Chapter 8: Al-Yamāma: archaeozoological study
p. 259-266
Texte intégral
1The faunal material from the excavations of the 2013 and 2015 seasons at the site of al-Yamāma was studied by the author during the final field mission. Thus, the corpus of the excavation of area N6, the mosque, and its surrounding area was completed, while the new material from Sounding 4 (domestic context in area K17) was added. The methodology follows that used during previous seasons (Monchot 2016). Taking advantage of the presence of the archaeobotanist C. Bouchaud, it is important to emphasize that some samples of sensitive Uf (e.g. floor, pit, ashy layers) were sieved through a 2 mm mesh.
2A total of 6782 bone remains were found during the final archaeological season, 2548 in the mosque area (Area N6, Building 1) while the remaining bones were found in Sounding 4, area K17 (n = 4234). As previously, the faunal assemblage is largely dominated by camel/caprine in both areas. Table 8.1 presents the species distribution by Uf (i.e. stratigraphic assignments).
1. Association of camel and caprine
3As previously shown (Monchot 2014), the bone assemblage is clearly dominated by the camel (Camelus dromedarius) and by the caprine — sheep/goat (Ovis aries/Capra hircus). These species make up a significant proportion of the assemblage from al-Yamāma throughout the excavated sequences, and the zooarchaeological results clearly show a subsistence economy largely based on these animals. They provide meat, milk, and wool. The camel also served as a means of transport from oasis to oasis. The high proportion of camel and caprine is not unusual in this area; they were the most common of the exploited terrestrial animals from late pre-Islamic/early Islamic contexts at Dūmat al-Jandal and from earlier periods in Saudi Arabia.
4Some of the ovicaprids or camel bones show cut or butchering marks (fig. 8.1) which are the result of disarticulation or filleting processes. The variety of butchery marks proves that the inhabitants of al-Yamāma consumed camel and sheep/goat meat. This is not an unexpected result as faunal remains represent consumption refuse recovered from domestic quarters.
2. Gazelle (Gazella sp.)
5Numerous samples were identified as gazelle among the different Uf of al-Yamāma, most of them from area K17 (Sounding 4), suggesting significant hunting activity by the inhabitants (fig. 8.2). The gazelle bones present characteristic osteomorphological features and a preliminary biometric study shows that these were smaller species (e.g. the Arabian gazelle, Gazella Arabica, also called the Saudi gazelle, Gazella saudiya) than the mountain gazelle (Gazella gazella) (Munro et al. 2011; Thouless et al. 1991). The Saudi gazelle is not regarded as a subspecies of G. Dorcas (Yom-Tov et al. 1995). Notably, the Arabian gazelle, the smallest of the species, was an elusive animal that was apparently hunted to extinction in its Middle Eastern homeland, Saudi Arabia.
3. Spiny-tailed lizard (Uromastyx aegyptia)
6The presence of the spiny-tailed lizard, already confirmed during the previous excavation seasons (Monchot et al. 2014), was confirmed. Numerous bones (n = 163) were found in Sounding 4 (area K17), in a domestic context and in Building 1, the mosque (area N6) (n = 33).
7The Egyptian spiny-tailed lizard or mastigure (Uromastyx aegyptia microlepsis) is present in central Saudi Arabia, the Sultanate of Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and in the north and south of Iraq (Wilms et al. 2009). This lizard is known locally as ḍabb (Eng. dabb lizard). It is a burrowing lizard which has a predilection for open habitats with sand and gravel substrates and sparse vegetation. This abundance of lizard remains associated with leftovers, especially in Sounding 4, confirms its anthropogenic origin, that is, its consumption by the inhabitants.
4. Ostrich (Struthio camelus)
8The ostrich is represented by 28 fragments of eggshell found everywhere in the domestic context of Sounding 4 (n = 20) or in the mosque area N6 (n = 8) (fig. 8.3). If the ostrich bones are quasi-absent in archaeological sites (with the possible exception of the Palaeolithic site of Umm el-Tlel in Syria; Bonilauri et al. 1990), eggshell fragments are known from various archaeological sites in Saudi Arabia (Potts 2001; Studer 2010; Monchot 2013) and in Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, and eastern Syria (see references in Summer 2003).
9The Middle Eastern ostrich or Arabian ostrich (Struthio camelus syriacus) is an extinct subspecies of the ostrich which once lived in the Arabian Peninsula and in the Near East. Ostriches also appear frequently on petroglyphs from prehistory to modern times, and in Islamic verse, especially in the poetry from Arabia itself, where these birds were common. Although the flesh is edible and the fat useful, the ostrich has been primarily valued for its plumage, notably the tail feathers, and for its large eggs (Laufer 1926).
10The question of the presence of ostrich eggs is interesting. Indeed, it is difficult to know whether they were consumed or whether the eggs were used as containers (Moorey 1994) or decorative elements (e.g. beads) as found in many countries in South Africa (Tapela 2001; Kandel & Conard 2005).
5. Domestic fowl (Gallus gallus)
