Version classiqueVersion mobile

What Works in Conservation 2020

William J. Sutherland
Lynn V. Dicks
Silviu O. Petrovan
et al.

2. Bat conservation

2. Bat conservation

Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson O.C. et John D. Altringham

Texte intégral

1 Expert assessors

2 Silviu Petrovan, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

3 Guido Reiter, Austrian Coordination Centre for Bat Conservation & Research, Austria

4 Jasja Dekker, Jasja Dekker Dierecologie, Netherlands

5 Johnny De Jong, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

6 Alice Hughes, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, China, P.R.

7 Danilo Russo, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy

8 Winifred Frick, Bat Conservation International, United States

9 Kirsty Park, University of Stirling, United Kingdom

10 Neil Furey, Harrison Institute, Cambodia

11 Anita Glover, Vincent Wildlife Trust, United Kingdom

12 Luisa Rodrigues, Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests, Portugal

13 Scope of assessment: for native wild bat species across the world.

14 Assessed: 2020. For previous assessments and expert panels please check What Works in Conservation 2019.

15 Effectiveness measure is the median % score for effectiveness.

16 Certainty measure is the median % certainty of evidence for effectiveness, determined by the quantity and quality of the evidence in the synopsis.

17 Harm measure is the median % score for negative side-effects to the group of species of concern.


Open access


Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search