• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 15542 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 15542 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • IRD Éditions
  • ›
  • Synthèses
  • ›
  • Rural societies in the face of climatic ...
  • ›
  • Part II. Impacts of the climate and envi...
  • ›
  • Chapter 10. The impacts of climate chang...
  • IRD Éditions
  • IRD Éditions
    IRD Éditions
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral Introduction Drafting future yield scenarios A decrease in agricultural yields under the effect of climate change The respective influence of changes in temperatures and precipitation in yield scenarios A contrast between the western and central Sahel in the yield scenarios Conclusions Bibliographie Auteurs

    Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Chapter 10. The impacts of climate change on crop yields in West Africa

    Benjamin Sultan, Philippe Roudier et Seydou Traoré

    p. 199-214

    Texte intégral Bibliographie References Auteurs

    Texte intégral

    Introduction

    1Climate has a very strong influence on farming, which is considered to be the human activity that is most dependent on climate variations (Oram, 1989; Hansen, 2002). The impacts of climate on agriculture vary from one part of the world to another, with particularly marked socioeconomic consequences in developing countries in the tropics. Indeed, these countries experience great climatic variability, such as the monsoon regime in India and West Africa and the influence on the American continent of El Niño events (Challinor et al., 2003). In many cases endemic poverty increases the risk and seriousness of natural catastrophes (UNPD, 2004).

    2The rural populations of sub-Saharan Africa are particularly exposed to climatic events as they are closely dependent on rainfed agriculture, practiced on nearly 93% of cultivated land. It is reminded that 80% of the cereals eaten in sub-Saharan Africa are produced by this traditional farming and that the farming sector employs 70% of the total force (FAO, 2003) and forms 15 to 20% of GDP. In addition to this dependence, the rapid growth of the population and its poverty prevents access to technological adaptation (mechanisation, fertilisers, irrigation) and are factors that aggravate the socioeconomic effects of the climate (UNDP, 2004). Indeed, the limited means of rainfed agriculture for anticipating and correcting the effects of climate fluctuations is illustrated clearly by the strong correlation between agricultural productivity and rainfall, with consequences for food security. Since the 1970s, the most serious famines that required international food aid (1974, 1984-1985, 1992 and 2002) were caused entirely or partly by climate variations (Dilley et al., 2005).

    3This being so, being able have better understanding and anticipation of climate fluctuations and their consequences for agriculture is a major issue for development and food security in sub-Saharan Africa.

    4If sub-Saharan Africa frequently faces food insecurity today, what is going to happen in the future? A retrospective look at the movement in recent years gives a fairly pessimistic view of the future. Indeed, in spite of an increase in food production, very strong population growth has caused an increase in the poverty rate and malnutrition in Africa that is faster than anywhere else in the world, with a lower index of agricultural production per person than in other continents. According to Collomb (1999), taking into account requirement projections for 2050, when the United Nations considers that the world population will peak, extremely great efforts must be made to increase food production: that in Africa should increase more than fivefold between 2000 and 2050! The future of this region thus depends on the ability of the farming sector to meet the challenge of feeding a rapidly growing population. Succeeding this will be all the more difficult as climate change is now an ongoing phenomenon and will certainly have consequences for agriculture in Africa as elsewhere. The fourth and fifth Assessment Reports (AR4 and AR5) of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) published in 2007 and 2014 respectively, have alerted the international community about an increase in temperature everywhere in the world and a probably increase in the frequency and intensity of major meteorological events such as droughts, with Africa mentioned as being the continent most vulnerable to changes in climate (IPCC, 2014). There is no doubt that a change in rainfall intensity and/or regime will affect the crop farming and pastoral systems in sub-Saharan Africa (CGIAR, 2009). Irrigated farming, like rice growing which plays an important role in feeding the urban population in Africa, will also be affected—not only because of a possible change in the availability of water but because of the rise in temperature that can lead to substantial decreases in yields (Dingkuhn, 1995; Dingkuhn and Miezan, 1995; Dingkuhn et al., 1995). It therefore seems crucial to be able to provide a more accurate image of the expected evolution of agricultural production potential in sub-Saharan Africa in the context of warming of the climate. However, the task is still difficult because of the strong uncertainty in regional climate change projections, in the response of plants to environmental changes (rainfall, temperature, atmospheric CO 2 concentration), in the linking of agronomic and climatic models and in the way farming systems will adapt gradually to environmental changes (Challinor et al., 2007). The aim here is 1) to draw up an objective appraisal of the literature on the effects of climate change on agriculture in West African and 2) to understand the determinants of this response.

    Drafting future yield scenarios

    5The literature on the impacts of climate change on agriculture in Africa and elsewhere in the world displays characteristic methodology described in Figure 1.

    Image

    Figure 1. Summary of the working method used in studies of impacts of climate change on yields.
    Source: from Roudier (2012).

    6Thus, the following main stages are required in quantification of the variations in crop yields resulting from climate change.

    Generating the future climate

    7Quantifying the impact of climate change on a given variable first requires the definition of the scenarios that describe the future evolution of the meteorological variables. The simplest method is to create a uniform scenario (e.g. + 10% rainfall, + 2°C in temperature) and to apply the change to observed climate data for the reference period (Ben Mohamed et al., 2002; Salack, 2006; Vanduivenbooden et al., 2002). However, it is clear that although the method makes it possible to perform analyses whose sensitivity is interesting it is based on strong hypotheses as regards the future climate and does not necessarily maintain the coherence between climatic variables. An approach with more solid scientific bases exists, with the use of global climate models (GCM). As has been seen in Chapter 3, GCMs give a great variety of responses depending on the emission scenario or model used. Thus, in order to sample part of the uncertainty of climate projections, most of the studies published use several GCMs and/or scenarios (e.g. Schlenker and Lobell, 2010).

