8. Shrublandand heathland conservation
p. 487
Texte intégral
1 Expert assessors
2 Andrew Bennet, La Trobe University, Australia
3 Brian van Wilgen, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
4 Rob Marrs, University of Liverpool, UK
5 Chris Diek, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK
6 G. Matt Davies, Ohio State University, USA
7 David Le Maitre, CSIR, UK
8 Giles Groome, Consultant Ecologist, UK
9 Isabel Barrio, University of Iceland, Iceland
10 James Adler, Surrey Wildlife Trust, UK
11 Jon Keeley, US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, USA
12 Jonty Denton, Consultant Ecologist, UK
13 Penny Anderson, Penny Anderson Associates Limited, UK
14 Scope of assessment: for the conservation of shrubland and heathland habitats (not specific species within these habitats).
15 Assessed: 2017.
16 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.
17 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
18 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects on the shrubland and heathland habitats of concern.

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.