11Only six remains represent the domestic fowl or chicken. One skull fragment, a distal fragment of a metatarsus, a proximal fragment of a tibiotarsus (Uf 106), and one fragment of a humerus diaphysis (Uf 156) were found in Trench A (mosque, area N6), whereas one fragment of a left proximal femur (Bp = 17.1 mm; Dp = 10.6 mm) and one fragment of a left distal femur (Bd = 15.3 mm; Dd = 11.4 mm) clearly belonging to the same individual, were found in Uf 435 (Sounding 4, area K17). Macroscopic inspection did not show any evidence of anthropic use such as cut marks or others traces of slaughtering. Nevertheless, these domestic fowl bones may be interpreted as food refuse although these species were not primarily used for consumption.
12The presence of some fragments of eggshell found in the sieve residue is questionable. They could have come from chicken or from wild galliforms, a species widely hunted and consumed.
6. Other species already attested during previous seasons
13Alongside sheep, goat, and camel, the inhabitants of the oasis kept other domestic animals, such as dog (Canis lupus f. familiaris), donkey (Equus asinus), and cat (Felis catus). These species are represented in a very low percentage, had other roles within the local economy, and were not generally used for food. Thus, the discovery of bones from these animals at archaeological sites is not a sign of consumption. In rare cases, however, bones were discovered with cut marks indicating that meat (or skin) was cut off with a knife, presumably for consumption.
14The donkey is represented by a second phalanx in Uf 434 and a proximal fragment of a first phalanx in Uf 413. The donkey, like the camel, was used as a beast of burden.
15The cat is present in a proximal radius and a fragment of ulna in Uf 137 (Trench A, mosque, area N6), and in three bones (proximal tibia, proximal ulna, and distal femur) in Uf 435 (Sounding 4, area K17, dwelling).
16Dogs may have been killed during hunting expeditions, or within the walls of the city, where they were attracted by food or rubbish.
17This year three bones of cattle (Bos Taurus) were found but no oryx (Oryx leucoryx) bones were identified, although its presence is suspected. Indeed, oryx bones are very similar in size and morphology to those of caprine (Peters et al. 1997); the intense fragmentation made their identification difficult.
7. New species
18Several new species were discovered this year, including two species of sea fish.
7.1. Serranidae
19The first specimen, a dorsal spine, belongs to the family Serranidae (order of Perciformes) and was located in area N6, Uf 132 (fig. 8.4). The family contains about 450 species in 64 genera, including the sea basses and groupers (subfamily Epinephelinae). Many serranid species are brightly coloured, and many of the larger species are caught commercially for food. It is not yet possible to be more specific about the origin of the grouper; this family is well represented in the Red Sea and in the Arabian Gulf. Grouper bones belonging to a minimum of seven specimens were found in Madāʾin Ṣāliḥ (Studer 2010). The presence of marine fish bones as far inland as al-Yamāma offers insights into dietary habits and trade.
7.2. Clupeidae
20Two very small vertebrae belonging to a Clupeidae (fig. 8.5) were found after sieving in Uf 148, which represents the sediments around tannūr St. 218. This is the fish family of the herring, shad, sardine, ilish, and menhaden. They include many of the most important food fish in the world and are also commonly caught for the production of fish oil and fish meal.
7.3. Cape hare
21A ubiquitous animal that can live in diverse environments such as steppes, agricultural areas, and even deserts when vegetation is sufficient. The Cape hare (Lepus capensis) is represented in Uf 417 (Sounding 4, area K17) by a distal humerus (distal breadth = 9.6 mm; distal depth = 5.9 mm), a proximal ulna, and a skull fragment. The Cape hare was also identified in Madāʾin Ṣāliḥ in a fourth–seventh-century AD level (Studer 2010).
7.4. Rodents
22Numerous rodent bones were identified and the species identification is ongoing (fig. 8.6). Nevertheless, one sub-complete skull of a Meriones was found in Uf 422 (Sounding 4, area K17). The Meriones is a rodent species of the family Muridae and includes the gerbil. The genus contains most animals referred to as jirds, rodents who tend to inhabit arid regions including clay desert, sandy desert, and steppe, but who are also present in slightly wetter regions; they are an agricultural pest.
7.5. Golden eagle and unidentified birds
23Some bird bones belonging to two or three species were found and the specific determination is ongoing. It can already be stated, however, that a proximal ulna discovered in Uf 417 (Sounding 4, area K17) proves the presence of a large Accipitridae, undoubtedly the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) (fig. 8.7) (Lepage 2007). While this raptor may have been captured for its feathers, Bundy reported communal roosting of Eastern imperial eagles in Saudi Arabia and northern India (quoted in Watson 1988).
Table 8.1
| UF | N | Camel | Cap | Gaz | Bos | Dog | Cat | Hare | Equid | Lizard | Rodent | Chicken | Bird | Ostrich | SH | MH | LH | IND |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 203 | 42 | 45 | 1 | 35 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| 63 | 19 | 15 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| 66 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 67 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 68 | 39 | 10 | 4 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
| 71 | 115 | 13 | 2 | 40 | 60 | |||||||||||||
