Version classiqueVersion mobile
OpenEdition Books

Language Testing Reconsidered

Janna Fox
Mari Wesche
Doreen Bayliss
et al.


Texte intégral

Abanomey, A. (2002). The effect of texts’ authenticity on reading-comprehension test-taking strategies used by adult Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.

Abedi, J. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4–14.

ACTFL proficiency guidelines. (1983). Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

ACTFL. (1985). ACTFL Proficiency guidelines (revised). Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL Materials Center.

Alderson, J. C. (1981a). Reaction to the Morrow paper (3). In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes (eds.), Issues in language testing (pp. 45–54). ELT documents 111. London: British Council.

Alderson, J. C. (1981b). Report of the discussion on communicative language testing. In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes (eds.). Issues in language testing (pp. 55–65). ELT documents 111. London: British Council.

Alderson, J. C. (1983). Response to Harrison: Who needs jam? In A. Hughes & D. Porter (eds.). Current developments in language testing (pp. 87–92). London: Academic Press.

Alderson, J. C. (1991). Bands and scores. In J. C. Alderson & B. North (eds.). Language testing in the 1990s: The communicative legacy (pp. 71–86). London: Modern English Publications, in association with Macmillan.

Alderson, J. C. (1993). Judgments in language testing. In D. Douglas & C. Chapelle (eds.), A new decade of language testing (pp. 46–57). Arlington. VA: TESOL.

Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.

Alderson, J. C., Figueras, N., Kuijper, H., Nold, G., Takala. S. & Tardieu, C. (2004). The development of specifications for item development and classification within the Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Reading and listening. Final Report of the Dutch CEF Construct Project. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

Alderson, J. C, Figueras, N., Nold. G., North, B., Takala, S. & Tardieu. C. (2006). Analysing tests of reading and listening in relation to the Common European Framework of Reference: The experience of the Dutch CEFR Construct Project. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(1). 3–30.

Alderson, J. C. & Hughes, A. (eds.). (1981). Issues in language testing. London: British Council.

Allan, A. (1992). Development and validation of a scale to measure test-wiseness in EFL/ESL reading test-takers. Language Testing, 9(2), 101–122.

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.

Anderson, N. J. (1989). Reading comprehension tests versus academic reading: What are second language readers doing? PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal,75(4), 460–472.

Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L. E, Perkins, K. & Cohen, A. D. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources. Language Testing,8(1), 41–66.

Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17, 1–42.

Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 453–476.

Bachman, L. F. (May, 2004). Some current trends and issues in language assessment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Tertiary/College English Teaching, Nanjing, China.

Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1–34.

Bachman, L. F. (2006). Generalizability: A journey into the nature of empirical research in applied linguistics. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle & P. Duff (eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple perspectives (pp. 165–207). Dordrecht: John Benjamins.

Bachman, L. F. & Cohen, A. D. (eds.) (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. (1980). The construct validation of oral proficiency tests. TESL Studies, 3, 1–20.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. (1981). The construct validation of the FSI oral interview. Language Learning, 31(1), 67–86.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bailey, A. L. & Butler, F. A. (2004). Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of English language learners K–12. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1, 177–193.

Banerjee, J. & Franceschina, F. (February 2006). Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels. Paper presented at the ESF SCSS Exploratory Workshop “Bridging the gap between research on second language acquisition and research on language testing,” Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Banerjee, J. & Luoma, S. (1997). Qualitative approaches to test validation. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (pp. 275–287). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

Barnwell, D. (1996). A history of foreign language testing in the United States: From its beginnings to the present. Tempe. AZ: Bilingual Press.

Bennett, R. E. (1998). Reinventing assessment: Speculations on the future of large-scale educational testing. Princeton. NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centred assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. In N. Bird, P. Falvey, A. B. M. Tsui, D. Allison & A. McNeill (eds.), Language and learning (pp. 73–94). Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Education, Hong Kong Department of Education.

Brindley, G. (1998). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programmes: A review of the issues. Language Testing. 15(1), 45–85.

Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393–407.

Brindley, G. & Ross, S. (2001). EAP assessment: Issues, models and outcomes. In M. Peacock & J. Flowerdew (eds.). English for academic purposes, pp. 148–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brindley, G. & Slatyer. H. (2002). Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 369–394.

