Versión clásicaVersión móvil

Global Austria

Günter Bischof
Fritz Plasser

Forum: The Globalization of Austrian Studies

Austrian Studies with Chinese Characteristics? Some Observations

Ke-chin Hsia y Fei-Hsien Wang

Nota del autor

In this report, we follow the East Asian norm by listing East Asian person’s family name before given name. Non-East Asian names and ours are still listed given name first. All transliteration is in the pinyin system.

Los formatos HTML, PDF y ePub de este libro son accesibles para los usuarios de las bibliotecas e instituciones que lo han adquirido como parte de la oferta OpenEdition Freemium for Books. El libro también puede adquirirse en los sitios de las librerías asociadas, en formatos PDF y ePub, si el editor ha optado por esta distribución comercial. Si la edición en papel está disponible, en esta página se proponen enlaces a las librerías.

Extracto del texto

“Austrian Studies” is an unfamiliar term in the Chinese-speaking world. Though Austria had long entered the consciousness of the Chinese, not the least since it was identified as one of the “eight imperialist invaders” in the wake of the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, there is no clear evidence that Austrian Studies was or is a banner under which research, teaching, and other intellectual activities have been pursued. German Studies (or more narrowly, Germanistik ), on the other hand, has long been institutionalized in the Chinese academic establishment. As early as 1918, the great educational reformer Cai Yuanpei, himself having spent several years at the University of Leipzig, set up a Germanistik unit (later department) in the Peking University.1 More often than not, scholarly or cultural interests in things Austrian or Habsburg have been considered part of the more global “German Studies” or “German culture.” It is the impression of this report’s authors that most in the Chinese-speak...

© innsbruck university press, 2011

Condiciones de uso:


Buscar en OpenEdition Search

Se le redirigirá a OpenEdition Search