• Contenu principal
  • Menu
OpenEdition Books
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue de 16075 livres
  • Éditeurs
  • Auteurs
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Partager
    • Facebook

    • X

    • Accueil
    • Catalogue de 16075 livres
    • Éditeurs
    • Auteurs
  • Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales

    • OpenEdition
  • Nos plateformes

    • OpenEdition Books
    • OpenEdition Journals
    • Hypothèses
    • Calenda
  • Bibliothèques

    • OpenEdition Freemium
  • Suivez-nous

  • Lettre d’information
OpenEdition Search

Redirection vers OpenEdition Search.

À quel endroit ?
  • Accademia University Press
  • ›
  • Collana dell'Associazione Italiana di Li...
  • ›
  • Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Confere...
  • ›
  • Contributed Papers
  • ›
  • Neural Surface Realization for Italian
  • Accademia University Press
  • Accademia University Press
    Accademia University Press
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Liens vers le livre
    Informations sur la couverture
    Table des matières
    Formats de lecture

    Plan

    Plan détaillé Texte intégral 1 Introduction 2 Neural network-based Surface Realization 3 Evaluation 4 Conclusion and Future Work Aknowledgment Bibliographie Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Ce livre est recensé par

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Neural Surface Realization for Italian

    Valerio Basile et Alessandro Mazzei

    p. 46-50

    Résumés

    We present an architecture based on neural networks to generate natural language from unordered dependency trees. The task is split into the two subproblems of word order prediction and morphology inflection. We test our model gold corpus (the Italian portion of the Universal Dependency treebanks) and an automatically parsed corpus from the Web.

    Questo lavoro introduce un’architettura basata su reti neurali per generare frasi in linguaggio naturale a partire da alberi a dipendenze. Il processo è diviso nei due sottoproblemi dell’ordinamento di parole e dell’inflessione morfologica, per i quali la nostra architettura prevede due modelli indipendenti, il cui risultato è combinato nella fase finale. Abbiamo testato il modello usando un gold corpus e un silver corpus ottenuto dal Web.

    Texte intégral 1 Introduction 2 Neural network-based Surface Realization 2.1 Word Ordering 2.2 Morphology Inflection 3 Evaluation 3.1 Training Data 3.2 Word Ordering Performances 3.3 Morphology Inflection Performances 3.4 Global Surface Realization Performances 4 Conclusion and Future Work Aknowledgment Bibliographie Notes de bas de page Auteurs

    Texte intégral

    1 Introduction

    1Natural Language Generation is the process of producing natural language utterances from an abstract representation of knowledge. As opposed to Natural Language Understanding, where the input is well-defined (typically a text or speech segment) and the output may vary in terms of complexity and scope of the analysis, in the generation process the input can take different forms and levels of abstraction, depending on the specific goals and applicative scenarios. However, the input structures for generation should be at least formally defined.

    2In this work we focus on the final part of the standard NLG pipeline defined by Reiter and Dale (2000), that is, surface realization, the task of producing natural language from formal abstract representations of sentences’ meaning and syntax.

    3We consider the surface realization of unordered Universal Dependency (UD) trees, i.e., syntactic structures where the words of a sentence are connected by labeled directed arcs in a tree-like fashion. The labels on the arcs indicate the syntactic relation holding between each word and its dependent words (Figure 1a). We approach the surface realization task in a supervised statistical setting. In particular, we draw inspiration from Basile (2015) by dividing the task into the two independent subtasks of word order prediction and morphology inflection prediction. Two neural network-based models run in parallel on the same input structure, and their output is later combined to produce the final surface form.

    4A first version of the system implementing our proposed architecture (called the DipInfo-UniTo realizer) was submitted to the shallow track of the Surface Realization Shared Task 2018 (Mille et al., 2018). The main research goal of this paper is to provide a critical analysis for tuning the training data and learning parameters of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer.

    2 Neural network-based Surface Realization

    5In the following sections, we detail the two neural networks employed to solve the subtasks of word order prediction (2.1) and morphology inflection (2.2) respectively.

