Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2021

 | 
William Junior Sutherland
, 
Lynn V. Dicks
, 
Silviu O. Petrovan
, 
et al.

1. Amphibian conservation

1. Amphibian conservation

Rebecca K. Smith, Helen Meredith et William J. Sutherland

Texte intégral

1 Expert assessors

2 Ariadne Angulo, Co-Chair of the Amphibian Specialist Group, Peru

3 Robert Brodman, Saint Joseph’s College, Indiana, USA

4 Andrew Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

5 Jeff Dawson, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK

6 Rob Gandola, University of Southampton, UK

7 Jaime García Moreno, International Union for Conservation of Nature, The Netherlands Trent Garner, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

8 Richard Griffiths, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

9 Sergei Kuzmin, Russian Academy of Sciences

10 Michael Lanoo, Indiana University, USA

11 Michael Lau, WWF-Hong Kong

12 James Lewis, Amphibian Survival Alliance/Global Wildlife Conservation, USA

13 An Martel, Ghent University, Belgium

14 LeGrand Nono Gonwouo, Cameroon Herpetology-Conservation Biology Foundation

15 Deanna Olson, US Forest Service

16 Timo Paasikunnas, Curator of Conservation at Helsinki Zoo, Finland

17 Frank Pasmans, Ghent University, Belgium

18 Silviu Petrovan, Froglife, UK

19 Carlos Martínez Rivera, Philadelphia Zoo, USA

20 Gonçalo Rosa, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

21 David Sewell, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK

22 Rebecca K. Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

23 Ben Tapley, Herpetology Department, Zoological Society of London, UK

24 Jeanne Tarrant, Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa

25 Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Wildlife Institute of India

26 Victor Wasonga, National Museums of Kenya

27 Ché Weldon, North-West University, South Africa

28 Sally Wren, Amphibian Specialist Group Programme Officer, New Zealand

29 Scope of assessment: for native wild amphibian species across the world. Assessed: 2014.

30 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

31 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

32 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search