Broadfoot. P. (2005). Dark alleys and blind bends: Testing the language of learning. Language Testing, 22(2), 123–141.

Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20(1), 1–25.

Brown, A. (2005). Interviewer variability in language proficiency interviews. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Brown, A. & McNamara, T. (2004). ‘The devil is in the detail’: Researching gender issues in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly 38(3), 524–538.

Brown, J. D., Hudson. T., Norris, J. & Bonk, W. (2002). An investigation of second language task-based performance assessments. SLTCC Technical Report 24. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Butler, F. A., & Stevens, R. (2001). Standardised assessment of the content knowledge of English language learners K–12: Current trends and old dilemmas. Language Testing, 18(4), 409–427.

Byrnes, H. (2005). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 248–282

Campbell, D. & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly,3(3), 229–242.

Canale, M. (1983). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. W. Oller, Jr. (ed.), Issues in language testing research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (eds.), Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Carroll, J. B. (1953). Some principles of language testing: Report of the fourth annual roundtable meeting on languages and linguistics. Washington, DC: Institute of Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University.

Carroll, J. B. (1961). Fundamental considerations in testing for English proficiency of foreign students. In Testing the English proficiency of foreign students (pp. 30–40). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Carroll, J. B. (1968). The psychology of language testing. In A. Davies (ed.), Language testing symposium: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 46–69). London: Oxford University Press.

Carroll, J. B. (1973). Foreign language testing: Will the persistent problems persist? In M. O’Brien (ed.), Testing in second language teaching: New dimensions (pp. 6–17). Dublin: ATESOL-Ireland.

Carroll, J. B. (1980). Testing communicative performance. London: Pergamon.

Carroll, J. B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. In J. W. Oller, Jr. (ed.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 80–105). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Carroll, J. B. (1986). LT+25, and beyond. Language Testing, 3(2), 123–129.

Carroll, J. B., Carton, A. S. & Wilds, C. (1959). An investigation of “cloze” items in the measurement of achievement in foreign languages. Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Research in Instruction, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University.

Center for Applied Linguistics. (1961). Testing the English proficiency of foreign students. Report of a conference sponsored by the Center for Applied Linguistics in cooperation with the Institute of International Education and the National Association of Foreign Student Advisers. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Chalhoub-Deville, M. (1995). A contextualized approach to describing oral language proficiency. Language Learning, 45(2), 251–281.

Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20(4), 369–383.

Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Deville, C. (2005). A look back at and forward to what language testers measure. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 815–831). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Tarone, E. (1996). What is the role of specific contexts in second language acquisition, teaching and testing? Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

Chamot, A. & O’Malley, J. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Chapelle, C. (1994). Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research? Second Language Research, 10, 157–187.

Chapelle, C. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cheng, L., Rogers, W. T. & Hu. H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3). 360–389.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Gravenhage: Mouton.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clapham, C. (1996). The development of IELTS: A study of the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension. Studies in Language Testing, 4. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Clark, J. L. D. (1972). Foreign language testing: Theory and practice. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.

Clark, J. L. D. (1975). Theoretical and technical considerations in oral proficiency testing. In R. Jones & B. Spolsky (eds.), Testing language proficiency (pp. 10–24). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Clark, J. L. D. (1979). Direct vs. semi-direct tests of speaking ability. In E. Brière & F. Hinofotis (eds.). Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties: A diagnostic survey with recovery procedures. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.

Cohen, A. D. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Cohen, A. D. (1984). On taking language tests: What the students report. Language Testing, 1(1), 70–81.

Cohen, A. D. (2000). Exploring strategies in test-taking: Fine-tuning verbal reports from respondents. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 127–150). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen, A. D. (In press). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, A. D. & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. A research report under the auspices of Brandéis University and submitted to the Jacob Hiatt Institute, Jerusalem. Educational Resources Information Center. ED 163 753, 47 pp.

Cohen, A. D. & Brooks-Carson. A. (2001). Research on direct vs. translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. Modern Language Journal, 85(2). 169–188.