    2.1 Word Ordering

    6We reformulate the problem of sentence-wise word ordering in terms of reordering the subtrees of its syntactical structure. The algorithm is composed of three steps: i) splitting the unordered tree into single-level unordered subtrees; ii) predicting the local word order for each subtree; iii) recomposing the single-level ordered subtrees into a single multi-level ordered tree to obtain the global word order.

    7In the first step, we split the original unordered universal dependency multilevel tree into a number of single-level unordered trees, where each subtree is composed by a head (the root) and all its dependents (the children), similarly to Bohnet et al. (2012). An example is shown in Figure 1: from the (unordered) tree representing the sentence “Numerose sue opere contengono prodotti chimici tossici.” (1a), each of its component subtrees (limited to one-level dependency) is considered separarately (1b). The head and the dependents of each subtree form an unordered list of lexical items. Crucially, we leverage the flat structure of the subtrees in order to extract structures that are suitable as input to the learning to rank algorithm in the next step of the process.

    Figure 1: Splitting the input tree into subtrees to extract lists of items for learning to rank.

    Image 10000000000002AF000002B8609A1BD1.jpg

    8In the second step of the algorithm, we predict the relative order of the head and the dependents of each subtree with a learning to rank approach. We employ the list-wise learning to rank algorithm ListNet, proposed by Cao et al. (2007). The relatively small size of the lists of items to rank allows us to use a list-wise approach, as opposed to pair-wise or poin-twise approaches, while keeping the computation times manageable. ListNet uses a list-wise loss function based on top one probability, i.e., the probability of an element of being the first one in the ranking. The top one probability model approximates the permutation probability model that assigns a probability to each possible permutation of an ordered list. This approximation is necessary to keep the problem tractable by avoiding the exponential explosion of the number of permutations. Formally, the top one probability of an object j is defined as

    Image 100000000000009800000022672EB68F.jpg

    9that is, the sum of the probabilities of all the possible permutations of n objects (denoted as Ωn ) where j is the first element. s=(s1, …, sn) is a given list of scores, i.e., the position of elements in the list. Considering two permutations of the same list y and z (for instance, the predicted order and the reference order) their distance is computed using cross entropy. The distance measure and the top one probabilities of the list elements are used in the loss function:

    Image 100000000000009F0000002296AD79BC.jpg

    10The list-wise loss function is plugged into a linear neural network model to provide a learning environment. ListNet takes as input a sequence of ordered lists of feature vectors (the features are encoded as numeric vectors). The weights of the network are iteratively adjusted by computing a list-wise cost function that measure the distance between the reference ranking and the prediction of the model and passing its value to the gradient descent algorithm for optimization of the parameters.

    11The choice of features for the supervised learning to rank component is a critical point of our solution. We use several word-level features encoded as one-hot vectors, namely: the universal POS-tag, the treebank specific POS tag, the morphology features and the head-status of the word (head of the single-level tree vs. leaf). Furthermore, we included word representations, differentiating between content words and function words: for open-class word lemmas (content words) we added the corresponding language-specific word embedding to the feature vector, from the pre-trained multilingual model Polyglot (Al-Rfou’ et al., 2013). Closed-class word lemmas (function words) are encoded as one-hot bags of words vectors. An implementation of the feature encoding for the word ordering module of our architecture is available online1.

    12In the third step of the word ordering algorithm, we reconstruct the global (i.e. sentence-level) order from the local order of the one-level trees under the hypothesis of projectivity2 — see Basile and Mazzei (2018) for details on this step.

    2.2 Morphology Inflection

    13The second component of our architecture is responsible for the morphology inflection. The task is formulated as an alignment problem between characters that can be modeled with the sequence to sequence paradigm. We use a deep neural network architecture based on a hard attention mechanism. The model has been recently introduced by Aharoni and Goldberg (2017). The model consists of a neural network in an encoder-decoder setting. However, at each step of the training, the model can either write a symbol to the output sequence, or move the attention pointer to the next state of the sequence. This mechanism is meant to model the natural monotonic alignment between the input and output sequences, while allowing the freedom to condition the output on the entire input sequence.