    Crop modelling

    8Constructing a model in which climatic information (temperature and/or precipitation for example) can be transcribed as agronomic variables (crop yields, biomass) is a prerequisite for the quantification of the links between climate and agriculture. This type of model is particularly useful for making a synthesis of existing knowledge on climate: plant relations, exploring hypotheses concerning climate change or farming practices, identifying key variables that should be pinpointed by researchers and drawing up scenarios for the future. Two separate approaches are generally used: the first is based on agronomic statistical models and the second on mechanistic models and both seek to estimate agricultural productivity in response to the climate. Empirical agricultural models are based on a statistical relation derived from observed data and that link agricultural yields at a given location with climatic variables. Although such relations are comparatively easy to set up, calibrating and validating a robust statistical model requires long data series (climate and yields). However, the relation has a particular advantage as it can be established directly at a large scale (national for example) using spatially aggregated climate data to predict yields in vast regions. The approach was used in particular by Lobell et al. (2008) and by Schlenker and Lobell (2010) who consider that it permits a simple evaluation of future climate impacts at a scale that is pertinent for informing decision makers.

    9The other approach is ‘mechanistic’ or ‘dynamic’ modelling based on equations representing the physiological processes of crop growth (uptake of carbon and nutrients, transpiration, etc.) and their development in response to the climate (e.g. the appearance of successive organs, vegetative phase, reproductive phase, etc.). As this approach can theoretically identify the intra-seasonal non-linear effects of climate on crops, most impact studies in agriculture use a mechanistic model (Roudier et al., 2011). However, not all the models of this kind have the same physiological approach and do not attain the same degree of detail. In particular, the positive effect of a high atmospheric CO2 concentration on photosynthesis (Tubiello et al., 2007 a and 2007 b) is not taken into account in all mechanistic models (e.g. Salack, 2006). Furthermore, these models require numerous parameters and are therefore used at field scale where these data are available and can be considered as homogeneous: they do not provide direct information on climate impacts at a larger scale.

    10It should be noted that a third approach, Ricardian analysis (Mendelsohn et al., 1994), is also used in estimating the impact of climate change on agriculture in West Africa (e.g. Kurukulasuriya and Mendelsohn, 2008; Molua, 2009). This approach is concentrated on the net income of farms rather than on yields and, unlike most impact studies, takes adaptation strategies into account. The Ricardian approach consists overall of several main stages: 1) the gathering of socioeconomic information about farms, 2) calculation of net farm return using this information, 3) establishing a regression between the calculated net return and different variables such as climate, soil and a set of economic variables, and 4) use of the link established between return and climate to project the impact of the future climate. It is noted that unlike empirical approaches, the regressions performed here are just for one year and so the method is a study of spatial variability.

    Linking GCMs and cropping models

    11Combining a GCM and an agricultural model raises several problems. First, GCMs generally display significant bias in their climate simulations and especially in cumulated precipitation and regional distribution. The proportion of small rainfall events (< 10 mm/day) in cumulated total and frequency are over-estimated whereas the opposite occurs (under-estimation) for heavy rainfall (> 20 mm/day) (Randall et al., 2007; Dai, 2006). Thus certain impact studies that give local results generally require a certain correction of bias. The most simple correction method is the anomaly method. For a given GCM, an average annual anomaly calculated between the future and the current simulated climate is added to a current observed dataset (see for example Müller et al., 2010). Secondly, the combining of a GCM and a deterministic model is more complex than the simple coupling of two models, because of the difference in the respective scales. Indeed, GCMs typically produce climatic projects for meshes with 2° side and although statistical models can be calibrated directly to use aggregated information of this type directly as input, mechanistic models require data at a finer scale. Downscaling must generally be performed from the overall GCM scale to the local scale of the agronomic model

    12Two types of downscaling are usually defined (and may sometimes be combined):

    • statistical downscaling, in which empirical relations between atmospheric circulation at the meso-scale and the local climate are used to create realistic time series of local climatic variables. This method includes stochastic time generators, regressions (linear or not) and the weather type method. For example, Zorita and Von Storch (1999), Müller et al. (2010) use a stochastic time generator to switch from monthly climatic variables to an hourly time step;
    • dynamical downscaling uses models of the regional climate at a fine resolution (approximately 10-50 km) imbricated in the GCM (Paeth et al., 2011).

    13The need for agronomic modelling for studies on climate change has led recently to the development of mechanistic models at a global scale. These models are created and calibrated to function directly at a scale compatible with GCM output, making it possible to avoid the downscaling stage. Certain models have been developed to be independent of impact models while others are parts of models of overall vegetation where they are used for cultivated land (De Noblet-Ducoudré et al., 2004; Bondeau et al., 2007; Berg et al., 2011). If necessary, they can thus be used for climate impact research.

    Adaptation to climate change

    14Some studies on the impacts of climatic change take into account the adaptation of farming systems or populations. Chuku and Okoye (2009) held that there are four main categories of available options for adaptation in agriculture to face climate change: 1) income and asset management strategies, 2) government programmes and support 3) farm production practices and 4) technological developments. It is stressed in the same study that these categories are characterised by the scale (local, national) and the type of agents involved. Sahelian farmers already use numerous options for adaptation at the local scale. They generally involve production practices (e.g. water management, the use of certain varieties, fertilisation) and also income management techniques (e.g. the diversification of returns, migration). It is thus seen that it may be necessary to consider adaptation in this type of study in order to avoid over-estimating the impact of climate change on farm yields. However, adaptation is not taken into account explicitly in most studies on West Africa. In some studies, such as that of Müller et al. (2010), sowing dates change each year but remain based overall on the same technique. This attitude is therefore more an adaptation to inter-annual climate variation than to climate change. Tingem and Rivington (2009) simulated the yields of certain crops with and without adaptation. They considered new sowing dates and hypothetical improved varieties. Future yield losses were thus clearly limited. Similarly, Butt et al. (2005) set out their results both without adaptation and with a set of theoretical adaptation options: economic options, crop combinations and varieties resistant to high temperatures. Here again, these options clearly increase future yields. Finally, Ricardian studies examine total adaptation. However, it is not possible to give detail in the results about what options are used and the impact of climatic changes without adaptation. Furthermore, this method does not take the costs of transition into account and hence overestimates the profit drawn from the adaptation.

