URL originale : https://books.openedition.org/obp/17452
2.6 Threat: Human intrusions and disturbance
p. 98-102
Texte intégral
2.6.1 Caving and tourism
Likely to be beneficial
Impose restrictions on cave visits
1Three studies evaluated the effects of imposing restrictions on cave visits on bat populations. One study was in the USA, one in Canada and one in Turkey.
2COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
3POPULATION RESPONSE (2 STUDIES)
4Abundance (2 studies): Two before-and-after studies in Canada and Turkey found that bat populations within caves increased after restrictions on cave visitors were imposed.
5BEHAVIOUR (1 STUDY)
6Behaviour change (1 study): One study in the USA found that reducing the number of people within cave tour groups did not have a significant effect on the number of take-offs, landings or overall activity (bat movements) of a cave myotis colony roosting within the cave.
7Assessment: likely to be beneficial (effectiveness 64 %; certainty 45 %; harms 0 %).
8https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1002
Trade-off between benefit and harms
Install and maintain cave gates to restrict public access
9Eleven studies evaluated the effects of installing cave gates on bat populations. Five studies were in Europe and six studies were in the USA.
10COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
11POPULATION RESPONSE (7 STUDIES)
12Abundance (7 studies): Three of four before-and-after studies (including one replicated study and one controlled study) in the Netherlands, the USA, Spain and Turkey found more or similar numbers of bats in caves and a bunker after gates were installed to restrict public access. The other study found fewer bats in caves after gates were installed. Two before-and-after studies in the USA and Spain found more bats within two caves after the size of the gated entrances were increased. One replicated, before-and-after study in the USA found that installing cave gates resulted in population increases or decreased rates of decline for 13 of 20 colonies of Indiana bat. One replicated, site comparison study in Spain found no difference in the population growth rates of bats roosting in caves with and without cave gates.
13Condition (1 study): One site comparison study in the USA found that bats hibernating in a cave with a wall and gate over the entrance lost more body mass than bats in a nearby unmodified cave.
14BEHAVIOUR (5 STUDIES)
15Use (1 study): One replicated, site comparison study in Spain found no difference in the occupancy rates of bats roosting in caves with and without cave gates.
16Behaviour change (4 studies): One replicated, controlled, before-and-after and site comparison study in the USA found that bats at cave entrances circled more and entered caves less after gates were installed. One replicated study in the USA found that bats flew through gates with a funnel design more frequently than gates with a round bar or angle iron design. One randomized, controlled, before-and-after study in the UK found that fewer bats flew through cave gates when the spacing between horizontal bars was reduced. One before-and-after study in the USA4 found that significantly fewer bats emerged from a cave with a gate installed compared with a cave with a fence.
17Assessment: trade-off between benefit and harms (effectiveness 70 %; certainty 50 %; harms 20 %).
18https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/999
Unknown effectiveness
Install fencing around cave entrances to restrict public access
19Two studies evaluated the effects of installing fencing around cave entrances on bat populations. One study was in the USA and one study was in Spain. COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
20POPULATION RESPONSE (1 STUDY)
21Abundance (1 study): One replicated, site comparison study in Spain found no difference in the population growth rates of bats roosting in caves with and without fencing or gates installed.
22BEHAVIOUR (2 STUDIES)
23Use (1 study): One replicated, site comparison study in Spain found no difference in the occupancy rates of bats roosting in caves with and without fencing or gates installed.
24Behaviour change (1 study): One controlled, before-and-after study in the USA found that significantly more southeastern myotis bats and gray myotis bats emerged from a cave after a steel gate was replaced with a fence.
25Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 40 %; certainty 20 %; harms 0 %).
26https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1991
Minimize noise levels within caves
27One study evaluated the effects of minimizing noise levels within caves on bat populations. The study was in the USA.
28COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
29POPULATION RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
30BEHAVIOUR (1 STUDY)
31Behaviour change (1 study): One controlled study in the USA found that experimental cave tours with groups that did not talk resulted in fewer bat flights than when groups did talk, but talking did not have an effect on the number of bat movements.
32Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 40 %; certainty 21 %; harms 0 %).
33https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1995
Restrict artificial lighting in caves and around cave entrances
34One study evaluated the effects of restricting artificial lighting in caves on bat populations. The study was in the USA.
35COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
36POPULATION RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)
37BEHAVIOUR (1 STUDY)
38Behaviour change (1 study): One controlled study in the USA found that using low intensity white lights or red lights in caves resulted in fewer bat flights than with full white lighting, but the number of bat movements was similar between all three light treatments.
39Assessment: unknown effectiveness (effectiveness 15 %; certainty 12 %; harms 0 %).
40https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/1994
No evidence found (no assessment)
41We have captured no evidence for the following interventions:
- Inform the public of ways to reduce disturbance to bats in caves
- Introduce guidelines for sustainable cave development and use
- Minimize alterations to caves for tourism
- Provide artificial subterranean bat roosts to replace roosts in disturbed caves
- Restore and maintain microclimate in modified caves
- Retain bat access points to caves
- Train tourist guides to minimize disturbance and promote bat conservation.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
What Works in Conservation 2020
Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org
Référence numérique du chapitre
Format
Référence numérique du livre
Format
1 / 3