Version classiqueVersion mobile

Waltzing Through Europe

 | 
Egil Bakka
, 
Theresa Jill Buckland
, 
Helena Saarikoski
, 
et al.

6. Decency, Health, and Grace Endangered by Quick Dancing?

The New Dance Style in Bohemia in 1830

Dorota Gremlicová

Texte intégral

1Newspaper articles constitute significant contemporary sources for discourses on dance. This chapter examines two such sources, offering detailed analysis of the texts, the authors, their background and the cultural and political climate they represent. The sources, consisting of a letter and a reply, discuss what the leading authorities of the time saw as positive and negative aspects of dancing, and together they redress the balance of the frequently one-sided outcries against dance as a danger to morality, decency and health.

Discussions about Dance in the Newspaper Bohemia

2In February 1830, there appeared in the newspaper Bohemia, printed in Prague, a series of articles dealing with various aspects of Carnival, including dancing. Two of them were written in the form of a letter and a response, and their authors reacted to the dancing practices of the time, citing in particular Reydowak, a fashionable dance of the contemporary repertory.

3The Bohemia was published as a free supplement to the newspaper Prager Zeitung from 1828 to 1835 with the subtitle Unterhaltungsblätter für gebildete Stände [Paper of Amusement for Educated People]. It later became an independent newspaper, one of the most influential German newspapers published in Bohemia until World War Two. In 1830, the supplement largely offered information on culture, theatrical and musical events, society life, curiosities, and sometimes also stories, travel experiences and depictions of foreign countries and their customs and culture. Political events were reported only occasionally, and when they were, it was for their more ‘amusing’ aspects.1

  • 2 Anton Müller, ‘Sendschreiben. Theater und geselliges Leben’, Bohemia, Unterhaltungsblätter für gebi (...)

4The first article, a letter addressed to the author of the column ‘Prager Novitäten’ [Prague Novelties] in Bohemia, was published on 7 February under the title ‘Sendschreiben’ [the Letter] (hereafter, referred to as the Letter). It covered the whole of page four under the heading ‘Theater und geselliges Leben’ [Theatre and Social Life]. After transcription from the Gothic script, it is slightly longer than two pages of A4 and is signed only with the initials ‘A. M.’.2

5The author begins by complimenting his addressee, dancing fashion whom he describes as an expert on Carnival matters. He says he is writing because he wishes to clarify his own opinion on some features of the, as he feels confused by conflicting impressions. On the one hand, he was touched by the statement in an article published previously in Prager Zeitung,3 which claimed that current dancing practices would have to become a subject for the ‘health police’. The young ladies would need special lung capacity to tackle the popular ‘Extra-Touren’,4 or else the turns might lead them directly to the cemetrey. The author referred to by his initials A. M. draws contrasting pictures of a seventeen-year-old girl dancing in February in the arms of her partner with red cheeks, out of breath, with her dress flying around her, and then in May, dying in her room from the effects of this activity. His anxiety was deepened by the poet Harro Harring (see below) who had expressed a hostile attitude towards Reydowak. Harring described the dance as the main offender in a general decline of good manners, and on this basis he denounced the whole nation of Bohemia for its sensuality. The author of the Letter does not want to accept such a harsh opinion, but, at the same time, he believes that the quick dancing lacks grace, while the behaviour of the dancing couples mixes unusual intimacy in public with a degree of indifference once the dance has finished.

6On the other hand, he sees dancing as the only opportunity for girls to move more freely in public. He names three fields in which dance provides a counterbalance to their everyday life: girls spend all their time sitting or standing by the fire, while sewing, playing the piano, in the theatre, or in a coach. They are always watched by the eyes of their mothers and aunts so that girls can not be closer than three metres to their beloved; wearing a ball-dress, each girl feels better and prettier than in her everyday clothes.

  • 5 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.

7In summary, the author of the Letter wants to find a balance between permissiveness and extreme severity in his attitude to dance manners. He identifies the topics of discussion: the danger to health including the threat of death, the loss of grace caused by the quickness of the dancing; and the level of intimacy versus polite public behaviour. At the centre of all these considerations he places the girls who dance.5

  • 6 Julius M. Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben des Herrn Rezensenten in Nro. 17 dieses Blattes’ (...)

8The Answer, entitled ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben des Herrn Rezensenten in Nr. 17 dieses Blattes’ [Response to the Letter of Mr Reviewer in No. 17 of this Paper] (hereafter, referred to as the Answer), appeared in Bohemia five days later, on 12 February in No. 19 in the same section of the newspaper (‘Theater und geselliges Leben’). After transcription, the length is three A4 pages, and it is signed by Julius Max Schottky (with the polite ending formulated ‘Mit Liebe und Hochachtung Ihr Julius Max Schottky’, i.e. ‘With Love and Respect Your J. M. Sch.’).6

9The author begins by saying that the question addressed to him in the Letter is one of the ‘great questions of the century’. In his opinion, dance is a very influential phenomenon of the time in which they are living, and it affects not only the ballroom but also family relations and the whole of public life. Firstly, he reacts to the rebuke of the quickness of dancing and reminds readers that in everyday life people travel at similar speed in many fields. If steam engines, quick carriages, express messengers exist, there is no reason to fear the quick Waltz and quick dancers, he writes. And moreover, he sees a tendency to accelerate the speed of dancing even more.

10To balance this conciliatory attitude, Schottky continues with a sad tale he had heard about a young lady who made a bet with her partner at a ball that she could dance longer than he. Eight times she flew through the hall dancing the Galop, then she drank a glass of cold water; the next day she fell ill, and several days later she died. For Schottky, this represented the dark side of contemporary modes of dancing.

11The author also reflected on the criticism of Reydowak (the Redowa) by Harro Harring, mentioned in the Letter. He describes his own experiences of this dance. When he saw it for the first time, he was alarmed by the lack of grace and charm. The girl drew so closely and passionately towards the man that one could see the imprints of his buttons on her face. Schottky even published a critical reaction to this indecent dancing fashion. However, thanks to a friend, a ‘real’ gentlewoman, he later changed his mind. While dancing Reydowak with her, he realised that the problem lies not in the dance but in the manner of dancing; one can dance Reydowak either nicely and tastefully, or dirtily and cheaply. It depends on the personality of the dancer. This statement concludes the article.

The Context of the Articles

  • 7 Jitka Lněničková, České země v době předbřeznové: 1792–1848 (Prague: Libri, 1999).

12In the year 1830, Prague and the whole of Bohemia belonged to the Austrian Empire. Prague had approximately 100,000 inhabitants. The Czech national movement was already underway, but it touched only a small part of society — the educated Czech middle-class circles. The majority of inhabitants felt German by nationality: that is why the newspaper Bohemia was printed in German, although some Czech magazines already existed. Public life was cultivated mainly in German, but the Czech language was slowly finding its place in the theatre, the sciences and so on. During the course of 1830, the national movement accelerated in a number of ways: the Sbor Muzejní pro řeč a literaturu českou [The Committee of the Museum for Czech Speech and Literature] was established, and student Karl Schneider organised a leaflet campaign for the national freedom of the Czech people.7 Some of the first public manifestations of the Czech nation in Prague were Czech balls, which started in the late 1830s. At first, they were private balls organised by Josef Kajetán Tyl; the first real public Czech ball was held in the Convict Hall in 1840. The idea that national aims could be successfully supported by dancing events such as public balls relates to the issues explored in the Letter and the Answer — the social significance of dancing.

  • 8 Jiří Štaif, Obezřetná elita: Česká společnost mezi tradicí a revolucí 1830–1851 (Prague: Dokořán, 2 (...)

