Conclusion
Texte intégral
1This ePaper has examined the cultural bases of the disconnect between foreigners’ and locals’ approaches to negotiation in present-day Afghanistan. While extensive literature exists in the fields of both cross-cultural negotiation and Pashtun (and Afghan) culture, no single publication on the topic of cross-cultural negotiation between foreigners and Afghans exists. This implies that the case of Afghanistan had yet to be discussed in the light of existing Western theories of cross-cultural negotiation. To address this gap, this study surveyed European and North American civilian foreigners with experience in Afghanistan. The survey included both questions determined by the author to be relevant to negotiations with Afghans and questions borrowed from experts in the field of cross-cultural negotiation, as found in the literature.
2As noted in the introduction, the present research is subject to several methodological limits. Firstly, the very small quantity of survey participants precludes any ambition to statistically significant results. Secondly, as the questions are asked in a very subjective way, the answers cannot be standardised in an objective manner. Third, and most importantly, face-to-face negotiations in Afghanistan are characterised by a very important asymmetry wherein the power distribution often (though not always) heavily favours the foreigner. This phenomenon shades any particular interaction, thus constituting an important bias that must be taken into account when interpreting results.
3Despite these caveats, the survey responses, in conjunction with the authors’ personal observations, nevertheless provide some insights, thus making it possible to demonstrate evidence of a relationship between selected elements of Pashtun tradition and the negotiation behaviour of Afghans. This relationship is postulated to play a major role in the cross-cultural interaction(s) described throughout the paper. These interactions are highly complex, and current cross-cultural theories fail to provide a solid basis upon which to interpret the reality. Afghanistan does not lend itself easily to the simplistic categorisations inherent to the rather bipolar worldview that continues to prevail in Western cross-cultural theory.

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council
Christiane Ahlborn
2010
The SWIFT Affair
Swiss Banking Secrecy and the Fight against Terrorist Financing
Johannes Köppel
2011
The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon
The Perceptions of Hizballah among Members of the Free Patriotic Movement
Fouad Ilias
2010
La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme
Défis, enjeux et perspectives concernant la Commission d'enquête internationale indépendante (UNIIIC) et le Tribunal spécial pour le Liban
Sébastien Moretti
2009
Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law
Claire Mitchell
2009