An Israeli-Palestinian Federation: An Alternative Approach to Peace
Over a year since Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, led to the devastating ongoing war in Gaza, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict seems as far from resolution as it ever has been. This paper suggests a possible pathway towards ending the conflict, not as an immediate solution, but as a viable option once the parties are motivated to seek compromise.
The paper begins by arguing that the two-state solution championed by diplomats from the end of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war to this day is no...
Note de l’auteur
With assistance from Fritz Froehlich, Catherine Germond, Farrah Hawana, Sarah Hibbin
Éditeur : Graduate Institute Publications
Lieu d’édition : Genève
Publication sur OpenEdition Books : 14 avril 2025
ISBN numérique : 978-2-940600-57-1
DOI : 10.4000/13r63
Collection : eCahiers de l’Institut | 58
Année d’édition : 2025
Over a year since Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, led to the devastating ongoing war in Gaza, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict seems as far from resolution as it ever has been. This paper suggests a possible pathway towards ending the conflict, not as an immediate solution, but as a viable option once the parties are motivated to seek compromise.
The paper begins by arguing that the two-state solution championed by diplomats from the end of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war to this day is no longer realistic. The Oslo Accords that aimed to implement this vision did not deliver, due to continuous violence, accelerated settlement construction in the West Bank and a persistent failure to resolve the key 'Permanent Status' issues (borders, Israeli settlements, security arrangements, Palestinian refugees, the status of Jerusalem). Oslo did nothing to halt the expansion of Israeli West Bank settlements, the population of which, at some 700,000, is three times what it was thirty years ago; nor has it done anything to resolve the plight of the Palestinian refugees, whose numbers have doubled to almost 6 million since the 1990s. Extremism has overwhelmed moderation in both societies, and the brutality of the past year only underlines the futility of continuing to pursue an Oslo-style two-state approach.
The authors argue that there are three broad options: a continuation of a deteriorating status quo, a one-state unitary solution, or a confederal/federal approach. The first two have little promise. Maintaining the status quo means sustained violence and suffering, and a further erosion of Israel’s international standing and moral capital. Promoting the notion of a unified democratic state of Israelis and Palestinians in today's inflamed climate is seen by most Israelis as advocating the end of the Jewish homeland, and will gain no traction in Israel.
This leaves the option of some kind of federation of the two peoples: one that preserves their distinct identities and self-rule, while sharing essential common functions like defense, foreign relations, monetary policy and the management of the economy and water/the environment. A distinction should be made between citizenship of the federation (available to all Israelis, all Palestinians currently resident in the West Bank and Gaza, and all UN-registered Palestinian refugees), and residency of each territory. Israelis, as residents of the Israeli territory, would elect representatives to an Israeli parliament, while Palestinians, as residents of the Palestinian territory, would elect representatives to a Palestinian parliament. A single, balanced federal chamber is proposed, with delegates either directly elected by each territory or appointed by the territorial governments/parliaments.
A federation offers practical possibilities for addressing two major stumbling blocks to peace: Israeli settlements and the return of Palestinian refugees. Two options are worth considering. Under the first, any federal citizen would have the right to live anywhere in the federation but would remain, for federal and territorial voting purposes, a resident of their 'own' Israeli or Palestinian territory, while bound by the laws and local taxes levied in the territory in which they live. A variant of this would allow a more limited number of Israeli settlers to remain in the West Bank, while also permitting refugees who lived in Israel before 1948 to return to the Israeli territory. Either option would ensure that Israelis and Palestinians maintain control of their 'own' respective territories.
Nearly 50 percent of the world’s population lives in some kind of federal or confederal arrangement (e.g. Brazil, the USA, the European Union). In all federations, the exact division of powers between individual member territories and the larger union is specified in a written constitution—as are the mechanisms for resolving different interpretations and disputes between territories, and for ensuring that all citizens possess equal rights before the law.
Support for a federal solution is not widespread at this juncture. The purpose of this paper is to disabuse policy-makers of the tired old two-state option, and to help introduce the case for federalism into the mainstream of policy and diplomatic debate.
Riccardo BOCCO is Emeritus Professor of Political Sociology at the Geneva Graduate Institute. His main geographical area of fieldwork for the last 45 years has been the Near East with a particular focus on Jordan, Israel/Palestine and Lebanon. He has successively worked on issues of development policies and State-building; on humanitarian aid and refugees; and monitoring the impact of international aid on civilian populations. He has been director of the French Centre for Research on the Contemporary Middle East, based in Amman, then Research Director and Academic Director for the Masters’ Program at the Graduate Institute. During the 2000s, he has led large-scale research projects on international aid in the Near East for several UN agencies. His present research project titled ‘Violence, memory and cinema’ explores the role of documentary and fiction films in (re)constructing collective memories and during armed conflicts (Israel/Palestine) in post-civil wars (Lebanon) and in post-dictatorship contexts (Argentina and Chile).He is also the co-editor of De/colonizing Palestine, Contemporary Debates (forthcoming). His publications and podcasts can be accessed on his personal website: https://riccardobocco.com/
Nigel ROBERTS has worked in international development, as a political economist, for over fifty years, and has lived for extended periods in Thailand, Nepal, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Palestine/Israel and Sydney (covering the Western Pacific). He spent 30 years as a World Bank staff member, latterly as a country director (including in Palestine/Israel between 2001-6) and a research director (co-managing the 2011 World Development report on Conflict, Security and Development). Since retiring from the World Bank in 2011, Nigel has worked on Somalia (as the World Bank delegate to the National Financial Governance Committee), Afghanistan (heading up an Overseas Development Institute team) and Myanmar (as director of the Joint Peace Fund). From 2015-18, he was the Chair of the UN Secretary-General’s Advisory Board for the UN Peace Building Fund, and from April to December 2020 was a senior adviser to the US Congress-mandated Afghanistan Peace Process Study Group.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Creative Commons - Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council
Christiane Ahlborn
2010
The SWIFT Affair
Swiss Banking Secrecy and the Fight against Terrorist Financing
Johannes Köppel
2011
The Evolving Patterns of Lebanese Politics in Post-Syria Lebanon
The Perceptions of Hizballah among Members of the Free Patriotic Movement
Fouad Ilias
2010
La justice internationale à l'épreuve du terrorisme
Défis, enjeux et perspectives concernant la Commission d'enquête internationale indépendante (UNIIIC) et le Tribunal spécial pour le Liban
Sébastien Moretti
2009
Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law
Claire Mitchell
2009