    A decrease in agricultural yields under the effect of climate change

    15Numerous articles and reports describe projections of yields in sub-Saharan Africa in response to environmental changes (Challinor et al., 2007). But all these documents are focused on a particular country or group of countries lay emphasis on a crop or a specific variety and use different methodologies (an empirical or mechanistic model to simulate yields, different regionalisation methods, different climatic models or scenarios, taking the effect of CO2 into account). It is therefore fairly difficult to have an idea of the overall impact of climate change on agriculture in Africa and above all of the uncertainties accompanying these projections. Roudier et al. (2011) performed a meta-analysis of the results in the literature, compiling the results given in 16 recent publications on the subject to form a yield database for the future. Figure 2a shows that the sign of the relative change in yield between the present and the future is negative in most cases, with a decrease in yield of some 10% in comparison with the present. However, this figure holds strong uncertainty as the distributions of the responses display considerable spread, varying from-40% to + 80% depending on the case. Taking into account atmospheric CO2, which has a fertilising effects on plants although this is still not well known and is poorly represented in models (Long et al., 2006; Tubiello et al., 2007 b; Ainsworth et al., 2008), mitigates the negative effect of climate change although the combined impacts of the environmental changes (climate and CO2) are negative overall.

    Image

    Figure 2. (a) Distribution of relative changes in yield in West Africa between the present and the future in 16 recently published studies (in blue). The same distribution is shown in orange but only for the studies in which the effect of CO2 on plants is not considered.
    (b) As in (a) but with distinction made between the results based on mechanistic models (in blue) and those based on empirical models (in orange).
    (c) As in (a) but with distinction made between results for weak (blue) or strong radiative forcing (orange).
    (d) As in (a), but comparing the results for the Sudan-Sahelian countries (in blue) with those for the Guinean countries (in orange).
    Source: from Roudier (2012).

    16It is also interesting to see that even if the dispersion of the results from the use of mechanistic models is stronger (which is logical as these models are less constrained than statistical models), the sign of the change of yield that they predict is the same as that of empirical models (Fig. 2b). The amplitude of the impacts of climatic change on yields appears to be modulated by the intensity of radiative forcing. In other words, the higher the concentration of atmospheric CO2 considered in these studies (distant time horizons, economic scenarios with high emission levels such as A2), the stronger the negative impact expected in yields (Fig. 2c). This observation highlights the importance of taking into account CO2 emission reduction by mitigation measures that can limit the impacts on agriculture in West Africa. Finally, Figure 2d shows that climate change has a differential impact according to region in West Africa, with the Sahelian countries being harder hit than the Guinean countries. This meta-analysis was extended to a larger set of publications (52 articles) to show the expected impact of climate change on the yields of 8 major crops in Africa and Asia (Knox et al., 2012). The latter authors show an 8% decrease in agricultural yields by 2050 in both regions. In Africa wheat yields will fall by 17%, maize by 5%, sorghum by 15% and millet by 10%. Because of a limited number of studies and also contradictory results, Knox et al. (2012) were unable to show results that were as clear-cut and robust for rice, cassava and sugar cane crops.

    The respective influence of changes in temperatures and precipitation in yield scenarios

    17We can now examine the climatic variables that cause this negative impact in the existing studies and in particular the respective roles of temperature and precipitation. Changes in these features are both major determinants in the recent trends observed in agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa. Both the increase in temperatures and above all the decrease in precipitation have led to production deficits since the 1970s (Barrios et al., 2008). Although the effects of precipitation have been dominant in recent history, as is shown by the strong link between rainfall and millet productivity in Niger, the situation might be completely different in the future. Indeed, Schlenker and Lobell (2010) show that the increase in temperature forecast by models is much stronger than that of precipitation, which is generally smaller than the historical standard deviation. Furthermore, the authors use empirical modelling of the climate-yield relation to show that the marginal impact of the change in the standard deviation of rainfall is smaller than that of a change in the standard deviation of temperatures in the future. Even if rainfall were not to change in the future, yields would decrease by about 15% as a result of the increase in temperatures that would shorten cropping cycles and increase moisture stress as a result of increased evaporation. According to Schlenker and Lobell (2010), changes in precipitation nonetheless have an impact, but smaller than that of temperature. Depending on whether rainfall increases or decreases in the future, the impact on yield could be amplified by a factor of two–respectively-10% and-21% if the median change is considered. This finding is coherent with that of Salack (2006) who showed that warming (+ 1.5°C) would inevitably have negative effects on the yield of a millet variety, even if these effects may be mitigated by an increase in precipitation.

    18Another way of addressing the respective effects of warming and variations in precipitation on agricultural yields was proposed by Sultan et al. (2013). The authors performed a set of simulations using the SARRA-H model (Dingkuhn et al., 2003) for several millet and sorghum varieties at a set of 35 meteorological stations covering 9 countries in West Africa during the period 1971-1990. The authors then used the delta method to superimpose incrementally at local meteorological stations temperature anomalies of from 0°C to + 6°C with 1°C steps and/or relative precipitation anomalies ranging from-20% to + 20% with 10% steps. SARRA-H model simulations were performed to quantify the yield response to these temperature and/or precipitation anomalies (Fig. 3).

    19It is seen that the negative impact on simulated yields caused by a 2°C temperature increase in Africa can be compensated by a 20% increase in rainfall. In contrast, when warming exceeds 3°C, a deficit in simulated yield is seen, whatever the rainfall anomaly considered (within the interval of variation-20% to + 20% that was considered to be realistic as we used the minimum and maximum projections of the models CMIP3 and CMIP5 for the region as a base). Projection of the temperature and precipitation response of all the CMIP3 and CMIP5 simulations (all the models and scenarios are merged in the figure) shows that these projections for 2030-2050 correspond to a yield response range varying from-10% to + 10% with a majority of negative to nil impact (from-10% to 0). However, all the projections using the period 2070-2090, whatever the model and/or scenario, display a yield response range that decreases from slightly (between-10% and 0) to strongly (to-40%). The variations in yield response in the future are largely dominated by the effect of temperature, with warming of up to + 4°C in the projects of models CMIP3 and CMIP5 in Africa, thus confirming the findings of BERG et al. (2013) and Schlenker and Lobell (2010). It is interesting to observe that these temperature variations and precipitations projected by the models and their impact on yields are very different to those observed during the 20th century. It can be seen in Figure 4 that past climatic anomalies are distributed along a vertical axis (precipitation anomalies characterise the variations from one decade to another) while projection spread markedly along a horizontal axis (temperature variations are discriminant in the projections). The projections of past and future decades and their yield response are thus clearly distinct in the figure. This shows that climate change and its consequences as projected by the models CMIP3 and CMIP5 are going to be something completely new that will be like nothing seen in Africa since the beginning of the 20th century. This underlines the scale of the future (and present) challenge of adaptation to climate change: how is it possible to adapt to an unknown (and uncertain) world?

