Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

4. FARMLAND CONSERVATION

4.3 Perennial (non-timber) crops

Texte intégral

Based on the collated evidence, what is the current assessment of the effectiveness of interventions for perennial (non-timber) crops?

Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

● Maintain traditional orchards

No evidence found (no assessment)

● Manage short-rotation coppice to benefit wildlife (includes 8m rides)
● Restore or create traditional orchards

Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

Maintain traditional orchards

1A replicated, controlled site comparison from Germany found more plant species in mown orchards than grazed or abandoned ones, but found no effects on wasps or bees. Two replicated site comparisons from Germany and Switzerland found traditional orchards managed under agri-environment schemes either did not have more plant species than controls or offered no clear benefits to birds. Assessment: unknown effectiveness — limited evidence (effectiveness 10%; certainty 15%).
http://www.conservationevidence.com/​actions/​703

No evidence found (no assessment)

2We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

  • Manage short-rotation coppice to benefit wildlife (includes 8 m rides)

  • Restore or create traditional orchards

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search