13The arts and culture of both Germans and Czechs living in the Czech lands at that time were especially influenced by the Biedermeier style, as was the case in the other countries that belonged to the Holy Alliance — Prussia, Austria and Russia. This movement was connected with the political era of the so-called Restoration, the consolidation of the political situation within the Austrian Empire and across Europe after the Napoleonic wars and the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The era is characterised by political conservatism on one side, and the slow establishment of bourgeois culture on the other. In the Austrian Monarchy, and especially the Czech lands, the period from the Vienna Congress to the Revolutions of 1848 is often seen as a time of growing conflict between the conservatism of the government and its attempts to resist the new tendencies — a constitution, civil liberties, freedom of speech etc. — inspired by the French Revolution, and the public desire for social and political change. Biedermeier style can be explained as a reaction to this social tension and it focused on matters of everyday life, encouraging moderation in behaviour and feelings.8

14The Austrian Empire stood at the centre of these conservative political powers. On 25 October 1820, the Congress of the Holy Alliance, which took place in the Moravian town of Opava (Troppau), discussed a plan of action against revolutionary movements in Europe. Opposition to this political centralisation can be seen in the interest of Bohemian intellectuals in events in Greece, such as the uprising against the Turks in 1821, the independence of Greece in 1830, and especially the revolution in Poland in 1830, which was a topic of great significance for Czechs.

Characteristics of the Authors and Authorities

  • 9 Born on the 6 or 8 July 1792. Osečná u Mimoně died on the 5 or 6 January 1843 in Prague.

15The initials A.M. under the Letter belong to Bohemia’s reviewer, Anton Müller.9 He studied classical languages and aesthetics at Prague University and taught at the Gymnasium in Jičín and Písek. In 1819, he was invited to the University in Innsbruck as a lecturer of classical languages and aesthetics. In 1823, thanks to the intercession of Count Karel Chotek, the Tyrolean governor, he started to teach history of philosophy, aesthetics, pedagogy, ethics, and, later, also Greek and Latin philology at Prague University. He did not write any books; he was especially active as a journalist for Prager Zeitung and between 1828 and 1843 for Bohemia. He wrote long reviews of performances in the Estates Theatre, critiques of exhibitions, concerts, and books and referred to public events.

  • 10 Sulzer, Johann G., ‘Tanz’, in Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste in Einzeln, Nach alph. Ordnung (...)
  • 11 Jitka Ludvova, et al., Hudební divadlo v českých zemích: Osobnosti 19. století (Prague: Divadelní (...)

16Müller was German but had many relationships with Czech intellectuals who circulated around František Palacký, a historian and politician, who was the leading figure of the Czech national movement. He paid attention, for instance, to Czech folk songs in an article in the magazine of the Museum (now the National Museum), as well as in his lectures. As a writer, he used themes from Czech mythology, for example, in the story Horymir and his Steed Šemík. He based his aesthetic opinions on Classicism: the works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Christoph Willibald Gluck demonstrated for him the pinnacle of perfection. He believed in some basic rules of artistic creativity, and in his reviews compared the specific artistic event with these ideal norms. After 1830, his aesthetic thinking changed slightly under the influence of the circle around Josef Proksch, a musician with progressive artistic opinions, and later the private teacher of the Czech composer Bedřich Smetana. In this circle, Müller acquainted himself with the thoughts of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, which influenced his aesthetic thinking, while earlier he was probably more familiar with Johann Georg Sulzer and his encyclopaedic work Allgemeine Theorie der Schönen Künste [General Theory of Fine Arts] (1771–1774).10 The Letter discussed in this chapter perhaps mirrors the start of the shift in Müller´s opinions, and his budding doubts about formerly held truths. In the 1830s, a growing openness to new phenomena can be discerned in his reviews.11

  • 12 Harro Paul Harring was born on 28 August 1798 in Ibenshof by Wobbenbüll, North Frisia. He died on t (...)
  • 13 Terezín in Czech.
  • 14 This poem has not yet been identified.
  • 15 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.
  • 16 George G. Byron, ‘Waltz, an Apostrophic Hymn’ [1812], Wikisource, 7 February 2013, http://en.wikiso (...)

17In the Letter, Anton Müller names as his ‘authority’ the North Frisian/German poet, painter and ‘professional’ revolutionary Harro Harring.12 From 1821, Harring supported the Greek fight for freedom, and in 1828 he visited Prague in an attempt to intervene on behalf of the Greek revolutionary Alexander Ypsilanti, who was imprisoned in the fortress Theresienstadt.13 After the failure of this effort, he escaped to Munich, and later stayed in Poland, Rio de Janeiro, and New York. He participated in the revolutionary events in Leipzig and Braunschweig in 1830 and in North Frisia in 1848. The last years of his life were spent on the island of Jersey where he committed suicide. He knew George Gordon Byron, Heinrich Heine and Giuseppe Garibaldi. According to Müller, Harring wrote and published in Prague a poem dealing with Reydowak.14 In this poem, mentioned earlier, he expressed a deep distaste for the dance, which he saw as an affront to decency and even as a reflection of the sensuality and luxuriance of the whole nation.15 This opinion seemed too strict to Müller and he convinced Harring to strike out the offensive words before printing. Müller asked Schottky, to whom he addressed his Letter, if his defence of Reydowak against Harring was justified. Harring’s dismissal of the dance fashion symbolised by Reydowak is reminiscent of the opinion of that other ‘revolutionary’ poet, Byron, in his poem ‘The Waltz’.16

  • 17 Born on 17 July 1791 in Prague, died on 15 March 1867 in Graz.
  • 18 Sebastian W. Schiessler, Carnevals-Almanach für das Jahr 1830 (Prague: C. W. Enders, 1830), http:// (...)

18A person of local importance is also mentioned in the Letter: Sebastian Willibald Schiessler,17 active as a writer (who wrote novels as well as books on economics, topography, and amusement), an amateur piano player, and a composer. In 1830, Schiessler published a book in Prague under the title Carnevals-Almanach, a compilation of information dealing with Carnival in history and the present. There are also short poems that provide characteristics of fashionable dances, music scores for dancing, and the first descriptions of these social dances printed in Bohemia. No similar book appeared in in Bohemia over the following decades, and it was connected with the excited interest in dancing that was also evident in newspapers during 1830. The book includes Reydowak, but only in the form of several musical scores; there is no description of movement.18

  • 19 Born in 1794, died in 1849.

19The author of the Answer, as previously mentioned, was Julius Maximilian Schottky.19 He was active as a writer, publishing books on historical topics from Bohemia, the life story of Nicolo Paganini or past and present Prague. In January 1830 in his column ‘Prager Novitäten’ [Prague Novelties] in Bohemia, he published articles dedicated to the theme of Carnival, hence Müller addressed him as a Carnival expert. In his Answer to Müller’s Letter, Schottky did not cite authorities, relying only on information known by hearsay from his acquaintances.

Fig. 6.1 Excerpt from music for Reydowak by Ch. W. Schiessler, published in his Carnevals-Almanach für das Jahr 1830 (Prague: C. W. Enders, 1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/​kramerius/​MShowMonograph.do?id=24112. Josef Vycpálek, České tance (Prague: B. Kočí, 1921), p. 47.

20Anton Müller and Julius Max Schottky almost certainly knew each other; the exchange of the Letter and the Answer in the pages of Bohemia seems scripted, manufacturing an opportunity to have a public discussion about an attractive topic.

Dance Forms Mentioned in the Discussion

  • 20 Dance programme of the ball in the Convict Hall 26.1.1829 and in the hall of the Spa at the Kleine (...)

21In the two texts, four dances are explicitly named: the Galop, Reydowak (in the more Czech form known also as Reydowák), Reydowačka, and the quick Waltz. Reydowak receives the bulk of the attention, but all the dances are used as examples of dances at a fast tempo, and as illustrations of the debate on ballroom fashion of the time. We have some evidence of the contemporary popularity of these dances in Prague. They were included in the social dance events repertoire as seen on dance programmes. For instance, a programme from the ball in the Convict Hall held on 26 January 1829 included the following dances: the Polonaise, the Deutscher, the Galop, the Ländler, Reydowak, the Waltz, the Cotillion, and Schlußdeutsch. At the ball held in the hall of the Spa at the Kleine Seite (in Czech Malá Strana) on 18 February in the same year, the programme of dances was exactly the same.20

Fig. 6.2 Invitation card to balls held in the Convict Hall in Prague between 1810–1820, still a popular place for dancing in 1830 (the building is in the background). Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov 2008), p. 128.