    14We employ all the morphological features provided by the UD annotation and the dependency relation binding the word to its head, that is, we transform the training files into a set of structures ((lemma, features), form) in order to learn the neural inflectional model associating a (lemma, features) to the corresponding form. An example of training instance for our morphology inflection module is the following:

    lemma: artificiale

    features:

    uPoS=ADJ

    xPoS=A

    rel=amod

    Number=Plur

    form: artificiali

    15Corresponding to the word form artificiali, an inflected form (plural) of the lemma artificiale (artificial).

    3 Evaluation

    16In this section, we present an evaluation of the models presented in Section 2, with particular consideration for two crucial points influencing the performances of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer, namely training data and learning parameters settings. In Basile and Mazzei (2018), the hardware limitations did not allow for an extensive experimentation dedicated to the optimization of the realizer performances. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by experimenting with higher computing capabilities, specifically a virtualized GNU/Linux box with 16-core and 64GB of RAM.

    3.1 Training Data

    17For our experiments, we used the four Italian corpora annotated with Universal Dependencies available on the Universal Dependency repositories3. In total, they comprise 270,703 tokens and 12,838 sentences. We have previously used this corpus for the training of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer that participated to the SRST18 competition (Baroni et al., 2009). We refer to this corpus as Gold-SRST18 henceforth.

    18Moreover, we used a larger corpus extracted from ItWaC, a large unannotated corpus of Italian (Baroni et al., 2009). We parsed ItWaC with UDpipe (Straka and Straková, 2017), and selected a random sample of 9,427 sentence (274,115 tokens). We refer to this corpus as Silver-WaC henceforth.

    3.2 Word Ordering Performances

    19We trained the word order prediction module of our system4 on the Gold-SRST18 corpus as well as on the larger corpus created by concatenating Gold-SRST18 and Silver-WaC.

    20The performance of the ListNet algorithm for word ordering is given in terms of average Kendall’s Tau (Kendall, 1938, τ ), a measure of rank correlation used to give a score to each of the rankings predicted by our model for every subtree (Figure 2). τ measures the similarity between two rankings by counting how many pairs of elements are swapped with respect to the original ordering out of all possible pairs of n elements:

    Image 10000000000001190000002274FF68D9.jpg

    21Therefore, τ ranges from -1 to 1.

    22In Figure 2 we reported the τ values obtained at various epochs of learning for both the Gold-SRST18 and Gold-SRST18+Silver-WaC corpora. In particular, in order to investigate the influence of the learning rate parameter (LR) in the learning of the ListNet model, we reported the τ trends for LR=5•10-5 (the value originally used for the official SRST18 submission), LR=5•10-6 and LR=5•10-7. It is quite clear that the value of LR has a great impact on the performance of the word ordering, and that LR=5•10-5 is not appropriate to reach the best performance. This explains the poor performance of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer in the SRST18 competition (Table 1). Indeed, the typical zigzag shape of the curve suggests a sort of loop in the gradient learning algorithm. In contrast, the LR=5•10-6 seems to reach a plateau value after the 100th epoch with both corpora used in the experiments. We used the system tuned with this value of the learning rate to evaluate the global performance of the realizer.

    Figure 2: The trend of the τ value with respect to the ListNet iteration

    Image 10000000000002B60000019A498AFF9C.jpg

    Figure 3: The trend of the Morphology Accuracy on the SRST18 development set with respect to the DNN training epochs

    Image 10000000000002BE000001A3AC2CF37A.jpg

    3.3 Morphology Inflection Performances

    23In order to understand the impact of the Silver-WaC corpus on the global performance of the system, we trained the DNN system for morphology inflection5 both on the Gold-SRST18 corpus and on the larger corpus composed by Gold-SRST18+ Silver-WaC. In Figure 3 we reported the accuracy on the SRST18 development set for both the corpora. A first analysis of the trend shows little improvement to the global performance of the realization from the inclusion of additional data (see the discussion in the next section).

