Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2015

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

2. Bat Conservation

2. Bat conservation

Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson, Rebecca K. Smith, John D Altringham et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

1John Altringham, University of Leeds, UK

2James Aegerter, Animal and Plant Health Agency, UK

3Kate Barlow, Bat Conservation Trust, UK

4Anna Berthinussen, University of Leeds, UK

5Fabio Bontadina, SWILD – Urban Ecology & Wildlife Research, Switzerland

6David Bullock, National Trust, UK

7Paul Cryan, Fort Collins Science Center, US Geological Survey, USA

8Brock Fenton, University of Western Ontario, Canada

9Anita Glover, University of Leeds, UK

10Joanne Hodgkins, National Trust, UK

11David Jacobs, University of Cape Town, South Africa

12Bradley Law, Forest Science Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Australia

13Christoph Meyer, Centre for Environmental Biology, Portugal

14Kirsty Park, University of Stirling, UK

15Guido Reiter, Co-ordination Centre for Bat Conservation and Research in Austria, Austria

16Danilo Russo, Federico II University of Naples, Italy

17Rebecca Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

18Matt Struebig, University of Kent, UK

19Christian Voigt, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

20Michael Willig, University of Connecticut, USA

Scope of assessment: for native wild bat species across the world

21Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

22Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

23Harm measure is the median% score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.

This book is meant as a guide to the evidence available for different conservation interventions and as a starting point in assessing their effectiveness. The assessments are based on the available evidence for the target group of species for each intervention. The assessment may therefore refer to different species or habitat to the one(s) you are considering. Before making any decisions about implementing interventions it is vital that you read the more detailed accounts of the evidence in order to assess their relevance for your study species or system.
Full details of the evidence are available at
www.conservationevidence.com
There may also be significant negative side-effects on the target groups or other species or communities that have not been identified in this assessment.
A lack of evidence means that we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search