22 of 92 possible actions to enhance natural regulation of pests (including animals, plants, fungi, bacteria and viruses) in agricultural systems across the world.

Assessed: 2014.

Effectiveness measure is the median% score.

Certainty measure is the median% certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median% score for negative side-effects for the farmer such as reduced yield and profits or increased costs.

CC-BY-4.0

Nur der Text ist unter der Lizenz CC BY 4.0 nutzbar. Alle anderen Elemente (Abbildungen, importierte Anhänge) sind „Alle Rechte vorbehalten“, sofern nicht anders angegeben.

Lesen

Open access

Kaufen

Suche in OpenEdition Search

Sie werden weitergeleitet zur OpenEdition Search