    3.4 Global Surface Realization Performances

    24Finally, we evaluate the end-to-end performance of our systems by combining the output of the two modules and submitting it to the evaluation scorer of the Surface Realization Shared Task. In Table 1 we report the performance of various tests systems with respect to the BLUE-4, DIST, NIST measures, as defined by Mille et al. (2018). The first line reports the official performance of the DipInfo-Unito realizer in the SRST18 for Italian. The last line reports the best performances achieved on Italian by the participants to SRST18 (Mille et al., 2018). The other lines report the performance of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer by considering various combination of the gold and silver corpora. The results show a clear improvement for the word order module (note that the DIST metric is character-based, therefore it is more sensitive to the morphological variation than NIST and BLEU-4). In contrast, the morphology submodule performance seems to be unaffected by the use of a larger training corpus. This effect could be due different causes. Errors are present in the silver standard training set, and it is not clear to what extent the morphology analysis is correct with respect to the syntactic analysis. The other possible cause is the neural model itself. Indeed, Aharoni and Goldberg (2017) report a plateau in performance after feeding it with relatively small datasets. The DipInfo-UniTo realizer performs better than the best systems of the SRST18 challenge for one out of three metrics (NIST).

    Table 1: The performances of the systems with respect to the BLUE-4, DIST, NIST measures

    ListNet

    Morpho

    BLEU-4

    DIST

    NIST

    Gsrst

    Gsrst

    24.61

    36.11

    8.25

    G

    G

    36.40

    32.80

    9.27

    G

    G+S

    36.60

    32.70

    9.30

    G+S

    G

    36.40

    32.80

    9.27

    G+S

    G+S

    36.60

    32.70

    9.30

    -

    -

    44.16

    58.61

    9.11

    4 Conclusion and Future Work

    25In this paper, we considered the problem of analysing the impact of the training data and parameters tuning on the (modular and global) performance of the DipInfo-UniTo realizer. We computationally proved that the DipInfo-UniTo realizer can gives competitive results (i) by augmenting the training data set with automatically annotated sentences, and (ii) by tuning the learning parameters of the neural models.

    26In future work, we intend to resolve the main lack of our approach, that is the impossibility to realize non-projective sentences. Moreover, further optimization of both neural models will be carried out on a new high-performance architecture (Aldinucci et al., 2018), by executing a systematic grid-search over the hyperparameter space, namely the regularization factor and weight initialization for ListNet, and the specific DNN hyperparameters for the morphology module.

    Aknowledgment

    27We thank the GARR consortium which kindly allowed to use to the GARR Cloud Platform6 to run some of the experiments described in this paper. Valerio Basile was partially funded by Progetto di Ateneo/CSP 2016 (Immigrants, Hate and Prejudice in Social Media, S1618_L2_BOSC_01).

    28Alessandro Mazzei was partially supported by the HPC4AI project, funded by the Region Piedmont POR-FESR 2014-20 programme (INFRA-P call).

    Bibliographie

    Roee Aharoni and Yoav Goldberg. 2017. Morphological inflection generation with hard monotonic attention. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2017, pages 2004–2015.

    Rami Al-Rfou’, Bryan Perozzi, and Steven Skiena. 2013. Polyglot: Distributed word representations for multilingual nlp. In CoNLL, pages 183–192. ACL.

    Marco Aldinucci, Sergio Rabellino, Marco Pironti, Filippo Spiga, Paolo Viviani, Maurizio Drocco, Marco Guerzoni, Guido Boella, Marco Mellia, Paolo Margara, Idillio Drago, Roberto Marturano, Guido Marchetto, Elio Piccolo, Stefano Bagnasco, Stefano Lusso, Sara Vallero, Giuseppe Attardi, Alex Barchiesi, Alberto Colla, and Fulvio Galeazzi. 2018. Hpc4ai, an ai-on-demand federated platform endeavour. In ACM Computing Frontiers, Ischia, Italy, May.

