Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2017

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

1. AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION

1. Amphibian conservation

Texte intégral

1Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith & William J. Sutherland

Expert assessors

Ariadne Angulo, Co-Chair of the Amphibian Specialist Group, Peru

Robert Brodman, Saint Joseph’s College, Indiana, USA

Andrew Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

Jeff Dawson, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK

Rob Gandola, University of Southampton, UK

Jaime García Moreno, International Union for Conservation of Nature, The Netherlands

Trent Garner, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

Richard Griffiths, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

Sergei Kuzmin, Russian Academy of Sciences

Michael Lanoo, Indiana University, USA

Michael Lau, WWF-Hong Kong

James Lewis, Amphibian Survival Alliance/Global Wildlife Conservation, USA

An Martel, Ghent University, Belgium

LeGrand Nono Gonwouo, Cameroon Herpetology-Conservation Biology Foundation

Deanna Olson, US Forest Service

Timo Paasikunnas, Curator of Conservation at Helsinki Zoo, Finland

Frank Pasmans, Ghent University, Belgium

Silviu Petrovan, Froglife, UK

Carlos Martínez Rivera, Philadelphia Zoo, USA

Gonçalo Rosa, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

David Sewell, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

Ben Tapley, Herpetology Department, Zoological Society of London, UK

Jeanne Tarrant, Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa

Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Wildlife Institute of India

Victor Wasonga, National Museums of Kenya

Ché Weldon, North-West University, South Africa

Sally Wren, Amphibian Specialist Group Programme Officer, New Zealand

Scope of assessment: for native wild amphibian species across the world.

Assessed: 2014.

Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search