• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 15902 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 15902 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • Graduate Institute Publications
  • ›
  • eCahiers de l’Institut
  • ›
  • Too Complex or Too Ambitious?
  • ›
  • Annexes
  • Graduate Institute Publications
  • Graduate Institute Publications
    Graduate Institute Publications
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral Annex I: Codebook (Hypothesis 1) Annex II: Examined data related to civil-society/advocacy organisations’ membership of the CETA DAG (Hypothesis 3b) Notes de bas de page

    Too Complex or Too Ambitious?

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Annexes

    Texte intégral Annex I: Codebook (Hypothesis 1) Annex II: Examined data related to civil-society/advocacy organisations’ membership of the CETA DAG (Hypothesis 3b) Notes de bas de page

    Texte intégral

    Annex I: Codebook (Hypothesis 1)

    Concept

    Definition

    Indicators

    Related Examples

    “Salience: 1”

    Manifested anticipation by i) official-level policy actors (i.e. the Council, the European Parliament, individual Member States, national legislatures); ii) private/advocacy actors (e.g. NGOs, unions, business groups) that the terms of an FTA (or chapters thereof) being negotiated will likely determine a utility loss. An analogous position can be voiced by individual members within the aforementioned institutions/organisations. To be coded under Salience:1, relevant textual entries need to pre-date the signing of an FTA, or to refer to the period preceding it.

    Manifestation of concern that the way an FTA chapter will address a specific issue is insufficient, too weak, or entirely undesirable.

    Open criticism or stigmatisation of the expected terms of an FTA chapter being negotiated.

    Investment-protection: “Of big concern is also the Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism that would allow foreign investors to directly sue the governments for loss of profit that may result from public policy decisions.” (European Students’ Union 2015)

    Trade and labour: “There are also concerns that TTIP could lead to a reduction of workers’ rights in the EU, which are high in comparison to those in the USA[.]” (EAPN 2015)

    Investment-protection: “Proofs of that are the creation of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) or ‘regulatory mechanisms’ which would seriously limit national governments’ sovereignty and the democratic scrutiny of economic policy.” (European Transport Workers’ Federation 2015)

    TSD: “All participants in the debate expressed their wish to maintain the current broad scope of TSD chapters in EU FTAs […]. More effective means are needed to achieve this however.” (European Commission Services 2018: 2)

    “Salience: 0”

    Manifestation by i) official-level policy actors (i.e. the Council, the European Parliament, individual Member States, national legislatures); ii) private/advocacy actors (e.g. NGOs, unions, business groups) of either a favourable or neutral position as to the expected terms of an FTA (or chapters thereof). An analogous position can be voiced by individual members within the aforementioned institutions/organisations. To be coded under Salience:0, relevant textual entries need to pre-date the signing of an FTA, or refer to the period preceding it.

    Open praise/optimism related to the likely terms of an FTA chapter being negotiated.

    Explicit or implicit neutrality over the likely terms of an FTA being negotiated.

    Acknowledgment that the way an FTA negotiation is being handled by official-level actors operating at the EU level is optimal or desirable.

    TSD/Trade and Labour: “Ongoing trade negotiations - such as the ones with Mercosur, Mexico and Chile - are therefore also used as a vehicle for the protection of core values, from human rights to the environment.” (Council of the European Union 2020b)

    Investment-protection: “Therefore, relating to the United States and TTIP, investment protection is not a key issue for German companies.” (Association of German Chambers of Industry and Commerce 2014: 1)

    Geographical indications: “EFOW is very satisfied with the result of today’s vote in the INTA committee on the report of MEP Lange concerning the European Parliament recommendations to the Commission for the negotiations of the Free Trade Agreement with the US. The call for an ambitious agreement which includes a greater protection and recognition of our GIs is a fundamental issue for the EU wine sector since the US is by far our leading destination country.” (EFOW 2015)

    “PROs: 1”

    Presence of political opposition/contestation potentially jeopardising the ratification of an EU FTA. PROs can be posed by i) official-level policy actors (i.e. the Council, the European Parliament, individual Member States, national legislatures); ii) private/advocacy actors (e.g. NGOs, unions, business groups). Private/advocacy organisations pose PROs by shaping the position of official-level policy actors with direct veto powers. To be coded under PROs:1, relevant textual entries need to time-wise follow the signing of an FTA, or to have been produced within the same year of signing in the case that they precede it. Alternatively, they need to make explicit reference to ratification in the case that they precede it ahead of the same year. Finally, relevant empirics time-wise anticipate the completion of an FTA ratification process.