    Marco Baroni, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi, and Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3):209–226, September.

    Valerio Basile and Alessandro Mazzei. 2018. The dipinfo-unito system for srst 2018. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Multilingual Surface Realisation, pages 65–71. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Valerio Basile. 2015. From Logic to Language : Natural Language Generation from Logical Forms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands.

    Bernd Bohnet, Anders Björkelund, Jonas Kuhn, Wolfgang Seeker, and Sina Zarrieß. 2012. Generating non-projective word order in statistical linearization. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 928–939. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Zhe Cao, Tao Qin, Tie-Yan Liu, Ming-Feng Tsai, and Hang Li. 2007. Learning to rank: From pairwise approach to listwise approach. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’07, pages 129–136, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

    M. G. Kendall. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1/2):81–93.

    Simon Mille, Anja Belz, Bernd Bohnet, Yvette Graham, Emily Pitler, and Leo Wanner. 2018. The first multilingual surface realisation shared task (sr’18): Overview and evaluation results. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Multilingual Surface Realisation, pages 1–12. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Milan Straka and Jana Straková. 2017. Tokenizing, pos tagging, lemmatizing and parsing ud 2.0 with udpipe. In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies, pages 88–99, Vancouver, Canada, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Notes de bas de page

    1 https://github.com/alexmazzei/ud2ln

    2 As a consequence of the design of our approach, the DipInfo-UniTo realizer cannot predict the correct word order for non-projective sentences.

    3 http://universaldependencies.org/

    4 Our implementation of ListNet featuring a regularization parameter to prevent overfitting is available at https://github.com/valeriobasile/listnet

    5 An implementation of the model by [Aharoni and Goldberg, 2017] is freely available as https://github.com/roeeaharoni/morphological-reinflection

    6 https://cloud.garr.it

    Auteurs

    • Valerio Basile

      Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10153 Torino – basile[at]di.unito.it.com

    • Alessandro Mazzei

      Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10153 Torino – mazzei[at]di.unito.it

    Précédent Suivant
    Table des matières

    Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

    Voir plus de livres
    Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015

    Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015

    3-4 December 2015, Trento

    Cristina Bosco, Sara Tonelli et Fabio Massimo Zanzotto (dir.)

    2015

    Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016

    Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016

    5-6 December 2016, Napoli

    Anna Corazza, Simonetta Montemagni et Giovanni Semeraro (dir.)

    2016

    EVALITA. Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    EVALITA. Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    Proceedings of the Final Workshop 7 December 2016, Naples

    Pierpaolo Basile, Franco Cutugno, Malvina Nissim et al. (dir.)

    2016

    Proceedings of the Fourth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2017

    Proceedings of the Fourth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2017

    11-12 December 2017, Rome

    Roberto Basili, Malvina Nissim et Giorgio Satta (dir.)

    2017

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    10-12 December 2018, Torino

    Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei et Fabio Tamburini (dir.)

    2018

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    Proceedings of the Final Workshop 12-13 December 2018, Naples

    Tommaso Caselli, Nicole Novielli, Viviana Patti et al. (dir.)

    2018

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian - December 17th, 2020

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian - December 17th, 2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian Final Workshop

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Maro et al. (dir.)

    2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2020

    Bologna, Italy, March 1-3, 2021

    Felice Dell'Orletta, Johanna Monti et Fabio Tamburini (dir.)

    2020

    Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CliC-it 2021

    Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CliC-it 2021

    Milan, Italy, 26-28 January, 2022

    Elisabetta Fersini, Marco Passarotti et Viviana Patti (dir.)

    2022

    Voir plus de livres
    1 / 9
    Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015

    Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015

    3-4 December 2015, Trento

    Cristina Bosco, Sara Tonelli et Fabio Massimo Zanzotto (dir.)

    2015

    Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016

    Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016

    5-6 December 2016, Napoli

    Anna Corazza, Simonetta Montemagni et Giovanni Semeraro (dir.)

