Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

3. BIRD CONSERVATION

3. Bird conservation

Texte intégral

1David R. Williams, Matthew F. Child, Lynn V. Dicks, Nancy Ockendon, Robert G. Pople, David A. Showler, Jessica C. Walsh, Erasmus K. H. J. zu Ermgassen & William J. Sutherland

Expert assessors

Tatsuya Amano, University of Cambridge, UK

Andy Brown, Natural England, UK

Fiona Burns, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK

Yohay Carmel, Israel Institute of Technology

Mick Clout, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Geoff Hilton, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, UK

Nancy Ockendon, University of Cambridge, UK

James Pearce-Higgins, British Trust for Ornithology, UK

Sugoto Roy, Food and Environment Research Agency, DEFRA, UK

Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

William J. Sutherland, University of Cambridge, UK

Judit Szabo, Charles Darwin University, Australia

Bernie Tershy, University of California, USA

Des Thomson, Scottish Natural Heritage, UK

Stuart Warrington, National Trust, UK

David Williams, University of Cambridge, UK

Scope of assessment: for native wild bird species across the world.

Assessed: 2015.

Effectiveness measure is the median % score.

Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern. This was not scored for section 3.11 on invasive species.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search