  • 21 This was the first public ball organised by Czech patriotic circles to support the Czech national m (...)

22The popularity of the Waltz and the Galop lasted throughout the nineteenth century, as in other European countries. Reydowak was also popular for some time across Europe and the USA, usually under the name of the Redowa. In the Czech lands, it slowly disappeared in the years following 1830, a phenomenon that was particularly notable among Germans; unfortunately, there are insufficient dance programmes in the archive to understand this process more accurately. Certainly, however, the order of dances from the first Czech ball21 in 1840 does not include Reydowak, indicating that this dance was not popular even among Czechs. Both dance programmes from 1829 show the composition of the repertoire. The exact movement differences between the Ländler, the Deutscher and the Waltz are not clear, as no detailed descriptions of these three dances as practised in the Czech lands exist from this period. The Deutscher is most likely the older, slower form of the Waltz. The reference to the Waltz almost certainly means the Viennese Waltz, the quicker version of the dance, which came into fashion after the Viennese Congress. The Ländler most probably included the arm movements that were typical of this form.

  • 22 Schiessler, Carnevals-Almanach.
  • 23 ‘If my name did not already betray the country that gave birth to me/ Truly, I would be afraid to a (...)

23With respect to Reydowak, Bohemian descriptions from the period are also not available. In Carnevals-Almanach by Schiessler, musical scores for Reydowak are included: one as the closing part of the Kegelquadrille (the Skittle-Quadrille), named Reydowak (in 3/4) by the composer Joseph Triebensee, the orchestra leader of the opera in the Prague theatre. As an independent number, there is Reydowak (in 3/8) with Reydowacžka (in 2/4) by S. W. Schiessler, the editor of the Almanach himself.22 This music was later reprinted in various sources, as well as in the most important collection of Czech folk dances by Josef Vycpálek (published in 1921 under the title České tance). Among the several dances described in words, Reydowak is not included in the Almanach (in the case of the Kegelquadrille, which is described, Reydowak is left without explanation). Reydowak can be found in the part of the Almanach entitled ‘Tanz-Vignetten’, including two-line stanzas dedicated to the particular dances created by Schiessler. Here also are the Minuet, the Waltz, the Quadrille, the Mazurka, the Galop, Reydowak and Reydowaczka, the Cotillion, Schnellwalzer, the Ecossaise, and Kehraus. For Reydowak and Reydowaczka the text is as follows: ‘Wenn mein Name nicht schon verriethe, welch Land mich geboren/ Wahrlich, ich würde mich scheu’n, ihn zu verkünden der Welt’.23 This does not in any case deal with the movement patterns of the dance or with the dance style.

Fig. 6.3 Video: the Stanford Vintage Dance Ensemble and Academy of Danse Libre performs their winning the Redowa at the Spoleto Festival, Italy 2011. Reconstruction/choreography by Richard Powers. ‘Stanford at Spoleto Festival: Winner’s Redowa’, 2: 08, posted online by Jason Anderson, Youtube, 17 July 2011, https://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=fzSRDv3f0-8

  • 24 Thomas Anton Kunz, Böhmische Nationalgesänge und Tänze (Prague: Ústav pro entnografii a folkloristi (...)
  • 25 Zíbrt, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo, pp. 356–57.
  • 26 Čeněk Zíbrt, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo: Dějiny tance v Čechách, na Moravě, ve Slezsku a na Slo (...)
  • 27 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.

24References to the dance in the Czech lands appeared from the beginning of the nineteenth century. One musical score for Reydowak is included in the manuscript collection of folk songs Böhmische Nationalgesänge und Tänze by Thomas Anton Kunz, created before 1830, but there is no description of the movement.24 Jan Jeník z Bratřic provides interesting details in his memoirs.25 He mentions the connection between two contrasting dances: Reydowak and Reydowaczka. Contrary to the later evolution of the two dances, he states that the Reydowaczka (in even metre) was played more slowly than Reydowak (in odd metre). This corresponds to the characteristics of Reydowak as the quick dance in Müller’s Letter. But another notice from 1833 speaks of the slow Reydowak and quick, ‘crackpot’ Reydowaczka,26 which again casts doubts on the preceding information. The evidence by Kunz and Bratřic also supports the note by Müller, that Reydowak came to the dance hall from the rural environment (employing the metaphor of a field flower being replanted in the greenhouse of the dancing hall).27

Fig. 6.4 ‘The Redowa Waltz: A new Bohemian waltzas danced in the Parisian saloons and taught by Monsieur Jules Martin’, c.1846. The Redowa waltz seemed to have become popular even in America. Jerome Robbins Dance Division, The New York Public Library Digital Collections, Public Domain, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/​items/​9fae00f0-3386-0131-f0f9-58d385a7bbd0

  • 28 Alfred Waldau, Böhmische Nationaltänze. Culturstudie (Prague: Hermann Dominikus, 1859), http://www. (...)
  • 29 Alfred Waldau, Böhmische Nationaltänze: Eine Kulturstudie (Prague: Vitalis, 2003), p. 27.

25Böhmische Nationaltänze [Bohemian National Dances] by Alfred Waldau (1859)28 includes some commentary on the dance and its character. He included Reydowak among the round dances with changes and figures (Rundtänze mit Abwechslungen und Figuren), and mentioned its popularity not only among ordinary people but also in higher society during the 1840s; he also described its later decline and return to the villages.29

  • 30 Karel Link, Beseda: Český salonní tanec (Prague: Nakladatel A. Storch syn, 1882).
  • 31 Adam Reichert, Die moderne Tanzkunst von ästetischen und theoretischen Standpunkte (Olmütz: Selbstv (...)

26The dance was used as one component of the Quadrille Česká Beseda, created in 1863, in the third Tour of the third Figure. The description of the Reydowak step, given by the creator of this national Quadrille, Karel Link, stressed the specific rhythm of the movement created by a prolonged first step (one-and-a-half beats in the 3/4 metre) and the sliding movement of the tip of the toe in the first and third step of each bar.30 The connection between Reydowak and Česká Beseda prolonged its life considerably in the Czech ballroom context, and could have influenced its acceptance in German circles, too. But in books such as the German manual of 1881 by the Moravian dancing master Adam Reichert, Reydowak is not included.31

Fig. 6.5 The ballroom dance Česká Beseda, Sokolské šibřinky in Beroun. ‘ “Česká Beseda” — Vystoupení skupiny “Beseda” Jitky Bonušové — Beroun 23/03/13’, 14: 51, uploaded by Ludmila Sluníčková, Youtube, 27 March 2013, https://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=Pmrh_0uhLX8

  • 32 Henri Cellarius, The Drawing Room Dances (E. Churton: London, 1847), pp. xi., 140 (pl. VII), http:/ (...)
  • 33 Eugène Coulon, Coulon’s Hand-Book; Containing all the Last New and Fashionable Dances (London: Jull (...)
  • 34 Philippe Gawlikowski, Guide Complet De La Danse (Paris: Taride, Libraire-éditeur, 1858), pp. 59–61, (...)
  • 35 Bernhard Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst: Ein Leitfaden für Lehrer und Lernende nebst einem Anhang(...)

27Descriptions of Reydowak appeared later in the nineteenth century in technical dance manuals from various countries, reflecting its fashionable nature (the dance went by the name of the Redowa abroad). It was popular not only in the ballroom but also in the theatre — the dance appeared in some operas. It is included in the books by Henri Cellarius,32 by Coulon33 and in the Guide Complet de La Danse by Philippe Gawlikowski, printed in Paris in 1858.34 Both Reydowak and Reydowaczka (as ‘Die Redowa/La Redowa’ and ‘Die Redowaczka/La Redowaczka’) are included in the dance manual by Bernhard Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst, published for the first time in 1855 (and then in many further editions), which was very influential in the German-speaking countries. Klemm describes the characteristic movement in both dances as jumping, and he compares the step of Reydowak with the pas de Basque in ballet.35 Klemm states the speed of Reydowak to be M.M. 88 for one quarter, which is valuable information. In the case of Reydowaczk, such details are missing.