    2016

    EVALITA. Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    EVALITA. Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    Proceedings of the Final Workshop 7 December 2016, Naples

    Pierpaolo Basile, Franco Cutugno, Malvina Nissim et al. (dir.)

    2016

    Proceedings of the Fourth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2017

    Proceedings of the Fourth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2017

    11-12 December 2017, Rome

    Roberto Basili, Malvina Nissim et Giorgio Satta (dir.)

    2017

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    10-12 December 2018, Torino

    Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei et Fabio Tamburini (dir.)

    2018

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian

    Proceedings of the Final Workshop 12-13 December 2018, Naples

    Tommaso Caselli, Nicole Novielli, Viviana Patti et al. (dir.)

    2018

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian - December 17th, 2020

    EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian - December 17th, 2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian Final Workshop

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Maro et al. (dir.)

    2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2020

    Proceedings of the Seventh Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2020

    Bologna, Italy, March 1-3, 2021

    Felice Dell'Orletta, Johanna Monti et Fabio Tamburini (dir.)

    2020

    Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CliC-it 2021

    Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CliC-it 2021

    Milan, Italy, 26-28 January, 2022

    Elisabetta Fersini, Marco Passarotti et Viviana Patti (dir.)

    2022

    Voir plus de chapitres

    Building a computational lexicon by using SQL

    Alessandro Mazzei

    Long-term Social Media Data Collection at the University of Turin

    Valerio Basile, Mirko Lai et Manuela Sanguinetti

    Generare messaggi persuasivi per una dieta salutare

    Alessandro Mazzei

    Domain Adaptation for Text Classification with Weird Embeddings

    Valerio Basile

    EVALITA 2020: Overview of the 7th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Di Maro et al.

    Preface to the EVALITA 2020 Proceedings

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Di Maro et al.

    Deep Tweets: from Entity Linking to Sentiment Analysis

    Pierpaolo Basile, Valerio Basile, Malvina Nissim et al.

    Preface

    Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei et Fabio Tamburini

    Hate Speech and Topic Shift in the Covid-19 Public Discourse on Social Media in Italy

    Komal Florio, Valerio Basile et Viviana Patti

    Argument Mining on Italian News Blogs

    Pierpaolo Basile, Valerio Basile, Elena Cabrio et al.

    Hurtlex: A Multilingual Lexicon of Words to Hurt

    Elisa Bassignana, Valerio Basile et Viviana Patti

    Overview of the Evalita 2016 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task

    Francesco Barbieri, Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce et al.

    Voir plus de chapitres
    1 / 12

    Building a computational lexicon by using SQL

    Alessandro Mazzei

    Long-term Social Media Data Collection at the University of Turin

    Valerio Basile, Mirko Lai et Manuela Sanguinetti

    Generare messaggi persuasivi per una dieta salutare

    Alessandro Mazzei

    Domain Adaptation for Text Classification with Weird Embeddings

    Valerio Basile

    EVALITA 2020: Overview of the 7th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Di Maro et al.

    Preface to the EVALITA 2020 Proceedings

    Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce, Maria Di Maro et al.

    Deep Tweets: from Entity Linking to Sentiment Analysis

    Pierpaolo Basile, Valerio Basile, Malvina Nissim et al.

    Preface

    Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei et Fabio Tamburini

    Hate Speech and Topic Shift in the Covid-19 Public Discourse on Social Media in Italy

    Komal Florio, Valerio Basile et Viviana Patti

    Argument Mining on Italian News Blogs

    Pierpaolo Basile, Valerio Basile, Elena Cabrio et al.

    Hurtlex: A Multilingual Lexicon of Words to Hurt

    Elisa Bassignana, Valerio Basile et Viviana Patti

    Overview of the Evalita 2016 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task

    Francesco Barbieri, Valerio Basile, Danilo Croce et al.

    Accès ouvert

    Accès ouvert

    ePub

    PDF

    PDF du chapitre

    1 https://github.com/alexmazzei/ud2ln

    2 As a consequence of the design of our approach, the DipInfo-UniTo realizer cannot predict the correct word order for non-projective sentences.

