3. Bird conservation
p. 141
Texte intégral
1 Expert assessors
2 Tatsuya Amano, University of Cambridge, UK
3 Andy Brown, Natural England, UK
4 Fiona Burns, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK
5 Yohay Carmel, Israel Institute of Technology
6 Mick Clout, University of Auckland, New Zealand
7 Geoff Hilton, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, UK
8 Nancy Ockendon, University of Cambridge, UK
9 James Pearce-Higgins, British Trust for Ornithology, UK
10 Sugoto Roy, Food and Environment Research Agency, DEFRA, UK
11 Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK
12 William J. Sutherland, University of Cambridge, UK
13 Judit Szabo, Charles Darwin University, Australia
14 Bernie Tershy, University of California, USA
15 Des Thomson, Scottish Natural Heritage, UK
16 Stuart Warrington, National Trust, UK
17 David Williams, University of Cambridge, UK
18 Scope of assessment: for native wild bird species across the world.
19 Assessed: 2015.
20 Effectiveness measure is the median % score.
21 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
22 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern. This was not scored for section 3.11 on invasive species.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
