Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2015

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

3. Bird Conservation

3. Bird conservation

David R. Williams, Matthew F. Child, Lynn V. Dicks, Nancy Ockendon, Robert G. Pople, David A. Showler, Jessica C. Walsh, Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

1Tatsuya Amano, Cambridge University, UK

2Andy Brown, Natural England, UK

3Fiona Burns, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK

4Yohay Carmel, Israel Institute of Technology, Israel

5Mick Clout, University of Auckland, New Zealand

6Geoff Hilton, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, UK

7Nancy Ockendon, Cambridge University, UK

8James Pearce-Higgins, British Trust for Ornithology, UK

9Sugoto Roy, Food and Environment Research Agency, DEFRA, UK

10Rebecca Smith, Cambridge University, UK

11William Sutherland, Cambridge University, UK

12Judit Szabo, Charles Darwin University, Australia

13Bernie Tershy, University of California, USA

14Des Thomson, Scottish Natural Heritage, UK

15Stuart Warrington, National Trust, UK

16David Williams, Cambridge University, UK

Scope of assessment: for native wild bird species across the world.

17Effectiveness measure is the median % score.

18Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

19Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern. This was not scored for section 3.11 on invasive species.

This book is meant as a guide to the evidence available for different conservation interventions and as a starting point in assessing their effectiveness. The assessments are based on the available evidence for the target group of species for each intervention. The assessment may therefore refer to different species or habitat to the one(s) you are considering. Before making any decisions about implementing interventions it is vital that you read the more detailed accounts of the evidence in order to assess their relevance for your study species or system.
Full details of the evidence are available at
www.conservationevidence.com
There may also be significant negative side-effects on the target groups or other species or communities that have not been identified in this assessment.
A lack of evidence means that we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.

Auteurs

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search