    3 http://universaldependencies.org/

    4 Our implementation of ListNet featuring a regularization parameter to prevent overfitting is available at https://github.com/valeriobasile/listnet

    5 An implementation of the model by [Aharoni and Goldberg, 2017] is freely available as https://github.com/roeeaharoni/morphological-reinflection

    6 https://cloud.garr.it

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    X Facebook Email

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Ce livre est cité par

    • Leoni, Chiara. Coccoli, Mauro. Torre, Ilaria. Vercelli, Gianni. (2020) Lecture Notes in Computer Science Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62365-4_34
    • Artese, Maria Teresa. Ciocca, Gianluigi. Gagliardi, Isabella. (2021) Lecture Notes in Computer Science Pattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68821-9_53
    • Konat, Barbara. Gajewska, Ewelina. Rossa, Wiktoria. (2024) Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions. Argumentation, 38. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-024-09631-2
    • Konat, Barbara. (2025) Argumentation Library Emotional Appeals in Argumentation. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-06332-8_8

    Ce chapitre est cité par

    • Mazzei, Alessandro. Cerrato, Mattia. Esposito, Roberto. Basile, Valerio. (2021) Ranking Algorithms for Word Ordering in Surface Realization. Information, 12. DOI: 10.3390/info12080337

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Vous pouvez vous connecter à votre bibliothèque à l’adresse suivante : https://freemium.openedition.org/oebooks

    Suggérer l’acquisition à votre bibliothèque

    Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez nous écrire à access[at]openedition.org

    Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

    Vérifiez si votre bibliothèque a déjà acquis ce livre : authentifiez-vous à OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

    Vous pouvez suggérer à votre bibliothèque d’acquérir un ou plusieurs livres publiés sur OpenEdition Books. N’hésitez pas à lui indiquer nos coordonnées : access[at]openedition.org

    Vous pouvez également nous indiquer, à l’aide du formulaire suivant, les coordonnées de votre bibliothèque afin que nous la contactions pour lui suggérer l’achat de ce livre. Les champs suivis de (*) sont obligatoires.

    Veuillez, s’il vous plaît, remplir tous les champs.

    La syntaxe de l’email est incorrecte.

    Référence numérique du chapitre

    Format

    Basile, V., & Mazzei, A. (2018). Neural Surface Realization for Italian. In E. Cabrio, A. Mazzei, & F. Tamburini (éds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018. Torino: Accademia University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.3079
    Basile, Valerio, et Alessandro Mazzei. « Neural Surface Realization for Italian ». In Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-It 2018, édité par Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei, et Fabio Tamburini. Torino: Accademia University Press, 2018. doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.3079.
    Basile, Valerio, et Alessandro Mazzei. « Neural Surface Realization for Italian ». Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-It 2018, édité par Elena Cabrio et al., Accademia University Press, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.3079.

    Référence numérique du livre

    Format

    Cabrio, E., Mazzei, A., & Tamburini, F. (éds.). (2018). Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018. Torino: Accademia University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.2802
    Cabrio, Elena, Alessandro Mazzei, et Fabio Tamburini, éd. Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-It 2018. Torino: Accademia University Press, 2018. doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.2802.
    Cabrio, Elena, et al., éditeurs. Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-It 2018. Accademia University Press, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.2802.
    Compatible avec Zotero Zotero

    1 / 3

    Accademia University Press

    Accademia University Press

    • Plan du site
    • Se connecter

    Suivez-nous

    • Facebook
    • Flux RSS

    URL : http://www.aaccademia.it/

    Email : info@aaccademia.it

    Adresse :

    Accademia University Press

    Via Carlo Alberto 55

    I‐10123

    Torino

    Italia

    OpenEdition
    • Candidater à OpenEdition Books
    • Connaître le programme OpenEdition Freemium
    • Commander des livres
    • S’abonner à la lettre d’OpenEdition
    • CGU d’OpenEdition Books
    • Accessibilité : partiellement conforme
    • Données personnelles
    • Gestion des cookies
    • Système de signalement