2. Bat conservation
p. 65
Texte intégral
1 Expert assessors
2 Silviu Petrovan, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
3 Guido Reiter, Austrian Coordination Centre for Bat Conservation & Research, Austria
4 Jasja Dekker, Jasja Dekker Dierecologie, Netherlands
5 Johnny De Jong, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
6 Alice Hughes, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, China, P.R.
7 Danilo Russo, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy
8 Winifred Frick, Bat Conservation International, United States
9 Kirsty Park, University of Stirling, United Kingdom
10 Neil Furey, Harrison Institute, Cambodia
11 Anita Glover, Vincent Wildlife Trust, United Kingdom
12 Luisa Rodrigues, Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests, Portugal
13 Scope of assessment: for native wild bat species across the world.
14 Assessed: 2020. For previous assessments and expert panels please check What Works in Conservation 2019.
15 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.
16 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.
17 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
