What Works in Conservation 2021
| , , ,2. Bat conservation
2. Bat conservation
Texte intégral
1 Expert assessors
2 Levente Barti, Myotis Bat Conservation Group, Romania
3 Manisha Bhardwaj, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
4 Johnny De Jong, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
5 Jasja Dekker, Jasja Dekker Dierecologie, Netherlands
6 Brock Fenton, University of Western Ontario, Canada
7 Winifred Frick, Bat Conservation International, United States
8 Anita Glover, Vincent Wildlife Trust, United Kingdom
9 Alice Hughes, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, China, P.R.
10 Csaba Jere, Romanian Bat Protection Association, Romania
11 Julia Lins Luz, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
12 Christoph Meyer, University of Salford, United Kingdom
13 Silviu Petrovan, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
14 Guido Reiter, Austrian Coordination Centre for Bat Conservation & Research, Austria
15 Luisa Rodrigues, Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests, Portugal
16 Danilo Russo, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy
17 Uttam Saikia, Zoological Survey of India, India
18 Mbeng Donatus Waghiiwimbom, University of Maroua, Cameroon
19 Carol Williams, Bat Conservation Trust, United Kingdom
20 Scope of assessment: for native wild bat species across the world.
21 Assessed: 2021. For previous assessments and expert panels please check What Works in Conservation 2020.
22 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.
23 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
24 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.
© Open Book Publishers, 2021
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0