| 72 | 150 | 49 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 61 | ||||||||||||
| 79 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 82 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| 83 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 85 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| 87 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 89 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 94 | 7 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| 104 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 105 | 97 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 78 | ||||||||||||
| 106 | 201 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 17 | 130 | |||||||||
| 107 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 108 | 18 | 3 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
| 111 | 74 | 44 | 16 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 112 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| 114 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 115 | 11 | 3 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| 116 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 118 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| 119* | 29 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 9 | ||||||||||||
| 120 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| 121 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 122 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| 123* | 63 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 27 | ||||||||||
| 124 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 125 | 25 | 8 | 7 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| 126 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 130 | 5 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 132 | 121 | 9 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 66 | ||||||||||||
| 133 | 12 | 1 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| 137 | 77 | 1 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 6 | |||||||||||
| 138 | 322 | 84 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 220 | ||||||||||
| 139 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 145 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| 146 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 147 | 37 | 15 | 1 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
| 148 | 306 | 8 | 99 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 181 | ||||||||||
| 149* | 22 | 1 | 1 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| 153 | 37 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 26 | |||||||||||||
| 155 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| 156 | 76 | 2 | 22 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 42 | |||||||||||
| 157 | 150 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 132 | |||||||||||||
| 158 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
| 159 | 42 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 28 | |||||||||||||
| 218* | 87 | 2 | 85 | |||||||||||||||
| P.226 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 401 | 23 | 7 | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| 402 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| 409 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 410 | 29 | 14 | 8 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 411 | 663 | 68 | 198 | 7 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 70 | 292 | ||||||
| 412 | 27 | 8 | 5 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 413* | 793 | 36 | 117 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 57 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 33 | 24 | 494 | |||||
| 414 | 24 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 9 | ||||||||||||
| 415 | 351 | 66 | 35 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 225 | |||||||||
| 416 | 10 | 4 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| 417 | 330 | 34 | 82 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 160 | ||||||
| 418 | 85 | 25 | 20 | 40 | ||||||||||||||
| 419* | 263 | 10 | 59 | 1 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 16 | 122 | |||||||
| 422 | 147 | 47 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 66 | |||||||||
| 423 | 335 | 58 | 96 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 156 | ||||||||
| 424 | 127 | 17 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 71 | ||||||||||
| 426 | 50 | 1 | 7 | 42 | ||||||||||||||
| 427* | 135 | 14 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 74 | ||||||||||
| 430 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| 431 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 433 | 128 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 108 | |||||||||||||
| 434 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| 435* | 90 | 17 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 46 | |||||||||||
| 437 | 214 | 26 | 101 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 76 | |||||||||
| 439* | 224 | 22 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 177 | ||||||||||||
| 440 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| 441 | 116 | 23 | 18 | 2 | 73 | |||||||||||||
| TOT | 6782 | 745 | 1410 | 45 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 196 | 23 | 6 | 34 | 28 | 99 | 17 | 372 | 3784 |
Species inventory of bone material by Uf
(Cap = caprine, Bos = cattle, SH = small-sized herbivore, MH = medium-sized herbivore, LH = large-sized herbivore, Ind = indeterminate, * = sieving of sediment)
Figure 8.1