    Image

    Figure 3. The effect of changes in temperature and precipitation on average yield. Relative change in yield (%) in comparison with the 1961-1990 reference period or 7 temperature scenarios (abscissae) and 5 rainfall scenarios (ordinates).
    The results are shown as the means for 35 meteorological stations in West Africa and 6 sorghum and millet varieties.
    The blue triangles and circles represent future changes projected by several GCMs of CMIP3 (AR4 in the figure) and three IPCC scenarios (B1, A1B, A2) respectively for the periods 2071-2090 and 2031-2050.
    The projections of CMIP5 models (AR5 in the figure) and of RCP scenarios (4.5, 6.0 and 8.5) are represented by orange triangles and circles.
    The temperature and precipitation anomalies observed since the beginning of the century using CRU data are also shown by decades (‘1940’ in the figure means the 1941-1950 anomaly in comparison with 1961-1990). All the changes in yields are significant at a 5% confidence level except for those in the box marked with a diagonal line.
    Source: IPCC (2014)

    A contrast between the western and central Sahel in the yield scenarios

    20Uncertainty about the future of precipitation in West Africa is also a very limiting factor for refining yield projections in response to environmental changes. Indeed, there is no agreement between climate models with regard to the impact of climate warming on rainfall in the Sahel (Cook and Vizy, 2006; Druyan, 2010), with some models mentioning possible aridification and others predicting increased rainfall in the future. Nonetheless, a few recent studies (Biasutti, 2013; Monerie et al., 2013, 2012; Patricola and Cook, 2010; Biasutti and Sobel, 2009) have found a robust signal between the different CMIP3 and CMIP5 models, showing a late start to the monsoon in the west of the Sahel and increased rainfall at the end of the winter period in the central Sahel. This contrast between the western and central Sahel in terms of the evolution of rainfall is not found in temperatures which, in contrast, display warming along a latitudinal gradient with the northern regions of the Sahel warming more than those of the south. The increase in temperatures in the mid-21st century—exceeding + 3°C in some places—is so marked that there will soon be nothing similar in recent history (Battisti and Naylor, 2009). Quantifying the impact of this shift in the seasonality of the monsoon, overlying the negative effect of warming on crops (Sultan et al., 2013; Roudier et al., 2011) can be particularly important for identifying crop varieties (early or late) or practices (sowing later or earlier) capable of limiting the impacts of climate change.

    Image

    Figure 4. Simulated response of sorghum yield to climate change.
    The relative change (%) in average sorghum yield during the periods 2031-2060 and 1961-1990 in scenario RCP8.5.
    The results are shown as average for 9 GCMs, two crop models and three sorghum varieties.
    The responses are calculated for 13 stations distributed in the Sahel (left), 6 stations in the west of the Sahel (middle) and 6 stations in the central Sahel (right).
    Source: after Sultan et al. (2014).

    21Figure 4 shows the response of sorghum yields to climate change simulated by the two agronomic models SARRA-H and APSIM (Sultan et al., 2014). It is noted that climate change causes sorghum yield loss of some 12% in the mid-21st century throughout the Sahel, which is strongly coherent with the figures found in the literature (Roudier et al., 2011). However, the impact differs greatly between the western and central Sahel. Indeed, yields losses are particularly high in the western Sahel (around 19%) as a result of the combination of warming and decreased precipitation at the beginning of the rainy season. In the central Sahel, temperature and precipitation operate in opposite directions—warming causes yield loss whereas increased rainfall at the end of the rainy season is favourable for growing sorghum. However, in spite of an increase in rainfall, the rise in temperatures dominates in the sign of climate change in the central Sahel, as yield losses of about 7% are observed in the mid-21st century. Comparison of the response of sorghum to climate change in the two fertilisation scenarios shows that an increase in inputs makes the crop more vulnerable to changes in temperature and precipitation with greater losses when more inputs are used. This finding is coherent with numerous studies that show that climate risk increases with intensification (see Affholder, 1997 for example).

    Conclusions

    22Anticipating climate fluctuations and changes is primordial for Sudan-Sahelian Africa. The quantification of the agronomic impacts of climate change requires the setting up of often complex methodology using tools taken from economics (emission scenarios, farming household decision models) from climate science (climate models and projections), agronomy (agronomic models) and statistics (regionalisation and bias correction), each with their share of error and their limits. In spite of these uncertainties, it has been shown that a decrease in grain productivity in the future is plausible as an effect of climate warming. This yield decrease is particularly marked in the western Sahel where the effects of a decrease in rainfall and a rise in temperature will be combined at the horizon 2050. However, the challenge to be met lies not as much in estimation of future yields that is deterministic and probably unfeasible but in the quantification, ranking and reduction of the uncertainties related to projections of climate change impacts. The framework of the new international projects for the intercomparison of regionalisation methods CORDEX (Coordonated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment) and for the intercomparison of agronomic models (AGMIP: Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project) will most certainly mark a turning point leading to better allowance for this uncertainty through coordinated studies focused on the impacts of climate on agriculture. Such studies have previously been performed in a very isolated, fragmented manner. However, there should be no waiting for further certitudes before thinking about adaptation measures that are both scientifically relevant and socially acceptable as today’s climate has already had an impact on the resources of rural populations. Nevertheless, the study of vulnerabilities and of adaptation to environmental changes requires dialogue between biophysical sciences (climate, hydrology, agronomy) and human sciences (demography, history, anthropology, economics). This multidisciplinary approach is crucial in addressing the question of adaptation to environmental changes in which the response of societies is set in overall social changes and in which the climate variable is far from being the one and only factor in the vulnerability of Sahelian societies.

    Bibliographie

    Des DOI sont automatiquement ajoutés aux références bibliographiques par Bilbo, l’outil d’annotation bibliographique d’OpenEdition. Ces références bibliographiques peuvent être téléchargées dans les formats APA, Chicago et MLA.

