Table des matières

• 1.1 Reinhold’s Influence
• 1. 2 The Crisis of Critical Philosophy
• 1.3 The Elementarphilosophie: “Scientific” Systematicity
• 1.4 The Elementarphilosophie: a “Popular” and Pedagogic Discipline
• 1.5 The Elementarphilosophie and its Systematic Connection with the History of Philosophy
• 1.6 The Crisis of the Elementarphilosophie and Hülsen’s Shift to the Wissenschaftslehre

• 2.1 Fichte’s Influence
• 2.2 The Rezension des Aenesidemus: the Origins of the Wissenschaftslehre
• 2.3 The Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre: the Nodal Points of Fichte’s Correction of Reinhold
• 2.4 The Spiritual-Imaginative Dimension of the Wissenschaftslehre
• 2.5 The Systematic Fusion of Method and System of Knowledge
• 2.6 The Qualitative Completeness of the Wissenschaftslehre
• 2.7 The Wissenschaftslehre and its Systematic Connection with the History of Philosophy
• 2.8 The Practical Vocation of the Scholar
• 2.9 The Spiritual-Normative Character of the Wissenschaftslehre

• 3.1 Hülsen’s Preisschrift
• 3.2 The Morally Adverse Situation of Man
• 3.3 The Genesis of Consciousness
• 3.4 The Deduction of Intuitional Representation: Rational Historicity
• 3.5 The Deduction of the Faculty of Judgment
• 3.6 The Asking-Answering Mechanism of Judgment
• 3.7 The Origins of Systematic Philosophy
• 3.8 The Systematic Character of Partisan Disputes
• 3.9 The Concept of the History of Philosophy
• 3.10 The General-Personal Philosophizing Task of the Self-Thinker
• 3.11 The Concept of a True Academy of Sciences
• 3.12 The Systematic Reconstruction of Philosophy’s History

Jakob Sigismund Beck’s Einzigmöglicher Standpunkt as a Reconstructive Example of a “Chapter” of the Systematic History of Philosophy

Hülsen’s Life