Right ulnar carpal bone of a camel showing disarticulation cut marks (area K17, Sounding 4, Uf 414)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.2

Disarticulation cut marks (removal of head) on an atlas of a (female) gazelle (area K17, Sounding 4, Uf 411)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.3

Ostrich eggshell found in a domestic context (area K17, Sounding 4, Uf 415)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.4

Dorsal spine of Serranidae (mosque area, area N6, Uf 132)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.5

Vertebrae of Clupeidae (mosque area, area N6, Uf 148)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.6

A Meriones (jird) skull (area K17, Sounding 4, Uf 422)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Figure 8.7

Proximal ulna of a large Accipitridae (Golden eagle) — Uf 417 (Sounding 4, area K17)
(Y. Hilbert, Saudi-French Archaeological Mission in al-Kharj)
Auteur
-
Hervé Monchot
Labex RESMED, UMR 8167 ‘Orient & Méditerranée’, Paris
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
La liberté d’association au Yémen
Une compilation de la législation relative aux associations et aux fondations
Anaïs Casanova et Guillaume Jeu
2007
Les Hiğra et les forteresses du savoir au Yémen
Ismā‘īl b. ‘Alī al-Akwa‘ Brigitte Marino (trad.)
1996
Société civile, associations et pouvoir local au Yémen
Actes de la Table Ronde « Société civile, citoyenneté et pouvoir local », Sanaa, 1–3 juillet 2006
Sarah Ben Nefissa, Maggy Grabundzija et Jean Lambert (dir.)
2008
Women and Civil Society: Capacity Building in Yemen
A Research Perspective on Development
Maggy Grabundzija et Blandine Destremau
2011
فن الرسوم الصخرية واستيطان اليمن في عصور ما قبل التاريخ
مديحه رشاد et ماري-لويز إينزان (dir.) رشـــــــاد مديحــــــه et الأقـــــرع عزيز علـي (trad.)
2009
Savoirs locaux et agriculture durable au Yémen
Séminaire ‘Place des pratiques et techniques anciennes dans l’agriculture yéménite d’aujourd’hui : problèmes et perspectives’, Sanaa, juin 2000
Frédéric Pelat et Amin Al-Hakimi (dir.) Saeed A. Ba-Angood et Daniel Varisco (trad.)
2003
Al-Kharj II: Report on two excavation seasons in the oasis of al-Kharj
2013 and 2015 — Saudi Arabia
Jérémie Schiettecatte et Abd al-Aziz al-Ghazzi (dir.)
2026
