1. Amphibian conservation
p. 9-10
Texte intégral
Expert assessors
1Ariadne Angulo, Co-Chair of the Amphibian Specialist Group, Peru
2Robert Brodman, Saint Joseph’s College, Indiana, USA
3Andrew Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK
4Jeff Dawson, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK
5Rob Gandola, University of Southampton, UK
6Jaime García Moreno, IUCN, the Netherlands
7Trent Garner, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK
8Richard Griffiths, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK
9Sergei Kuzmin, Russian Academy of Sciences
10Michael Lanoo, Indiana University, USA
11Michael Lau, WWF-Hong Kong
12James Lewis, Amphibian Survival Alliance/Global Wildlife Conservation, USA
13An Martel, Ghent University, Belgium
14LeGrand Nono Gonwouo, Cameroon Herpetology-Conservation Biology Foundation
15Deanna Olson, US Forest Service, USA
16Timo Paasikunnas, Curator of Conservation at Helsinki Zoo, Finland
17Frank Pasmans, Ghent University, Belgium
18Silviu Petrovan, Froglife, UK
19Carlos Martínez Rivera, Philadelphia Zoo, USA
20Gonçalo Rosa, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK
21David Sewell, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK
22Rebecca Smith, Cambridge University, UK
23Ben Tapley, Herpetology Department, Zoological Society of London, UK
24Jeanne Tarrant, Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa
25Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Wildlife Institute of India
26Victor Wasonga, National Museums of Kenya
27Ché Weldon, North-West University, South Africa
28Sally Wren, Amphibian Specialist Group Programme Officer, New Zealand
Scope of assessment: for native wild amphibian species across the world
29Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.
30Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
31Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.
This book is meant as a guide to the evidence available for different conservation interventions and as a starting point in assessing their effectiveness. The assessments are based on the available evidence for the target group of species for each intervention. The assessment may therefore refer to different species or habitat to the one (s) you are considering. Before making any decisions about implementing interventions it is vital that you read the more detailed accounts of the evidence in order to assess their relevance for your study species or system.
Full details of the evidence are available at
www. conservationevidence. com There may also be significant negative side-effects on the target groups or other species or communities that have not been identified in this assessment.
A lack of evidence means that we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Global evidence for the effects of interventions for terrestrial mammals excluding bats and primates
Nick A. Littlewood, Ricardo Rocha, Rebecca K. Smith et al.
2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Global evidence for the effects of interventions for terrestrial mammals excluding bats and primates
Nick A. Littlewood, Ricardo Rocha, Rebecca K. Smith et al.
2020
1. Amphibian Conservation
Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith et William J. Sutherland
5. Some aspects of control of freshwater invasive species
David Aldridge, Rebecca K. Smith et William J. Sutherland
1. Amphibian conservation
Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith et William J. Sutherland
1. Amphibian conservation
Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith et William J. Sutherland
8. Shrubland and heathland conservation
Philip A. Martin, Ricardo Rocha, Rebecca K. Smith et al.
2. Bat Conservation
Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson, Rebecca K. Smith et al.
2. Bat conservation
Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson, Rebecca K. Smith et al.
6. Peatland Conservation
Global evidence for the effects of interventions to conserve peatland vegetation
Nigel G. Taylor, Patrick Grillas et William J. Sutherland