    Format

    • APA
    • Chicago
    • MLA
    Battisti, D. S., & Naylor, R. L. (2009). Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat. In Science (Vols. 323, Issues 5911, pp. 240-244). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164363
    Druyan, L. M. (2011). Studies of 21st‐century precipitation trends over West Africa. In International Journal of Climatology (Vols. 31, Issues 10, pp. 1415-1424). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2180
    Monerie, P., Fontaine, B., & Roucou, P. (2012). Expected future changes in the African monsoon between 2030 and 2070 using some CMIP3 and CMIP5 models under a medium‐low RCP scenario. In Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (Vols. 117, Issue D16). American Geophysical Union (AGU). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017510
    Paeth, H., Hall, N. M., Gaertner, M. A., Alonso, M. D., Moumouni, S., Polcher, J., Ruti, P. M., Fink, A. H., Gosset, M., Lebel, T., Gaye, A. T., Rowell, D. P., Moufouma‐Okia, W., Jacob, D., Rockel, B., Giorgi, F., & Rummukainen, M. (2011). Progress in regional downscaling of west African precipitation. In Atmospheric Science Letters (Vols. 12, Issue 1, pp. 75-82). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.306
    Sultan, B., Roudier, P., Quirion, P., Alhassane, A., Muller, B., Dingkuhn, M., Ciais, P., Guimberteau, M., Traore, S., & Baron, C. (2013). Assessing climate change impacts on sorghum and millet yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian savannas of West Africa. In Environmental Research Letters (Vols. 8, Issue 1, p. 014040). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040
    Tubiello, F. N., Soussana, J.-F., & Howden, S. M. (2007). Crop and pasture response to climate change. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vols. 104, Issues 50, pp. 19686-19690). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701728104
    Battisti, David. S., and Rosamond L. Naylor. “Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity With Unprecedented Seasonal Heat”. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), January 9, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164363.
    Druyan, Leonard M. “Studies of 21st‐century Precipitation Trends over West Africa”. International Journal of Climatology. Wiley, July 25, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2180.
    Monerie, Paul‐Arthur, Bernard Fontaine, and Pascal Roucou. “Expected Future Changes in the African Monsoon Between 2030 and 2070 Using Some CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models under a medium‐low RCP Scenario”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. American Geophysical Union (AGU), August 25, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017510.
    Paeth, Heiko, Nicholas M.J. Hall, Miguel Angel Gaertner, Marta Dominguez Alonso, Sounmaïla Moumouni, Jan Polcher, Paolo M. Ruti, et al. “Progress in Regional Downscaling of West African Precipitation”. Atmospheric Science Letters. Wiley, January 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.306.
    Sultan, B, P Roudier, P Quirion, A Alhassane, B Muller, M Dingkuhn, P Ciais, M Guimberteau, S Traore, and C Baron. “Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Sorghum and Millet Yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian Savannas of West Africa”. Environmental Research Letters. IOP Publishing, March 1, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040.
    Tubiello, Francesco N., Jean-François Soussana, and S. Mark Howden. “Crop and Pasture Response to Climate Change”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, December 11, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701728104.
    Battisti, David. S., and Rosamond L. Naylor. “Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity With Unprecedented Seasonal Heat”. Science, vol. 323, no. 5911, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 9 Jan. 2009, pp. 240-4. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164363.
    Druyan, Leonard M. “Studies of 21st‐century Precipitation Trends over West Africa”. International Journal of Climatology, vol. 31, no. 10, Wiley, 25 July 2011, pp. 1415-24. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2180.
    Monerie, Paul‐Arthur, et al. “Expected Future Changes in the African Monsoon Between 2030 and 2070 Using Some CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models under a medium‐low RCP Scenario”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 117, no. D16, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 25 Aug. 2012. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017510.
    Paeth, Heiko, et al. “Progress in Regional Downscaling of West African Precipitation”. Atmospheric Science Letters, vol. 12, no. 1, Wiley, Jan. 2011, pp. 75-82. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.306.
    Sultan, B, et al. “Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Sorghum and Millet Yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian Savannas of West Africa”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, IOP Publishing, 1 Mar. 2013, p. 014040. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040.
    Tubiello, Francesco N., et al. “Crop and Pasture Response to Climate Change”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 50, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 11 Dec. 2007, pp. 19686-90. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701728104.

    Cette bibliographie a été enrichie de toutes les références bibliographiques automatiquement générées par Bilbo en utilisant Crossref.

    References

    Affholder F., 1997
    Empirically modeling the interaction between intensification and climatic risk in semi-arid regions.
    Field Crops Research, 52: 79-93.

    Ainsworth E. A., Leakey A. D. B., Ort D. R., Long S. P., 2008
    FACE-ing the facts: inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply.
    New Phytologist, 179: 5-9.

    Barrios S., Ouattara B., Strobl E., 2008
    The impact of climatic change on agricultural production: Is it different for Africa?
    Food Policy, 33: 287-298.

    10.1126/science.1164363 :

    Battisti D., Naylor R. L., 2009
    Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat.
    Science, 323 (5911): 240. doi:DOI: 10.1126/science.1164363

    Ben Mohamed A., Vanduivenbooden N., Abdousallam S., 2002
    Impact of climate change on agricultural production in the Sahel–Part 1. Methodological approach and case study for millet in Niger.
    Climatic Change, 54: 327-348.

    Berg A., Sultan B., De Noblet N., 2011
    Including Tropical Croplands in a Terrestrial Biosphere Model: Application to West Africa.
    Climatic Change, 104 (3-4): 755-782.

    Berg A., De Noblet-Ducoudré N., Sultan B., Lengaigne M., Guimberteau M., 2013
    Projections of climate change impacts on potential crop productivity over tropical regions.
    Agric. For. Meteorol., 170: 89-102, ISSN 0168-1923, 0.1016/j.agrformet.2011.12.003

    Biasutti M., 2013
    Forced Sahel rainfall trends in the CMIP5 archive.
    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118: 1613-1623.

    Biasutti M., Sobel A. H., 2009
    Delayed Sahel rainfall and global seasonal cycle in a warmer climate.
    Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (23): L23707.

    Bondeau A., Smith P. C., Zaehle S., Schaphoff S., Lucht W., Cramer W., Gerten D., Lotze-Campen H., Müller C., Reichstein M., Smith B., 2007
    Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance.
    Global Change Biology, 13: 679-706.

    Butt T., McCarl B., Angerer J., Dyke P., Stuth J., 2005
    The economic and food security implications of climate change in Mali.
    Climatic Change, 68: 355-378.

