9. Management of captive animals
p. 527-528
Texte intégral
1 Husbandry interventions for captive breeding amphibians
2 Expert assessors
3 Kay Bradfield, Perth Zoo, Australia
4 Jeff Dawson, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, UK
5 Devin Edmonds, Association Mitsinjo, Madagascar
6 Jonathan Kolby, Honduras Amphibian Rescue and Conservation Center, Honduras
7 Stephanie Jayson, Veterinary Department, Zoological Society of London, UK
8 Daniel Nicholson, Queen Mary University of London, UK
9 Silviu O. Petrovan, Cambridge University, UK and Froglife Trust, UK
10 Jay Redbond, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, UK
11 Rebecca K. Smith, Cambridge University, UK
12 Benjamin Tapley, Herpetology Section, Zoological Society of London, UK
13 Scope of assessment: for husbandry interventions for captive breeding amphibians.
14 Assessed: 2017.
15 Promoting health and welfare in captive carnivores (felids, canids and ursids) through feeding practices
16 Expert assessors
17 Kathy Baker, Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust, Newquay Zoo, UK
18 Marcus Clauss, University of Zurich, Switzerland
19 Ellen Dierenfeld, Independent comparative nutrition consultant, USA
20 Thomas Quirke, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
21 Joanna Newbolt, Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust, Paignton Zoo, and University of Plymouth, UK
22 Simon Marsh, Yorkshire Wildlife Wildlife Park, UK
23 Amy Plowman, Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust, Paignton Zoo, UK
24 Katherine Whitehouse-Tedd, Nottingham Trent University, UK
25Gwen Wirobski, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria
26 Scope of assessment: for promoting health and welfare in captive carnivores (felids, canids and ursids) through feeding practices.
27 Assessed: 2018.
28Promoting natural feeding behaviours in primates in captivity
29 Expert assessors
30 Francis Cabana, Wildlife Reserves Singapore, Singapore
31 Po-Han Chou, Taipei Zoo, Taiwan
32 Ellen Dierenfeld, Independent comparative nutrition consultant, USA
33 Mike Downman, Dartmoor Zoo, UK
34 Craig Gilchrist, Paignton Zoo, UK
35 Amy Plowman, Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust, Paignton Zoo, UK
36 Scope of assessment: for promoting natural feeding behaviours in captive primates.
37 Assessed: 2017.
38 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.
39 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
40 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects on the species included.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
