Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

2. BAT CONSERVATION

2. Bat conservation

Texte intégral

1Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson, Rebecca K. Smith, John D. Altringham & William J. Sutherland

Expert assessors

John Altringham, University of Leeds, UK

James Aegerter, Animal and Plant Health Agency, UK

Kate Barlow, Bat Conservation Trust, UK

Anna Berthinussen, University of Leeds, UK

Fabio Bontadina, SWILD—Urban Ecology & Wildlife Research, Switzerland

David Bullock, National Trust, UK

Paul Cryan, Fort Collins Science Center, US Geological Survey

Brock Fenton, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Anita Glover, University of Leeds, UK

Joanne Hodgkins, National Trust, UK

David Jacobs, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Bradley Law, Forest Science Centre, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australia

Christoph Meyer, Centre for Environmental Biology, Portugal

Kirsty Park, University of Stirling, UK

Guido Reiter, Co-ordination Centre for Bat Conservation and Research in Austria

Danilo Russo, Federico II University of Naples, Italy

Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

Matt Struebig, University of Kent, UK

Christian Voigt, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

Michael Willig, University of Connecticut, USA

Scope of assessment: for native wild bat species across the world.

Assessed: 2015.

Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search