Version classiqueVersion mobile

The role of German universities in a system of joint knowledge generation and innovation

Mirja Meyborg

13. References

Texte intégral

Abramson, H. N., Encarnacao, J., Reid, P. P., & Schmoch, U. (1997). Technology Transfer Systems in the United States and Germany. Washington: National Academy Press.

Acs, Z., Anselin, L, & Varga, A. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 42, Is. 3, pp. 422-448.

Adams, J. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 2, pp. 253-278.

Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, pp. 1-32.

Anselin, L., Acs, J., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy Vol. 31, pp. 1069-1085.

Archinugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation, Vol. 24, pp. 517-528.

Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 559-580.

Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (1997). Localisation, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards regional Innovation Systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5, 3: 299-330. European Planning Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 299-330.


Bacon, F. (1597). MeditationesSacrae. Meditationes Sacrae.

Becker, G. S. (1994). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: The University Chicago Press, 3rd Edition.

Becker, W. (2003). Evaluation of the Role of Universities. Working Paper 241, University of Augsburg, pp. 1-26.

Bellgardt, E. (2004). StatistikmitSPSS. 2. überarbeitete Auflage, Vahlen.

Berman, E. (1990). The economic impact of industry-funded university R&D. Research Policy, Vol. 19, pp. 349-355.

Bertram, B. (2011). Innovationsprozesse wissensbasierter Technologien - Beispiel der PEM-Brennstoffzelle. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organisations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, Vol. 16, pp. 1021-1046.

BMBF. (2004). Forschungslandkarte Fachhochschulen - Potentialstudie. Bonn und Berlin.

BMBF. (2012). Wissenschaft, Hochschule, Exzellenzinitiative. Retrieved from, 06/09/2012

Borch, O. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1995). Strategic Networks among Small Firms: Implications for Strategy Research Methodology. Journal of Management Studies Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 420-441.

Borchert, J., Philipp, G., & Hagenhoff, S. (2004). Innovationsnetzwerke als Quelle von Wettbewerbsvorteilen. Working Paper No. 11, M. Schumann (Ed.).

Bosch, K. (1996). Großes Lehrbuch der Statistik. München: Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH.

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 61-74.

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative millieux: knowledge "tacitness" reconsidered. Regional Science, Vol. 80, 255-273.

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2003). Mobility and Social Networks: Localised Knowledge Spillover Revisited. CESPRI, Working Paper No. 142, pp. 1-29.

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, Resource Review, pp. 1-8.

Camagni, R. (2001). The economic role and spatial contradictions of global city-regions: the functional, cognitive and evolutionary context. Scott A. (2001), pp. 96-118.

Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 463-480.

Carpenter, M., & Narin, F. (1983). Validation Study: Patents Citations as Indicators of Science and foreign Dependence. Wold Patent Information, Vol. 5, Is. 3, pp. 180-185.

Chandy, R., Hopstaken, B., Narasimhan, O., & Prabhu, J. (2006). From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 43, pp. 494-508.

Christ, J. (2007). Varieties of Systems of Innovation: A Survey of their Evolution in Growth Theory and Economic Geography. Hohenheim: Schriftenreihe des Promotionsschwerpunkts Globalisierung und Beschäftigung.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 128-152.

Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552, pp. 1-31.

Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 945-974.

Cooke, P., Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional Innovation Systems, Institutional and Organisastional Dimensions. Research Policy, Vol. 26, IS 4-5, pp. 475-491.

Coombs, R., Narandren, P., & Richards, A. (1996). A literature-based innovation output indicator. Research Policy, Vol. 25, No.3, pp. 403-413.

Cowan, R., David, A., & Foray, D. (2000). The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 211-253.

DESTATIS. (2010). Bildung und Kultur - Monetäre hochschulstatistische Kennzahlen. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 11 Reihe 4.3.2.

DESTATIS. (2011). Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from Zahlen und Fakten, Hochschulen insgesamt:

DESTATIS. (2012). Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from

Oxford Dictionaries. (2012). Bibliography.

Edquist, C. (2001). Innovation Policy. A Systematic Approach. Oxford: University Press.

Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. Fagerberg, Jan, Mowery, David C. and Nelson, Richard R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook oflnnovation, Oxford University Press, pp. 181-208.

Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.

Edquist, C. (2001). The System of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art DRUID Conference, Aalborg, June 12-15, 2001. DRUID Conference, Aalborg.

EFI-Gutachten. (2012). Gutachten zur Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation. Berlin: http://www.e-/

Ejermo, O. (2009). Regional Innovation Measured By Patent Data - Does Quality Matter? Industry and Innovation, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 141-165.

Etkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry government relations. Research Policy, pp. 109-123.

Etzkowitz, H. (1989). Entrepreneurial Science in the Academy: A Case of the Transformation of Norms. Social Problems, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 14-29.

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of the New University-Industry Linkages. Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 823-834.

Falagras, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strength and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, pp. 338-342.

Fischer, M. M. (2006). The New Economy and Networking. In M. Fischer, Innovation, Networks, and Knowledge Spillovers, Selected Essays (pp. 95-115). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Florida, R., Gates, G., Knudsen, B., & Stolarick, K. (2006). The University and the Creative Economy. Working Paper.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.

Freeman, C, & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicaindicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 583-589.

Frietsch, R., & Jung, T. (2008). Transnational Patents - Structures, Trends and Recent Developments, Studie zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. XX-2009, Expertenkommission für Forschung und Innovation.

Frietsch, R., Köhler, F., & Blind, K. (2008). Weltmarktpatente –Strukturen und deren Veränderungen, Studie zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 7-2008, Expertenkommission für Forschung und Innovation.

Gellert, W., Gottwald, S., Hellwich, M., Kästner, H., & Küstner, H. (1989). The VNR Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Gelsing, L. (1992). Innovation and development of industrial networks, in: B. Lundvall (Ed.), Nationale Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publisher.

Glückler, J. (2007). Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 7, IS. 5, pp. 619-634.

Godin, B. (2007). National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective. Project on the History and Sociology of STI Statistics: Working Paper No. 36.

Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). What is Scientific Culture and How to Measure it: A Multidimensional Model. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 43-58.

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1661-1707.

Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, Patents, and Productivity. University of Chicago Press.

Grodal, S. (2004). Industrial dynamics, innovation and development. Working Paper presented at the Druid Summer Conference 2004, pp. 1-28.

Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge: MIT Press.

Grupp, H. (1998). Messung und Erklärung des technischen Wandels. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation andsectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 371-380.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Oster, S. M. (2002). Tools or Toys? The Impact of High Technology on Scholarly Productivity. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 539-555.

Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited: An Analysis of Impressions. Communication Research, Vol. 28, 325-347.

Hochschulrahmengesetz. (2005). BMBF. Retrieved from

Hoogendoorn, G. (2008). Scopus: The Continuing Development of an Abstract and Citation Database. The Serials Librarian, Vol. 55, Is. 1-2, pp. 227-234.

Howells, J. (2002). Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography. Sage, Urban Studies Journal Foundation, Vol. 39, No. 5-6, pp. 871-884.

Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (2000). Global Marketing. Marketing Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 18-28.

Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real affects of academic research. The American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 957-970.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 434, pp. 578-598.

Johnson, D. K., & Lybecker, K. M. (2012). Does Distance Matter Less Now? The Changing Role of Geography in Biotechnology Innovation. Springer Rev Ind Organ, Vol. 40, pp. 21-35.

Karlsson, C, & Zhang, W.-B. (2001). The role of universities in regional development - Endogenous human capital and growth in a two-region model. The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 179-197.

Katila, R., & Ahuia, G. (2002). Something old, somethin new: A longitudinal Study od Search Behavior and new Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 1183-1194.

Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, Vol. 40, No. 3, 541-554.

Kim, J. L, & Marschke, G. (2005). The Influence of University Research on Industrial Innovation. Working Paper presented on NBER conference Academic Science and Entrepreneurship, pp. 1-37.

Kleinknecht, A., van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, Vol 11, No. 2, pp. 109-121.

Konrad, A., & Zloczysti, P. (2010). Normung und Innovation sind keine Gegensätze. Berlin: DIW. No. 40.

Koschatzky, K. (2001). Räumliche Aspekte im Innovationsprozess. Hamburg: LIT Verlag.

Kowalski, J. S., & Schaffer, A. (2011). KIT - Impulsgeber für Karlsruhe und die TechnologieRegion. Karlsruhe: KIT Publishing.

Lendel, I. (2010). The Impact of Research Universities on Regional Economies: The Concept of University Products. Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 24, No. 3, pp. 210-230.

Lepori, B., Barre, R., & Filliatreau, G. (2008). New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators. Research Evaluation, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 33-44.

List, F. (1841). The National System of Political Economy. London: Longman, English Edition 1904.

Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2004). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 21, pp. 1-28.

Lucas, R. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary, Vol. 22, 2988, pp. 3-42.

Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.

MacPherson, A. (2005). The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation: The case of New York State's medical devices sector. Regional Science, Vol. 81, Is. 1, pp. 121-129.

Mallon, W. (2006). The Benefits and Challenges of Research Centers and Institutes in Academic Medicine: Findings from Six Universities and Their Medical Schools. Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 6, pp. 502-512.

Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings Research Policy 26, 773-776. Research Policy, Vol. 26, pp. 773-776.

Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, pp. 55-65.

Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 1047-1058.

Marshall, A. (1907). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.

Martin, B., & Nightingale, P. (2000). Science, technology and innovation. Cheltenham.

Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (1999). Europe: one or several systems of innovation? An analysis based on patent citations. Open Access publications from Maastricht University, pp. 149-174.

McKelvey, M., Alm, H., & Riccaboni, M. (2003). Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector? Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 483-501.

Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologie: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 835-851.

Miner, A., Eesley, D., Devaughn, M., & Rura, T. (2001). The Magic Beanstalk Vison: Commercialising University Inventions and Research. Stanford: University Press.

