Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2015

 | 
William J. Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Nancy Ockendon
, 
et al.

1. Amphibian conservation

1. Amphibian conservation

Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

Expert assessors

1Ariadne Angulo, Co-Chair of the Amphibian Specialist Group, Peru

2Robert Brodman, Saint Joseph’s College, Indiana, USA

3Andrew Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

4Jeff Dawson, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK

5Rob Gandola, University of Southampton, UK

6Jaime García Moreno, IUCN, the Netherlands

7Trent Garner, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

8Richard Griffiths, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

9Sergei Kuzmin, Russian Academy of Sciences

10Michael Lanoo, Indiana University, USA

11Michael Lau, WWF-Hong Kong

12James Lewis, Amphibian Survival Alliance/Global Wildlife Conservation, USA

13An Martel, Ghent University, Belgium

14LeGrand Nono Gonwouo, Cameroon Herpetology-Conservation Biology Foundation

15Deanna Olson, US Forest Service, USA

16Timo Paasikunnas, Curator of Conservation at Helsinki Zoo, Finland

17Frank Pasmans, Ghent University, Belgium

18Silviu Petrovan, Froglife, UK

19Carlos Martínez Rivera, Philadelphia Zoo, USA

20Gonçalo Rosa, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

21David Sewell, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

22Rebecca Smith, Cambridge University, UK

23Ben Tapley, Herpetology Department, Zoological Society of London, UK

24Jeanne Tarrant, Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa

25Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Wildlife Institute of India

26Victor Wasonga, National Museums of Kenya

27Ché Weldon, North-West University, South Africa

28Sally Wren, Amphibian Specialist Group Programme Officer, New Zealand

Scope of assessment: for native wild amphibian species across the world

29Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

30Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

31Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.

This book is meant as a guide to the evidence available for different conservation interventions and as a starting point in assessing their effectiveness. The assessments are based on the available evidence for the target group of species for each intervention. The assessment may therefore refer to different species or habitat to the one (s) you are considering. Before making any decisions about implementing interventions it is vital that you read the more detailed accounts of the evidence in order to assess their relevance for your study species or system.
Full details of the evidence are available at
www. conservationevidence. com There may also be significant negative side-effects on the target groups or other species or communities that have not been identified in this assessment.
A lack of evidence means that we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.

Lire

Open access

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search