Table des matières
Katell Berthelot, Natalie B. Dohrmann et Capucine Nemo-Pekelman
IntroductionRoman Law, provincials and barbarians
Carlos Lévy
Cicero, law, and the barbarians- An orator facing civilizational problems
- The creation of civilization in De inventione
- Cicero versus Lucretius: human origins and the barbarians
- Who are barbarians? The characteristics of barbarians according to Cicero
- Pro Sestio: Barbarism in the city
- Towards a philosophical theorization
- The philosophical answer in De re publica and De legibus: Barbarians and universal law
- Universal law, Roman law, and barbarians
- Conclusion
Julien Dubouloz
Accommodating former legal systems and Roman lawCicero’s rhetorical and legal perspective in the Verrine orations
Clifford Ando
Performing justice in republican empire, 1-565 CEImperial justice as drama
Kaius Tuori
Between the good king and the cruel tyrantThe Acta Isidori and the perception of Roman emperors among provincial litigants
Hayim Lapin
Pappus and Julianus, the Maccabaean martyrs, and rabbinic martyrdom history in Late AntiquityProvincial negotiation with the imperial legal system
Aitor Blanco-Pérez
Appealing for the emperor’s justiceProvincial petitions and imperial responses prior to Late Antiquity
Capucine Nemo-Pekelman
Jewish judicial patrons and advocates in the Western Roman Empire (5th century)Legal pluralism under empire
Marie Roux
Judicial pluralism in the Visigothic kingdom of ToulouseSpecial jurisdictions and communal courts
Kimberley Czajkowski
Legal knowledge and its transmission in three marriage contracts from the Judaean desertThe impact of imperial law on rabbinic legal thinking
Catherine Hezser
Did Palestinian rabbis know Roman law?Methodological considerations and case studies
Orit Malka et Yakir Paz
A rabbinic postliminiumThe property of captives in tannaitic halakhah in light of Roman Law
Yael Wilfand
“A proselyte whose sons converted with him”Roman laws on new citizens’ authority over their children and tannaitic rulings on converts to Judaism and their offspring
Natalie B. Dohrmann
Ad similitudinem arbitrorumOn the perils of commensurability and comparison in Roman and rabbinic law
Law and self-perception
Katell Berthelot
“Not like our Rock is their rock” (Deut 32:31)Rabbinic perceptions of Roman courts and jurisdiction
- Introduction
- The prohibition of non-Jewish tribunals
- Association of non-Jewish courts with idolatry and impiety
- Legal documents and conflict of authority
- The connection between the courts of the nations and idolatry
- The association of Jewish or rabbinic jurisdiction with the Jerusalem Temple and with God himself
- Conclusion
Kimberley Fowler
Early Christian perspectives on Roman law and Mosaic lawChristine Hayes
“Barbarians” judge the lawThe rabbis on the uncivil law of Rome
- Part I - Law, the barbarian repertoire, and intercultural polemics
- Intercultural polemics: apologetics and redirection – Romans, the Second Sophistic, Christians
- a) Romans
- b) Writers of the Second Sophistic
- c) Christians
- Part II - Second Temple Jewish use of the barbarian repertoire
- Part III - The barbarian repertoire in Palestinian rabbinic sources
- Rabbinic apologetics I: barbarizing the stubborn and rebellious son
- Rabbinic apologetics II: a pleasant death – Roman and rabbinic death penalty discourses
- a) Roman death penalty law: degrees of severity and the aesthetics of execution
- b) Excising the Torah’s inner barbarian
- Rabbinic redirection
- a) Esau the barbarian
- b) Barbarized emperors
- Conclusion