Miozzo, M., & Dewick, P. (2004). Networks and Innovation: sustainable technologies in Scottish social housing. R&D Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 323-333.

Misera, S. (2010). Dirttmittelforschung - Chancen, Risiken und Praxisprobleme. Bonn: Dissertation durch die Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelm Universität Bonn.

Monjon, S., & Waelbroeck, P. (2003). Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1255-1270.

Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 4, pp. 3-21.

Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. (1998). Technology overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 507-523.

Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Reserach Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 1499-1508.

Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are ʺx-efficientʺ (and x-effective) Why some are slow learners. Research Policy Vol. 31, pp. 291-302.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Working Paper, pp. 1-12.

Nooy, d. W., Mrvar, A., & Btagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

OECD. (1997). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo ManuakGuidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data., 28.08.2012: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, European Commission, Eurostat.

OECD. (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo ManuakGuidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition. http://www.eds-/, 28.08.2012: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Oxford, U. (2012). Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from, 28.08.2012

Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world's largest firms:xomplex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy VOL 26, pp. 141-156.

Plotkin, H. (1994). The Nature of Knowledge: Concerning Adaptations, Instinct and the Evolution of Intelligence. London: Allen Lane.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quartely, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 15-34.

Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98 No.6, pp. 1320-1349.

Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings: JAI, pp. 295-336.

Rallet, T., & Torre, A. (2000). Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era if global economy? GeoJournal, Vol. 49, pp. 373-380.

Reud, N., & Smith, B. W. (2009). Social network analysis: Its use in local economic development. Economic Development Journal, pp. 48-55.

Reuters, T. (2012). Web of Science. Retrieved from

Roberts, E. B. (2007). Managing Invention and Innovation. Research Technology Management, Vol. 55, pp. 35-54.

Rogers, M. (1998). The Definition and Measurement of Innovation. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 10/1998.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of PoliticalEconomy, 98, pp. 71-102.

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 1002-1037.

Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 323-348.

Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. New York: Oxford: Oxford University.

Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. (2003). The Governance of Networks and Economic Power: The Nature and Impact of Subcontracting Relationships. Journal of Economic Survey, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 670-691.

Schartinger, D., Rammera, C, Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 303-328.

Schmoch, U. (2003). Hochschulforschung und Industrieforschung: Perspektiven der Interaktion. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

Schmoch, U. (1999). Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States-A Comparison. Industty and Innovation, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 51-68.

Schmoch, U. (1990). Wettbewerbsvorsprung durch Patentinformation -Handbuch für dieRecherchenpraxis. Köln: Verlag TÜV Rheinland GmbH.

Schmoch, U., Grupp, H., & Mannsbart, W. (1988). Technikprognosen mit Patentindikatoren . Köln: Verlag TÜV Rheinland.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). BUSINESS CYCLES - A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. München und Leipzig: Neuausgabe hrgg. von Röpke, J. and Stiller, O., Berlin 2006.

Scopus. (2013). Sciencedirect. Retrieved from

Scott, J. (1988). Social Network Analysis. Sociology, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 109-127.

Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.

Simmie, J. (2004). Innovation and Clustering in the Globalised International Economy. Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5/6, pp. 1095-1112.

Smith, A., & McCulloch, J. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Harvard College: Harvard College Library.

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, Published by: The MIT, pp. 65-94.

Stephan, P. E. (1996). The Economics of Science. Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 1199-1235.

Storper, M., & Venables, A. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 4, Is. 4, pp. 351-370.

Teece, D. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-25.

Tijssen, R. J. (1998). Science and Technology Indicators. Science and Technology, pp. 1-34.

Tijssen, R. (2002). Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 509-526.

Tindall, D. B., & Wellman, B. (2001). Canada as Social Structure: Social Network Analysis and Canadian Sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 26, pp. 265-308.

Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation Vol. 29, pp. 59-71.

Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 47-59.

Tran, C. A. (2011). Role and Dynamics of,Late-comers' in the global Technology Competition. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

Trune, D. R., & Gosling, L. N. (1998). University Technology Transfer Programs: A Profit/Loss Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 197-204.

Vahs, D., & Burmester, R. (2002). Innovationsmanagement: von der Produktidee zur erfolgreichen Vermarktung. Stuttgart: Schaffer und Poeschel Verlag, 2. Auflage.

Von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wainfan, L, & Davis, P. K. (2004). Challenges in Virtual Collaboration: Videoconferencing, Audioconferencing, and Computer-Mediated Communications. Pittsburgh: RAND.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Web of Knowledge. (2012). Retrieved from uct=WOS&SID=TliiAmOHI4olEmfFi85&search_mode=GeneralSearch

Wissenschaftsrat. (2007). Empfehlungen zur Interaktion von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft., 07.09.2012.

Xu, J., & Chen, H. (2005). Criminal network analysis and visualisation. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, Iss. 6, pp. 100-107.

Zißler, M. (2011). Technologietransfer durch Auftragsforschung. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

Zucker, L, & Darby, M. R. (2001). Capturing Technological Opportunity via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 26, No. 1-2, pp. 37-58.


Open access

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search