    CGIAR–Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 2009
    Climate, agriculture and food security: A strategy for change.
    Alliance of the CGIAR Centers.

    Challinor A. J., Slingo J. M., Wheeler T. R., Craufurd P. Q., Grimes D. I. F., 2003
    Toward a combined seasonal weather and crop productivity forecasting system: determination of the working spatial scale.
    J. Appl. Meteorol., 42: 175-192.

    Challinor A., Wheeler T., Garforth C., Craufurd P., Kassam A., 2007
    Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change.
    Climatic Change, 83: 381-399.

    Chuku C., Okoye C., 2009
    Increasing resilience and reducing vulnerability in sub-Saharan African agriculture: Strategies for risk coping and management.
    African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4: 1524-1535.

    Collomb P., 1999
    Une voie étroite pour la sécurité alimentaire d’ici à 2050. Paris, Economica, 197 p.

    Cook K., Vizy E., 2006
    Coupled Model Simulations of the West African Monsoon System: Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Simulations.
    Journal of Climate, 19: 3681-3703.

    Dai A., 2006
    Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models.
    Journal of Climate, 19: 4605-4630.

    de Noblet-Ducoudré N., Gervois S., Ciais P., Viovy N., Brisson N., Seguin B., Perrier A., 2004
    Coupling the Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Transfer Scheme Orchidee to the agronomy model STICS to study the influence of croplands on the European carbon and water budgets. Agronomie, 24: 397-407.

    Dilley M., Chen R. S., Deichmann U., Lerner-Lam A. L., Arnold M., 2005
    Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis.
    Disaster Risk Management Series, 5, Washington, DC, The World Bank.

    Dingkuhn M., 1995
    Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel.
    3. Characterizing environments by simulating crop phenology.
    Agric. Sys., 48: 435-456.

    Dingkuhn M., Miezan K. M., 1995
    Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel.
    II. Validation of photothermal constants and characterization of genotypes.
    Agric. Syst., 48: 411-434.

    Dingkuhn M., Sow A., Samb A., Diack S., Asch F., 1995
    Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel.
    1. Photothermal and micro-climatic responses of flowering.
    Agric. Sys., 48: 385-410.

    Dingkuhn M., Baron C., Bonnal V., Maraux F., Sarr B., Sultan B., Clopes A., Forest F., 2003
    «Decision support tools for rainfed crops in the Sahel at the plot and regional scale». In Struif Bontkes T. E., Wopereis M. C. S. (eds): Decision support tools for smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa–a practical guide, Wageningen The Netherlands, CTA: 127-139.

    10.1002/joc.2180 :

    Druyan L. M., 2010
    Studies of 21st-century precipitation trends over West Africa.
    International Journal of Climatology, 31 (10): 1415-1424. DOI: 10.1002/joc.2180

    FAO, 2003
    The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome, Food and Agricultural Organisation.

    Hansen J. W., 2002
    Realizing the potential benefits of climate prediction to agriculture: issues, approaches, challenges.
    Agricultural Systems, 74: 309-330.

    IPCC, 2014
    «Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects». In Barros V. R., Field C. B., Dokken D. J., Mastrandrea M. D., Mach K. J., Bilir T. E., Chatterjee M., Ebi K. L., Estrada Y. O., Genova R. C., Girma B., Kissel E. S., Levy A. N., MacCracken S., Mastrandrea P. R., White L. L. (eds): Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 688 p.

    Knox J., Hess T., Daccache A., Wheeler T., 2012
    Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia.
    Environ. Res. Lett., 7: 1-8.

    Kurukulasuriya P., Mendelsohn R., 2008
    A Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on African Cropland.
    African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2: 1-23.

    Lobell D. B., Burke M. B., Tebaldi C., Mastrandrea M. D., Falcon W. P., Naylor R. L., 2008
    Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for Food Security in 2030.
    Science, 319: 607-610.

    Long S. P., Ainsworth E. A., Leakey A. D. B., Morgan P. B., 2006
    Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations.
    Science, 312: 1918-1921.

    Mendelsohn R., Nordhaus W. D., Shaw D., 1994
    The impact of global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis. American Economic Review, 84: 753-771.

    Molua E. L., 2009
    An empirical assessment of the impact of climate change on smallholder agriculture in Cameroon.
    Global and Planetary Change, 67: 205-208.

    10.1029/2012JD017510 :

    Monerie P.-A., Fontaine B., Roucou P., 2012
    Expected future changes in the African monsoon between 2030 and 2070 using some CMIP3 and CMIP5 models under a medium-low RCP scenario.
    J. Geophys. Res., 117 (16): D16111, doi: 10.1029/2012JD017510.

    10.1002/joc :

    Monerie P.-A., Roucou P., Fontaine B., 2013
    Mid-century effects of Climate Change on African monsoon dynamics using the A1B emission scenario.
    Int. J. Climatol., 33: 881-896. doi: 10.1002/joc. 3476

    Müller C., Bondeau A., Popp A., Waha K., Fader M., 2010
    Climate change impacts on agricultural yields.
    Background note to the World Development Report, 11 p.

    Oram P. A., 1989
    Sensitivity of agricultural production to climatic change, an update.
    Climate and Food Security, IRRI, Manila, The Philippines: 25-44.

    10.1002/asl.306 :

    Paeth H., Hall N. M. J., Gaertner M. A., Alonso M. D., Moumouni S., Polcher J., Ruti P. M., Fink A. H., Gosset M., Lebel T., Gaye A. T., Rowell D. P., Moufouma-Okia W., Jacob D., Rockel B., Giorgi F., Rummukainen M., 2011
    Progress in regional downscaling of west African precipitation.
    Atmosph. Sci. Lett., 12: 75-82. doi: 10.1002/asl.306

    Patricola C. M., Cook K. H., 2010
    Northern African climate at the end of the twenty-first century: an integrated application of regional and global climate models.
    Climate Dynamics, 35: 193-212.

    PNUD, 2004
    Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. UNDP global report, ed. M. Pelling.

    Randall D. A., Wood R. A., Bony S., Colman R., Fichefet T., Fyfe J., Kattsov V., Pitman A., Shukla J., Srinivasan J., Stouffer R. J., Sumi A., Taylor K. E., 2007
    «Climate models and their evaluation». In Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., Miller H. L. (eds): Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.