    The manifested intention to veto an FTA by an official-level policy actor; (the Council, the EP, and individual Member States).

    An invitation to reject an FTA voiced by private/advocacy organisations, or members thereof (e.g. NGOs, unions, business groups) to official-level policy actors in charge of ratification.

    Open criticism of an FTA, voiced in the aftermath of signing and before ratification is completed – either at the EU and/or Member-State level.

    i/ii) “France says NO to Mercosur: A wise decision” (FNSEA 2019)1

    iii) “EU’s Investment Court System in TTIP and CETA does not protect governments’ right to regulate.” (UNI Europa 2016)

    “PROs: 0”

    A condition of substantial absence of political challenges to the ratification of an FTA, which makes the latter unlikely to face a veto during ratification. To be coded under PROs:0, relevant textual entries need to time-wise follow the signing of an FTA, or to have been produced within the same year of signing in the case that they precede it. Alternatively, they need to make explicit reference to ratification in the case that they precede it ahead of the same year. Finally, relevant empirics time-wise anticipate the completion of an FTA ratification process.

    Explicit support to the ratification of an FTA, voiced by i) official-level policy actors; ii) private/advocacy organisations, or members thereof.

    Explicit or implicit neutrality over the ratification of an FTA.

    Explicit or implicit praise of an FTA (or chapters within it), voiced in the aftermath of signing and before ratification is completed – either at the EU and/or Member-State level.

    “European Business Calls for Swift Ratification of the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement.” (European Footwear Confederation 2018: 2)

    TSD: “The EESC stands ready to assist the Commission in the development of an effective mechanism that improves the implementation and monitoring of TSD chapters in EU FTAs and enforces full compliance, drawing on the experiences of other countries as well as proposals developed by business, environment, labour and other civil society groups.” (European Economic and Social Committee 2018: 8)

    Regulation and NTBs/TSD: “The entry into force of the agreement with Japan in February this year adds to the list, together with other agreements such as Korea and Canada, of ‘new generation agreements’ mainly negotiated after 2006. These types of agreements aim not only to liberalise trade, but to also include commitments on key issues for chemicals such as regulatory cooperation, as well as stronger rules-based and values-based provisions included in its Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters.” (Cefic 2019)

    Annex II: Examined data related to civil-society/advocacy organisations’ membership of the CETA DAG (Hypothesis 3b)2

    Organisation name

    Organisation type

    Position on CETA3

    Average full-time lobbying personnel

    Number of CETA DAG members

    Offices in EU Member States

    EU lobbying budget

    ClientEarth

    NGO

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    Agriculture: concerns with lowering of food standards.

    6.5

    1

    Belgium

    Germany Luxembourg Poland

    Spain

    UK

    500,000 - 599,999 €

    Confédération française démocratique du travail (CFDT)

    Trade union

    Labour: concerns on CETA’s impact on worker rights.

    Need to protect EU regulatory sovereignty and rule of law.

    5

    1

    France

    200,000 -299,999 €

    Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL)

    Trade union

    Labour: concerns on CETA’s impact on worker rights.

    Agriculture: concerns with lowering of food standards.

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    12.2

    1

    Italy

    400,000 - 499,999 €

    Eurogroup for Animals

    NGO

    Agriculture: concerns with lowering of food standards (from an animal-welfare perspective).

    4.5

    1

    Belgium

    900,000 - 999,999 €

    European Public Service Union (EPSU)

    Trade union

    Labour: concerns on CETA’s impact on worker rights.

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    4.5

    2

    Belgium

    700,000 - 799,999 €

    European Trade Union Committee for Education (ETUCE)

    Trade union

    CETA’s impact on EU public services.

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    8

    2

    Belgium

    700,000 - 799,999 €

    European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)

    Trade union

    Labour: concerns on CETA’s impact on worker rights.

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    22.2

    2

    Belgium

    1,000,000 -1,249,999 €

    FH Danish Trade Union Confederation

    Trade union

    Supportive of CETA.

    n/a

    1

    Denmark

    n/a

    Fondation Nicolas Hulot

    NGO

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    TSD: concerns with CETA impact on climate change.

    Agriculture: concerns with lowering of food standards.

    n/a

    1

    France

    n/a

    German Trade Union Confederation (DGB)

    Trade union

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    n/a

    2

    Germany

    n/a

    Humane Society International/Europe

    NGO

    n/a

    2.2

    1

    Belgium

    600,000 - 699,999 €

    Swedish Trade Union Confederation

    Trade union

    Exemption of public services from CETA.

    Need to protect EU regulatory sovereignty and rule of law.

    5.5

    1

    Sweden

    n/a

    Trades Union Congress (TUC)

    Trade union

    Labour: concerns on CETA’s impact on worker rights.

    Geographical indications (GIs): concerns with CETA impact on protection of EU GIs.

    Investment protection: critic of ISDS/ICS.

    1

    1

    Belgium

    UK

    100,000 – 199,000 €

    Notes de bas de page

    1 Original in French translated by the author: “La France dit NON au Mercosur Une décision de sagesse” (FNSEA 2019).

    2 The following figures were gathered via the EU Transparency Register research page (European Commission 2020b), by entering the name of the organisation as stated in the first column of the table below: Average full-time lobbying personnel; Number of CETA DAG members; Offices in EU Member States; EU lobbying budget. Figures listed under the aforementioned headings were last accessed on 1st July 2020.

    3 ClientEarth (2016a, 2016b); Confédération française démocratique du travail (2017); CGIL (2016a, 2016c); Eurogroup for Animals (2017); EPSU (2016); European Trade Union Committee for Education (2017); ETUC and CLC (2013); FH Danish Trade Union Confederation (2017); Fondation Nicolas Hulot (2017); German Trade Union Confederation (DGB) (2016); Swedish Trade Union Confederation (2016); Trades Union Congress (2020).

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Creative Commons - Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    The Functional Beginning of Belligerent Occupation

    The Functional Beginning of Belligerent Occupation

    Michael Siegrist

    2011

    « Société civile » et évolution de l’autoritarisme en Syrie

    « Société civile » et évolution de l’autoritarisme en Syrie

    Claudie Fioroni

    2011

    The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council

    The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council

    Christiane Ahlborn

    2010

    Réchauffement climatique et migrations forcées : le cas de Tuvalu

    Réchauffement climatique et migrations forcées : le cas de Tuvalu

    Geremia Cometti

    2010

    The SWIFT Affair

    The SWIFT Affair

    Swiss Banking Secrecy and the Fight against Terrorist Financing

    Johannes Köppel

    2011

    The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon

    The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon

    The Perceptions of Hizballah among Members of the Free Patriotic Movement

    Fouad Ilias

    2010

    La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme

    La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme

    Défis, enjeux et perspectives concernant la Commission d'enquête internationale indépendante (UNIIIC) et le Tribunal spécial pour le Liban

    Sébastien Moretti

    2009

    Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law

    Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law

    Claire Mitchell

    2009

    La microfinance au Bénin

    La microfinance au Bénin

    Théophile Sossa

    2011

    Le juge interaméricain et le « jus cogens »

    Le juge interaméricain et le « jus cogens »

    Elise Hansbury

    2011

    La naissance du territoire de l’Irak

    La naissance du territoire de l’Irak

    À l’origine d’un État-frontière

    Hassan Thuillard

    2012

    Les associations françaises de défense des étrangers face à l’Europe

    Les associations françaises de défense des étrangers face à l’Europe

    Léa Breton

    2012

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 12
    The Functional Beginning of Belligerent Occupation

    The Functional Beginning of Belligerent Occupation

    Michael Siegrist

    2011

    « Société civile » et évolution de l’autoritarisme en Syrie

    « Société civile » et évolution de l’autoritarisme en Syrie

    Claudie Fioroni

    2011

    The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council

    The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council

    Christiane Ahlborn

    2010

    Réchauffement climatique et migrations forcées : le cas de Tuvalu

    Réchauffement climatique et migrations forcées : le cas de Tuvalu

    Geremia Cometti

    2010

    The SWIFT Affair

    The SWIFT Affair

    Swiss Banking Secrecy and the Fight against Terrorist Financing

    Johannes Köppel

    2011

    The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon

    The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon

    The Perceptions of Hizballah among Members of the Free Patriotic Movement

    Fouad Ilias

    2010

    La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme

    La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme

    Défis, enjeux et perspectives concernant la Commission d'enquête internationale indépendante (UNIIIC) et le Tribunal spécial pour le Liban

    Sébastien Moretti

    2009

    Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law

    Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law

    Claire Mitchell

    2009

    La microfinance au Bénin

    La microfinance au Bénin

    Théophile Sossa

    2011

    Le juge interaméricain et le « jus cogens »

    Le juge interaméricain et le « jus cogens »

    Elise Hansbury

    2011

    La naissance du territoire de l’Irak

    La naissance du territoire de l’Irak

    À l’origine d’un État-frontière

    Hassan Thuillard

    2012

    Les associations françaises de défense des étrangers face à l’Europe

    Les associations françaises de défense des étrangers face à l’Europe

    Léa Breton

    2012

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert freemium

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Acheter

    ePub / PDF

    1 Original in French translated by the author: “La France dit NON au Mercosur Une décision de sagesse” (FNSEA 2019).

    2 The following figures were gathered via the EU Transparency Register research page (European Commission 2020b), by entering the name of the organisation as stated in the first column of the table below: Average full-time lobbying personnel; Number of CETA DAG members; Offices in EU Member States; EU lobbying budget. Figures listed under the aforementioned headings were last accessed on 1st July 2020.

    3 ClientEarth (2016a, 2016b); Confédération française démocratique du travail (2017); CGIL (2016a, 2016c); Eurogroup for Animals (2017); EPSU (2016); European Trade Union Committee for Education (2017); ETUC and CLC (2013); FH Danish Trade Union Confederation (2017); Fondation Nicolas Hulot (2017); German Trade Union Confederation (DGB) (2016); Swedish Trade Union Confederation (2016); Trades Union Congress (2020).

    Too Complex or Too Ambitious?

    X Facebook Email

    Too Complex or Too Ambitious?

    Ce livre est diffusé en accès ouvert freemium. L’accès à la lecture en ligne est disponible. L’accès aux versions PDF et ePub est réservé aux bibliothèques l’ayant acquis. Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque Acheter ce livre aux formats PDF et ePub

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    Too Complex or Too Ambitious?

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Biffi, L. (2021). Annexes. In Too Complex or Too Ambitious?. Genève: Graduate Institute Publications. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.8147
    Biffi, Leopoldo. « Annexes ». In Too Complex or Too Ambitious?. Genève: Graduate Institute Publications, 2021. doi:10.4000/books.iheid.8147.
    Biffi, Leopoldo. « Annexes ». Too Complex or Too Ambitious?, Graduate Institute Publications, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.8147.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Biffi, L. (2021). Too Complex or Too Ambitious?. Genève: Graduate Institute Publications. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.8097
    Biffi, Leopoldo. Too Complex or Too Ambitious?. Genève: Graduate Institute Publications, 2021. doi:10.4000/books.iheid.8097.
    Biffi, Leopoldo. Too Complex or Too Ambitious?. Graduate Institute Publications, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.8097.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    Graduate Institute Publications

    Graduate Institute Publications

    • Mentions légales
    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Facebook
    • X
    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://graduateinstitute.ch

    Email : researchoffice@graduateinstitute.ch

    Adresse :

    Institut de hautes études internationales et du développement / Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

    CP 1672

    1211

    Genève

    Suisse

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement