-
Pas de résultats
- Navigation
What Works in Conservation 2017
Introduction
1. Amphibian conservation
1.1 Threat: Residential and commercial development
1.2 Threat: Agriculture
1.3 Threat: Energy production and mining
1.4 Threat: Transportation and service corridors
1.5 Threat: Biological resource use
1.6 Threat: Human intrusions and disturbance
1.7 Threat: Natural system modifications
1.8 Threat: Invasive and other problematic species
1.9 Threat: Pollution
1.10 Threat: Climate change and severe weather
1.11 Habitat protection
1.12 Habitat restoration and creation
1.13 Species management
1.14 Education and awareness raising
2. Bat conservation
2.1 Threat: Residential and commercial development
2.2 Threat: Agriculture
2.3 Threat: Energy production – wind turbines
2.4 Threat: Energy production – mining
2.5 Threat: Transportation and service corridors
2.6 Threat: Biological resource use
2.7 Threat: Human disturbance – caving and tourism
2.8 Threat: Natural system modification – natural fire and fire suppression
2.9 Threat: Invasive species
2.10 Threat: Pollution
2.11 Providing artificial roost structures for bats
2.12 Education and awareness raising
3. Bird conservation
3.1 Habitat protection
3.2 Education and awareness raising
3.3 Threat: Residential and commercial development
3.4 Threat: Agriculture
3.5 Threat: Energy production and mining
3.6 Threat: Transportation and service corridors
3.7 Threat: Biological resource use
3.8 Threat: Human intrusions and disturbance
3.9 Threat: Natural system modifications
3.10 Habitat restoration and creation
3.11 Threat: Invasive alien and other problematic species
3.12 Threat: Pollution
3.13 Threat: Climate change, extreme weather and geological events
3.14 General responses to small/declining populations
3.15 Captive breeding, rearing and releases (ex situ conservation)
4. Farmland conservation
4.1 All farming systems
4.2 Arable farming
4.3 Perennial (non-timber) crops
4.4 Livestock farming
4.5 Threat: Residential and commercial development
4.6 Threat: Agri-chemicals
4.7 Threat: Transport and service corridors
4.8 Threat: Hunting and trapping (for pest control, food or sport)
4.9 Threat: Natural system modification
4.10 Threat: Invasive and other problematic species
4.11 Threat: Education and awareness
5. Forest conservation
5.1 Threat: Residential and commercial development
5.2 Threat: Agriculture
5.3 Threat: Transport and service corridors
5.4 Threat: Biological resource use
5.5 Habitat protection
5.6 Threat: Invasive and other problematic species
5.7 Threat: Pollution
5.8 Threat: Climate change and severe weather
5.9 Habitat protection
5.10 Habitat restoration and creation
5.11 Actions to improve survival and growth rate of planted trees
5.12 Education and awareness raising
6. Some aspects of control of freshwater invasive species
6.1 Threat: Invasive plants
6.2 Threat: Invasive molluscs
6.3 Threat: Invasive crustaceans
6.4 Threat: Invasive fish
6.5 Threat: Invasive reptiles
6.6 Threat: Invasive amphibians
7. Some aspects of enhancing natural pest control
7.1 Reducing agricultural pollution
7.2 All farming systems
7.3 Arable farming
7.4 Perennial farming
7.5 Livestock farming and pasture
8. Enhancing soil fertility
8.1 Reducing agricultural pollution
8.2 All farming systems
8.3 Arable farming
8.4 Livestock and pasture farming
- Table des matières
1. AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION
2. BAT CONSERVATION
3. BIRD CONSERVATION
4. FARMLAND CONSERVATION
5. FOREST CONSERVATION
6. SOME ASPECTS OF CONTROL OF FRESHWATER INVASIVE SPECIES
7. SOME ASPECTS OF ENHANCING NATURAL PEST CONTROL
- imprimer
- Citer
Référence électronique du chapitre
3.1 Habitat protection In : What Works in Conservation 2017 [en ligne]. Cambridge : Open Book Publishers, 2017 (généré le 29 mars 2024). Disponible sur Internet : <https://books.openedition.org/obp/3756>. ISBN : 978-2-8218-8395-6.Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Ockendon, N., & Smith, R. K. (Eds.) 2017. 3.1 Habitat protection. In What Works in Conservation 2017. Open Book Publishers. Tiré de https://books.openedition.org/obp/3756Sutherland, William J, et al., (dir..) “3.1 Habitat protection”. Cambridge : Open Book Publishers, 2017. (pp. 97-98) Web. <https://books.openedition.org/obp/3756>.Référence électronique du livre
SUTHERLAND, William J. (dir.) ; et al. What Works in Conservation 2017. Nouvelle édition [en ligne]. Cambridge : Open Book Publishers, 2017 (généré le 29 mars 2024). Disponible sur Internet : <https://books.openedition.org/obp/3710>. ISBN : 978-2-8218-8395-6.Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Ockendon, N., & Smith, R. K. (Eds.) 2017. What Works in Conservation 2017. Open Book Publishers. Tiré de https://books.openedition.org/obp/3710Sutherland, William J, et al., ed. What Works in Conservation 2017. Cambridge : Open Book Publishers, 2017. Web. <https://books.openedition.org/obp/3710>.Compatible avec Zotero - Partager URL :
- Courriel
Collez le code html suivant pour intégrer ce livre sur votre site.
3.1 Habitat protection
Based on the collated evidence, what is the current assessment of the effectiveness of interventions for habitat protection?
Likely to be beneficial |
● Legally protect habitats |
Trade-offs between benefit and harms |
● Provide or retain un-harvested buffer strips |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) |
● Ensure connectivity between habitat patches |
Likely to be beneficial
Legally protect habitats for birds
1Four studies from Europe found that populations increased after habitat protection and a review from China found high use of protected habitats by cranes. A replicated, randomised and controlled study from Argentina found that some, but not all bird groups had higher species richness or were at higher densities in protected habitats. Assessment: likely to be beneficial (effectiveness 50%; certainty 52%; harms 0%).
http://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/158
Trade-off between benefit and harms
Provide or retain un-harvested buffer strips
2Three replicated studies from the USA found that species richness or abundances were higher in narrow (<100 m) strips of forest, but five replicated studies from North America found that wider strips retained a community more similar to that of uncut forest than narrow strips. Tw replicated studies from the USA found no differences in productivity between wide and narrow buffers, but that predation of artificial nests was higher in buffers than in continuous forest. Assessment: trade-offs between benefits and harms (effectiveness 60%; certainty 55%; harms 20%).
http://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/161
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)
Ensure connectivity between habitat patches
3Two studies of a replicated, controlled experiment in Canadian forests found that some species (not forest specialists) were found at higher densities in forest patches connected to continuous forest, compared to isolated patches and that some species used corridors more than clearcuts between patches. Assessment: unknown effectiveness — limited evidence (effectiveness 38%; certainty 38%; harms 0%).
http://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/160