Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

1. AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION

1.1 Threat: Residential and commercial development

Texte intégral

Based on the collated evidence, what is the current assessment of the effectiveness of interventions for residential and commercial development?

Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

● Legal protection of species

No evidence found (no assessment)

● Protect brownfield or ex-industrial sites
● Restrict herbicide, fungicide and pesticide use on and around ponds on golf courses

Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)

Legal protection of species

1Three reviews, including one systematic review, in the Netherlands and UK found that legal protection of amphibians was not effective at protecting populations during development. Two reviews found that the number of great crested newt mitigation licences issued in England and Wales increased over 10 years. Assessment: unknown effectiveness —limited evidence (effectiveness 10%; certainty 35%; harms 7%).
http://www.conservationevidence.com/​actions/​779

No evidence found (no assessment)

2We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:

  • Protect brownfield or ex-industrial sites

  • Restrict herbicide, fungicide and pesticide use on and around ponds on golf courses

CC-BY-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search