7. Primate conservation

Jessica Junker, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Lisa Orth, Rebecca K. Smith, Silviu O. Petrovan et William J. Sutherland

p. 435


Texte intégral

1 Expert assessors

2 Graham L. Banes, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

3 Sergio Marrocoli, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany Sarah Papworth, Royal Holloway University of London, UK

4 Silviu O. Petrovan, University of Cambridge, UK

5 Andrew J. Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society, Uganda

6 Ricardo Rocha, University of Cambridge, UK

7 Joanna M. Setchell, Durham University, UK

8 Kathy Slater, Operation Wallacea, UK

9 Erin Wessling, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany

10 Liz Williamson, University of Stirling, UK

11 Scope of assessment: for wild primate species across the world.

12 Assessed: 2017.

13 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

14 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

15 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.


Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.