  • 36 Link, Beseda.
  • 37 Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst, pp. 149–57.
  • 38 Daniela Stavĕlová, ‘Polka jako český národní symbol’, Český lid, 93 (2006), 3–26.

28Link´s Česká Beseda36 and Klemm´s Katechismus der Tanzkunst37 nevertheless only partly reveal the vivid character of these dances in the Prague ballrooms of 1830. Between 1830 and 1855 (Klemm´s description), or 1863 (Česká Beseda), dancing style changed. This had less effect on the dances in 3/4 metre based on the Waltz than on those in 2/4 metre, including probably Reydowaczka. In 1830, the Polka was still not practised as a social dance in Prague, although in some form it already existed outside the city, especially in East Bohemia.38 The fashion for the Polka started in Europe in the 1840s. It is therefore difficult to ascertain what Reydowaczka looked like in the year 1830. Probably it was based on the Galop, the most popular 2/4 dance of that time, and it did not include the double turning of the couple, typical for the Polka (and linked later with Reydowacka, as it is found in some Czech sources from the second half of the nineteenth century). Klemm mentions the connection between Reydowaczka and the Galop, and according to him, its basic step is pas chassé.

  • 39 Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst, pp. 149–57.

29Klemm also provides information on some typical additional movements and motifs; namely, in Reydowak, he describes the alternation of the turning and progressing around the circle using the pas de Basque steps, and halting and moving forwards and backwards using the same step without turning; this halting was done at the man’s instigation. The same principle is also used in Reydowaczka.39 As Reydowak is included in Česká Beseda as a part of the Quadrille, it is limited only to the basic step motif, without any additional movements.

  • 40 František Dlouhý, O historickém vývoji tance a jeho kulturním významě; Český tanec národní (Prague: (...)

30Another Czech description can be found in the book by František Dlouhý, O historickém vývoji tance a jeho kulturním významě. Český tanec národní [On the Historical Evolution of Dance and its Cultural Significance: The Czech National Dance], published in 1880. He mentions some features of Reydowak that Klemm also notes: the returning in the movement around the circle (three times turning and progressing by Waltz steps forward, then one backward) and balancing on the spot (which can happen at any time according to the decision of the dancing couple). In the case of Reydowaczka (Rejdovačka), he states only that it is danced in Polka rhythm.40

  • 41 Josef Pohl, Úplný tanečník: soubor všech tanců s návodem naučiti se jim (V Praze: Frant. Bačkovsk (...)

31The description of Reydowak in a social dance manual by Josef Pohl from the end of the nineteenth century is not very clear: he states that the dancers do not embrace each other, they hold each other with crossed hands, the lady walks backward, the gentleman faces in her direction, and they move in the characteristic ‘rejdování’ manner (lenken, umwenden or herumtreiben in German), alternating this movement by balancing on the spot.41

32Reydowak was included in many social dance manuals printed in Bohemia from the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, and in the folk songs and dance collections from the twentieth century. But the dance programmes from the public balls of the second half of the nineteenth century do not include the dance. It could have been part of the curriculum in the dance schools, but it was not a living element of the repertoire of the balls as an independent dance, only as a part of the Česká Beseda.

  • 42 Josef Jungmann, Slownjk česko-německý (Prague: Knjžecj arcibiskupská tiskárna, Josefa wdowa Fetterl (...)

33The movement structure of the dance probably changed in the course of time and in different contexts. Often, as we have seen, the characteristic movement pattern of rejdování (herumtreiben) is mentioned. The concept is not etymologically clear; the German word can be translated as ‘to drive to and fro’ or ‘to drive around’. The Czech verb rejdovat had a special meaning connected to the movement of a boat during anchoring, approaching its berth; it is connected to the German term for the anchorage: ‘die Reede’. It indicates movement with (small) changes of direction (as the boat tries to hit the mooring). In his dictionary, Josef Jungmann connects the Czech term rejdovat with the notion of driving with the back of a car slightly at an angle.42 In dance, rejdování could be performed by several different movements: by alternative turning (directing) of the couple slightly to the right and left, by the alternation of moving forward and backward, by balancing inside and outside the circle, either while moving in space or staying (almost) on the spot. It was typical for the specific movement motifs to be executed by each dancing couple at will, so that couples were independent and the course of the dance was not uniform and strictly fixed. This feature could give the dance the symbolic aspect of being free from rules and conventions.

The Play of Opinions

34In the Letter and the Answer, we find several categories of thoughts and evaluation dealing with dances, dance fashion and social behaviour. The majority are not new. Some of them repeatedly appeared from the Renaissance onwards, either in the dance manuals or other texts, for instance, medical or moralising treatises. Some of them were connected specifically with the dance forms of the Waltz type and the dancing etiquette of bourgeois culture in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The manner in which the Letter and the Answer reflect these things is affected by the local atmosphere, mentality, and the historical background of the Czech lands; the discussion is not only nuanced by these things, but also by personalities and the opinions of individuals who conducted the debate.

  • 43 Lněničková, České země v době předbřeznové.

35The Bohemian society of the 1830s represented specific circumstances, influenced by the growing Czech national movement, the political dependence of the country on the Austrian Monarchy, the strong impact of the Napoleonic Wars not only in the material sphere (military engagements on the territory of Moravia and Bohemia, namely the battle of Austerlitz/Slavkov in 1805 and the battle of Chlumec in 1813) but also mentally and spiritually by strengthening censorship, limiting public behaviour (especially political activity) and the propagation of liberal, ‘Republican’ ideas. During 1830, a process of recovery and the relaxation of restrictions on public life began, in which dance events played an important role as public social activities. The whole period from the Napoleonic Wars until the Viennese revolution in March 1848, followed by a similar affair in Prague, is labelled ‘Pre-March Time’ by historians and understood as a relatively stable period but with some noticeable events, among them mainly the revolutionary year of 1830. Czech society was deeply affected by the revolution in Poland, since it experienced a sense of connection and solidarity with another Slavonic nation, but this happened in November 1830, long after the debate analysed in this chapter. Nevertheless, from the beginning, the year 1830 marks an obvious turning point: prior to this, the atmosphere seemed to be moderate, muted, and sleepy, while preference for the private sphere of life and conservative feelings held sway; afterwards, life started to become more vivid, optimistic, and active, more public, more progressive in opinions and attitudes, and more individualistic.43

  • 44 Miloš Havelka, ‘Byl Herbart filosofem biedermeieru? Herbartův pokus o realistickou akceptaci zodvoj (...)

36The change that happened around the year 1830 was also visible in the artistic, aesthetic field. The beginning of the nineteenth century is connected in Bohemia mainly with the Biedermeier style, which was embraced by people belonging to the bourgeoisie (but also accepted by the aristocracy). Biedermeier is usually understood as the art of home interior design, applying the arts to create an intimate, private mood. More recent interpretation of the Biedermeier movement has tended to rethink its meaning, widening its application into more cultural and artistic spheres, rather than seeing it as some passive, private, closed, spiritual, and artistic phenomenon. Instead, emphasis is placed upon the achievement of balance between real life and ideals, upon searching for an equilibrium in mind, and harmony between the notion of liberty and the responsibility of the individual. The main tool for achieving this was the concept of moral sense (as formulated, for instance, by the German philosopher Johann Friedrich Herbart).44 This approach corresponds with the importance of questions of morality that are also expressed in the Letter and the Answer. The discussion about dance fashion held in Bohemia in 1830 stands on the edge of two types of cultural life and ways of thinking in the Czech lands.

Fig. 6.6 V. R. Grüner, ‘Carneval in Prague’, ca.1829. Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov, 2008), p. 123.

  • 45 Alessandro Arcangeli, ‘Dance and Health: The Renaissance Physician’s View’, Dance Research, 18.1 (2 (...)

37One topic discussed in the debate between Anton Müller and Julius Max Schottky is the impact of the contemporary way of dancing on health, especially that of young women. Commentaries dealing with this topic had appeared already in Renaissance dance manuals and medical literature. According to Alessandro Arcangeli’s interpretation, the Renaissance physicians shared, in general, the notion of the prophylactic benefit of dancing when performed in a ‘controlled’ way. Dance balances body and mind, it gives people the ability to move harmoniously, it strengthens the body, especially the legs, and it can even serve as a cure, for instance for melancholy. The desirable way of dancing formulated by these sources is to dance in a very calm manner, without any wild movements, after dining, performed in harmony and measure following the music. They also articulated the more problematic attributes of dance, which could have the contrary influence not only on one’s health and physical state but principally on one’s moral being: violent movements and excessively quick whirling might cause loss of balance or dizziness, which meant also a loss of the balance of one’s mind, a loss of dignity, and other undesirable outcomes. They also differentiated between dance situations: they believed it was most appropriate to dance in the open air, not to hold a ball in a closed dusty room that was noisy and crowded, as was customary. But, instead of dancing for their health, they noticed that people danced more for their pleasure.45

  • 46 Helena Lorenzová, ‘Dietetika duše. K praktické filosofii (estetice) osvícentsví a biedermeieru’, in (...)
  • 47 Lorenzová, ‘Dietetika duše’.
  • 48 Bernard Specht, Ueber Anstand, Schönheit und Grazie im Tanz. Nebst einem Vorschlage zur allgemeinen (...)
  • 49 Christian Länger, Terpsichore: Ein Taschenbuch der neuesten gesellschaftlichen Tänze (Würzburg: Etl (...)
  • 50 Tereza Babická, ‘Německá taneční kritika v Praze ve 30. letech 19. Století’ (unpublished thesis, Ac (...)
  • 51 Karel Link, Tanec se stanoviska theoretického a aesthetického (Prague: Knihkupectví J. Nowotný, 187 (...)
  • 52 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.

38Many of these opinions crop up repeatedly in various types of texts dealing with dance until the nineteenth century. In the first third of the nineteenth century in Bohemia, as in other German-speaking countries, there were popular instructions on how to achieve a long, healthy and happy life, formulated for instance by Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland in his book Die Kunst das menschliche Leben zu verlängern, known later as Makrobiotics, first published in 1796.46 He did not write specifically about dance, but he named among misdemeanours that could shorten life the diseases caused by unreasonable actions. Violent and uncontrolled dancing could easily be such a dangerous activity. His successor Wilhelm Bronn in his Kalobiotik (1835) formulated a more joyous picture of a suitable way of life and recommended a rich social life including dance events and physical activities. A truly happy life has to be, nevertheless, moral, too.47 The authors of the Letter and the Answer likewise vacillated between these two points: dance as a danger, and dance as a joyful phenomenon. Both Müller and Schottky remind the reader about the sad accident of a young girl, who apparently died after of her behaviour during a ball. Such stories are nothing new or rare at this point in time. From the end of the eighteenth century, warnings that dancers (mainly girls) could die as a result of quick, violent dancing, because they became sweaty, caught a chill, drank too much cold water, and thus fell ill with pneumonia or tuberculosis, frequently appeared in newspapers and dance treatises. This danger was, according to the opinions of authors of these texts, connected especially to specific dances: the Waltz (the Deutscher), the Galop, and, in our newspaper debate, Reydowak. In the Czech lands, as early as 1789 Bernard Specht had written in his treatise Ueber Anstand, Schönheit und Grazie im Tanz about the profits of dancing (strengthening of the body, becoming lighter, more pliable, developing a more natural movement when walking) and its dangers (exhaustion, tuberculosis and death).48 And still in 1838, Christian Länger (and many other European authors before and after), in his dance manual Terpsichore, repeated similar warnings about the danger of death from tuberculosis because of overly enthusiastic dancing (or rounds of dance that were too quick and too long).49 Several reports of such accidents appeared in the Prague newspapers in the 1830s, not only involving young girls but also gentlemen.50 Later, during the nineteenth century, this theme of illness and death slowly disappeared, replaced by more emphasis on the positive impact of dance on health, as in the book by Prague dancing master Karel Link in 1872.51 In the debate in Bohemia, Müller also tried to ameliorate the sad story of the dead girl by contrasting it with the fact that dancing was almost the only opportunity for greater physical activity for girls from the middle-class families.52

  • 53 Grace was one of the most important qualities for him also in the case of theatrical dancing, as se (...)
  • 54 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.
  • 55 In respect to carriages, Schottky either has in mind express mail stagecoaches, which started to go (...)
  • 56 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’.
  • 57 Wilhelm Bronn, Für Kalobiotik, Kunst, das Leben zu verschönern, als neu ausgestecktes Feld menschli (...)
  • 58 Jaroslav Langer, ‘České prostonárodní obyčeje a písně, [1834]’, in Spisy Jaroslava Langera, 2 vols (...)

39The theme of the dangerous pace of some popular dances was closely connected in the debate with questions of endangering health; these two aspects were usually understood as being linked. According to the traditional view, quick dancing risked uncontrolled, passionate, and wild behaviour, and so it was an additional aspect of moral impropriety. Speed was accompanied by the close (indeed, too close) embrace of the couple, and with whirling, which was often mentioned in connection with the Waltz. For Anton Müller, ‘in the bacchantic fast running’, grace53 is lost. While a horse can be beautiful while galloping at its fastest pace, a girl cannot (A. M. 1830).54 Julius Schottky was less strict in his Answer and viewed the popularity of quick dances in a wider perspective. He saw the speed and tempestuous nature of the flight that was typical for the dances of his time as a parallel to the vigour of that era, when everything was as fast as a mountain stream: steam and machines, quick carriages, quick print machines, quick typewriters.55 In such a world, quick dancers could also exist, he said. His words imply that his evaluation was not negative; he understood this quickness as joined with happiness, the joy of life, a mood that would be positive for human living and society.56 He was not alone in holding this point of view at that time; similar opinions can be seen in Bronn’s Kalobiotik.57 But there were also opposing voices, like that of Czech writer Jaroslav Langer. In the mid-1830s, Langer wrote to condemn the quick (wild) dances that came from the villages to the towns and even abroad (Reydowak, among others) and did not bring any credit to the nation. He also repeated the connection between quick dancing and the danger of death.58 Schottky and Langer therefore represented a polarisation in the Bohemian society of that time. Schottky’s standpoint was closer to the view of the young intellectual generation, especially students, who were also the typical participants in such rapid dancing.

Fig. 6.7 Entrance ticket to the charitable ball of the Institute of the Poor held in the hall of the Spa in Prague, 20 January 1830. Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov 2008), p. 128.

  • 59 Sulzer, ‘Tanz’.
  • 60 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.
  • 61 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’

40The third field for discussion identified by Müller and Schottky was that of morals and of the place of dance in social life. The manner in which they argued shows a mixture of ‘universal’ and ‘local’ aspects and standpoints; those shared universally among European middle-class intellectuals, as well as those distinctive to Bohemian circumstances. Among the relatively universal ideas was the opinion that the mode of dancing, including posture and movement, mirrors or expresses the moral character of an individual. This idea was precisely formulated, for example, by Johann Georg Sulzer in the entry on dance in his encyclopaedia.59 His thoughts were also very influential in Bohemian-German circles, including upon Anton Müller, the aesthetician. From this point of view, we can understand the commentary by Müller about the overly intimate behaviour of couples dancing the Waltz.60 And Schottky expressed the same way of thinking in his conclusion: it was not the dance itself, but the personality of the dancer and his or her morals that ultimately decided the moral message of the particular dance.61

  • 62 Dorota Gremlicová, ‘Tělo, nebo sen? Romantický tanec 19. století’, in Tělo a tělesnost v české kult (...)
  • 63 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, pp. 92–93.
  • 64 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (Leipzig: Weigand, 1774), p. 38.
  • 65 ‘Und da wir nun gar an’s Walzen kamen, und wie die Sphären um einander herum rollen’. Translated fr (...)
  • 66 Byron, ‘Waltz’.
  • 67 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.
  • 68 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, p. 93.

41Together with the idea of personality transposed into dance movement, Müller mentioned another aspect of contemporary dancing behaviour, which we can call ‘published intimacy’.62 It is connected with the tendency of bourgeois society to differ between several spheres of life: the sphere of the state, the public space of the citizen’s community, and the private (intimate) space of family. Each of these spheres had appropriate behaviour and rules, a specific ‘culture’.63 Dances like the Waltz, in which the couple came together inside a closed space with very intimate, personal feelings, made it possible to break the limits of the public sphere by embracing, touching a person of the opposite sex who was not a relative. These attributes of the Waltz provoked both enthusiasm and distaste from the beginning of the social life of this dance. Johann Wolfgang Goethe in his novel Die Leiden des jungen Werthers [The Sorrows of Young Werther] saw in it the sign of belonging to an unofficial circle of ‘new’ bourgeois people capable of deep feelings, represented by the leading figures of Lotte and Werther.64 He also exactly expresses the intimate atmosphere of the dance, the enclosing of the couple and their isolation from the other ‘world’: ‘we revolved around each other like the (cosmic) spheres’.65 The opposite opinion was voiced a little later by Byron, who, in his poem ‘The Waltz’, denounced the dance mainly from a moral point of view.66 Anton Müller did not add anything new to these polarised opinions. Rather, he reflected weakened concern about the moral aspect of such dances. It seems that this ‘published intimacy’ was, in his time, experienced less and less by dancing people as something important and symbolic: while dancing, the couple showed provocative ‘public tenderness’, but when the dance was finished, the dancer would indifferently throw his lady off. In fact, with understanding and sympathy, Müller commented on the fact that, for girls, dancing gave a rare opportunity to experience the nearness of a young man, to touch him without any rebuke, although he also expressed his doubts about the borderline of proper public behaviour and personal liberty, a theme of concern to both German and Czech intellectuals at the time.67 The fact that girls and women are placed at the centre of these ideas seems to correspond with the new tendency of the time to include women more in Bohemian public life.68

  • 69 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’.

42The debate in the newspaper Bohemia on the topics of health, the rapidity of the dancing, and its moral aspects, was a stimulus for contemplation of cultural and social spheres. It is clear that for the authors of the Letter and the Answer, dance could serve as a basis for such considerations. Schottky wrote directly, that ‘if dance belongs still among the most influential phenomena of our days, its consequences are not limited only to the dance hall, but they also touch on family and public lives’. He opened his Answer with this statement, and it forms the basis for his subsequent thoughts. He tried to keep this overall perspective and to focus on this symbolic meaning of dance in contemporary Bohemian society.69

Conclusion

  • 70 Miroslav Hroch, Na prahu národní existence: touha a skutečnost (Prague: Mladá fronta, 1999).

43As already stated, the basic mood of the exchange of opinions between Müller and Schottky is amicable; they searched for a balanced attitude to the phenomena with which they dealt. Nevertheless, in this attempt at harmony, a desire for joyful, liberal behaviour in dance that was currently missing in real life can also be detected. As noted above, in contemporary Czech historiography, the period of the 1830s is understood as a time of social and cultural change. This shift had political and mental aspects. After the Congress of Vienna in 1815, which concluded the period of the Napoleonic Wars, society in the Austrian Empire was under very strict state control; it was forbidden to express any progressive, liberal or republican thoughts, not only in public but also for example in private correspondence. People were vigilant; many of them accepted ‘state’ opinion that prohibited such revolutionary movements or thoughts. This atmosphere also created some mental barriers against accepting cultural phenomena, including dance. The notions of liberty and equality were .reflected diffidently and cautiously, in a limited way.70

  • 71 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, pp. 40–43.

44At the end of the 1820s, however, intellectual circles in Bohemia, both Czech and German, were more and more influenced by the liberal movement in other European countries, especially in the parts of Germany close to its territory, such as Saxony, for instance. Alongside this, some change in mentality began in bourgeois circles, which resulted in greater courage to think about human rights, liberty and self-expression, and about the value of novelties in material as well as spiritual aspects of life.71 In this light, the conclusions of Müller and Schottky effectively herald the development of public life in the 1830s. As members of local intellectual circles, they show that dance could be an appropriate element of public behaviour, capable of acting as a model example.

Bibliographie

Bibliography

Arcangeli, Alessandro, ‘Dance and Health: The Renaissance Physician’s View’, Dance Research, 18.1 (2000), 3–30, https://doi.org/10.3366/1291009

Babická, Tereza, ‘Německá taneční kritika v Praze ve 30. letech 19. Století’ (unpublished thesis, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, 2011).

Bohemia, Unterhaltungsblätter für gebildete Stände [n.a.], 3 (1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/PShowVolume.do?it=0&id=14191

Bronn, Wilhelm, Für Kalobiotik, Kunst, das Leben zu verschönern, als neu ausgestecktes Feld menschlichen Strebens: Winke zur Erhöhung und Veredelung des Lebensgenusses 1 (Vienna: Gerold, 1835).

Byron, George G., ‘Waltz, an Apostrophic Hymn’ [1812], Wikisource, 7 February 2013, http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Works_of_Lord_Byron_(ed._Coleridge,_Prothero)/Poetry/Volume_1/The_Waltz

Cellarius, Henri, The Drawing Room Dances (E. Churton: London, 1847), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1847-Cellarius-Drawing_Room_(LOC).pdf

Coulon, Eugène, Coulon’s Hand-Book; Containing all the Last New and Fashionable Dances (London: Jullien & Co., 1860), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1860-Coulon-Hand-Book_(LOC).pdf

Dlouhý, František, O historickém vývoji tance a jeho kulturním významě; Český tanec národní (Prague: F. A. Urbánek, 1880).

Gawlikowski, Philippe, Guide complet de la danse (Paris: Taride, Libraire-éditeur, 1858), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1858-Gawlikowski-Guide_Complet_(LOC).pdf.

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (Leipzig: Weigand, 1774).

Gremlicová, Dorota, ‚Tělo, nebo sen? Romantický tanec 19. století’, in Tělo a tělesnost v české kultuře 19. století, Sborník příspěvků z 29. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 26.-28. února 2009, ed. by Taťána Petrasová and Pavla Machalíková (Prague: Academia, 2010), pp. 168–75.

Havelka, Miloš, ‘Byl Herbart filosofem biedermeieru? Herbartův pokus o realistickou akceptaci zodvojenosti člověka a světa’, in Biedermeier v českých zemích. Sborník příspěvků z 23. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 6.–8. března 2003, ed. by Helena Lorenzová and Taťána Petrasová (Prague: Koniasch Latin Press, 2004), pp. 25–37.

Hroch, Miroslav, Na prahu národní existence: touha a skutečnost (Prague: Mladá fronta, 1999).

Jungmann, Josef, Slownjk česko-německý (Prague: Knjžecj arcibiskupská tiskárna, Josefa wdowa Fetterlowá, 1837), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/handle/ABA001/183651

K. K. privat, Prager Zeitung [n.a.], 15.18 (31 January 1830), http://anno.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno?aid=pag&datum=18300131&zoom=33

Klemm, Bernhard, Katechismus der Tanzkunst: Ein Leitfaden für Lehrer und Lernende nebst einem Anhang über Choreographie, 7th edn (Leipzig: J.J. Weber, 1901), http://books.google.com/books?id=XkpKAAAAYAAJ

Kunz, Thomas Anton, Böhmische Nationalgesänge und Tänze (Prague: Ústav pro entnografii a folkloristiku AV ČR, 1996)

Länger, Christian, Terpsichore: Ein Taschenbuch der neuesten gesellschaftlichen Tänze. (Würzburg: Etlinger’schen Buchhandlung, 1838), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1838-Langer-Terpsichore_(BSB).pdf

Langer, Jaroslav, ‚České prostonárodní obyčeje a písně. [1834]’, in Spisy Jaroslava Langera, 2 vols (Prague: Vídeň, 1861), II, 75.

Link, Karel, Tanec se stanoviska theoretického a aesthetického (Prague: Knihkupectví J. Nowotný, 1872).

Link, Karel, Beseda: Český salonní tanec (Prague: Nakladatel A. Storch syn, 1882).

Lněničková, Jitka, České země v době předbřeznové: 1792–1848 (Prague: Libri, 1999).

Lorenzová, Helena, ‘Dietetika duše. K praktické filosofii (estetice) osvícentsví a biedermeieru’, in Biedermeier v českých zemích. Sborník příspěvků z 23. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 6.–8. března 2003, ed. by Helena Lorenzová and Taťána Petrasová (Prague: Koniasch Latin Press, 2004), pp. 38–48.

Ludvová, Jitka, et al., Hudební divadlo v českých zemích: Osobnosti 19. století (Prague: Divadelní ústav: Academia, 2006).

Míka, Zdeněk, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov 2008).

Pohl, Josef, Úplný tanečník: soubor všech tanců s návodem naučiti se jim (V Praze: Frant. Bačkovský, 1899).

Reichert, Adam, Die moderne Tanzkunst von ästetischen und theoretischen Standpunkte (Olmütz: Selbstverlag, 1881).

Schiessler, Sebastian Willibald, Carnevals-Almanach für das Jahr 1830 (Prague: C. W. Enders, 1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/MShowMonograph.do?id=24112

Specht, Bernard, Ueber Anstand, Schönheit und Grazie im Tanz. Nebst einem Vorschlage zur allgemeinen Balltracht (Prag: J. J. Diesbach, 1789).

Stavĕlová, Daniela, Polka jako český národní symbol‘, Český lid, 93 (2006), 3–26.

Sulzer, Johann G., ‚Tanz‘, in Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste in Einzeln, Nach alph. Ordnung der kunstwörter… Abgehandelt (Leipzig: M.G. Wiedmann, 1773–1775), pp. 747–51.

Štaif, Jiří, Obezřetná elita: Česká společnost mezi tradicí a revolucí 1830–1851 (Prague: Dokořán, 2005).

Vycpálek, Josef, České tance (Prague: B. Kočí, 1921).

Waldau, Alfred, Böhmische Nationaltänze: Eine Kulturstudie (Prague: Vitalis, 2003).

— —, Böhmische Nationaltänze. Culturstudie (Prague: Hermann Dominikus, 1859), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1859-Waldau-Bohmische_(Goog).pdf

Zíbrt, Čeněk, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo: Dějiny tance v Čechách, na Moravě, ve Slezsku a na Slovensku Od nejstarší doby až do konce 19. století se zvláštním zřetelem k dějinám tance vubec (Prague: Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury, hudby a umění, 1960).

— —, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo: Dějiny tance v Čechách, na Moravě, ve Slezsku a na Slovensku Od nejstarší doby až do konce 19. století se zvláštním zřetelem k dějinám tance vubec (Prague: F. Šimáček, 1895), https://archive.org/details/jak_se_kdy_v_cechach_tancova-zibrt

Notes

1 Bohemia, Unterhaltungsblätter für gebildete Stände [n.a.], 3 (1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/PShowVolume.do?it=0&id=14191

2 Anton Müller, ‘Sendschreiben. Theater und geselliges Leben’, Bohemia, Unterhaltungsblätter für gebildete Stände, 17 (7 February 1830), pp. 3–4, section ‘Prager Novitäten’.

3 K. K. privat, Prager Zeitung [n.a.], 15.18 (31 January 1830), http://anno.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno?aid=pag&datum=18300131&zoom=33

4 It is not clear exactly what the ‘Extra-Touren’ was.

5 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.

6 Julius M. Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben des Herrn Rezensenten in Nro. 17 dieses Blattes’, Bohemia, Unterhaltungsblätter für gebildete Stände, 19 (12 February 1830), pp. 3–4.

7 Jitka Lněničková, České země v době předbřeznové: 1792–1848 (Prague: Libri, 1999).

8 Jiří Štaif, Obezřetná elita: Česká společnost mezi tradicí a revolucí 1830–1851 (Prague: Dokořán, 2005).

9 Born on the 6 or 8 July 1792. Osečná u Mimoně died on the 5 or 6 January 1843 in Prague.

10 Sulzer, Johann G., ‘Tanz’, in Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste in Einzeln, Nach alph. Ordnung der kunstwörter… Abgehandelt (Leipzig: M. G. Weidmann, 1773–1775), pp. 747–51.

11 Jitka Ludvova, et al., Hudební divadlo v českých zemích: Osobnosti 19. století (Prague: Divadelní ústav: Academia, 2006).

12 Harro Paul Harring was born on 28 August 1798 in Ibenshof by Wobbenbüll, North Frisia. He died on the 15 May 1870 in Saint Helier, Jersey.

13 Terezín in Czech.

14 This poem has not yet been identified.

15 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.

16 George G. Byron, ‘Waltz, an Apostrophic Hymn’ [1812], Wikisource, 7 February 2013, http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Works_of_Lord_Byron_(ed._Coleridge,_Prothero)/Poetry/Volume_1/The_Waltz

17 Born on 17 July 1791 in Prague, died on 15 March 1867 in Graz.

18 Sebastian W. Schiessler, Carnevals-Almanach für das Jahr 1830 (Prague: C. W. Enders, 1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/MShowMonograph.do?id=24112

19 Born in 1794, died in 1849.

20 Dance programme of the ball in the Convict Hall 26.1.1829 and in the hall of the Spa at the Kleine Seite 18.2.1829. Archive of the National Museum, the Collection of J. Dušek, Inv. Nro. 1710/11, 1715/8.

21 This was the first public ball organised by Czech patriotic circles to support the Czech national movement. More in Čeněk Zíbrt, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo: Dějiny tance v Čechách, na Moravě, ve Slezsku a na Slovensku Od nejstarší doby až do konce 19. století se zvláštním zřetelem k dějinám tance vubec (Prague: F. Šimáček, 1895), pp. 306–34, https://archive.org/details/jak_se_kdy_v_cechach_tancova-zibrt

22 Schiessler, Carnevals-Almanach.

23 ‘If my name did not already betray the country that gave birth to me/ Truly, I would be afraid to announce it to the world’. Translation from German by Dorota Gremlicová. Ibid., p. 297.

24 Thomas Anton Kunz, Böhmische Nationalgesänge und Tänze (Prague: Ústav pro entnografii a folkloristiku AV ČR, 1996)

25 Zíbrt, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo, pp. 356–57.

26 Čeněk Zíbrt, Jak se kdy v Čechách tancovalo: Dějiny tance v Čechách, na Moravě, ve Slezsku a na Slovensku Od nejstarší doby až do konce 19. století se zvláštním zřetelem k dějinám tance vubec (Prague: Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury, hudby a umění, 1960), p. 272.

27 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’, pp. 3–4.

28 Alfred Waldau, Böhmische Nationaltänze. Culturstudie (Prague: Hermann Dominikus, 1859), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1859-Waldau-Bohmische_(Goog).pdf

29 Alfred Waldau, Böhmische Nationaltänze: Eine Kulturstudie (Prague: Vitalis, 2003), p. 27.

30 Karel Link, Beseda: Český salonní tanec (Prague: Nakladatel A. Storch syn, 1882).

31 Adam Reichert, Die moderne Tanzkunst von ästetischen und theoretischen Standpunkte (Olmütz: Selbstverlag, 1881).

32 Henri Cellarius, The Drawing Room Dances (E. Churton: London, 1847), pp. xi., 140 (pl. VII), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1847-Cellarius-Drawing_Room_(LOC).pdf

33 Eugène Coulon, Coulon’s Hand-Book; Containing all the Last New and Fashionable Dances (London: Jullien & Co., 1860), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1860-Coulon-Hand-Book_(LOC).pdf

34 Philippe Gawlikowski, Guide Complet De La Danse (Paris: Taride, Libraire-éditeur, 1858), pp. 59–61, http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1858-Gawlikowski-Guide_Complet_(LOC).pdf

35 Bernhard Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst: Ein Leitfaden für Lehrer und Lernende nebst einem Anhang über Choreographie 7 Aufl (Leipzig: J. J. Weber, 1901) pp. 148–9, http://books.google.com/books?id=XkpKAAAAYAAJ

36 Link, Beseda.

37 Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst, pp. 149–57.

38 Daniela Stavĕlová, ‘Polka jako český národní symbol’, Český lid, 93 (2006), 3–26.

39 Klemm, Katechismus der Tanzkunst, pp. 149–57.

40 František Dlouhý, O historickém vývoji tance a jeho kulturním významě; Český tanec národní (Prague: F. A. Urbánek, 1880), pp. 47–8.

41 Josef Pohl, Úplný tanečník: soubor všech tanců s návodem naučiti se jim (V Praze: Frant. Bačkovský, 1899), pp. 43–4.

42 Josef Jungmann, Slownjk česko-německý (Prague: Knjžecj arcibiskupská tiskárna, Josefa wdowa Fetterlowá, 1837), p. 822, http://kramerius.nkp.cz/kramerius/handle/ABA001/183651

43 Lněničková, České země v době předbřeznové.

44 Miloš Havelka, ‘Byl Herbart filosofem biedermeieru? Herbartův pokus o realistickou akceptaci zodvojenosti člověka a světa’, in Biedermeier v českých zemích. Sborník příspěvků z 23. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 6.–8. března 2003, ed. by Helena Lorenzová and Taťána Petrasová (Prague: Koniasch Latin Press, 2004), pp. 25–37.

45 Alessandro Arcangeli, ‘Dance and Health: The Renaissance Physician’s View’, Dance Research, 18.1 (2000), 3–30, https://doi.org/10.3366/1291009

46 Helena Lorenzová, ‘Dietetika duše. K praktické filosofii (estetice) osvícentsví a biedermeieru’, in Biedermeier v českých zemích. Sborník příspěvků z 23. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 6.–8. března 2003, ed. by Helena Lorenzová and Taťána Petrasová (Prague: Koniasch Latin Press, 2004), pp. 38–48.

47 Lorenzová, ‘Dietetika duše’.

48 Bernard Specht, Ueber Anstand, Schönheit und Grazie im Tanz. Nebst einem Vorschlage zur allgemeinen Balltracht (Prag: J. J. Diesbach, 1789).

49 Christian Länger, Terpsichore: Ein Taschenbuch der neuesten gesellschaftlichen Tänze (Würzburg: Etlinger’schen Buchhandlung, 1838), http://www.libraryofdance.org/manuals/1838-Langer-Terpsichore_(BSB).pdf

50 Tereza Babická, ‘Německá taneční kritika v Praze ve 30. letech 19. Století’ (unpublished thesis, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, 2011), p. 52.

51 Karel Link, Tanec se stanoviska theoretického a aesthetického (Prague: Knihkupectví J. Nowotný, 1872), pp. 4–6.

52 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.

53 Grace was one of the most important qualities for him also in the case of theatrical dancing, as seen in his theatre reviews published also in the newspaper Bohemia. Babická, Německá taneční Kritika.

54 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.

55 In respect to carriages, Schottky either has in mind express mail stagecoaches, which started to go from Prague to Vienna in 1823 and shortened the travel from three days to thirty-seven hours, or the new horse-drawn trams, the first lines of which were opened in 1827 (from České Budějovice to Linz) and in spring 1830 (so called Lány horse-drawn rail).

56 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’.

57 Wilhelm Bronn, Für Kalobiotik, Kunst, das Leben zu verschönern, als neu ausgestecktes Feld menschlichen Strebens: Winke zur Erhöhung und Veredelung des Lebensgenusses 1 (Vienna: Gerold, 1835).

58 Jaroslav Langer, ‘České prostonárodní obyčeje a písně, [1834]’, in Spisy Jaroslava Langera, 2 vols (Prague: Vídeň, 1861), II, 75.

59 Sulzer, ‘Tanz’.

60 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.

61 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’

62 Dorota Gremlicová, ‘Tělo, nebo sen? Romantický tanec 19. století’, in Tělo a tělesnost v české kultuře 19. století, Sborník příspěvků z 29. ročníku symposia k problematice 19. století, Plzeň, 26.-28. února 2009, ed. by Taťána Petrasová and Pavla Machalíková (Prague: Academia, 2010), pp. 168–75.

63 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, pp. 92–93.

64 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (Leipzig: Weigand, 1774), p. 38.

65 ‘Und da wir nun gar an’s Walzen kamen, und wie die Sphären um einander herum rollen’. Translated from the German by Dorota Gremlicová.

66 Byron, ‘Waltz’.

67 Müller, ‘Sendschreiben’.

68 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, p. 93.

69 Schottky, ‘Antwort auf das Sendschreiben’.

70 Miroslav Hroch, Na prahu národní existence: touha a skutečnost (Prague: Mladá fronta, 1999).

71 Štaif, Obezřetná elita, pp. 40–43.

Table des illustrations

Légende Fig. 6.1 Excerpt from music for Reydowak by Ch. W. Schiessler, published in his Carnevals-Almanach für das Jahr 1830 (Prague: C. W. Enders, 1830), http://kramerius.nkp.cz/​kramerius/​MShowMonograph.do?id=24112. Josef Vycpálek, České tance (Prague: B. Kočí, 1921), p. 47.
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 31k
Légende Fig. 6.2 Invitation card to balls held in the Convict Hall in Prague between 1810–1820, still a popular place for dancing in 1830 (the building is in the background). Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov 2008), p. 128.
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 27k
Légende Fig. 6.3 Video: the Stanford Vintage Dance Ensemble and Academy of Danse Libre performs their winning the Redowa at the Spoleto Festival, Italy 2011. Reconstruction/choreography by Richard Powers. ‘Stanford at Spoleto Festival: Winner’s Redowa’, 2: 08, posted online by Jason Anderson, Youtube, 17 July 2011, https://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=fzSRDv3f0-8
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 5,3k
Légende Fig. 6.4 ‘The Redowa Waltz: A new Bohemian waltzas danced in the Parisian saloons and taught by Monsieur Jules Martin’, c.1846. The Redowa waltz seemed to have become popular even in America. Jerome Robbins Dance Division, The New York Public Library Digital Collections, Public Domain, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/​items/​9fae00f0-3386-0131-f0f9-58d385a7bbd0
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 39k
Légende Fig. 6.5 The ballroom dance Česká Beseda, Sokolské šibřinky in Beroun. ‘ “Česká Beseda” — Vystoupení skupiny “Beseda” Jitky Bonušové — Beroun 23/03/13’, 14: 51, uploaded by Ludmila Sluníčková, Youtube, 27 March 2013, https://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=Pmrh_0uhLX8
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 5,4k
Légende Fig. 6.6 V. R. Grüner, ‘Carneval in Prague’, ca.1829. Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov, 2008), p. 123.
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-6.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 83k
Légende Fig. 6.7 Entrance ticket to the charitable ball of the Institute of the Poor held in the hall of the Spa in Prague, 20 January 1830. Zdeněk Míka, Zábava a slavnosti staré Prahy (Prague: Nakladatelství Ostrov 2008), p. 128.
URL http://books.openedition.org/obp/docannexe/image/14792/img-7.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 49k

Auteur

Is Professor of Dance Studies at the Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czech Republic. She is a dance historian, choreologist, pedagogue, and dance critic specialising in theatrical dance. Her books include Stopy Tance: Taneční Prameny a Jejich Interpretace [Traces of Dance: Dance Sources and their Interpretation] (2007) and Tanec a společnost [Dance and Society] (2009).

Acheter

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search