Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2015

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

4. Farmland Conservation

4. Farmland conservation

Lynn V. Dicks, Joscelyne E. Ashpole, Juliana Dänhardt, Katy James, Annelie Jönsson, Nicola Randall, David A. Showler, Rebecca K. Smith, Susan Turpie, David R. Williams et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

1Lynn V. Dicks, University of Cambridge, UK

2Ian Hodge, University of Cambridge, UK

3Clunie Keenleyside, Institute for European Environmental Policy, UK

4Will Peach, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK

5Nicola Randall, Harper Adams University, UK

6Jörn Scharlemann, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, UK

7Gavin Siriwardena, British Trust for Ornithology, UK

8Henrik Smith, Lund University, Sweden

9Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

10William J. Sutherland, University of Cambridge, UK

11Scope of assessment: for native farmland wildlife in northern and western Europe (European countries west of Russia, but not south of France, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary and Romania)

12Effectiveness measure is the% of experts that answered yes to the question: based on the evidence presented does this intervention benefit wildlife? (Yes, no or don’t know).

13Certainty measure is the median% score for the question: how much do we understand the extent to which this intervention benefits wildlife on farmland? (0 = no evidence, 100% = certainty).

14Harm measure was not scored for this synopsis.

This book is meant as a guide to the evidence available for different conservation interventions and as a starting point in assessing their effectiveness. The assessments are based on the available evidence for the target group of species for each intervention. The assessment may therefore refer to different species or habitat to the one(s) you are considering. Before making any decisions about implementing interventions it is vital that you read the more detailed accounts of the evidence in order to assess their relevance for your study species or system.
Full details of the evidence are available at
www.conservationevidence.com
There may also be significant negative side-effects on the target groups or other species or communities that have not been identified in this assessment.
A lack of evidence means that we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.

Auteurs

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search