    Roudier P., 2012
    Climat et agriculture en Afrique de l’Ouest : quantification de l’impact du changement climatique sur les rendements et évaluation de l’utilité des prévisions saisonnières.
    Thèse de doctorat, Paris, EHESS, 189 p.

    Roudier P., Sultan B., Quirion P., Berg A., 2011
    The impact of future climate change on West African crop yields: What does the recent literature say?
    Global Environ. Change, 21 (3): 1073-1083.

    Salack S., 2006
    Impacts des changements climatiques sur la production du mil et du sorgho dans les sites pilotes du plateau central, de Tahoua et de Fakara.
    CILSS, 33 p.

    Schlenker W., Lobell D. B., 2010
    Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture.
    Environmental Research Letters, 5: 1-8.

    10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040 :

    Sultan B., Roudier P., Baron C., Quirion P., Muller B., Alhassane A., Ciais P., Guimberteau M., Traoré S. B., Dingkuhn M., 2013
    Assessing climate change impacts on sorghum and millet yields in West Africa.
    Environmental Research Letter, 8: 9 p., doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040.

    Sultan B., Guan K., Kouressy M., Biasutti M., Piani C., Hammer G. L., Mclean G., Lobell D. B., 2014
    Robust features of future climate change impacts on sorghum yields in West Africa.
    Environ. Res. Lett., 9 (10): 1-13.

    Tingem M., Rivington M., 2009
    Adaptation for crop agriculture to climate change in Cameroon: Turning on the heat. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14: 153-168.

    10.1073/pnas.0701728104 :

    Tubiello F. N., Soussana J. F., Howden M., 2007 a
    Crop and pasture response to climate change.
    Proc. Nat. Americ. Soc., 104: 19686-19690.

    Tubiello F. N., Amthor J. S., Boote K. J., Donatelli M., Easterling W., Fischer G., Gifford R. M., Howden M., Reilly J., Rosenzweig C., 2007 b
    Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply: A comment on “Food for Thought…” by Long et al. Science, 312: 1918-1921, 2006.
    European Journal of Agronomy, 26: 215-223.

    Vanduivenbooden N., Abdousallam S., Ben Mohamed A., 2002
    Impact of climate change on agricultural production in the Sahel–Part 2. Case study for groundnut and cowpea in Niger.
    Climatic Change, 54: 349-368.

    Zorita E., Von Storch H., 1999
    The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods.
    Journal of Climate, 12: 2474-2489.

    Auteurs

    • Benjamin Sultan

      Climatologist, IRD, UMR 7159 Locean (UPMC/CNRS/IRD/MNHN), IPSL

    • Philippe Roudier

      Hydrologist, Climate and Risk Management Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission (EC), Ispra, Italy

    • Seydou Traoré

      Agroclimatologist, Centre régional Agrhymet, Niamey, Niger

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    La population réunionnaise

    La population réunionnaise

    Analyse démographique

    Frédéric Sandron (dir.)

    2007

    Du social hors la loi

    Du social hors la loi

    L’anthropologie analytique de Christian Geffray

    Yann Guillaud et Frédéric Létang (dir.)

    2009

    Gestion durable des eaux et des sols au Maroc

    Gestion durable des eaux et des sols au Maroc

    Valorisation des techniques traditionnelles méditerranéennes

    Éric Roose, Mohamed Sabir et Abdellah Laouina

    2010

    Madagascar face au défi des Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement

    Madagascar face au défi des Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement

    Bénédicte Gastineau, Flore Gubert, Anne-Sophie Robilliard et al. (dir.)

    2010

    Le projet majeur africain de la Grande Muraille Verte

    Le projet majeur africain de la Grande Muraille Verte

    Concepts et mise en œuvre

    Abdoulaye Dia et Robin Duponnois (dir.)

    2010

    La Grande Muraille Verte

    La Grande Muraille Verte

    Capitalisation des recherches et valorisation des savoirs locaux

    Abdoulaye Dia et Robin Duponnois (dir.)

    2012

    Un arbre au désert

    Un arbre au désert

    Acacia raddiana

    Michel Grouzis et Édouard Le Floc’h (dir.)

    2003

    Parcours de recherche à Madagascar

    Parcours de recherche à Madagascar

    L’IRD-Orstom et ses partenaires

    Christian Feller et Frédéric Sandron (dir.)

    2010

    Pratiques et représentations linguistiques en Guyane

    Pratiques et représentations linguistiques en Guyane

    Regards croisés

    Isabelle Léglise et Bettina Migge (dir.)

    2008

    La pêche aux Antilles

    La pêche aux Antilles

    Gilles Blanchet, Bertrand Gobert et Jean-Alfred Guérédrat (dir.)

    2002

    Les sociétés rurales face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Les sociétés rurales face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al. (dir.)

    2015

    Aires marine protégées ouest-africaines

    Aires marine protégées ouest-africaines

    Défis scientifiques et enjeux sociétaux

    Marie Bonnin, Raymond Laë et Mohamed Behnassi (dir.)

    2015

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 12
    La population réunionnaise

    La population réunionnaise

    Analyse démographique

    Frédéric Sandron (dir.)

    2007

    Du social hors la loi

    Du social hors la loi

    L’anthropologie analytique de Christian Geffray

    Yann Guillaud et Frédéric Létang (dir.)

    2009

    Gestion durable des eaux et des sols au Maroc

    Gestion durable des eaux et des sols au Maroc

    Valorisation des techniques traditionnelles méditerranéennes

    Éric Roose, Mohamed Sabir et Abdellah Laouina

    2010

    Madagascar face au défi des Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement

    Madagascar face au défi des Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement

    Bénédicte Gastineau, Flore Gubert, Anne-Sophie Robilliard et al. (dir.)

    2010

    Le projet majeur africain de la Grande Muraille Verte

    Le projet majeur africain de la Grande Muraille Verte

    Concepts et mise en œuvre

    Abdoulaye Dia et Robin Duponnois (dir.)

    2010

    La Grande Muraille Verte

    La Grande Muraille Verte

    Capitalisation des recherches et valorisation des savoirs locaux

    Abdoulaye Dia et Robin Duponnois (dir.)

    2012

    Un arbre au désert

    Un arbre au désert

    Acacia raddiana

    Michel Grouzis et Édouard Le Floc’h (dir.)

