Version classiqueVersion mobile
OpenEdition Books

A Tale of Two Villages

 | 
Alina Mungiu-Pippidi

Appendices

Texte intégral

1. Survey sources

1The present study cites a number of opinion polls:

  • County-level representative poll, October 2000, CURS (Romanian Centre for Urban and Regional Sociology) – CURS 1. The size of the sample was 37,474; for Olt county n=851 and for Argeş county n=848.

  • National representative poll, November 2000, CURS and Romanian Academic Society – CURS 2.

  • National representative poll conducted by Metromedia in May 2001 for the Soros Foundation (BOP Programme) – Metromedia.

21.1 JA comparison of the regions studied with the national sample

3Figures in brackets are standard deviations.

41.2 Comparative living standards: urban – rural – regional

Rural-urban comparative indices of ownership

Rural-urban comparative indices of ownership

Source: CURS 2

2. Nucşoara and Scorniceşti – Demographic and electoral village data

SCORNICEŞTI

5Total population: 12,787

6Urban: 4,794

7Rural: 7,993

8Villages:

  1. Scorniceşti

  2. Piscani

  3. Baltati

  4. Mărgineni-Slobozia

  5. Mihăileşti-Popeşti

  6. Constantineşti

  7. Mogoşeşti

  8. Negreni

  9. Bircii

  10. Chiteasca

  11. Teiuş

  12. Rusciori

  13. Jitaru

  14. Suica

NUCŞOARA

9Total population: c. 1,800

10Villages:

  1. Nucşoara

  2. Gruiu

  3. Sboghiţeşti

  4. Slatina

Table des illustrations

Crédits Source: CURS 1
URL http://books.openedition.org/ceup/docannexe/image/2478/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 96k
Titre Rural-urban comparative indices of ownership
Crédits Source: CURS 2
URL http://books.openedition.org/ceup/docannexe/image/2478/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 213k

© Central European University Press, 2010

Conditions d’utilisation : http://www.openedition.org/6540