Cohen, A. D. & Macaro, E. (eds.) (In press). Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, A. D., Segal, M. & Weiss Bar-Siman-Tov, R. (1985). The C-test in Hebrew. In C. Klein-Braley & U. Raatz (eds.). C-Test s in der Praxis (pp. 121–127). AKS Rundbrief Special Issue 13/14. Bochum, Germany: Ruhr-Universitiit Bochum.

Cohen. A. D. & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Monograph No. 33. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved October 20, 2006:

Cooper, R. L. (1968). An elaborated language testing model. Language Learning (Special issue No. 7), 57–72.

Council of Europe. (2001). A Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coxhead, A. (1998). An academic word list. English Language Institute Occasional Publication, No. 18. Wellington: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.

Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (1993a). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (1993b). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Cunningham, J. & Moore, D. (1993). The contribution of understanding academic vocabulary to answering comprension questions. Journal of Reading Behaviors, 25, 171–180.

Darnell, D. K. (1968). The development of an English language proficiency test of foreign students, using a clozentropy procedure (Final report, Project #7-8-010, Grant OEG-8-070010-200(057)).

Darnell, D. K. (1970). Clozentropy: A procedure for testing English language proficiency of foreign students. Speech monographs, 37, 36–46.

Davidson, F. & Cho, Y. (2001). Issues in EAP Test Development: What one institutions and its history tell us. In M. Peacock & J. Flowerdew (eds.), English for academic purposes, pp. 286–297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, A. (1965). Proficiency in English as a second language. PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham.

Davies, A. (1977). The construction of language tests. In J. P. B. Allen & A. Davies (eds.), Testing and experimental methods (pp. 38–104). London: Oxford University Press.

Davies, A. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Davies. A. (2007). Assessing academic English: Testing English proficiency 1950–2005: The IELTS solution, Studies in Language Testing, 23. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Davies, A. (ed.). (1968). Language testing symposium: a psycholinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dollerup, C, Glahn, E. & Rosenberg Hansen, C. (1982). Reading strategies and testsolving techniques in an EFL-reading comprehension test: A preliminary report. Journal of Applied Language Study, 1(1), 9399.

Douglas, D. (1978). Simplified clozentropy: An analysis of L1 and L2 responses to reading texts. In V. Kohonen & N. E. Enkvist (eds.), Text linguistics, cognitive learning and language teaching (pp. 223238). Turku: Finnish Association of Applied Linguistics.

Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing language for specific purposes: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Douglas, D. & Hegelheimer, V. (2005). Cognitive processes and use of knowledge in performing new TOEFL listening tasks. 2nd Interim Report to Educational Testing Service. Ames: Iowa State University.

Eades. D. (2005). Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics,26(4). 503526.

Eades, D., Fraser, H., Siegel. J., McNamara, T. & Baker, B. (2003). Linguistic identification in the determination of nationality: A preliminary report. Language Policy, 2(2), 179-199.

Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Edelenbos, P. & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of’diagnostic competence’. Language Testing, 21(3), 259283.

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1888). The statistics of examinations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 51, 599635.

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1890). The element of chance in competitive examinations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 55, 644663.

Educational Testing Service. (1982). ETS oral proficiency manual. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.

Educational Testing Service. (1995). TOEFL test preparation kit. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Educational Testing Service. (2002). LanguEdge Courseware: Handbook for scoring speaking and writing. Princeton. NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Elder, C., Iwashita, N. & McNamara, T. (2002). Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: What does the test-taker have to offer? Language Testing, 19(4), 347368.

English Language Testing Service (ELTS). (1980). London: British Council.

English Proficiency Test Battery (EPTB). (1964). Short version form A, parts 1 and 2. London: British Council.

Enright, M. K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M. (2000). TOEFL 2000: Reading Framework: A working paper. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

Evans, B. & Hornberger, N. (2005). Child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4(1), 6785.

Falvey, P. & Shaw, S. (2006). 1ELTS Writing: Revising assessment criteria and scales (Phase 5). Research Notes, 23 (February), pp. 813, University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.

Farhady, H. (1983). On the plausibility of the unitary language proficiency factor. In J. W. Oller, Jr. (ed.). Issues in language testing research (pp. 1128). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Finoccchiaro, M. & Sako, S. (1983). Foreign language testing: A practical approach. New York: Regents.

Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language. Rowley, MA: Newbury.

Fishman, J. A., Cooper, R. L. & Ma, R. (1971). Bilingualism in the barrio. Bloomington, IN: Research Center for the Language Sciences, Indiana University.

Flowerdew, J. (1993). Concordancing as a tool in course design. System, 21, 231244.

Forster, D. E. & Karn, R. (1998). Teaching TOEIC/TOEFL test-taking strategies. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Seattle, WA, March 1721, 1998. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427543)

Foucault, M. (1972 [1969]). The archaeology of knowledge, trans. A. M. S. Smith. London: Routledge. [Originally published as L’archeologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard (1969).]

Foucault, M. (1977 [1975]). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, trans. A. Sheridan. London: Allen Lane. [Originally published as Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Éditions Gallimard (1975).]

Franceschina, F. (2006). Introducing LANCAWE (Lancaster Corpus of Academic Written English). Paper presented at the Learner Corpus Colloquium, Learner Corpus Research Easter School, April 3, 2006. Centre for English Corpus Linguistics, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Fulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13(2), 208238.

Fulcher, G. (2004a). Are Europe’s tests being built on an’unsafe’framework. Education Guardian, March 18.

Fulcher, G. (2004b). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly 1(4), 253266.

Gaies, S., Gradman, H. & Spolsky, B. (1977). Towards the measurement of functional proficiency: Contextualization of the noise test. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 5157.

Gibbons, P. (1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12, 99118.

Gordon, C. (1987). The effect of testing method on achievement in reading comprehension tests in English as a foreign language. MA thesis, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.

Graduateshotline. (2006). TOEFL. Retrieved January 29, 2007:

Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook, Studies in Language Testing, 5. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Grotjahn, R. (1986). Test validation and cognitive psychology: Some methodological considerations. Language Testing, 3(2), 159185.

Grotjahn, R. (1987). How to construct and evaluate a C-Test: A discussion of some problems and some statistical analyses. In R. Grotjahn, C. Klein-Braley, & D. K. Stevenson (eds.), Taking their measure: The validity and validation of language tests (pp. 219254). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer.

Hamp-Lyons, L. & Kroll, B. (1997). TOEFL 2000: Writing, composition, community and assessment. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (ed.). (1991). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Harris, D. (1969). Testing English as a second language. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Harrison, A. (1983). Communicative testing: Jam tomorrow? In A. Hughes & D. Porter (eds.), Current developments in language testing (pp. 7786). London: Academic Press.

Hartog, P. & Rhodes, E. C. (1935). An Examination of examinations, being a summary of investigations on comparison of marks allotted to examination scripts by independent examiners and boards of examiners, together with a section on viva voce examinations. London: Macmillan.

Hartog, P. & Rhodes. E. C. (1936). The marks of examiners, being a comparison of marks allotted to examination scripts by independent examiners and boards of examiners. together with a section on viva voce examinations. London: Macmillan and Company Ltd.

Hawkey, R. (2006). Impact Theory and practice: Studies of IELTS and Progetto Lingue 2000, Studies in Language Testing. 24. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

He. A. & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. Young & A. He (eds.). Talking and testing (pp. 124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Heaton, J. (1975). Writing English language tests. London: Longman.

Heaton, J. (1988). Writing English language tests. 2nd ed. London: Longman.

Hill, A. A. (ed.). (1953). Report of the fourth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language teaching. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research. 67(f), 88140.

Holtzman, P. (1967). English language proficiency testing and the individual. In D. Wigglesworth (éd.). ATESL Conference Papers (pp. 7684). Los Altos, CA: Language Research Associates Press.

Homburg, T.J. & Spaan. M. C. (1981). ESL Reading proficiency assessment: Testing strategies. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (eds.), On TESOL ’81 (pp. 2533). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Hughes, A. & Porter, D. (eds.). (1983). Current developments in language testing. London: Academic Press.

Huhta. A., Luoma, S., Osearson. M.. Sajavaara, K., Takala. S. & Teasdale. A. (2002). DIALANG: A diagnostic language assessment system for adult learners. In J. C. Alderson (ed.). Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning. teaching, assessment. Case studies (pp. 130145). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Hyland. K. (2004). Patterns of engagement: Dialogic features and L2 undergraduate writing. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (eds.). Analysing academic writing (pp. 523). London: Continuum.

International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (1989; revised 1995). Cambridge: UCLES; London: British Council; Canberra: IDP

ILTA Code of Ethics for Foreign/Second Language Testing. (2000). Vancouver. B.C.: International Language Testing Association.

Irvine, P., Atai. P. & Oller, J.W., Jr. (1974). Cloze, dictation and the test of English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 24. 245252.

Jacoby. S. & McNamara, T. (1999). Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3). 213241.

Jacoby, S. & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 28. 171183.

Jamieson, J., Jones, S., Kirsch, I., Mosenthal, P. & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 framework: A working paper. TOEFL Monograph Series MS-16. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Jones, R. (1979a). Performance testing of second language proficiency. In E. Brière & F. Hinofotis (eds.), Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies (pp. 5057). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Jones, R. (1979b). The oral interview of the Foreign Service Institute. In B. Spolsky (ed.), Some major tests (pp. 104–115). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Jones, R. (1985a). Second language performance testing: An overview. In P. Hauptman, R. LeBlanc & M. Wesche (eds.), Second language performance testing (pp. 1524). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Jones, R. (1985b). Some basic considerations in testing oral proficiency. In Y. Lee, A. Fok, R. Lord & G. Low (eds.), New directions in language testing (pp. 7784). Oxford: Pergamon.

Kaftandjieva, F. & Takala, S. (2006). The mapping sentence guide to the galaxy of ‘can dos’. Retrieved June 29, 2006:

Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validation. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527553.

Klein-Braley, C. (1985). A close-up on the C test: A study in the construct validation of authentic tests. Language Testing, 2(1), 76104.

Klein-Braley, C. (1997). C-tests in the context of reduced redundancy testing: An appraisal. Language Testing, 14(1), 4784.

Klein-Braley, C. & Raatz, U. (1984). A survey of research on the C-Test. Language Testing, 1(2), 134146.

König, K. & Perchinig, B. (2005). Austria. In J. Niessen, Y. Schibel & C. Thompson (eds.), Current immigration debates in Europe: A publication of the European Migration Dialogue. Retrieved January 11, 2007:

Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366372.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

Kunnan, A. J. (2005a). 40 years in applied linguistics: An interview with Alan Davies. Language Assessment Quarterly,2(1), 3550.

Kunnan, A. J. (2005b). Language assessment from a wider context. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 779794). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.

Language and National Origin Group. (2004). Guidelines for the use of language analysis in relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 261–266.

Latham, H. (1877). On the action of examinations considered as a means of selection. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell and Company.

Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests, Studies in Language Testing, 14. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Lazaraton, A. (2003). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in applied linguistics: Whose criteria and whose research? Modern Language Journal, 87. 1–12.

Lazaraton, A. (2004). Qualitative research methods in language test development and validation. In M. Milanovic & C. Weir (eds.), European language testing in a global context: Proceedings of the ALTE Barcelona Conference, July 2001. Studies in Language Testing, 18 (pp. 51–71). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Lazaraton, A. & Frantz, R. (1997). An analysis of the relationship between task features and candidate output for the Revised FCE Speaking Test. Unpublished report for Cambridge ESOL.

Leung, C. & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3). 335359.

Levin, T., Shohamy, E., & Spolsky, B. (2003). Academic achievements of immigrants in schools. Report submitted to the Ministry of Education. Tel Aviv University [in Hebrew].

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Long, M. &Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56.

Lowry, D. T. & Marr, T. J. (1975). Clozentropy as a Measure of International Communication Comprehension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39. 301.

Lumley, T. & Brown, A. (2004a). Test-taker and rater perspectives on integrated reading and writing tasks in the Next Generation TOEFL. Language Testing Update, 35, 75–79.

Lumley, T. & Brown. A. (2004b). Test taker response to integrated reading/writing tasks in TOEFL: Evidence from writers, texts, and raters. Final Report to ETS. Language Testing Research Centre, University of Melbourne.

Lumley, T. & Brown, A. (2005). Research methods in language testing. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 833–855). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Madsen, H. (1983). Techniques in testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McNamara, T. (1995). Modelling performance: Opening Pandora’s box. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 159-175.

McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.

McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349.

McNamara, T., Hill, K. & May, L. (2002). Discourse and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 221–242.

McNamara, T. & Lumley, T. (1997). The effect of interlocutor and assessment mode variables in overseas assessments of speaking skills in occupational settings. Language Testing, 14(2), 140-156.

McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.

Macaulay, T. B. (1853). Speeches, parliamentary and miscellaneous. London: Henry Vizetelly.

Madaus, G. F. & Kellaghan, T. (1991). Student examination systems in the European community: Lessons for the United States (Contractor Report submitted to the Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress).

Marinelli, V. (2005). The Netherlands. In J. Niessen, Y. Schibel & C. Thompson (eds.), Current immigration debates in Europe: A publication of the European Migration Dialogue. Retrieved January 11, 2007:

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). 3rd ed. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing.

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessment. Educational Researcher, 23, 13–23.

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(4), 241–257.

Milanovic, M. & Saville, N. (1994). An investigation of marking strategies using verbal protocols. Paper presented at 16th Language Testing Research Colloquium, March 1994, in Washington, DC.

Milanovic, M. & Saville, N. (1996). Introduction. In M. Milanovic & N. Saville (eds.), Performance, testing, cognition and assessment: Selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Cambridge and Arnhem, Studies in Language Testing, 3 (pp. 92–114). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Milanovic, M., Saville, N. & Shuhong, S. (1996). A study of the decision-making behaviour of composition markers. In M. Milanovic & N. Saville (eds.), Performance, testing, cognition and assessment: Selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Studies in Language Testing, 3 (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Monroe, P. (ed.). (1939). Conference on examinations under the auspices of the Carnegie Corporation, the Carnegie Foundation, the International Institute of Teachers College, Columbia University, at the Hotel Royal, Dinard, France, September 16th to 19th, 1938. New York City: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: revolution or evolution? In C. J. Brumfit & K. Johnson (eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching (pp. 143–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morrow, K. (1981). Communicative language testing: Revolution or evolution? In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes (eds.), Issues in language testing (pp. 9–25). London: British Council.

Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle & Heinle.

Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6(2), 199–215.

No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Public Law 107-110 (January 8, 2002). United States Congress.

Norris, J., Brown, J. D., Hudson. T. & Yoshioka, J. (1998). Designing second language performance assessments. SLTCC Technical Report 18. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

Nyhus. S. E. (1994). Attitudes of non-native speakers of English toward the use of verbal report to elicit their reading comprehension strategies. Plan B masters paper, Department of English as a Second Language, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Oller, J. W.. Jr. (1972). Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 56, 151–158.

Oller, J. W., Jr. (1975). Research with cloze procedures in measuring the proficiency of non-native speakers of English: An annotated bibliography. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics.

Oller, J. W., Jr. (1976). Evidence of a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. Die neuren sprachen, 76, 165–174.

Oller, J. W., Jr. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.

Oller, J. W., Jr. (1983). A consensus for the eighties? In J.W. Oller, Jr. (éd.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 351–356). Rowley. MA: Newbury House.

Oller, J. W., Jr. & Hinofotis, F. (1980). Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about second language ability: Indivisible or partially divisible competence? In J.W. Oller, Jr. & K. Perkins (eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 13-23). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.

Palmer, A.. Groot, P. & Trosper, G. (eds.). (1981). The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington. DC: TESOL.

Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics. 15(2), 115–138.

Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56.

Pomerantz, A. & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van dijk (ed.). Discourse as social action, discourse studies: A multidisciplinarv introduction (pp. 64–91). London: Sage.

Pope, A. (1711). An essay on criticism. London: Lewis.

Psychological Corporation. (1997). Language Aptitude Battery for the Japanese. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test-takers’cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289–325.

Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test-takers: A structural equation modelling approach. Language Testing, 15(3), 333-379.

Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach, Studies in Language Testing, 8. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

QSR International (2005). NVivo 6 [software program].

Raatz, U. & Klein-Braley, C. (1981). The C-test: A modification of the cloze procedure. In T. Culhane, C. Klein-Braley, & D. K. Stevenson (eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 113–138). University of Essex Occasional Papers 4. Colchester: Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.

Ravelli, L. J. & Ellis, R. A. (eds.). (2004). Analysing academic writing. London: Continuum.

Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429–462.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Read, J. & Chapelle, C. (2001). A framework for second language assessment. Language Testing, 18(l), 1-32.

Reath, A. (2004). Language analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity, and consequences. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 209-233.

Resnick, L. (ed.). (1993). Cognition and instruction, 10(2/3).

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rivera, C. (ed.). (1983). An ethnographic/sociolinguistic approach to language proficiency assessment. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Rivera, C. (ed.). (1984). Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: Research and application. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Roach, J. O. (1945). Some problems of oral examinations in modern languages: An experimental approach based on the Cambridge Examinations in English for foreign students, being a report circulated to oral examiners and local examiners for those examinations. Cambridge: Local Examinations Syndicate.

Rogers, W.T. & Bateson, D. J. (1991). The influence of test-wiseness on the performance of high school seniors on school leaving examinations. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 159–183.

Roth, W. (1998). Situated cognition and assessment of competence in science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 155–169.

Saloman, G. & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.

Sarig, G. (1987). High-level reading in the first and in the foreign language: Some comparative process data. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 105-123). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Saville. N. (2000). Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks. Research Notes, 2 (August), pp. 16–17. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

Saville, N. & Kunnan, A. J. (2006). People and events in language testing: A sort of memoir: An interview with Bernard Spolsky. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 243–266.

Saville, N. & O’Sullivan, B. (2000). Developing observation checklists for speaking-tests. Research Notes, 3 (November), pp. 6–10. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Jacoby. S. & Olsher. D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3–31.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2). 4–13.

Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1963), The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.

Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow, UK: Pearson Educational.

Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.

Shohamy, E.. Reves, T. & Bejeruno, Y. (1986). Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency. English Language Teaching Journal, 40(3). 212-220.

Short, D. (1994). Expanding middle school horizons: Integrating language, culture and social studies. TESOL Quarterly. 28, 581-608.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Snow, M. A. (2005). A model of academic literacy for integrated language and content instruction. In E. Hinkel (ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and research, pp. 693-712. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Solano-Flores. G. & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2). 3-13.

Song, W. (2004). Language learner strategy use and English proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery (pp. 1-26). Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 3. Retrieved October 20.2006:

Spolsky, B. (1967). Do they know enough English? In D. Wigglesworth (ed.), ATESL Selected Conference Papers. Washington. DC: NAFSA Studies and Papers, English Language Series.

Spolsky, B. (1971). Reduced redundancy as a language testing tool. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.), Applications of linguistics: Selected papers of the Second International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge, September 1969 (pp. 383-390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spolsky, B. (1973). What does it mean to know a language, or how do you get someone to perform his competence? In J. W. Oller Jr. & J. C. Richards (eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher (pp. 164–176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

Spolsky, B. (1977). Language testing: Art or science. In G. Nickel (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (pp. 7–28). Stuttgart: Hochschulverlag.

Spolsky, B. (1978). Introduction: Linguists and language testers. In B. Spolsky (ed.), Approaches to language testing (pp. v–x). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Spolsky, B. (1981). Some ethical questions about language testing. In C. Klein-Braley & D. Stevenson (eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 5-30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Spolsky, B. (1984). The uses of language tests: An ethical envoi. In C. Rivera (ed.), Placement procedures in bilingual education: Education and policy issues (pp. 3–7). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Spolsky, B. (1985). What does it mean to know how to use a language: An essay on the theoretical basis of language testing. Language Testing, 2(2), 180-191.

Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words: The development of objective language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Spolsky, B. (1996). Robert Lado, 1915-1995. Language Testing Update, 19, 66.

Spolsky, B. (1997). The ethics of gatekeeping tests: What have we learnt in a hundred years. Language Testing, 14(3), 242-247.

Spolsky, B. (2003). Review of Continuity and Innovation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 305–309.

Spolsky, B., Murphy, P., Holm, W. & Ferrel, A. (1971). Three functional tests of oral proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 221–235.

Spolsky, B., Sigurd, B., Sato, M., Walker, E. & Aterburn, C. (1968). Preliminary studies in the development of techniques for testing overall second language proficiency. Language Learning, 3, 79–101.

Stemmer, B. (1991). What’s on a C-test taker’s mind? Mental processes in C-test taking. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.

Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14(2), 214–231.

Swain, M. (1985). Large-scale communicative language testing: A case study. In Y. Lee, A. Fok, R. Lord & G. Low (eds.), New directions in language testing (pp. 35–46). Oxford: Pergamon.

Taguchi, N. (2001). L2 learners’ strategic mental processes during a listening test. JALT Journal, 23(2), 176–201.

Tarone, E. (2000). Still wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 182–198.

Taylor, L. (2005). Using qualitative research methods in test development and validation. Research Notes, 21 (August), pp. 2–4. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.

Taylor, W. S. (1953). Cloze procedures: A new tool for readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–433.

TechSmith. (2004). Morue. Okemos, MI: Techsmith Corporation.

Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). (1964). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Test of English as a Foreign Language Internet Based Test (TOEFL iBT). (2005). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Test of Spoken English (TSE). (1979). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Test of Written English (TWE). (1986). Princeton. NJ: TOEFL/Educational Testing Service.

Thomas, W. & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority education students. Washington. DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Thorndike, E. L. (1910). Handwriting. Teachers College Record.11, 83-175.

Tian, S. (2000). TOEFL reading comprehension: Strategies used by Taiwanese students with coaching-school training. PhD dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University.

Tomalin, C. (2003). Samuel Pepys: The unequalled self. London: Viking.

Tsagari, C. (1994). Method effect on testing reading comprehension: How far can we go? MA thesis. University of Lancaster. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424768)

Upshur. J. (1979). Functional proficiency theory and a research role for language tests. In E. Brière & F. Hinofotis (eds.), Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies (pp. 75–100). Washington. DC: TESOL.

Upshur, J. & Turner. C. (1999). Systematic effects in the rating of second language speaking ability: Test method and learner discourse. Language Testing, 16. 82–111.

Valette. R. (1967). Modern language testing: A handbook. New-York: Harcourt. Brace Jovanovich.

van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly. 23. 489–508.

van Lier. L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer.

Vogely, A. J. (1998). Listening comprehension anxiety: Students’ reported sources and solutions. Foreign Language annals,31(1). 67–80.

Vollmer, H. (1980). A study of alternatives in explaining the general language proficiency factor. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium. San Francisco.

Vollmer. H. & Sang, F. (1983). Competing hypotheses about second language ability: A plea for caution. In J. W. Oller. Jr. (ed.). Issues in language testing research (pp. 29–74). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Weir, C. (1981). Reaction to the Morrow paper (1). In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes (eds.). Issues in language testing (pp. 26–37). London: British Council.

Weir, C. & Milanovic, M. (2003). Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination 19132002. Studies in Language Testing, 15. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.

Wesche, M. (1987). Second language performance testing: The Ontario test of ESL as an example. Language Testing. 4(1). 28–47.

Wilds, C. (1975). The oral interview test. In B. Spolsky & R. L. Jones (eds.), Testing language proficiency (pp. 29–37). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Wiley, E. & Ingram, D. E. (1995, 1999). International Second Language Proficiency Ratings (ISLPR): General proficiency version for English. Brisbane: Centre for Applied Linguistics and Languages, Griffith University.

Wu, Y. (1998). What do tests of listening comprehension test? A retrospection study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple-choice task. Language Testing,75(1), 21–44.

Yang, P. (2000). Effects of test-wiseness upon performance on the Test of English as a Foreign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta.

Yoshida-Morise, Y. (1998). The use of communication strategies in language proficiency interviews. In R. Young & A. W. He (eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 205–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Yoshizawa, K. (2002). Relationships among strategy use, foreign language aptitude, and second language proficiency: A structural equation modeling approach. PhD dissertation, Temple University.

Young, R. (2000). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, BC.

Young, R. & He, A. W. (eds.). (1998). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Zamel, V. & Spack, R. (eds.). (1998). Negotiating academic literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

© Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press, 2007

Conditions d’utilisation :


Volume papier