    2003

    Parcours de recherche à Madagascar

    Parcours de recherche à Madagascar

    L’IRD-Orstom et ses partenaires

    Christian Feller et Frédéric Sandron (dir.)

    2010

    Pratiques et représentations linguistiques en Guyane

    Pratiques et représentations linguistiques en Guyane

    Regards croisés

    Isabelle Léglise et Bettina Migge (dir.)

    2008

    La pêche aux Antilles

    La pêche aux Antilles

    Gilles Blanchet, Bertrand Gobert et Jean-Alfred Guérédrat (dir.)

    2002

    Les sociétés rurales face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Les sociétés rurales face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al. (dir.)

    2015

    Aires marine protégées ouest-africaines

    Aires marine protégées ouest-africaines

    Défis scientifiques et enjeux sociétaux

    Marie Bonnin, Raymond Laë et Mohamed Behnassi (dir.)

    2015

    Voir plus de chapitres

    Introduction générale

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Amadou Oumarou et al.

    Chapitre 10. Les impacts du changement climatique sur les rendements agricoles en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Benjamin Sultan, Philippe Roudier et Seydou Traoré

    Conclusion

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al.

    Introduction

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Amadou Oumarou et al.

    Introduction générale

    Benjamin Sultan, Aymar Yaovi Bossa, Seyni Salack et al.

    Conclusion

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al.

    Chapter 4. Contrasting perceptions with climate change

    Scientific observations in three West African contexts

    Frédéric Kosmowski, Richard Lalou, Benjamin Sultan et al.

    Chapitre 4. Observations et perceptions des changements climatiques

    Analyse comparée dans trois pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest

    Frédéric Kosmowski, Richard Lalou, Benjamin Sultan et al.

    Voir plus de chapitres
    1 / 8

    Introduction générale

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Amadou Oumarou et al.

    Chapitre 10. Les impacts du changement climatique sur les rendements agricoles en Afrique de l’Ouest

    Benjamin Sultan, Philippe Roudier et Seydou Traoré

    Conclusion

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al.

    Introduction

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Amadou Oumarou et al.

    Introduction générale

    Benjamin Sultan, Aymar Yaovi Bossa, Seyni Salack et al.

    Conclusion

    Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni et al.

    Chapter 4. Contrasting perceptions with climate change

    Scientific observations in three West African contexts

    Frédéric Kosmowski, Richard Lalou, Benjamin Sultan et al.

    Chapitre 4. Observations et perceptions des changements climatiques

    Analyse comparée dans trois pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest

    Frédéric Kosmowski, Richard Lalou, Benjamin Sultan et al.

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert freemium

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Acheter

    Édition imprimée

    IRD Éditions
    • amazon.fr
    • decitre.fr
    • mollat.com
    ePub / PDF

    Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa

    X Facebook Email

    Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa

    Ce livre est cité par

    • Fall, Papa. Diouf, Ibrahima. Deme, Abdoulaye. Diouf, Semou. Sene, Doudou. Sultan, Benjamin. Famien, Adjoua Moïse. Janicot, Serge. (2023) Bias-Corrected CMIP5 Projections for Climate Change and Assessments of Impact on Malaria in Senegal under the VECTRI Model. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed8060310
    • Ndiaye, Aissatou. Moussa, Mounkaila Saley. Dione, Cheikh. Sawadogo, Windmanagda. Bliefernicht, Jan. Dungall, Laouali. Kunstmann, Harald. (2022) Projected Changes in Solar PV and Wind Energy Potential over West Africa: An Analysis of CORDEX-CORE Simulations. Energies, 15. DOI: 10.3390/en15249602
    • Malou, Oscar Pascal. Moulin, Patricia. Chevallier, Tiphaine. Masse, Dominique. Vayssières, Jonathan. Badiane-Ndour, Ndèye Yacine. Tall, Laure. Thiam, Abou. Chapuis-Lardy, Lydie. (2021) Estimates of carbon stocks in sandy soils cultivated under local management practices in Senegal’s groundnut basin. Regional Environmental Change, 21. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-021-01790-2

    Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa

    Ce livre est diffusé en accès ouvert freemium. L’accès à la lecture en ligne est disponible. L’accès aux versions PDF et ePub est réservé aux bibliothèques l’ayant acquis. Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque Acheter ce livre aux formats PDF et ePub

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Sultan, B., Roudier, P., & Traoré, S. (2017). Chapter 10. The impacts of climate change on crop yields in West Africa. In B. Sultan, R. Lalou, M. A. Sanni, A. Oumarou, & M. Arame Soumaré (éds.), Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa (1‑). IRD Éditions. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12352
    Sultan, Benjamin, Philippe Roudier, et Seydou Traoré. « Chapter 10. The Impacts of Climate Change on Crop Yields in West Africa ». In Rural Societies in the Face of Climatic and Environmental Changes in West Africa, édité par Benjamin Sultan, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni, Amadou Oumarou, et Mame Arame Soumaré. Marseille: IRD Éditions, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12352.
    Sultan, Benjamin, et al. « Chapter 10. The Impacts of Climate Change on Crop Yields in West Africa ». Rural Societies in the Face of Climatic and Environmental Changes in West Africa, édité par Benjamin Sultan et al., IRD Éditions, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12352.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Sultan, B., Lalou, R., Sanni, M. A., Oumarou, A., & Arame Soumaré, M. (éds.). (2017). Rural societies in the face of climatic and environmental changes in West Africa (S. Barnard, Trad.; 1‑). IRD Éditions. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12298
    Sultan, Benjamin, Richard Lalou, Mouftaou Amadou Sanni, Amadou Oumarou, et Mame Arame Soumaré, éd. Rural Societies in the Face of Climatic and Environmental Changes in West Africa. Traduit par Simon Barnard. Marseille: IRD Éditions, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12298.
    Sultan, Benjamin, et al., éditeurs. Rural Societies in the Face of Climatic and Environmental Changes in West Africa. Traduit par Simon Barnard, IRD Éditions, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.12298.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    IRD Éditions

    IRD Éditions

    • Mentions légales
    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://www.editions.ird.fr

    Email : editions@ird.fr

    Adresse :

    IRD

    44, bd de Dunkerque

    CS 90009

    13572

    Marseille

    France

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement