Version classiqueVersion mobile
OpenEdition Books

Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?

 | 
David K. Levine

References

Texte intégral

1Admati, A. [1985]: ”A Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium for Multi-asset Securities Markets,” Econometrica 53: 629–658.

2Ainslie, G. [2001]: Breakdown of Will, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3Akerlof, G. A. [2001]: ”Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior,” Nobel Lecture.

4Allais, M. [1953]: Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine,” Econometrica 21: 503–546.

5Andreoni, J. [1988]: ”Why Free Ride?: Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 37: 291–304.

6— and C. Sprenger [2010]: ”Certain and Uncertain Utility: The Allais Paradox and Five Decision Theory Phenomena,” Levine’s Working Paper Archive 814577000000000447.

7Ariely, D., G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec [2003]: ”Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 73–105.

8Barro, R. [1974]: ”Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” The Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1117.

9Becker, G. and R. Posner [2004]: ”Suicide: An Economic Approach,” Mimeo, The University of Chicago.

10—, M. H. Degroot and J. Marschak [1964]: ”Measuring Utility by a Single-response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science 9: 226–232.

11Bernoulli, D. [1738]: Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis (Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk).

12Black, F. [1986]: ”Noise,” The Journal of Finance 41: 529–543.

13Blakeslee, F. [2003]: ”Brain Experts now Follow the Money,” New York Times, June 17.

14Boldrin, M., L. Christiano and J. Fisher [2001]: ”Habit Persistence, Asset Returns, and the Business Cycle,” American Economic Review 91: 149–166.

15— and D. K. Levine [2001]: ”Growth Cycles and Market Crashes,” Journal of Economic Theory 96: 13-39.

16Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels [2000]: ”ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition,” American Economic Review 90: 166–193.

17Borgers, T. and R. Sarin [2000]: ”Naive Reinforcement Learning with Endogenous Aspirations,” International Economic Review 41: 921–950.

18Bosch-Domenech, A. and J. Silvestre [2006]: ”Reflections on Gains and Losses: A 2 × 2 × 7 Experiment,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 33: 217–235.

19Brown, J. N. and R. W. Rosenthal [1990]: ”Testing the Minmax Hypothesis: A Reexamination of O’Neill’s Game Experiment,” Econometrica 57: 1065–1082.

20Bruhin, A., H. Fehr-Duda and T. Epper [2010]: ”Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion,” Econometrica 78: 1375–1412.

21Camerer, C. F., G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec [2005]: ”Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 44: 9–64.

22—, T.-H. Ho and J.-K. Chong [2004]: ”A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 861-898.

23— and K. Weigelt [1988]: ”Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model,” Econometrica 56: 1–36.

24Churchill, W. [1947]: Speech in House of Commons, November 11.

25Cole, H. and L. Ohanian [2004]: ”New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression,” Journal of Political Economy 112: 779–816.

26Conan Doyle, A. [1893]: ”The Final Problem,” The Strand Magazine.

27Constantinides, G. [1990]: ”Habit Formation: A Resolution of the Equity Premium Puzzle,” Journal of Political Economy 98: 519–543.

28Costa-Gomes, M., V. P. Crawford and B. Broseta [2001]: ”Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study,” Econometrica 69: 1193–123.

29Cox, J. C., B. Roberson and V. L. Smith [1982]: ”Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions,” Research in Experimental Economics, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

30—, D. Friedman and V. Sadiraj [2008]: ”Revealed Altruism,” Econometrica 76: 1, 31–69.

31Dal Bo, P. [2005]: ”Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games,” The American Economic Review 95: 1591–1604.

32Davis, Douglas D. and Charles A. Holt [1993]: Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33Dekel, E., B. L. Lipman and A. Rustichini [2001]: ”Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space,” Econometrica 69: 891–934.

34DellaVigna, Stefano [2009]: ”Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field,” Journal of Economic Literature, 47: 315–372.

35— and U. Malmendier [2006]: ”Paying not to Go to the Gym,” American Economic Review 96: 694–719.

36Diamond, D. W. and P. H. Dybvig [1983]: ”Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity,” The Journal of Political Economy 91: 401–419.

37Dickhaut, J., K. McCabe, J. C. Nagode, A. Rustichini and J. V. Pardo [2003]: ”The Impact of the Certainty Context on the Process of Choice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 3536–3541.

38Domar, E. [1946]: ”Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment,” Econometrica 14: 137–147.

39Dufwenberg, M., P. Heidhues, G. Kirchsteiger, F. Riedel and J. Sobel [2011]: ”Other-Regarding Preferences in General Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies 78: 613–639.

40Dusenberry, J. [1949]: Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior.

41Edgeworth, F. Y. [1881]: Mathematical Psychics, reprint [1967]: New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

42Erev, I. and Alvin R. Roth [1995]: ”Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Model in the Intermediate Term,” Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164–212.

43Feddersen, T. J. and W. Pesendorfer [1996]: ”The Swing Voter’s Curse,” American Economic Review 86: 408–424.

44Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt [1999]: ”A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868.

45Fiorina, M. P. [1971]: ”A Note on Probability Matching and Rational Choice,” Behavioral Science 16: 158–166.

46Foster, D. P. and H. P. Young [2003]: ”Learning, Hypothesis Testing, and Nash Equilibrium,” Games and Economic Behavior 45: 73–96.

47Fudenberg, D. and D. M. Kreps, [1988]: ”A Theory of Learning, Experimentation and Equilibrium in Games,” Mimeo, MIT.

48— and D. K. Levine [1988]: ”On The Robustness of Equilibrium Refinements,” Journal of Economic Theory 44: 354–380.

49— and J. Tirole [1991]: Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

50— and D. Kreps [1992]: ”Learning Mixed Equilibria,” Games and Economic Behavior 5: 320–367.

51— and D. K. Levine [1993]: ”Self-Confirming Equilibrium,” Econometrica 61: 523–545.

52— [1995]: ”Consistency and Cautious Fictitious Play,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19: 1065–1089.

53— [1997]: ”Measuring Players’ Losses in Experimental Games,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 507–536.

54— [1998]: Theory of Learning in Games, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

55— [2005]: ”Learning and Belief Based Trading,” The Latin American Journal of Economics, 42: 199–207.

56— [2006]: ”A Dual Self Model of Impulse Control,” American Economic Review 96: 1449–1476.

57— [2009]: ”Self-Confirming Equilibrium and the Lucas Critique,” forthcoming Journal of Economic Theory 144: 2354–2371.

58— [2009]: ”Learning and Equilibrium,” Annual Review of Economics 1: 385–420.

59— [2012]: ”Timing and Self-Control,” Econometrica 80: 1–42.

60— and Z. Maniadis [2011]: ”Reexamining Coherent Arbitrariness for the Evalution of Common Goods and Lotteries,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, forthcoming.

61Gabaix, X. and D. Laibson [2001]: ”The 6D Bias and the Equity-Premium Puzzle,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16: 257–312.

62Garrett, T. A. and R. S. Sobel [1999]: ”Gamblers Favor Skewness not Risk: Further Evidence from United States Lottery Games,” Economics Letters 63: 85–90.

63GivingUSA Foundation [2009]: ”U.S. Charitable Giving Estimated to be $307.65 Billion in 2008.” Press release available at: http://www.givingusa.org/​press_releases/​gusa/​GivingReaches300billion.pdf

64Glimcher, P. [2002]: Decisions, Uncertainty and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

65Godlewski, C. J. [2007]: ”An Empirical Investigation of Bank Risk-Taking in Emerging Markets within a Prospect Theory Framework: A Note,” Banks and Bank Systems 2: 35–43.

66Goeree, J. K. and C. A. Holt [2001]: ”Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions,” The American Economic Review 91: 1402–1422.

67Goldman, S. M. [1978]: ”Gift quilibria and ParetoE Optimality,” Journal of Economic Theory 18: 368–370.

68Graf, V., D. H. Bullock and M. E. Bitterman [1964]: ”Further Experiments on Probability-matching in the Pigeon,” Journal of Experimental Animal Behavior 7: 151–157.

69Green, D. and I. Shapiro [1994]: Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory.

70Green, L. and J. Myerson [1996]: ”Exponential Versus Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Outcomes: Risk and Waiting Time,” American Zoologist, 36: 496–505.

71Grossman, S. J. and G. Laroque [1990]: ”Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods,” Econometrica 58: 25–51.

72Gul, F. and W. Pesendorfer [2001] ”Temptation and Self Control.” Econometrica 69: 1403–1436.

73— [2004]: ”The Canonical Type Space for Interdependent Preferences,” working paper, Princeton Economics.

74— [2005]: ”The Case for Mindless Economics,” working paper, Princeton Economics.

75Guth, W. and R. Tietz [1988]: ”Ultimatum Bargaining for a Shrinking Cake: An Experimental Analysis,” in R. Tietz, W. Albers and R. Selten, eds., Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets, Berlin, Germany: Springer.

76— [1990]: ”Ultimatum Bargaining Behavior: A Survey and Comparison of Results,” Journal of Economic Psychology 11: 417–449.

77—, P. Ockenfels and R. Tietz [1990]: Distributive Justice Versus Bargaining Power: Some Experimental Results, Frankfurt, Germany: Frankfurter Arbeiten zur Experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung.

78—, R. Schmittberger and B. Schwartz [1982]: ”An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–388.

79Halevy, Y. [2008]: ”Strotz Meets Allais: Diminishing Impatience and the Certainty Effect,” American Economic Review 98: 1145–1162.

80Harrison, G. W. [1989]: ”Theory and Misbehavior in First-Price Auctions,” American Economic Review 79: 749–762.

81— [1991]: ”Rational Expectations and Experimental Methods,” in Gross, B. A. (ed.), Rational Expectations and Efficiency in Futures Markets, London: Routledge.

82— [1992]: ”First-Price Auctions: Reply,” American Economic Review 82: 1426–1443.

83— and J. Hirshleifer [1989]: ”An Experimental Evaluation of Weakest Link/Best Shot Models of Public Goods,” Journal of Political Economy 97: 201–225.

84— and K. McCabe [1992]: ”Testing Noncooperative Bargaining Theory in Experiments,” in R. M. Isaac (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

85— [1994]: ”Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists,” Empirical Economics 19: 223–243

86Harrod, R. [1939]: ”An Essay in Dynamic Theory,” Economic Journal 49: 14–33.

87Hey, J. D. and Chris Orme [1994]: ”Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data,” Econometrica 62: 1291–1396.

88Holt, C. and S. Laury [2002]: ”Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects,” American Economic Review 92: 1644–1655.

89Hwang, S. H. and S. Bowles [2008]: ”Is Altruism Bad For Cooperation?” Mimeo, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

90Ipsen, E. [1992]: ”Krona’s Fall Threatens a New Currency Crisis in Europe,” New York Times, November 20.

91Isaac, R. M. and J. M. Walker [1988]: ”Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 179–200.

92Jones, L. E. and R. E. Manuelli [1992]: ”The Coordination Problem and Equilibrium Theories of Recessions,” The American Economic Review 82: 451–471.

93Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky [1979]: ”Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk,” Econometrica 47: 313–327.

94Kandori, M., G. Mailath and R. Rob [1993]: ”Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games,” Econometrica 61: 29–56.

95Keren, G. and P. Roelsofsma [1995]: ”Immediacy and Certainty in Intertemporal Choice,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making 63: 297–297.

96Keynes, J. M. [1936]: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

97Kix, P. [2010]: ”The Truth about Suicide Bombers,” Boston Globe, December 5.

98Knight, F. [1921]: Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company.

99Kranich, L. J. [1988]: ”Altruism and Efficiency: A Welfare Analysis of the Walrasian Mechanism with Transfers,” Journal of Public Economics 36: 369–386. Kreps, D. and B. Wilson [1982]: ”Reputation and Imperfect Information,” Journal of Economic Theory 50: 253–79.

100Krugman, P. [1979]: ”A Model of Balance-of-Payments Crises,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 11: 311–325.

101— [2009]: ”How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?” New York Times Magazine, September 2. Laibson, D. [1997]: ”Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 443–477.

102Leijonhufvud, A. [1973]: ”Effective Demand Failures,” The Swedish Journal of Economics 75: 27–48.

103Leland, J. W. [1994]: ”Generalized Similarity Judgments: An Alternative Explanation for Choice Anomalies,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9: 141–172.

104Levine, D. K. [1981]: ”Extrapolative Investment Equilibrium,” unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.

105— [1998]: ”Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments,” Review of Economic Dynamics 1: 593–622.

106— [1999]: ”Learning in the Stock Flow Model,” in Money, Markets and Method: Essays in Honour of Robert W. Clower, ed. P. Howitt, E. de Antoni and A. Leijonhufvud, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 236–246.

107— and T. R. Palfrey [2007]: ”The Paradox of Voter Participation: A Laboratory Study,” American Political Science Review 101: 143–158.

108— and J. Zheng [2010]: The Relationship of Economic Theory to Experiments,” in The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, ed. Guillame Frechette and Andrew Schotter, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

109Loewenstein, G. and P. Ubel [2010]: ”Economics Behaving Badly” New York Times, July 14.

110Lucas, R. [1995]: interviewed in ”Economics Dynasty Continues: Robert Lucas Wins Nobel Prize,” Chicago Journal, The University of Chicago Magazine, December.

111Machina, M. [1982]: ” ‘Expected Utility’Analysis without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50: 277–323.

112Majure, R. [1994]: ”Fitting Learning and Evolution Models to Experimental Data,” Equilibrium Game Theory, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

113Mankiw, N. G. [1985]: ”Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 529–537.

114— [2010]: ”New Keynesian Economics” in The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, available at: www.econlib.org

115McFadden, D. [1980]: ”Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice among Products,” Journal of Business 53: S13–S29.

116McKelvey, R. D. and T. Palfrey [1992]: ”An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game,” Econometrica 60: 803–836.

117— [1995]: ”Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games,” Games and Economic Behavior 10: 6–38.

118Mehra, R. and E. C. Prescott [1985]: ”The Equity Premium: A Puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics 15: 145–161.

119Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts [1982]: ”Predation, Reputation and Entry Deterrence,” Econometrica 50: 443–60.

120Mookerjhee, D. and B. Sopher [1994]: ”Learning Behavior in an Experimental Matching Pennies Game,” Games and Economic Behavior 7: 62–91.

121Nachbar, J. H. [1990]: ”Evolutionary Selection Dynamics in Games: Convergence and Limit Properties,” International Journal of Game Theory 19: 59–89.

122Nagel, R. [1995]: ”Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study,” The American Economic Review 5: 1313–1326.

123Ochs, J. [1994]: ”Games with Unique Mixed Strategy Equilibria: An Experimental Study,” Games and Economic Behavior 10: 202–217.

124— and A. E. Roth [1989]: ”An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining,” American Economic Review 79: 355–384.

125O’Neill, B. [1987]: ”Nonmetric Test of the Minimax Theory of Two-Person Zerosum Game,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of America 84: 2106–2109.

126Osborne, M. J. [2003]: An Introduction to Game Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

127Padoa-Schioppa, C. and J. A. Assad [2006]: ”Neurons in the Orbitofrontal Cortex Encode Economic Value,” Nature 441: 223–226.

128Pedersen, L. [2009]: ”When Everyone Runs for the Exit,” working Paper, NYU.

129Pigou, A. [1920]: The Economics of Welfare.

130Plott, C. R. [1996]: ”Comments on: Daniel Kahneman, ‘New Challenges to the

131Rationality Assumption,” The Rationality Foundations of Economic Behavior ed. K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlaman and C. Schmidt. London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martins Press, 220–224.

132— and V. L. Smith [1978]: ”An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions,” Review of Economic Studies 45: 133–153.

133— and K. Zeiler [2005]: ”The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the Endowment Effect and Subject Misconceptions,” American Economic Review 95: 530–545.

134Prasnikar, V. and A. E. Roth [1992]: ”Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 865–888.

135Rabin, M. [1993]: ”Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” The American Economic Review 83: 1281–1302.

136— [2000]: ”Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem,” Econometrica 83: 1281–1302.

137Rader, T. [1980]: ”The Second Theorem of Welfare Economics when Utilities are Interdependent,” Joumal of Economic Theory 23: 420–424.

138Radner, R. [1990]: ”Collusive Behavior in Noncooperative Epsilon-Equilibria of Oligopolies with Long but Finite Lives,” Journal of Economic Theory 22: 136–154.

139RAND [1955]: A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates, The Rand Corporation.

140Rapoport, A. and M. A. Fuller [1995]: ”Bidding Strategies in a Bilateral Monopoly with Two-Sided Incomplete Information,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39: 179–176.

141Roth, A. E. and M. W. K. Malouf [1979]: ”Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining,” Psychological Review 84: 803–836.

142— and F. Schoumaker [1983]: ”Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study,” American Economic Review 73: 362–372.

143—, V. Prasnikar, M. Okuno-Fujiwara and S. Zamir [1991]: ”Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study,” American Economic Review 81: 1068–1095.

144Rubinstein, A. [1988]: ”Similarity and Decision-Making Under Risk (Is there a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?),” Journal of Economic Theory 46: 145–153.

145Salant, S. W. [1983]: ”The Vulnerability of Price Stabilization Schemes to Speculative Attack,” The Journal of Political Economy 91: 1–38.

146Sargent, T., N. Williams and T. Zhao [2006a]: ”Shocks and Government Beliefs: The Rise and Fall of American Inflation,” American Economic Review 96: 1193–1224.

147— [2006b]: ”The Conquest of South American Inflation,” working paper NYU.

148Schelling, T. C. [1960]: The Strategy of Conflict Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

149Selten, R. [1967]: Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des Eingeschränkten Rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments,” in Beiträge zur Experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, ed. H. Sauermann, Tübingen, Germany: JCB Mohr, 136–168.

150— [1965]: ”Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit,” Ges. Staatswiss., 121: 301–324.

151Shapiro, C. and J. E. Stiglitz [1984]: ”Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device,” American Economic Review 74: 433–444.

152Sharkansky, S. [2002]: ”Psychotic Death Cult Photo Album,” in The Shark Blog, available at: http://www.usefulwork.com/​shark.

153Shiller, R. J. [1981]: ”Do Stock Prices Move too much to Be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?” The American Economic Review 71: 421–436.

154Simon, H. A. [1956]: ”Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment,” Psychological Review 63: 129–138.

155Sims, C. A. [2003]: ”Implications of Rational Inattention,” Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 665–690.

156Smith, V. L. [1962]: ”An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy 70: 111–137.

157Sobel, J. and L. Santos-Pinto [2005]: ”A Model of Positive Self-Image in Subjective Assessments,” American Economic Review 95: 1386–1402.

158Stahl, D. O. II, P. W. Wilson [1994]: ”Experimental Evidence on Players’ Models of Other Players,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25: 309–327.

159Strotz, R. [1955]: ”Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization,” Review of Economic Studies 23: 165–180.

160Sutan, A. and M. Willinger [2004]: ”Coordination in Cobweb Experiments With(out) Belief Elicitation,” Mimeo, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

161Thaler, R. H. [1980]: ”Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60

162Thaler, R. H. and H. M. Shefrin [1981]: ”An Economic Theory of Self-Control,” Journal of Political Economy 89: 392–406.

163— and S. Mullainathan [2010]: ”Behavioral Economics,” in The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, available at: www.econlib.org

164University of California, Office of the President, Student Academic Services [2003]: ”Undergraduate Access to the University of California after the Elimination of Race Conscious Policies.”

165Veblen, T. [1898]: ”Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12: 373–397.

166Villaverde, J. and A. Mukherji [2003]: ”Can We Really Observe Hyperbolic Discounting?” Levine’s Working Paper Archive 618897000000000779.

167Weber, B. and G. Chapman [2005]: ”The Combined Effects of Risk and Time on Choice: Does Uncertainty Eliminate the Immediacy Effect? Does Delay Eliminate the Certainty Effect?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96: 104–118.

168Weber, M. [1958]: ”Zwischenbetrachtung,” in Gesammelte Aufsaze zur Religionssoziologie, ed C. B. Mohr, Tubingen, Germany.

169Young, P. [1993]: ”The Evolution of Conventions,” Econometrica 61: 57–84.

Acheter

Volume papier

Chargement

Unavailable